<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush and Mush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stiles</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37944</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37944</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;next to of course god america i
love you land of the pilgrims&#039; and so forth oh
say can you see by the dawn&#039;s early my
country &#039;tis of centuries come and go
and are no more what of it we should worry
in every language even deafanddumb
thy sons acclaim your glorious name by gorry
by jingo by gee by gosh by gum
why talk of beauty what could be more beaut-
iful than these heroic happy dead
who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter
they did not stop to think they died instead
then shall the voice of liberty be mute?&quot;

He spoke. And drank rapidly a glass of water
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
&#8220;next to of course god america i<br />
love you land of the pilgrims&#8217; and so forth oh<br />
say can you see by the dawn&#8217;s early my<br />
country &#8217;tis of centuries come and go<br />
and are no more what of it we should worry<br />
in every language even deafanddumb<br />
thy sons acclaim your glorious name by gorry<br />
by jingo by gee by gosh by gum<br />
why talk of beauty what could be more beaut-<br />
iful than these heroic happy dead<br />
who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter<br />
they did not stop to think they died instead<br />
then shall the voice of liberty be mute?&#8221;</p>
<p>He spoke. And drank rapidly a glass of water
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kismet Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37940</link>
		<dc:creator>Kismet Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37940</guid>
		<description>A happy poem anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A happy poem anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stiles</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37938</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37938</guid>
		<description>Sid --

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;
Shame such acuity didn’t surface prior to Iraq.
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With the Taliban next door and the North West Frontier in a permanently low state of revolt, even the mouth breathers in the White House could see which way the wind would blow in Afghanistan.  Fact, it&#039;s how they justified supporting Musharraf at that point in time.

Iraq was the triumph of hope and veniality over experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sid &#8211;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<i><br />
Shame such acuity didn’t surface prior to Iraq.<br />
</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>With the Taliban next door and the North West Frontier in a permanently low state of revolt, even the mouth breathers in the White House could see which way the wind would blow in Afghanistan.  Fact, it&#8217;s how they justified supporting Musharraf at that point in time.</p>
<p>Iraq was the triumph of hope and veniality over experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAtley</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37931</link>
		<dc:creator>DAtley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37931</guid>
		<description>Invading pakistan was implausible....
Dude I live in US, and i would tell you in that all accross my dem leaning state, people would have applauded
if a nuke was hurled ove kapistan or akpistan(Mr hitchens...;-) ).
Beleive me with a dems in city council, school board, 
rotary club to all the way to governiship, every one 
was PISSED that nothing was being done about
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
The number of non brown folks(ie blacks/chinese/hispanics/whites) who after having learned that i was a kafir, told me that the root source of terrorism is Saudi Arabia and we arent doing much about it was practicaly universal, and NO one blamed it on the Republicans...But a Geopolitical reality in the short run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invading pakistan was implausible&#8230;.<br />
Dude I live in US, and i would tell you in that all accross my dem leaning state, people would have applauded<br />
if a nuke was hurled ove kapistan or akpistan(Mr hitchens&#8230;;-) ).<br />
Beleive me with a dems in city council, school board,<br />
rotary club to all the way to governiship, every one<br />
was PISSED that nothing was being done about<br />
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.<br />
The number of non brown folks(ie blacks/chinese/hispanics/whites) who after having learned that i was a kafir, told me that the root source of terrorism is Saudi Arabia and we arent doing much about it was practicaly universal, and NO one blamed it on the Republicans&#8230;But a Geopolitical reality in the short run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37920</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37920</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;no doubt everyone would have been banned now&lt;/i&gt;

God, can people stop whining? There have been plenty of India bashing threads, some by me. I generally try and allow people their freedom of speech unless they turn racist, xenophobic or start typing out lots of expletives. Accusing me of bias like a spoilt kid does not make me sympathetic to your cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>no doubt everyone would have been banned now</i></p>
<p>God, can people stop whining? There have been plenty of India bashing threads, some by me. I generally try and allow people their freedom of speech unless they turn racist, xenophobic or start typing out lots of expletives. Accusing me of bias like a spoilt kid does not make me sympathetic to your cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37912</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37912</guid>
		<description>as per usual a thread about pakistan descends into pak bashing. if these same things were said about india, no doubt everyone would have been banned now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as per usual a thread about pakistan descends into pak bashing. if these same things were said about india, no doubt everyone would have been banned now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37911</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37911</guid>
		<description>I personally think writing a book while in office is in poor taste.More importantly the most important part of the book on Mush is the final chapter and that i will imagine be a very different tale. 

