<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shariah law and cultural wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53730</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53730</guid>
		<description>*claps for soru* - spot on! and i love the word &quot;theonomist&quot;. describes halakhah (at least the way i look at it) perfectly.

TFI - in that case, stop quacking like a duck and i&#039;ll put the hoisin sauce away.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*claps for soru* &#8211; spot on! and i love the word &#8220;theonomist&#8221;. describes halakhah (at least the way i look at it) perfectly.</p>
<p>TFI &#8211; in that case, stop quacking like a duck and i&#8217;ll put the hoisin sauce away.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53729</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53729</guid>
		<description>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6321475.stm

This fool should know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6321475.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6321475.stm</a></p>
<p>This fool should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53544</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53544</guid>
		<description>TFI,
Depends what you mean really.
The key issue is dogma and intolerance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFI,<br />
Depends what you mean really.<br />
The key issue is dogma and intolerance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53542</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53542</guid>
		<description>Great post Soru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Soru</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53537</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53537</guid>
		<description>&#039;What is the exact definition of shariah or What definition of shariah does the surveyed endorse.&#039;

That&#039;s a key question. The one I would like to see asked is something like: &#039;what does Sharia mean to you?&#039;

non-religious: &#039;nothing&#039; 

ultra-liberal: &#039;parables and stories that provide wisdom and insight about choices to be made in life&#039;

liberal: &#039;a set of rules (e.g. don&#039;t drink alcohol) for an individual to task themselves with following&#039;

conservative: &#039;a set of rules governing the personal relations (marriage, parentood, etc.) of muslims&#039;

theonomist: &#039;a set of rules for a muslim nation analagous to the legal system in the UK&#039;

theocratic: &#039;as above, but with clerics instead of judges and politicians&#039;

radical: &#039;a plan that will transform the entire world into something radically different and better than the world today&#039;

terrorist: &#039;an excuse to kill you&#039;

The problem with this discussion is it tends strongly to someone from one of those camps saying they are simply and obviously right and that none of the other groups, if they will even admit they exist, count as any kind of Muslim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;What is the exact definition of shariah or What definition of shariah does the surveyed endorse.&#8217;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a key question. The one I would like to see asked is something like: &#8216;what does Sharia mean to you?&#8217;</p>
<p>non-religious: &#8216;nothing&#8217; </p>
<p>ultra-liberal: &#8216;parables and stories that provide wisdom and insight about choices to be made in life&#8217;</p>
<p>liberal: &#8216;a set of rules (e.g. don&#8217;t drink alcohol) for an individual to task themselves with following&#8217;</p>
<p>conservative: &#8216;a set of rules governing the personal relations (marriage, parentood, etc.) of muslims&#8217;</p>
<p>theonomist: &#8216;a set of rules for a muslim nation analagous to the legal system in the UK&#8217;</p>
<p>theocratic: &#8216;as above, but with clerics instead of judges and politicians&#8217;</p>
<p>radical: &#8216;a plan that will transform the entire world into something radically different and better than the world today&#8217;</p>
<p>terrorist: &#8216;an excuse to kill you&#8217;</p>
<p>The problem with this discussion is it tends strongly to someone from one of those camps saying they are simply and obviously right and that none of the other groups, if they will even admit they exist, count as any kind of Muslim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFriendlyInfidel</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53535</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFriendlyInfidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53535</guid>
		<description>One thing that gets right on my tits about these religous waccos is their retarded insistence to view those of us without a religion as another religion, where darwin is considered our false prophet.

Arrrrggggghhhhh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that gets right on my tits about these religous waccos is their retarded insistence to view those of us without a religion as another religion, where darwin is considered our false prophet.</p>
<p>Arrrrggggghhhhh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFriendlyInfidel</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53534</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFriendlyInfidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53534</guid>
		<description>&quot;Retarded to the point of religion&quot;

Circular beliefs are bad, full stop. There is no debate. The religous logic always does come down to &quot;This is the truth because I really FEEL that it must be true&quot;.

Bring back the Enlightenment. Bollocks to ID. Ship the religous waccos off to the moon. After all America hasn&#039;t managed to full digest the last batch we sent over. In fact why are we recieving these exported waccs? Is this some kind of religous wacco revenge being waged on ourselves?

