I wouldn’t call it a “conspiracy”, but an attack on a major Muslim Organisation which the Zionist body sees as a threat.

Good one.

I really must get round to watching The Life of Brian.

Surprisingly, I agree with you, to the extent that £60 six years ago, is not the killer point that Harrys Place and some others make it out to be. But you conflate that with a lot of other stuff I can’t subscribe to at all. It is not all tied together in some sort of conspiracy. There is a legitimate question over the role that the government has given, (or maybe the past tense would be more accurate), the MCB.

Consultation, I would suggest, should be on the broadest basis possible. Not limited to people who may, or may not, represent you. A voice given up to a choir, is an individual voice lost. Don’t lose yours to collectivism.

MPACUK was created by a Palestinian. Asghar himself stated this on islam Channel. talk about spreading shit around.

On the issue of Asghar Bukhari’s Donation (Note, MPACUK was not even created, so I’m not even sure why the hell you tarnish MPAC for it), has learnt from his mistake.

Those who hate MPAC/Asghar for what it/he stands for, don’t give two shits if he made an honest mistake. At least he admits it and has learnt from the mistake. It’s far better than massacring children in their cots and then blaming it on a “technical fault”. I still have not seen anyone comment on that.

Only bad Muslim issue’s come on board on this site. Are Pickler’s just here to stir shit up? Isn’t there anything else to report?

The Israel test thing sounds quite funny. I was very amused when Sunny claimed that Inayat Bunglawala was in the habit of accusing MCB critics of being Mossad agents. I don’t know how much he goes in for that, but Sunny’s claim had me in hysterics for some reason, I think it was probably the conjunction with Inayat’s photograph at the top of the page.

you’re right. I renamed the post from ‘MPAC fond of Irving’ to ‘MPAC funded Irving’. Sensationalist, possibly. But given that MPAC is a web-based front for Bukhari, and has been used to springboard a lot of his ideas, I think its not unfair to say Bukhari is MPAC.

Remind me, who raised the topic?

“Like I say I’m sceptical of the intentions of some of those who are trying to play the whole thing up and making it more than it was.”

Why not call them Islamophobes and leave it at that.

Like I say I’m sceptical of the intentions of some of those who are trying to play the whole thing up and making it more than it was.

Youthful indiscretion? Incorrect title as MPAC did not exist then this is pathetic.

Damn it Anas your an intelligent man yet you come out with some amazing excuses for him. Read my comments on Golmals blog anti-semitism runs through Bukhari’s like lettering in a stick of rock.

Do you have an odious agenda?