• Family

    • Liberal Conspiracy
  • Comrades

    • Andy Worthington
    • Angela Saini
    • Bartholomew’s notes
    • Bleeding Heart Show
    • Bloggerheads
    • Blood & Treasure
    • Campaign against Honour Killings
    • Cath Elliott
    • Chicken Yoghurt
    • Daily Mail Watch
    • Dave Hill
    • Dr. Mitu Khurana
    • Europhobia
    • Faith in Society
    • Feminism for non-lefties
    • Feministing
    • Gender Bytes
    • Harry’s Place
    • IKWRO
    • MediaWatchWatch
    • Ministry of Truth
    • Natalie Bennett
    • New Statesman blogs
    • Operation Black Vote
    • Our Kingdom
    • Robert Sharp
    • Rupa Huq
    • Shiraz Socialist
    • Shuggy’s Blog
    • Stumbling and Mumbling
    • Ta-Nehisi Coates
    • The F Word
    • Though Cowards Flinch
    • Tory Troll
    • UK Polling Report
  • In-laws

    • Aaron Heath
    • Douglas Clark's saloon
    • Earwicga
    • Get There Steppin’
    • Incurable Hippie
    • Neha Viswanathan
    • Power of Choice
    • Rita Banerji
    • Sarah
    • Sepia Mutiny
    • Sonia Faleiro
    • Southall Black Sisters
    • The Langar Hall
    • Turban Head

  • David Davis wants freedom for whitey!

    by Leon
    17th June, 2008 at 4:39 pm    

    I was literally about to post the same thing but the excellent RecessMonkey got there first so the hat tip is his:

    Attention seeking egotist, David “basher” Davis has launched his new website. The masthead - featuring a load of fuzzily-unidentifiable “endorsers” makes it clear that this is a “Whites Only” campaign.

    According to the scooptastic PR Week, Lobby firm Fleishman Hillard is thought to be behind the Davis campaign.

    Sunny was right; Brown people better watch out freedom aint for us!*

    *please note this is a joke, I feel the need to add that given the large number of over the top postings these past few days…

                  Post to del.icio.us

    Filed in: Civil liberties,Election News,Humour

    29 Comments below   |  

    Reactions: Twitter, blogs

    1. Sunny — on 17th June, 2008 at 4:43 pm  

      ha ha!


    2. Kulvinder — on 17th June, 2008 at 4:46 pm  

      Well i can’t see any minority groups there but apart from DD i can’t see any old people either…so he still gets my support.

    3. Tim J — on 17th June, 2008 at 5:08 pm  

      Non-white population in H&H?


    4. Gege — on 17th June, 2008 at 5:11 pm  

      the dude in the white shirt is clearly brown.

    5. Ravi Naik — on 17th June, 2008 at 5:12 pm  

      The 4th guy counting from the left is Asian, of the “yellow” kind.

    6. northerner — on 17th June, 2008 at 5:17 pm  

      no turbanators, no hijabis, no beardos…no eco warriors…where is this Great Britain of ours? I fully endorse DD’s stance, but a pic does say a thousand words, right?

    7. David T — on 17th June, 2008 at 5:19 pm  

      Davis Davis’ top five “traditional British freedom” issues

      1. Clause 28: The Traditional Freedom of British Parents to Protect Their Children From Homosexual Deviants

      2. Fox Hunting: A Traditional British Pastime, Outlawed By Homosexual Communists

      3. Speed Cameras: What is this? Nazi Germany? At least you can do 150mph on the German autobahn!!!!

      4. Hanging: The Freedom of a Man to be Hanged by his Lily White Neck Until He Be Dead and may God Have Mercy on his Soul

      5. 42 Days: Jolly unfair to our brown brothers. And if we send them all back, there’ll be no need for it


    8. Jai Patel — on 17th June, 2008 at 5:20 pm  

      awwww i miss the united colours of benetton effect! No ones wearing glasses either! how unrepresentative of modern Britain..what is he trying to imply! *stomps off*

    9. a very public sociologist — on 17th June, 2008 at 6:44 pm  

      Poor old DD’s dropped a bollock over this and no mistaking. Will we see a few brown and black people sprinkled into his frighteningly youthful entourage when they’ve realised the cock up?

    10. Bishop Hill — on 17th June, 2008 at 6:47 pm  

      I also think that the two young ladies standing next to each other at the left hand end should be snogging. This would demonstrate that DD is not homophobic. It would also perk up the visitor numbers no end.

    11. Faisal Antifa — on 17th June, 2008 at 7:07 pm  

      In terms of a genocidal subtext, it could hardly get clearer… Nazism has been bubblin’ under in the Tory party for decades, at a minimum, and it looks as tho’ Dachau Davis wants to take the lid off and let the jackboots come flocking out on the autobahn to ethnic oblivion. Disgusting is hardly the word. If Cameron had the courage of his loudly expressed convictions (huh), he’d send this fascist freak packing from the party.

