Asian millionaire plans to join BNP


by Sunny
22nd February, 2010 at 11:46 am    

This story in the Sun is ace:

A TYCOON who starred on TV’s Secret Millionaire is joining the British National Party to RILE them – because he is Asian.
Mo Chaudry, 49, will formally apply today – days after the BNP had to change its whites-only constitution because it breached equality laws.

The Pakistan-born businessman, who is worth £60million, admitted last night: “I will not be welcomed with open arms.” Despite blasting the party as racist, he vowed: “I want to stand up and be counted – and expose the BNP for what they are.

Looks a bit like a publicity stunt, but who cares.

I had a long-ish argument with Trevor Phillips about the EHRC’s decision to take the BNP to court. My argument was that it handed the BNP an excuse to pretend they were a normal party and thus sanitise their public image over a longer period of time. One side-effect I did NOT anticipate was a big split within party members who would be driven to the National Front. Watch the video below. Maybe Trevor was right after all…


via North of Westminster


              Post to del.icio.us


Filed in: Race politics






34 Comments below   |  

Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Taz

    RT @pickledpolitics Pickled Politics » Asian millionaire plans to join BNP http://bit.ly/ccaao1


  2. pickles

    Blog post:: Asian millionaire plans to join BNP http://bit.ly/b9XwnK


  3. farhanashaikh

    RT @pickledpolitics: Blog post:: Asian millionaire plans to join BNP http://bit.ly/b9XwnK


  4. Kingmaker

    Why? Just why??? RT @pickledpolitics: Blog post:: Asian millionaire plans to join BNP http://bit.ly/b9XwnK




  1. Lee John Barnes — on 22nd February, 2010 at 12:42 pm  

    He is welcome to join.

    We will educate him about the true state of our society and then deploy him to educate others about what is coming for this nation if the present social and political systems are kept in place.

    As for a split with the NF – HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA the Nf is run by the drunk Eddie Morisson and ‘shifty’ Tom Linden.

    They hold their meetings in a phone box.

    A split.

    Good one.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

  2. Tom Johnson — on 22nd February, 2010 at 2:00 pm  

    Is this tycoon thick or what?

    He’s now on record as stating that his reason for wanting to join the BNP is to ‘rile’ them. He clearly doesn’t support the aims/objectives of the party indeed he wants to expose their ‘racism’.

    What he’s doing is called entryism, they can legitimately refuse him membership. The Labour Party can tell him all about that.

    As for the video claims about mass defections to the NF, long on claims short on evidence.

  3. Yakoub — on 22nd February, 2010 at 2:02 pm  

    Watching the video, I just laughed – BNP and NF are both masters at talking utter bollocks.

  4. Lee John Barnes — on 22nd February, 2010 at 2:16 pm  

    We will let him join, take his membership fees and then assess his behaviour.

    If he acts like an entryist, causes problems and acts like an idiot, then we will boot him out.

    After his cheque has cleared of course.

    You can all join, the more the merrier as its more money for us to campaign with, but the moment you open your mouth and cause us problems we will kick you out – regardless of your race, religion etc etc.

  5. persephone — on 22nd February, 2010 at 2:41 pm  

    ” We will let him join, take his membership fees and then assess his behaviour.”

    I don’t think his behaviour would fit the BNP way.

    Because Mo Chaudry is a self made man who created a personal fortune through hard work, is in a mixed race marriage with several children, is a business/skills mentor and a motivational speaker amongst other things. Perhaps his behaviour may even be a positive influence.

    Unless of course he decides to go native by blaming certain races for the lack of success and achievement in certain indigenous groups. Then he would fit right in.

  6. Lee John Barnes — on 22nd February, 2010 at 2:51 pm  

    A few trouble makers are welcome.

    We will take their dosh and then kick them out to make an example of them.

    Plus we will also have their names and addresses of course once they have joined, which is always useful for us in relation to legal cases etc.

    I am sure you reds and trouble makers will love us to have all your home details when you join.