TFI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Retarded to the point of religion&#8221;</p>
<p>Circular beliefs are bad, full stop. There is no debate. The religous logic always does come down to &#8220;This is the truth because I really FEEL that it must be true&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bring back the Enlightenment. Bollocks to ID. Ship the religous waccos off to the moon. After all America hasn&#8217;t managed to full digest the last batch we sent over. In fact why are we recieving these exported waccs? Is this some kind of religous wacco revenge being waged on ourselves?</p>
<p>TFI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasneem Khalil</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53533</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasneem Khalil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53533</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;59% of Muslims would prefer to live under British law, compared to 28% who would prefer to live under sharia law.&lt;/i&gt;

One obvious question that is missing in this survey: What is the exact definition of shariah or What definition of shariah does the surveyed endorse. IMHO, you can not compare &quot;British law&quot; -- a civil code -- with &quot;shariah&quot; -- a religious code. This is a flawed question in the first place. While immense debating is going on in the Muslim quarter whether shariah is binding even on a &quot;Muslim&quot; society or not how can PEx put the &quot;British law&quot; (note UK is, as we know till date: &quot;Dar al-Harb&quot; not &quot;Dar al-Islam&quot;. By that count shariah is NOT APPLICABLE for the British society) at par with &quot;shariah&quot;. PEx should have done their homework on shariah before throwing in their questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>59% of Muslims would prefer to live under British law, compared to 28% who would prefer to live under sharia law.</i></p>
<p>One obvious question that is missing in this survey: What is the exact definition of shariah or What definition of shariah does the surveyed endorse. IMHO, you can not compare &#8220;British law&#8221; &#8212; a civil code &#8212; with &#8220;shariah&#8221; &#8212; a religious code. This is a flawed question in the first place. While immense debating is going on in the Muslim quarter whether shariah is binding even on a &#8220;Muslim&#8221; society or not how can PEx put the &#8220;British law&#8221; (note UK is, as we know till date: &#8220;Dar al-Harb&#8221; not &#8220;Dar al-Islam&#8221;. By that count shariah is NOT APPLICABLE for the British society) at par with &#8220;shariah&#8221;. PEx should have done their homework on shariah before throwing in their questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardeep</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53519</link>
		<dc:creator>hardeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53519</guid>
		<description>Hey Sunny,

Any idea where that quote from Guru Nanak is?  I wanted to hopefully check it out.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sunny,</p>
<p>Any idea where that quote from Guru Nanak is?  I wanted to hopefully check it out.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Preast</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53416</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Preast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53416</guid>
		<description>Jagdeep wrote:  &quot;Howâ€™s your chemistry? I think I got a B grade at GCSE. Letâ€™s see if we can stuff the Saudis by inventing a car that runs on orange peel and tootpaste or something.&quot;

Despite scoring a grade U in chemistry CSE, I reckon I can do better than that.  The compound I have invented is a veritable godsend to plumbers everywhere, a glue that sticks firmly even to ceramics, and even underwater, setting in seconds.  It&#039;s revolutionary.  All I need is someone with the expertise to bottle it to get in touch.  I call it &quot;beer pooh glue&quot;, and it&#039;s a winner in waiting, no error.  How am I not rich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jagdeep wrote:  &#8220;Howâ€™s your chemistry? I think I got a B grade at GCSE. Letâ€™s see if we can stuff the Saudis by inventing a car that runs on orange peel and tootpaste or something.&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite scoring a grade U in chemistry CSE, I reckon I can do better than that.  The compound I have invented is a veritable godsend to plumbers everywhere, a glue that sticks firmly even to ceramics, and even underwater, setting in seconds.  It&#8217;s revolutionary.  All I need is someone with the expertise to bottle it to get in touch.  I call it &#8220;beer pooh glue&#8221;, and it&#8217;s a winner in waiting, no error.  How am I not rich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahil</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53414</link>
		<dc:creator>Sahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53414</guid>
		<description>Sonia, that&#039;s an excellent link!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia, that&#8217;s an excellent link!!!  <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53410</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53410</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen something said sensible about sharia - people who mindlessly want &#039;sharia&#039; law for the sake of it - because they&#039;re &#039;Muslim&#039; - should think about what mezba&#039;s being saying &lt;a href=&quot;http://mezba.blogspot.com/2007/01/you-want-justice-no.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;

i think the sensible thing that came out of the report was that government shouldn&#039;t be trying to engage with people on the basis of religious identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen something said sensible about sharia &#8211; people who mindlessly want &#8216;sharia&#8217; law for the sake of it &#8211; because they&#8217;re &#8216;Muslim&#8217; &#8211; should think about what mezba&#8217;s being saying <a href="http://mezba.blogspot.com/2007/01/you-want-justice-no.html" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>i think the sensible thing that came out of the report was that government shouldn&#8217;t be trying to engage with people on the basis of religious identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR1001</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53396</link>
		<dc:creator>DR1001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53396</guid>
		<description>&quot; we have allowed their ghastly clergy to poison the minds of an entire generation of muslims by effectively allowing islamic education to be outsourced to the wahhabis.&quot;