Still his media campaign has been a hit in the US, one may not agree with him or his view of the world, but that probably feeds sales of the book even more ..(something for the more rabid pak bashers to ponder)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think writing a book while in office is in poor taste.More importantly the most important part of the book on Mush is the final chapter and that i will imagine be a very different tale. </p>
<p>Still his media campaign has been a hit in the US, one may not agree with him or his view of the world, but that probably feeds sales of the book even more ..(something for the more rabid pak bashers to ponder)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikrant Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37909</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikrant Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37909</guid>
		<description>whine all you like raz...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whine all you like raz&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37908</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37908</guid>
		<description>First of all I&#039;m not calling for India to be destroyed. Secondly, Indians have been whining about me on PP ever since I first started posting on here. I&#039;m sure they would all like a Septic Mutation style 100% Indian zone on here, but tough shit. Amazing how even the presence of one Pakistani can cause such outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all I&#8217;m not calling for India to be destroyed. Secondly, Indians have been whining about me on PP ever since I first started posting on here. I&#8217;m sure they would all like a Septic Mutation style 100% Indian zone on here, but tough shit. Amazing how even the presence of one Pakistani can cause such outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikrant Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37904</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikrant Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37904</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;if people like justforfun are going to articulate such shocking views on Pickled Politics, they are going to be called to account.&lt;/i&gt;

Raz, when was the last anyone ever called you to account your bizarre comments about India and Indians in general?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>if people like justforfun are going to articulate such shocking views on Pickled Politics, they are going to be called to account.</i></p>
<p>Raz, when was the last anyone ever called you to account your bizarre comments about India and Indians in general?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37902</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37902</guid>
		<description>Even 60 years after partition, people like justforfun cannot accept the reality of an independent Pakistan. Shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even 60 years after partition, people like justforfun cannot accept the reality of an independent Pakistan. Shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37901</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37901</guid>
		<description>Disgraceful. You have to fear for the future of the subcontinent with hatemongers like justforfun around. The battle for the future of India is at hand. Will it be the moderation of the Sunny Hundals of this world which wins out, or the racism, bigotry and hatred of justforfun? Only time will tell....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgraceful. You have to fear for the future of the subcontinent with hatemongers like justforfun around. The battle for the future of India is at hand. Will it be the moderation of the Sunny Hundals of this world which wins out, or the racism, bigotry and hatred of justforfun? Only time will tell&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37900</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37900</guid>
		<description>Chris I take your point, but &#039;maybe&#039; is the word. It also assumes that failed states will emerge from the break up.  If there were ground troops I am sure that is the case, but perhaps people inside Pakistan think that the constituant parts of Pakistan can make a go of it on their own after a coup d&#039;etat and oodles of dollars to re-define and re-invigorate the area.  Of course that plan will never work because the US will not spend oodles of dollars to re-build countries, unless there is a chance that it can make oodles of dollars back again, and unfortunately Pakistan has nothing that that would entice the Americans to act at present.  Things have to get alot wors, I fear before the USA switches tack and stops proping up the military in Pakistan and providing them with moral succour.  

I have no idea either way , but I cling to the idea that most people world wide just want to get on with improving their lives without religion being dragged into it.  However in Pakistan I believe the military and the religious parties are in a symbiotic relationship that allows each other to define and sustain themselves by the actions of the other - nice double act.  I understand why this idea might be dangerous for some who think of Pakistan as a sacrosanct single Islamic entity.  I think this mental burden of having to live up to this religious standard is at the root of alot of the problems in the area.  Since Terry Thomas, Pakistanis cannot just be Pakistanis but have to be Islamic Pakistanis.  Perhaps some in Pakistan are just fed up with this and want out.  Pakistan is after all like India,  a product of colonial map drawing and like India will only survive if it can convince its constituents that they all have a better future inside a state rather than on their own.  Bangladesh made that choice 35 years ago, but  not for religious grounds but just plain good old fashion - kick out the oppressors, and some will make the choice again if people like Raz just block their ears and close their eyes. Its realpolic about where the limits of US power extend and what the US thinks it can acheive when they are faced with choices.  So  the rantings of Raz against my obvious blasphemy is quite laughable.  I have re-read my post and all I seem to ask is that the people of Pakistan realise that perhaps being in a perpetual miltary dictatorship is not the way to try and better onesself.  But then what do I care - I don&#039;t have to live there. However the people of Pakistan will be faced with a choice soon, if they don&#039;t get a grip of themselves and sort out their religious and miltary leaders, but ooo that might be Un-islamic - no its not! - its seeing where the car is going and turning away from the abyss, or it just the fantasy of a Hindutva fanatic - perhaps if I was a Hinu and fanatic, but am I being irrational in thinking there is dwindling patience in the US and elsewhere with current policy on Pakistan?  The US might just not be bothered in supporting a state called Pakistan in a few years time. 