  7. MiriamBinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 2:52 pm  

    @ Lee John Barnes # 5 – So you are hereby declaring that the intention of the party is to only allow those ideas, concepts and general demeanour that are agreeable to the management? In other words: No new ideas please, we are racist white supremacists! … Oops, sorry, Racist White Nationalists of course ;)

  8. swift — on 22nd February, 2010 at 3:00 pm  

    Lee John Barnes

    A few trouble makers are welcome.

    We will take their dosh and then kick them out to make an example of them.

    Plus we will also have their names and addresses of course once they have joined, which is always useful for us in relation to legal cases etc.

    I am sure you reds and trouble makers will love us to have all your home details when you join.

    Just in case anyone was under the impression the BNP is a legitamate political party rather than a bunch of street hooligans and racist thugs

  9. Lee John Barnes — on 22nd February, 2010 at 3:01 pm  

    Would the Tories allow New Labour activists to infiltrate and cause trouble in the Tory Party ?

    Grow up you prat.

    As for racist / white supremacists/ blah blah blah EPIC YAWN – for fucks sake evolve your facile rhetoric.

    You must be boring yourselves by now with that old shit.

    Play another record for fucks sake.

  10. Lee John Barnes — on 22nd February, 2010 at 3:04 pm  

    If thugs join our party, then they should expect to be treated like thugs.

    They shall reap what they sow.

    Self Defence Is No Offence.

  11. MiriamBinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 3:10 pm  

    @ Lee John Barnes # 10 – “Grow up you prat” followed by a “for fucks sake” x 2 you sure do set a wonderful example.

    I take it you do not deny the supposition posited by # 8 then. Only those ideas approved by the management, namely Nick Griffin himself, may be espoused by all those who are currently members of or will become members of the BNP.

  12. MiriamBinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 3:16 pm  

    @ Lee John Barnes # 10 – “Grow up you prat” followed by “for fucks sake” x 2 are of course wonderful examples of mature debate ;)

    So I take it that you are not denying that only those ideas approved by Nick Griffin and cohorts are to be expressed by those who are currently members or will be members of the BNP …

    As for your reap what you sow in # 11 … Kindly note that I have not called you any derogatory names nor used any expletives. I’d appreciate you refraining from addressing me or my posts in those terms. Thank you.

  13. platinum786 — on 22nd February, 2010 at 3:39 pm  

    Lee you know where we all are, the parts of the cities you don’t dare show your face in, come and get us.

    Just don’t forget we also have a list of where you are, it’s on the inernet.

  14. MiriamBinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 4:01 pm  

    @ Lee John Barnes # 10 – “Grow up you prat.” and “for fucks sake” x 2 are hardly examples of mature debate I would have thought.

    I take it that seeing as you have not denied it, that all members and future members will be expected to uphold and subscribe to all the ideas, policies and proposals of Nick Griffin or those he is agreeable to appoint.

    Considering Mo Chaudrey is an upstanding member of society without any thuggery charges to his credit your assumption that he is joining your party as a ‘thug’ is rather far fetched … unless of course you hold that all those who become members of the BNP are necessarily thugs.

    As for reaping what is sown, kindly note that I have refrained from using any expletives or referring to you by any derogatory terms; do try and restrain yourself likewise … thank you

  15. MiriamBinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 4:04 pm  

    Please don’t think for one moment that your infantile posturing worries me in the slightest Mr Barnes. I am posting under my given name and am on the electoral role. If you care to come and call, please feel free to do so.

  16. Lee John Barnes — on 22nd February, 2010 at 4:07 pm  

    I couldnt care less where any of you mugs live.

    I am about as interested in your location as the location of dark matter within the quantum universe.

    The point is that if anyone tries to join the party and cause problems then you will be thrown out faster than a Times reporter.

  17. Dalbir — on 22nd February, 2010 at 4:15 pm  

    Lee have you ever thought your policies/ideas might drag Britain into another dark age?

    Honestly, have you never met a nonwhite that you actually warmed to?

  18. Duncan — on 22nd February, 2010 at 4:23 pm  

    One side-effect I did NOT anticipate was a big split within party members who would be driven to the National Front.

