<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Foreign Office and radical Islam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28359</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28359</guid>
		<description>Roger has a good point in no. 74. it&#039;s part of treating muslims as a &#039;separate&#039; crew which is obviously part of the problem in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger has a good point in no. 74. it&#8217;s part of treating muslims as a &#8216;separate&#8217; crew which is obviously part of the problem in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28357</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28357</guid>
		<description>Siraj, I think I&#039;ve worked out where you misunderstand me.  What I do (challenge other Muslims) and how I do it (without pretending that Muslims are more worse than other people).  We agree on the first bit, but maybe not the second.

I do think challenging supremacism is primarily a Muslim problem when it comes to my contact with fellow Muslims, and when there is any debate about our identity as Muslims.  I&#039;m not particularly concerned about the isolation and marginalisation you mention - I am coming at it more from the perspective of challenging hatred.  And whether you believe it or not, I take this as one of my responsibilities.

I don&#039;t think that challenging hatred is a specifically Muslim issue, however.  You may think it is.  Or you may think that arguing against supremacism is too abstract to make sense to people in the real world.  

I think focusing only on Muslims&#039; ideological shortcomings will add to their sense of injustice and paranoia, hence make it impossible to make a difference in the real world.  I think this is so obvious it makes me suspicious when people insist not only that dealing with the hatred of other Muslims is my responsibility, but also that I have to do so in an unjust and ineffective way, otherwise I am somehow one of them, an apologist, etc. etc.

I understand such people probably want to vent their anger, but if I&#039;m going to make a genuine difference, I have to ignore their advice.  Perhaps this is analogous to how the MCB is positioned.  To make a real difference they need to have credibility.  And what makes them credible to Sunny and Martin Bright, will probably be the opposite of what makes them credible to radicalised supremacists.  The question is whether they seek a particular kind of credibility in order to represent that group&#039;s opinions or to change them.

We can only speculate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siraj, I think I&#8217;ve worked out where you misunderstand me.  What I do (challenge other Muslims) and how I do it (without pretending that Muslims are more worse than other people).  We agree on the first bit, but maybe not the second.</p>
<p>I do think challenging supremacism is primarily a Muslim problem when it comes to my contact with fellow Muslims, and when there is any debate about our identity as Muslims.  I&#8217;m not particularly concerned about the isolation and marginalisation you mention &#8211; I am coming at it more from the perspective of challenging hatred.  And whether you believe it or not, I take this as one of my responsibilities.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that challenging hatred is a specifically Muslim issue, however.  You may think it is.  Or you may think that arguing against supremacism is too abstract to make sense to people in the real world.  </p>
<p>I think focusing only on Muslims&#8217; ideological shortcomings will add to their sense of injustice and paranoia, hence make it impossible to make a difference in the real world.  I think this is so obvious it makes me suspicious when people insist not only that dealing with the hatred of other Muslims is my responsibility, but also that I have to do so in an unjust and ineffective way, otherwise I am somehow one of them, an apologist, etc. etc.</p>
<p>I understand such people probably want to vent their anger, but if I&#8217;m going to make a genuine difference, I have to ignore their advice.  Perhaps this is analogous to how the MCB is positioned.  To make a real difference they need to have credibility.  And what makes them credible to Sunny and Martin Bright, will probably be the opposite of what makes them credible to radicalised supremacists.  The question is whether they seek a particular kind of credibility in order to represent that group&#8217;s opinions or to change them.</p>
<p>We can only speculate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serious Golmal &#187; Sayeedi Update</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28206</link>
		<dc:creator>Serious Golmal &#187; Sayeedi Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28206</guid>
		<description>[...] On Thursday and Friday a heated and informed discussion on Martin Bright&#8217;s documentary Who Represents British Muslims was kicking off on Pickled Politics before it was aired on Channel 4 on Friday night. One of the clerics spotlighted on the programme was the Bangladeshi MP Delwar Hossein Sayeedi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Thursday and Friday a heated and informed discussion on Martin Bright&#8217;s documentary Who Represents British Muslims was kicking off on Pickled Politics before it was aired on Channel 4 on Friday night. One of the clerics spotlighted on the programme was the Bangladeshi MP Delwar Hossein Sayeedi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28198</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 07:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28198</guid>
		<description>As a matter of interest, why do- or should- muslims need any organisations that &quot;speak&quot; for them? After all, the PM doesn&#039;t call in the Archbishop of Canterbury to learn what the views of christians are and- if he did- he&#039;d know that it was only the opinions of anglicans he&#039;d get. Muslims in the UK probably have much more in common with other non-muslims than they do with other muslims in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a matter of interest, why do- or should- muslims need any organisations that &#8220;speak&#8221; for them? After all, the PM doesn&#8217;t call in the Archbishop of Canterbury to learn what the views of christians are and- if he did- he&#8217;d know that it was only the opinions of anglicans he&#8217;d get. Muslims in the UK probably have much more in common with other non-muslims than they do with other muslims in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28196</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 07:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28196</guid>
		<description>&quot;the idea for RESPECT was formulated at a dinner party with Milne, Andrew Murray (CPB) and Galloway. &quot;
One dinner party I&#039;m glad to have missed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the idea for RESPECT was formulated at a dinner party with Milne, Andrew Murray (CPB) and Galloway. &#8221;<br />
One dinner party I&#8217;m glad to have missed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28175</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28175</guid>
		<description>Sayeedi was denied entry? Woohoo! The fucking FCO and even Dr Abdul Bari should be ashamed of themselves. The latter should be ashamed of betraying Bengalis.