Justforfun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris I take your point, but &#8216;maybe&#8217; is the word. It also assumes that failed states will emerge from the break up.  If there were ground troops I am sure that is the case, but perhaps people inside Pakistan think that the constituant parts of Pakistan can make a go of it on their own after a coup d&#8217;etat and oodles of dollars to re-define and re-invigorate the area.  Of course that plan will never work because the US will not spend oodles of dollars to re-build countries, unless there is a chance that it can make oodles of dollars back again, and unfortunately Pakistan has nothing that that would entice the Americans to act at present.  Things have to get alot wors, I fear before the USA switches tack and stops proping up the military in Pakistan and providing them with moral succour.  </p>
<p>I have no idea either way , but I cling to the idea that most people world wide just want to get on with improving their lives without religion being dragged into it.  However in Pakistan I believe the military and the religious parties are in a symbiotic relationship that allows each other to define and sustain themselves by the actions of the other &#8211; nice double act.  I understand why this idea might be dangerous for some who think of Pakistan as a sacrosanct single Islamic entity.  I think this mental burden of having to live up to this religious standard is at the root of alot of the problems in the area.  Since Terry Thomas, Pakistanis cannot just be Pakistanis but have to be Islamic Pakistanis.  Perhaps some in Pakistan are just fed up with this and want out.  Pakistan is after all like India,  a product of colonial map drawing and like India will only survive if it can convince its constituents that they all have a better future inside a state rather than on their own.  Bangladesh made that choice 35 years ago, but  not for religious grounds but just plain good old fashion &#8211; kick out the oppressors, and some will make the choice again if people like Raz just block their ears and close their eyes. Its realpolic about where the limits of US power extend and what the US thinks it can acheive when they are faced with choices.  So  the rantings of Raz against my obvious blasphemy is quite laughable.  I have re-read my post and all I seem to ask is that the people of Pakistan realise that perhaps being in a perpetual miltary dictatorship is not the way to try and better onesself.  But then what do I care &#8211; I don&#8217;t have to live there. However the people of Pakistan will be faced with a choice soon, if they don&#8217;t get a grip of themselves and sort out their religious and miltary leaders, but ooo that might be Un-islamic &#8211; no its not! &#8211; its seeing where the car is going and turning away from the abyss, or it just the fantasy of a Hindutva fanatic &#8211; perhaps if I was a Hinu and fanatic, but am I being irrational in thinking there is dwindling patience in the US and elsewhere with current policy on Pakistan?  The US might just not be bothered in supporting a state called Pakistan in a few years time. </p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-2#comment-37892</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37892</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pickled Politics is the wrong audience for all this and always has been&quot;

Jai,

if people like justforfun are going to articulate such shocking views on Pickled Politics, they are going to be called to account. What is your opinion about justforfuns wish to see Pakistan dismantled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pickled Politics is the wrong audience for all this and always has been&#8221;</p>
<p>Jai,</p>
<p>if people like justforfun are going to articulate such shocking views on Pickled Politics, they are going to be called to account. What is your opinion about justforfuns wish to see Pakistan dismantled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-1#comment-37891</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37891</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That’s the sort of failed state scenario in which terrorists can hide - and whatever you may think of the present US administration, that is one thing of which they are very well aware.&lt;/i&gt;

Shame such acuity didn&#039;t surface prior to Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That’s the sort of failed state scenario in which terrorists can hide &#8211; and whatever you may think of the present US administration, that is one thing of which they are very well aware.</i></p>
<p>Shame such acuity didn&#8217;t surface prior to Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stiles</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-1#comment-37889</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37889</guid>
		<description>justforfun - 

That it is feasible for the US to bomb Pakistan is obvious, and if a threat had been made that is exactly the form it would have taken, bombing on the Serbian model.

The point Alex makes is somewhat different - bombing Pakistan would have lead to possible disintegration and maybe talibanisation of parts of it.  That&#039;s the sort of failed state scenario in which terrorists can hide - and whatever you may think of the present US administration, that is one thing of which they are very well aware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>justforfun &#8211; </p>
<p>That it is feasible for the US to bomb Pakistan is obvious, and if a threat had been made that is exactly the form it would have taken, bombing on the Serbian model.</p>
<p>The point Alex makes is somewhat different &#8211; bombing Pakistan would have lead to possible disintegration and maybe talibanisation of parts of it.  That&#8217;s the sort of failed state scenario in which terrorists can hide &#8211; and whatever you may think of the present US administration, that is one thing of which they are very well aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-1#comment-37883</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37883</guid>
		<description>No worries - Vikrant - you have alot to see , and I am jealous, very jealous. 

