Sunny Hundal website

  • Family

    • Liberal Conspiracy
    • Sunny Hundal
  • Comrades

    • Andy Worthington
    • Angela Saini
    • Bartholomew’s notes
    • Bleeding Heart Show
    • Bloggerheads
    • Blood & Treasure
    • Campaign against Honour Killings
    • Cath Elliott
    • Chicken Yoghurt
    • Daily Mail Watch
    • Dave Hill
    • Dr. Mitu Khurana
    • Europhobia
    • Faith in Society
    • Feminism for non-lefties
    • Feministing
    • Gender Bytes
    • Harry’s Place
    • IKWRO
    • MediaWatchWatch
    • Ministry of Truth
    • Natalie Bennett
    • New Statesman blogs
    • Operation Black Vote
    • Our Kingdom
    • Robert Sharp
    • Rupa Huq
    • Shiraz Socialist
    • Shuggy’s Blog
    • Stumbling and Mumbling
    • Ta-Nehisi Coates
    • The F Word
    • Though Cowards Flinch
    • Tory Troll
    • UK Polling Report
  • In-laws

    • Aaron Heath
    • Douglas Clark's saloon
    • Earwicga
    • Get There Steppin’
    • Incurable Hippie
    • Neha Viswanathan
    • Power of Choice
    • Rita Banerji
    • Sarah
    • Sepia Mutiny
    • Sonia Faleiro
    • Southall Black Sisters
    • The Langar Hall
    • Turban Head

  • With friends like these…

    by Sunny
    21st September, 2006 at 10:23 pm    

    Human Rights Watch has just published a report on the situation in Azad Kashmir (the part of Kashmir controlled by Pakistan) following the earthquake last year. The report is very critical on two fronts: the government’s policy following the earthquake and its persecution of pro-independence Kashmiris.

    In its summary HRW makes a few important points I’m highlighting underneath.

    1) “In the first seventy-two hours after the earthquake, thousands of Pakistani troops stationed in Azad Kashmir prioritized the evacuation of their own personnel over providing relief to desperate civilians. The international media began converging on Muzaffarabad within twenty-four hours of the earthquake and fanned out to other towns in Azad Kashmir shortly thereafter.

    “They filmed Pakistani troops standing by and refusing to help because they had “no orders” to do so as locals attempted to dig out those still alive, sending a chilling message of indifference from Islamabad. Having filmed the refusal, journalists switched off their cameras and joined the rescue effort themselves; in one instance they shamed the soldiers into helping. But unlike the death and destruction, the media were not everywhere. The death toll continued to mount.”

    2) Human rights abuses by the Indian security forces and separatist forces in Jammu and Kashmir have been relatively well documented and often condemned. But the world knows little about Azad Kashmir, other than that the territory has been used by Pakistan-backed militant groups as a staging ground for attacks in Jammu and Kashmir.

    3) …though “Azad” means “free,” the residents of Azad Kashmir are anything but. Azad Kashmir is a land of strict curbs on political pluralism, freedom of expression, and freedom of association; a muzzled press; banned books; arbitrary arrest and detention and torture at the hands of the Pakistani military and the police; and discrimination against refugees from Jammu and Kashmir state. Singled out are Kashmiri nationalists who do not support the idea of Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan.

    4) As the Pakistani military prioritized the rescue of its own personnel, it probably sought the assistance of its closest allies in Azad Kashmir, the militant groups. These groups, which had undoubtedly suffered the loss of personnel and infrastructure themselves in the earthquake, won much local appreciation for their rescue and relief efforts. This public relations coup could not have been possible without logistical support from sections of the Pakistani military’s intelligence apparatus.

    And most importantly: “Successive Pakistani governments have asserted that Kashmir’s political future must be determined in accordance with the wishes of the people. But the reality of Azad Kashmir prior to the earthquake was life dominated by governmental restrictions on fundamental freedoms.

    My view on the conflict is simple. I would rather the whole of Kashmir be made independent with an independent government that works in conjunction with India and Pakistan. Before that happens however the Indian govt needs to seriously re-evaluate its own security forces in the area, while Pakistan needs to stop funding these terrorist groups.

    Both countries are simply using the lives of the Kashmiri population as a means to their own goals, rather than looking for a solution that is about what those people want.

    Related story on BBC.

                  Post to

    Filed in: India,Pakistan,South Asia

    8 Comments below   |  

    Reactions: Twitter, blogs

    1. Sajn — on 22nd September, 2006 at 12:07 am  

      I have to say that little of the above bears any resemblance to my experience and knowledge of Azad Kashmir.

      If anything here are too many parties and political groupings, mostly out to get what they can for themselves. Not sure why they think there is no freedom of expression or freedom of association.

      Generally the army was praised by locals during the immediate aftermath of the earthquake so again I don’t know where and why HRW have got their information from.

      I also recall some reports in the western media comparing favourably the efforts made by the Pakistani Army against that of the Indian troops occupying Indian Held Kashmir.

    2. Leon — on 22nd September, 2006 at 10:21 am  

      I think your spot on about independence Sunny the problem is how is this going to come about if both sides view the region they way they do?

    3. Jagdeep — on 22nd September, 2006 at 11:18 am  

      Never mind that, here is the reason why Musharaff went on TV immediately after 9/11 and made a speech supporting America with his moustache quivering:

      We’ll bomb you to Stone Age, US told Pakistan

    4. Sunny — on 22nd September, 2006 at 2:57 pm  

      Jagdeep - Saw that too. But you expected Bush to behave any differently?

    5. Jagdeep — on 22nd September, 2006 at 3:21 pm  

      I think it has some cosmic comedy in there Sunny. From the fathers of the taliban to discarding the bastard child. Anyway, Musharaff must have shit his pants!

    6. Anas — on 22nd September, 2006 at 4:35 pm  

      Apparently “Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan spent more on weapons than on health care between 2002 and 2003″ (from by far the most important news story today

      Absolutely obscene. The problem is that, unless you’re wealthy, your life is generally very cheap in Pakistan.

    7. Zak — on 24th September, 2006 at 5:47 pm  

      The problem is one of mindset, neither India nor Pakistan want to give Kashmiris the right of independence simply because it invites a precedent to other religo-ethnic groups. Ideally the solution is something in between. The big question is how many people have to die before a compromise is struck?

    8. Anil — on 26th September, 2006 at 4:53 pm  

      Nice post, Sunny — thanks for this. One additional important thing worth noting: this is the second major, comprehensive report by HRW this month on Kashmir. The first one focused on J&K, the second on Azad Kashmir. They really have taken an impartial, holistic view of the situation on both sides of the LOC.

      Links to both reports here:

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

    Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
    With the help of PHP and Wordpress.