http://www.TheGrace.com

http://www.TheGrace.net

http://www.TheGrace.org
سلام لكم في محبة الله.نتأمل زياراتكم الكريمة لموقع النعمة موقع مجلة النعمة يقدم كلمة الله الكتاب المقدس الإنجيل رسالة السيد يسوع المسيح قراءات مختارة مواضيع مصيرية قصص واقعية شهادات شخصية ترانيم ممتازة ردود مؤكدة كتب بنّاءة رسوم تسالي تأملات يوميات
Bible Read search in Arabic Studys Stories Testimonies Acappella Hymns and Poems Answers Books Links Daily devotions Acappella Music Graphics /Alnemat Journal Arabe Chrétien La Grâce la Revue Arabe sur Internet offre La Sainte Bible Al-Injil L’Evangile de Jésus Christ gratuit, Bienvenue a La Grâce.

This still stands unaddressed.

As others have already pointed out in the forum, I track media consumption habits and report on ethnic media for ‘Asians’. That includes Muslims. Two of my regular columnists are Muslims. We cover the ethnic media, including Muslim media. So the idea that I cannot comment on how young Muslims are responding to mainstream media coverage is silly. It implies that non-Muslims can never commentate on what British Muslims are doing, unless a select bunch of internet activists consider them to be experts. It also implies Muslims who are professionals in fields other than religion should not be allowed to commentate on the basis of their religion. It is absurd.

also mentions on mpac that you removed one of your articles at the behest of some of your readers

I wrote an article on the Lebanon conflict which was a bit hurried and inadequate. I deleted it off my own accord. Since then we have covered the Israel/Lebanon conflict numerous times. Do a search. It was a silly attempt at mud-slinging.

Thank you.

*gets coat and shuffles off*

I do not know ‘Khalid’ and so im not sure why I should answer on his behalf. Personally, I have no reason to think you are racist based on the article in question and I do not know Khalid to question him further on your behalf. I notice that he, or someone else, also mentions on mpac that you removed one of your articles at the behest of some of your readers that I assume wanted you to remove it. I have no idea if this accusation from him is true either and would welcome your comments.

Anonmouse your stupidity knows no bounds. Yes I know there are white Muslims. But that wasn’t the point of my sentence above. It was referring to white people in general.

Secondly, your friend ‘Khalid’, hiding behinding an anonymous identity calls me a racist. That’s funny. Who am I being racist again exactly? The Muslim race? And how? By saying Wilson may be a twat but I defend his freedom of speech? Rather like how I think Hizb ut Tahrir might be idiots but I defend their right to freedom of speech?

Many of those on the MPAC forums are just frustrated little kids like yourself who don’t really think their bullshit through. They just like coming out with it.

Will you respond to Katy’s comments which show that you breach your own policies as to comments:

“Katy — on 19th August, 2006 at 1:04 pm

This Holubz bloke isn’t Israeli or Jewish, if his website is anything to go by. He seems to be in favour of converting people to Christianity.

Whatever else he might be, he is clearly a loon, and if Conservative Home don’t consider his comments to be acceptable as he posted them, I would have thought they should delete them altogether, not amend them to make him look less loopy and offensive than he is.”

According to your own conservativeHome policy you are meant to DELETE his post and BAN him from posting. Why instead did you modify his comments to make them acceptable? Do you sympathise with his theme?

Apologies.

Hi Katy – I will take your word for it; I dont want to read his website in any great detail considering what an offensive bigot he is.

I will say this clearly for everyone reading. I am not a racist. I am not an anti-semite. I’m not even an anti-Israeli. What I am is someone who believes in peace and justice. These are two things that zionist israeli governments, led by some zionist terrorist prime ministers (fact), have deprived palestinians of for far too long.

You are guilty. You are guilty of not following your own editorial policies on appropriate posts. You are guilty of allowing racism on your website. You are guilty of allowing hateful posts on your website. You are guilty of allowing islamophobia on your website. You are guilty of not banning those who make racist and islamaphobic comments. You are guilty of accusing muslims who complained to Orange of being muslim extremists (ie terrorists or terrorist supporters). You are guilty of pretending this is about freedom speech.

That sort of comment doesn’t sit well next to accusations of racial, or religious, bias. That is not to say that the chap isn’t a prat of the first order, he just isn’t a Jewish one.”

How silly your ranting is. He has the israeli national flag as the picture for his homepage. You dont know whether he is an israeli or not but you assume because he has a link to a christian network that he is not israeli. Then you assume i am anti-semitic. I will assume one thing but unlike you I will be accurate in my assumption: You’re stupid.

You’ve had your say about all this, you’ve laboured your points to death, so why don’t you just go for a walk or something?

I don’t have time to follow up on every little moan about things you don’t agree with. I obviously don’t agree with what that guy said and have now taken the bits which were most likely to “offend” you in the hope that you would stop generalising about “Islamophobia” etc etc etc. He has never commented on ConHome before and is not representative of those who do.

Editing the comment further would just be to delete things you don’t agree with. Unlike what you have made clear with your moderate-sounding vendetta against Inigo Wilson, I don’t generally play the person when disagreeing with someone, I play the ball.

I’m not returning to this thread, I’m going to call my Muslim girlfriend in Tehran.