Sunny Hundal website



  • Family

    • Liberal Conspiracy
    • Sunny Hundal
  • Comrades

    • Andy Worthington
    • Angela Saini
    • Bartholomew’s notes
    • Bleeding Heart Show
    • Bloggerheads
    • Blood & Treasure
    • Campaign against Honour Killings
    • Cath Elliott
    • Chicken Yoghurt
    • Daily Mail Watch
    • Dave Hill
    • Dr. Mitu Khurana
    • Europhobia
    • Faith in Society
    • Feminism for non-lefties
    • Feministing
    • Gender Bytes
    • Harry’s Place
    • IKWRO
    • MediaWatchWatch
    • Ministry of Truth
    • Natalie Bennett
    • New Statesman blogs
    • Operation Black Vote
    • Our Kingdom
    • Robert Sharp
    • Rupa Huq
    • Shiraz Socialist
    • Shuggy’s Blog
    • Stumbling and Mumbling
    • Ta-Nehisi Coates
    • The F Word
    • Though Cowards Flinch
    • Tory Troll
    • UK Polling Report
  • In-laws

    • Aaron Heath
    • Douglas Clark's saloon
    • Earwicga
    • Get There Steppin’
    • Incurable Hippie
    • Neha Viswanathan
    • Power of Choice
    • Rita Banerji
    • Sarah
    • Sepia Mutiny
    • Sonia Faleiro
    • Southall Black Sisters
    • The Langar Hall
    • Turban Head

  • Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update


    by Rumbold
    3rd February, 2010 at 7:54 pm    

    Dr. Mitu Khurana’s final court date for custody of her children is approaching. Some of you may remember Mitu’s story, but for those who don’t, I have added in background detail.

    Dr. Mitu Khurana is a brave woman. She struggled against her husband and her in-laws years ago when she was pregnant. They slipped eggs into her food, knowing she was allergic to them. Other times they denied her food and water. Her crime? To have become pregnant with two daughters and refused to abort them. In August 2005 she gave birth, but the pressure did not stop. It was suggested that she give her children up for adoption, while her mother-in-law once shoved her then four month old daughter down the stairs.

    In March 2008 Dr. Mitu was thrown out of her house by her husband, who is also a doctor. The next month she went back to their home only to discover that while ill (and in hospital), doctors had illegally performed a test to determine the sex of the foetus. Sex determination tests are illegal in India, as a response to the major imbalance between the sexes. There are 107 men for every 100 women in India, which translates to a gap of tens of millions. This is largely the result of abortion and the killing of female children. Many women go along with these tests, or even instigate them, but Dr. Mitu did not stay silent. She spoke out and filed a complaint with the Women’s Commission and various NGOs, and became the first woman to file a complaint under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PC-PNDT) Act in Delhi.

    Her case soon became a cause celebre and was widely covered in the Indian media. Yet she still fears for the safety of her daughters. As Rita Banerji, the founder and chief administrator of The 50 Million Missing: A Campaign Against India’s Female Genocide (an NGO) pointed out to me:

    It is interesting that when the media in India covers Mitu’s case they hover around the hospital gates or her in-laws house. The logical thing to do would be to go to the courts and the government offices for those are the offices with authority to implement laws and book violators. But the media does not approach them — and the reason I am told is that the government does not want to answer to cases like this!

    Since Dr. Mitu launched her case, she has been harassed and has had to fight every step of the way in order to get the authorities to do what they are supposed to. When she spoke to a senior official he tried to stop her:

    Before filing the case I had met Dr Puneet Bedi, a member of the Core Monitoring Committee. He did not take me seriously. Also, he warned me that if I file a case, the concerned hospital, where the sex determination was done without my knowledge, would threaten and offer me bribes and I would be forced to settle the case with my husband and close it.

    Some politicians in Delhi are sympathetic, but she still has to struggle against a mentality that values boys over girls. Her husband and his family have yet to be charged with anything, and her daughters are still at risk. A high court judge even tried to get her to reconcile with her husband, despite the threat of violence against her children. Other people, including some workmates, have also encouraged her to drop the case. One person told her to continue to get pregnant until she has a son for her husband.

    Now her husband and in-laws are after her daughters. For a long while they wanted nothing to do with the young girls, but late last year her husband filed a custody case. Dr. Mitu believes that they only want custody as a way of putting pressure on her to drop her other cases. Her daughters currently live with her, and the case will be decided on 20th February. If the court rules in favour of the father, Dr. Mitu fears she will never see her daughters alive again.

    To support Mitu, please contact the Indian embassy to make your views known, or leave messages on this website.


                  Post to del.icio.us


    Filed in: 'Honour'-based violence,India,Sex equality






    15 Comments below   |  

    Reactions: Twitter, blogs
    1. pickles

      Blog post:: Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update http://bit.ly/9g8let


    2. CathElliott

      RT @pickledpolitics: Blog post:: Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update http://bit.ly/9g8let


    3. jezhumble

      RT @pickledpolitics Pickled Politics » Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update http://bit.ly/bXr4oD


    4. 50 Million Missing

      RT @CathElliott: RT @pickledpolitics: Blog post:: Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update http://bit.ly/9g8let


    5. earwicga

      RT @pickledpolitics Pickled Politics » Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update http://bit.ly/bXr4oD


    6. Dr. Mitu Khurana: an update « Mitu Khurana

      [...] case, Female foeticide, gender imbalance, Ultrasound Sex Determination by Supporters of Mitu Dr. Mitu Khurana: an updateby Rumbold 3rd February, [...]




    1. douglas clark — on 3rd February, 2010 at 8:19 pm  

      Rumbold,

      I do not know how to say this exactly.

      That is disgusting and terrible.

    2. Roger — on 4th February, 2010 at 12:43 am  

      An appalling story, but

      “It was suggested that she give her children up for abortion,”
      Surely you mean
      “It was suggested that she give her children up for adoption, ”
      Delete when corrected.

    3. Rumbold — on 4th February, 2010 at 6:31 pm  

      Thanks Douglas (and Roger).

    4. terry fitz — on 5th February, 2010 at 1:53 pm  

      Nothing seems to have changed in a decade. In 2001 a friend of mine Mala Sen published “Death by Fire: Sati, Dowry Death and Female Infanticide in modern India”.

      I remember how upset she was by what she discovered and paid for the treatment of a woman who had been set on fire. I’ll let her know about this.

    5. Deep Singh — on 5th February, 2010 at 3:31 pm  

      “Other people, including some workmates, have also encouraged her to drop the case”

      Why does this not come as a surprise! In a culture which places the notion of joint extended families above all other matters to the point of making it a religious obligation, this is precisely the type of attitude one can expect to find - the sad reality is that I doubt it is limited to the Indian sub-continent as there are plenty of Diaspora Indians of all descriptions who retain this type of mentality.

    6. Vikrant — on 5th February, 2010 at 4:35 pm  

      To support Mitu, please contact the Indian embassy to make your views known, or leave messages on this website.

      And how does that help? Indian government i believe is powerless when it comes to matters in civilian courts!

    7. Martin Sullivan — on 6th February, 2010 at 2:39 pm  

      Can’t the Pakistanis invade and rescue this poor woman and her daughters?

    8. Rumbold — on 6th February, 2010 at 6:12 pm  

      Vikrant:

      There appears to be pressure from the government (or figures within the government) as well to drop the case.

    9. earwicga — on 2nd March, 2010 at 7:35 pm  

      Any update on the custody case Rumbold?

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

    Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
    With the help of PHP and Wordpress.