Comments on: Event: discussion on media and Pakistan’s stability

By: Naadir Jeewa

Naadir Jeewa — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:14:29 +0000

@3 Bollocks.

What we need:
The US needs to find a way for Pakistan to surrender to an unstoppable future permanent member of the UNSC, and massively crucial trading partner without losing face.

How do we get it:
Uhhhhh….

By: Kam

Kam — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:52:31 +0000

Stability is something else and security situation is something else. During ww2 when german Luftwaffe was bombing london day and dayout, night and night out, I think stability of Britain wasnt an issue. De-stability arises from anarchy, revolution, civil-war etc. TTP’s does not have such support or strenght that they can destabalize pakistan. We have a genuine security sutauation which is terrorism. No matter how much lives terrorism claims it is only classed as a high level of crime(according to law) rahter than a war. International media claims that Pakistan is being de-stabalized because they want an excuse to get rid of our nuclear program. They have played such games before please refer to suez canal crisis in 1950s and you will notice 99% resemblance.

By: Fojee Punjabi

Fojee Punjabi — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:47:22 +0000

Of course it is, they’re fighting a war on fronts that the United States has for donkey’s years.

The Taleban and al-Qaeda aren’t stupid: they’re mimicking the tactics that The West have used to spread their message of Jihad to Muslims the world over just like the Americans and Britain have used Hollywood and the such to further their cause in foreign lands.

Don’t forget: bin Laden was the CIA’s boy against the Soviets… these guys might live in caves but they certainly aren’t simpletons!

By: zak

zak — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:29:41 +0000

I’d have loved to attend this..I just got back from peshawar and boy do i have loads of stories.