    12. Jock — on 17th June, 2008 at 7:33 pm  

      You’re all mistaken! I can clearly tell the guy on the far left is a ginger. That’s *real* diversity, no doubting that!!

    13. Antisocialist — on 17th June, 2008 at 8:51 pm  

      ‘Whitey’? Yeah, of course you’re ‘only joking’.

      Browney (or should that be blackey, I get so confused these days) do you think Faisal #11 has got the joke. ‘Genocidal subtext’, ‘autobahn to ethnic oblivion’, ‘fascist freak’, now that is funny.

      Out of interest can someone get the calculator out and tell me the exact percentage of ‘brown’ skin you’d be happy with.

    14. Bert Rustle — on 17th June, 2008 at 8:52 pm  

      Whitey? Is Darkie OK on this blog as well?

    15. Praguetory — on 17th June, 2008 at 10:41 pm  

      Leon and Recess Monkey are predictable bedfellows. I can see 6 who look ‘darker’ than Alex Black Man Trapped In A White Body‘ Hilton. Where are the blondes by the way?

    16. Leon — on 17th June, 2008 at 10:47 pm  

      Is Darkie OK on this blog as well?

      You think nigger and honky are equal as well?

    17. Leon — on 17th June, 2008 at 10:48 pm  

      Leon and Recess Monkey are predictable bedfellows.

      Ok Pricktory I’ll bite, exactly what do you mean by that?

    18. BenSix — on 17th June, 2008 at 10:57 pm  

      “Ok Pricktory I’ll bite, exactly what do you mean by that?”

      He means “if I insult both of them at once then maybe I’ll get more attention”. ;)



    19. Praguetory — on 18th June, 2008 at 8:43 am  


      It means I think you are both clinical idiots whose synapses seem to have adapted in such a way that there is rarely an occasion where you won’t introduce irrelevant racial material into a serious argument.

      I hope you both keep ‘supporting’ Labour. It helps.

    20. Bert Rustle — on 18th June, 2008 at 8:46 am  

      Leon 16 wrote … Is Darkie OK on this blog as well?

      You think nigger and honky are equal as well? … Please answer my question, “Is Darkie OK on this blog as well?”

      Regarding your question, reportedly music which repeatedly uses the former is quite popular at present, whereas I am unaware to which extent popular music uses the latter. Could this be because the latter is deemed more insulting than the former? Have you heard a Honky address a fellow Honky as Honky? I have not.

      Do you have a partial hierarchy of equivalent terms used by the various racial and religious groups to address each other? For example, I recall a UK TV program on Channel 4 where “Slave” was used as a term of address to Jamaicans by Africans. Where would this fit into your ranking of Whitey, Darkie, Nigger and Honky?

    21. South Yorks. — on 18th June, 2008 at 9:20 am  

      So what’s so bad about white people? Why would you be so reviled by a group of people who all happen to be white? Would a political campaign featuring all non-white people be more acceptable, or should we throw in a token white person (usually somebody very old giving the impression the white race is old, tired and on its last legs)?

      Maybe you could look at such a campaign as not being incredibly patronising to non-whites by sticking in the token participant, just to break up the hideous whiteness.

      To me, non-white people are just as human and normal as anybody else. They’re not to be used just to give whiteness a more acceptable face. Unless you want them to be?

    22. MaidMarian — on 18th June, 2008 at 9:20 am  

      It looks as though Davis has a second head growing out of his left shoulder.

      I wonder what McKenzie will come up with?

    23. bananabrain — on 18th June, 2008 at 9:26 am  

      “dachau davis”?

      how pathetic. this is precisely the sort of thing which shows how little people understand what the holocaust actually was.



    24. billaricaydicky — on 18th June, 2008 at 11:15 am  

      Can’t see any bricklayers with our white vans either!

    25. fug — on 18th June, 2008 at 1:05 pm  

      oh dear how embarrassing. a bunch of brown wannabe white integrants like yourselves complaining that every banger, somali and black man doesnt feature on initial campaign material.

      how characteristicaly superficial. everywhere is not londonistan you know.

    26. Leon — on 18th June, 2008 at 1:52 pm  

      fug, I believe, like some others on here, you ever didn’t read the disclaimer or have no sense of humour…

    27. Sunny — on 18th June, 2008 at 2:47 pm  

      MacKenzie isn’t running…

    28. fug — on 18th June, 2008 at 3:20 pm  

      oh, my bad, this time.

    29. Anas — on 18th June, 2008 at 6:56 pm  

      MacKenzie isn’t running…

      No wonder. He’s such a fat unhealthy looking piece of shit I’m surprised he doesn’t get out of breath after walking a few paces.

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

    Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
    With the help of PHP and Wordpress.