Aghh - I just went to look for my canvas rucksack in my loft with all my trekking stuff- I can&#039;t find my rubber soled green canvas army boots.  I&#039;ve kept them for twenty three years and now my wife must have thrown them out.  They were a gift from a BSF guy who gave me a lift in Kashmir - hey one could hitch hike then out in the middle of nowhere and get a lift of whoever stopped. Things change - thats the sad part..

I digress - Just keep an open mind and look to the future, the past glories of ancestors are not past down in ones genes.  

Justforfun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries &#8211; Vikrant &#8211; you have alot to see , and I am jealous, very jealous. </p>
<p>Aghh &#8211; I just went to look for my canvas rucksack in my loft with all my trekking stuff- I can&#8217;t find my rubber soled green canvas army boots.  I&#8217;ve kept them for twenty three years and now my wife must have thrown them out.  They were a gift from a BSF guy who gave me a lift in Kashmir &#8211; hey one could hitch hike then out in the middle of nowhere and get a lift of whoever stopped. Things change &#8211; thats the sad part..</p>
<p>I digress &#8211; Just keep an open mind and look to the future, the past glories of ancestors are not past down in ones genes.  </p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikrant Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-1#comment-37878</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikrant Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37878</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You will be changed, and hopefully you will have alot to contibute without making silly statements about the level of descrimination against Dalits in India.&lt;/i&gt;

In my defense i can only say that the Maharashtrian India i&#039;ve been exposed to most, is *nearly* free from caste prejudices. Or may be it is the way since Dalits make up only about 5% of this state&#039;s population. Maratha Empire was first to employ Dalit soldiers. Maratha state of Kolhapur was first to abolish untouchability (way  back in 1840&#039;s)... I&#039;ll be going to Rajasthan this Diwali hopefully i&#039;ll be able to see how Dalits in North India fare as opposed to Western India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You will be changed, and hopefully you will have alot to contibute without making silly statements about the level of descrimination against Dalits in India.</i></p>
<p>In my defense i can only say that the Maharashtrian India i&#8217;ve been exposed to most, is *nearly* free from caste prejudices. Or may be it is the way since Dalits make up only about 5% of this state&#8217;s population. Maratha Empire was first to employ Dalit soldiers. Maratha state of Kolhapur was first to abolish untouchability (way  back in 1840&#8217;s)&#8230; I&#8217;ll be going to Rajasthan this Diwali hopefully i&#8217;ll be able to see how Dalits in North India fare as opposed to Western India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anas</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-1#comment-37877</link>
		<dc:creator>Anas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37877</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;At the time presidential candidate Bush was widely castigated. Not only could he not name the Pakistani general, he was endorsing the military takeover of a democratic government.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, the US has been doing that since WW2, especially in S. America, a lot of the time providing active military support. Apparently, US support for Pakistan throughout its the period of its bloody and murderous actions against Bangladesh is known as the &quot;Pakistan tilt&quot; . It&#039;s just one of a large number of instances when the US has actively supported largescale massacres of innocent civilians across the world during the last 50-60 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>At the time presidential candidate Bush was widely castigated. Not only could he not name the Pakistani general, he was endorsing the military takeover of a democratic government.</i></p>
<p>Well, the US has been doing that since WW2, especially in S. America, a lot of the time providing active military support. Apparently, US support for Pakistan throughout its the period of its bloody and murderous actions against Bangladesh is known as the &#8220;Pakistan tilt&#8221; . It&#8217;s just one of a large number of instances when the US has actively supported largescale massacres of innocent civilians across the world during the last 50-60 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikrant Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799/comment-page-1#comment-37876</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikrant Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/799#comment-37876</guid>
		<description>Now let me ask you a few honest q&#039;s

Why do Pakistanis tolerate Islamist Jihadist organisations that specifically target Indians esp. Hindus?

Does average Pakistani realise that his ancestors were probably same as mine?

Why do Pakistanis insist on falsifying Arab/Persian lineage, why are they so ashamed of their Indian heritage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now let me ask you a few honest q&#8217;s</p>
<p>Why do Pakistanis tolerate Islamist Jihadist organisations that specifically target Indians esp. Hindus?</p>
<p>Does average Pakistani realise that his ancestors were probably same as mine?</p>
<p>Why do Pakistanis insist on falsifying Arab/Persian lineage, why are they so ashamed of their Indian heritage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