I cannot agree more with this statement.
Those nutcases that are penetrating the mosques from Somalia etc almost have a completely different religion to the majority of law abiding Sunnis living in the UK.
There are so many ordinary hardworking young muslims that just want to get on with live and tired of all the crap going on also.
I find the stats shown here about them wanting sharia law just incredible...i blame also those people on the cable channels.
I can&#039;t see even a Muslim country like Bangladesh accepting Sharia law let alone these hotheads wanting it in the UK.
As someone said they are just mascho driven , bravado youngsters probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; we have allowed their ghastly clergy to poison the minds of an entire generation of muslims by effectively allowing islamic education to be outsourced to the wahhabis.&#8221;</p>
<p>I cannot agree more with this statement.<br />
Those nutcases that are penetrating the mosques from Somalia etc almost have a completely different religion to the majority of law abiding Sunnis living in the UK.<br />
There are so many ordinary hardworking young muslims that just want to get on with live and tired of all the crap going on also.<br />
I find the stats shown here about them wanting sharia law just incredible&#8230;i blame also those people on the cable channels.<br />
I can&#8217;t see even a Muslim country like Bangladesh accepting Sharia law let alone these hotheads wanting it in the UK.<br />
As someone said they are just mascho driven , bravado youngsters probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagdeep</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53391</guid>
		<description>Or invent an alternative fuel source quick time, bananabrain. How&#039;s your chemistry? I think I got a B grade at GCSE. Let&#039;s see if we can stuff the Saudis by inventing a car that runs on orange peel and tootpaste or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or invent an alternative fuel source quick time, bananabrain. How&#8217;s your chemistry? I think I got a B grade at GCSE. Let&#8217;s see if we can stuff the Saudis by inventing a car that runs on orange peel and tootpaste or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53390</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53390</guid>
		<description>Jagdeep #23
I wasn&#039;t being entirely serious about the older muslims wanting shoplifters hands chopped off. Still good points well made.

As Om Puri says as he throws out his Islamist son in My Son the Fanatic &quot;I have had enough of your anti-democratic and anti-jewish bullshit&quot;. Many will see the errors of their ways and reject such views and will be embarrassed by them in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jagdeep #23<br />
I wasn&#8217;t being entirely serious about the older muslims wanting shoplifters hands chopped off. Still good points well made.</p>
<p>As Om Puri says as he throws out his Islamist son in My Son the Fanatic &#8220;I have had enough of your anti-democratic and anti-jewish bullshit&#8221;. Many will see the errors of their ways and reject such views and will be embarrassed by them in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53355</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53355</guid>
		<description>*yet again, claps for jagdeep for saying what i was about to say*

the saudis are at the root of this. because of our desire not to upset their precious royal family with its grubby little hands on the oil taps, or for fear that the alternatives aren&#039;t people you can bribe (or won&#039;t be interested in tax-free shopping trips to london so they can bang hookers and drink in casinos) we have allowed their ghastly clergy to poison the minds of an entire generation of muslims by effectively allowing islamic education to be outsourced to the wahhabis. and it&#039;s too late to fix that, because they have got thousands of jobs in marginal constituencies and billions in defence contracts for our GDP tied up in all those things like the al-yamamah deal. that&#039;s why we need to find something to replace oil - then you&#039;d see some reform, pronto.