    You were right not to anticipate this. It’s not happening. The BNP is a party of roughly 10,000 people and a small number of these have left to join the NF, noticeably Chris Jackson. I don’t see how anyone with a sense of proportion can call this a ‘big split’.

    The National Front is not a functioning political organisation. It is a social club for racist misfits and people expelled from other fascist parties.

  19. MiriamBinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 5:05 pm  

    @ Lee John Barnes # 15 – Of course not my dear chap. Knowing would mean that you might actually be required to do a bit more then infantile posturing on the internet ;)

  20. Kulvinder — on 22nd February, 2010 at 5:09 pm  

    FWIW i think its a stupid and divisive idea; its trolling them for no good reason. They’ll have plenty of time to think of ways in which his presence at any meetings can be used for their own PR, and paying them to disagree with them is a frankly ridiculous. What exactly is he going to ‘expose’ them as?! I’d take it as given that the vast majority of people understand their philosophy.

  21. David T — on 22nd February, 2010 at 5:45 pm  

    Duncan: “It is a social club for racist misfits and people expelled from other fascist parties”

    LJB: “As for a split with the NF – HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA the Nf is run by the drunk Eddie Morisson and ’shifty’ Tom Linden.”

    Although Lee John Barnes has great hopes for the NF:

    The BNP has the primary political struggle to fight in Britain, whilst the NF has a different struggle to commence.

    Instead of seeking to expand as a political party, the NF needs to adopt a nationalist community building agenda and an active street presence.

    If Chris Jackson can harness the energy of the NF and direct it into building a musical network, a community network, an educational network and a prison outreach programme for white prisoners in British jails and also build a powerful street presence for the NF around the country, then all the good for us in the BNP.

    http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/12/20/bnp-idiot-endorses-national-front-again/

  22. Sunny — on 22nd February, 2010 at 5:56 pm  

    Interesting point Duncan… will keep that in mind. Though the NF idiots seem anxious to keep up the pretence of a big split.

  23. KJB — on 22nd February, 2010 at 6:23 pm  

    I agree with Kulvinder. They are thick, sure, but not THAT thick – I suspect they’ll do as their august legal officer (or whatever he’s calling himself these days) says and take his membership money without accepting him.

    Good to see the BNP trolls are still so sure of themselves and their inherent supremacy in EVERYTHING that they continue to stalk the sites of their political (and probably personal) polar opposites…[/sarcasm]

  24. persephone — on 22nd February, 2010 at 7:50 pm  

    ” We will let him join, take his membership fees and then assess his behaviour”

    I don’t think his behaviour would fit the BNP way.

    Because Mo Chaudry is a self made man who created a personal fortune through hard work, s a business/skills mentor and a motivational speaker amongst other things. Perhaps his behaviour may even be a positive influence.

    Unless of course he decides to go native by blaming certain races for the lack of success and achievement in certain indigenous groups. Then he would fit right in.

  25. over yonder — on 23rd February, 2010 at 10:56 am  

    at this rate the bnp are going to go the way of Terre blanche’s AWB.

  26. David Jones — on 23rd February, 2010 at 12:21 pm  

    The BNP are constantly denigrated as “supremacist”, “racist” and supporters of Apartheid, yet has miriambinder noticed that it is Jews who are “supremacist” by considering themselves as God’s chosen people. Also they are “racist” because they operate a eugenic ethnocentrist programme of cultural and genetic isolation from gentile societies in order to further their group or race interest. If this is not a form of apartheid they certainly operate a proactive policy of racial separation in Israel, along the lines of Hitler’s Nuremburg laws. It’s only the Jewish contol of the media which has prevented these facts being widely known to the sheeple.

  27. Abdul Abbulbul Emir — on 23rd February, 2010 at 12:58 pm  

    it is Jews who are “supremacist” by considering themselves as God’s chosen people.

    Mrs A asks

    Why should God choose the Jews ?