unfortunately, the only thing i could do straight away was a) complain about it loudly on places like PP and b) start driving a prius. and neither of those are exactly a solution.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yet again, claps for jagdeep for saying what i was about to say*</p>
<p>the saudis are at the root of this. because of our desire not to upset their precious royal family with its grubby little hands on the oil taps, or for fear that the alternatives aren&#8217;t people you can bribe (or won&#8217;t be interested in tax-free shopping trips to london so they can bang hookers and drink in casinos) we have allowed their ghastly clergy to poison the minds of an entire generation of muslims by effectively allowing islamic education to be outsourced to the wahhabis. and it&#8217;s too late to fix that, because they have got thousands of jobs in marginal constituencies and billions in defence contracts for our GDP tied up in all those things like the al-yamamah deal. that&#8217;s why we need to find something to replace oil &#8211; then you&#8217;d see some reform, pronto.</p>
<p>unfortunately, the only thing i could do straight away was a) complain about it loudly on places like PP and b) start driving a prius. and neither of those are exactly a solution.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagdeep</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53335</guid>
		<description>ZinZin, the older Muslims of Pakistani background were by and large chilled out and tolerant and respectful of British society. The jihad-chic hooligans you see today are like Paki-bashing skinheads of the 1970&#039;s. self-alienating self-perpetuating bigots with a victimhood complex stewing in their own hatred, because they don&#039;t have the wit or intelligence or imagination to do anything else. Count Saudi money and a coterie of Maududi spouting morons of the Sacranie/Bunglawala/Holocaust Memorial Day Boycott  generation for setting the scenery. The original working class Muslim immigrants were keep-your-head-down, gentle, respectful and dignified men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZinZin, the older Muslims of Pakistani background were by and large chilled out and tolerant and respectful of British society. The jihad-chic hooligans you see today are like Paki-bashing skinheads of the 1970&#8242;s. self-alienating self-perpetuating bigots with a victimhood complex stewing in their own hatred, because they don&#8217;t have the wit or intelligence or imagination to do anything else. Count Saudi money and a coterie of Maududi spouting morons of the Sacranie/Bunglawala/Holocaust Memorial Day Boycott  generation for setting the scenery. The original working class Muslim immigrants were keep-your-head-down, gentle, respectful and dignified men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53334</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53334</guid>
		<description>&#039;Does it really matter if people who commit terrorism or support terrorism do it in the name of theism, atheism, or the teletubbies? &#039;

Largely not. However, there is the issue of overseas support. 

As far as I know, there aren&#039;t any organised TinkiWinkist groups that run training camps teaching weapons training, explosives and so on. Such training does seem to be the difference between an essentially joke threat, like the Angry Brigade or most of the stuff you read of in the papers, and bombs that actually go bang properly. 

Downloading recipes off the internet is over-rated, as anyone who tried to cook something reasonably complex that way will tell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Does it really matter if people who commit terrorism or support terrorism do it in the name of theism, atheism, or the teletubbies? &#8216;</p>
<p>Largely not. However, there is the issue of overseas support. </p>
<p>As far as I know, there aren&#8217;t any organised TinkiWinkist groups that run training camps teaching weapons training, explosives and so on. Such training does seem to be the difference between an essentially joke threat, like the Angry Brigade or most of the stuff you read of in the papers, and bombs that actually go bang properly. </p>
<p>Downloading recipes off the internet is over-rated, as anyone who tried to cook something reasonably complex that way will tell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagdeep</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53333</guid>
		<description>The thing to worry about is whether the &#039;youth&#039; questioned are just teenage blowhards mouthing off in a macho style with a punk rock attitude. And when they get married, have children, have to get a job and work for a living they understand that those attitude originated from a location on their ass crack and become normal people. If not, there is going to be a lot of traction ahead, and unpleasentness in British society, this time with the shadow of semtex in nightclubs full of dancing sluts to worry about.

Everyone should be worried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing to worry about is whether the &#8216;youth&#8217; questioned are just teenage blowhards mouthing off in a macho style with a punk rock attitude. And when they get married, have children, have to get a job and work for a living they understand that those attitude originated from a location on their ass crack and become normal people. If not, there is going to be a lot of traction ahead, and unpleasentness in British society, this time with the shadow of semtex in nightclubs full of dancing sluts to worry about.</p>
<p>Everyone should be worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53304</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/984#comment-53304</guid>
		<description>Perhaps these muslim youths should try living in a state which practices shariah law within a week they would be boarding the next plane back to the UK. These kids wants it both ways they want shariah yet they want to enjoy the benefits of the west such as the social freedoms (sex before marriage), the consumer culture and its wealth. The older muslims just want the shoplifters to have their hands chopped off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps these muslim youths should try living in a state which practices shariah law within a week they would be boarding the next plane back to the UK. These kids wants it both ways they want shariah yet they want to enjoy the benefits of the west such as the social freedoms (sex before marriage), the consumer culture and its wealth. The older muslims just want the shoplifters to have their hands chopped off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