    Perhaps there was a mistake and the wonderful hunter gatherer Brit people who have been living here since the ice age were meant to be chosen instead.

    Perhaps Harrys’ Place could hold a poll on this.

    Peace….

  28. Jai — on 23rd February, 2010 at 1:23 pm  

    yet has miriambinder noticed that it is Jews who are “supremacist” by considering themselves as God’s chosen people.

    The ultraorthodox organised versions of all the “Abrahamic” religions include this assertion – including Christianity. Also, let’s not forget that the BNP itself claims to championing “Christian Britain” and is even affiliated with the “Christian Council of Britain”, a front organisation for the BNP set up by “Reverend” Robert West (who appeared alongside Andrew Brons on the BBC’s ‘The Big Questions’ last summer), who mysteriously belongs to no known denomination in Britain and is not formally registered as a “reverend” with any of the churches in this country either.

    Also they are “racist” because they operate a eugenic ethnocentrist programme of cultural and genetic isolation from gentile societies in order to further their group or race interest. If this is not a form of apartheid they certainly operate a proactive policy of racial separation in Israel, along the lines of Hitler’s Nuremburg laws.

    Then complain directly to the government of Israel. Presumably you know where their embassy is located in London. I’m sure that Mossad would be interested in your “concerns” too. After all, presumably you have sufficient courage to be willing to say this directly to the Israeli administration and the associated security services, rather than anonymously writing posts about in on internet blogs (whilst regularly changing your username on PP — and yes, we do know about that too).

    And given the fact that the alleged Israeli policies covered in the assertions above are policies which a BNP government itself would implement in Britain in relation to non-white people — and this has been confirmed in writing directly by the BNP’s senior leadership — then presumably these are “eugenic ethnocentric” racial apartheid policies you are actually applauding, rather than condemning.

    Incidentally, we’re still waiting for an explanation of exactly how a BNP government would reduce Britain’s non-white population from 10% to 1%, considering that Nick Griffin has directly confirmed that this is still one of the BNP’s main goals along with the fact that the BNP has officially abandoned its “voluntary repatriation” policies. If the BNP also has an issue with Jewish people — something confirmed in video footage of a speech to BNP supporters by Griffin in Burnley in 2006, and continuing to be confirmed by the remarks by “David Jones” in post #26 — then presumably Jews will also be included in the planned population reduction programme.

  29. MiriamBinder — on 23rd February, 2010 at 1:40 pm  

    @ Abdul Abbulbul Emir # 27 – Chosen does not necessarily imply preferred. There are any number of reasons for choosing one instead of another and supremacy is not necessarily the only or even a relevant determinant.

    As a little matter often overlooked: Observant Jews are required to uphold 613 laws (I’m sure bananabrain will correct me if I have the number wrong) to be considered righteous in the eyes of G-d, gentiles need only uphold the 7 laws given to Moses.

    Hardly a level playing field wouldn’t you say ;)

  30. over yonder — on 23rd February, 2010 at 2:23 pm  

    Muslims believe that special status was given to the children of Israel (a term referring to the 12 sons of Jacob and his descendents) but because of disobedience fell from favour with God or Allah.

    Some Muslims believe that it was becasue of their breaking of the covenent that God’s last and final prophet was raised from amongst the Arabs rather than the Jews.

    Reference is made to this in many verses of the quraan:

    Children of Israel! call to mind the (special) favour which I bestowed upon you, and that I preferred you to all other nations (for My Message). [Qur'an, sura 2:47]

    And remember We took your covenant and We raised above you Mount (Sinai) : (Saying): “Hold firmly to what We have given you and bring (ever) to remembrance what is therein: Perchance ye may fear Allah.” [Qur'an, sura 2:63]

    And remember We [Allah] made a covenant with the Children of Israel (to this effect): Worship none but Allah; treat with kindness your parents and kindred, and orphans and those in need; speak fair to the people; be steadfast in prayer; and practise regular charity. Then did ye turn back, except a few among you, and ye backslide (even now). [Qur'an, sura 2:83]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
With the help of PHP and Wordpress.