Martin - Glad to see you were reading the thread. I think it is tricky to please mainstream and Muslim audiences. If it achieves the intended effect of forcing a change in government policy, then it&#039;s great news. It&#039;s time they wisened up.

But Muslim audiences need a bit more of a refined message. To be honest I don&#039;t think Michael Gove helped. There are plenty of Muslim people who dislike him for other reasons than being &quot;medievil&quot;.

I am glad of one thing - it did not demonise the British Muslim population. 

It would have been good to get Neal Robinson on there too. He was quite articulate and knowledgable at the policy exchange launch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sayeedi was denied entry? Woohoo! The fucking FCO and even Dr Abdul Bari should be ashamed of themselves. The latter should be ashamed of betraying Bengalis.</p>
<p>Martin &#8211; Glad to see you were reading the thread. I think it is tricky to please mainstream and Muslim audiences. If it achieves the intended effect of forcing a change in government policy, then it&#8217;s great news. It&#8217;s time they wisened up.</p>
<p>But Muslim audiences need a bit more of a refined message. To be honest I don&#8217;t think Michael Gove helped. There are plenty of Muslim people who dislike him for other reasons than being &#8220;medievil&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am glad of one thing &#8211; it did not demonise the British Muslim population. </p>
<p>It would have been good to get Neal Robinson on there too. He was quite articulate and knowledgable at the policy exchange launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Bright</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28167</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28167</guid>
		<description>My modest programme seems to have caused something of a stir. Sorry some of you found it disappointing, but it was only 30 minutes long - I couldn&#039;t cover everything and it had to make sense for a wider audience. The word &quot;Sufi&quot; was always going to be a problem and was clearly shorthand. But it was also the shorthand used by the interviewees. Possibly we should have used &quot;Barelwi&quot; but that is a more specific term.

The programme was always intended by me as an intervention in the deabte and seems to have done the trick in raising some important issues. I can&#039;t help people who didn&#039;t like the tone. 

I am happy to engage with anyone who wants to email me at the New Statesman. My email address is not hard to find.

And yes, it seems that Sayeedi has left the country. 

I can only hope that the government begins to wise up. Their strange love-affair with the Islamist politics of Jamaat-e-Islami and the Ikhwan needs to be scrutinised further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My modest programme seems to have caused something of a stir. Sorry some of you found it disappointing, but it was only 30 minutes long &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t cover everything and it had to make sense for a wider audience. The word &#8220;Sufi&#8221; was always going to be a problem and was clearly shorthand. But it was also the shorthand used by the interviewees. Possibly we should have used &#8220;Barelwi&#8221; but that is a more specific term.</p>
<p>The programme was always intended by me as an intervention in the deabte and seems to have done the trick in raising some important issues. I can&#8217;t help people who didn&#8217;t like the tone. </p>
<p>I am happy to engage with anyone who wants to email me at the New Statesman. My email address is not hard to find.</p>
<p>And yes, it seems that Sayeedi has left the country. </p>
<p>I can only hope that the government begins to wise up. Their strange love-affair with the Islamist politics of Jamaat-e-Islami and the Ikhwan needs to be scrutinised further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28140</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28140</guid>
		<description>The good news is that Sayeedi was denied entry into the UK this morning. Don&#039;t have full details so don&#039;t know if his visa has been permanently revoked. :-)

Woohoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that Sayeedi was denied entry into the UK this morning. Don&#8217;t have full details so don&#8217;t know if his visa has been permanently revoked. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Woohoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28113</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28113</guid>
		<description>Barelwi: traditionalist Indo-Pakistani Sunnis
Deobandi: revivalist Indo-Pakistani Sunnis
Wahhabi: revivalist Arab Sunnis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barelwi: traditionalist Indo-Pakistani Sunnis<br />
Deobandi: revivalist Indo-Pakistani Sunnis<br />
Wahhabi: revivalist Arab Sunnis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekeroftruth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28110</link>
		<dc:creator>seekeroftruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28110</guid>
		<description>For a cogent and unapologetic analysis of the present huge divide between the &#039;extremists&#039; and the &#039;moderates&#039;, please read this:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0060563397/026-0276433-5514821?v=glance&amp;n=266239

It doesn&#039;t seem at all that both parties are following the same religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a cogent and unapologetic analysis of the present huge divide between the &#8216;extremists&#8217; and the &#8216;moderates&#8217;, please read this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0060563397/026-0276433-5514821?v=glance&#038;n=266239" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0060563397/026-0276433-5514821?v=glance&#038;n=266239</a></p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem at all that both parties are following the same religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekeroftruth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28109</link>
		<dc:creator>seekeroftruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28109</guid>
		<description>Barelwi is relatively more &#039;sufi infused&#039; in the sense that there seems to be more spirituality in it, it is more easy going (they are fine with traditional music, qawali etc whereas hardline orthodox want to stop music). Barelwi Islam is considered more &#039;superstitious&#039; by puritans because many Barelwis revere their saints and claim that the Prophet was  made of &#039;light&#039; etc. Barelwis tend to be more tolerant than salafis but many people from orthodox madhabs consider Barelwis not as &#039;orthodox&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barelwi is relatively more &#8216;sufi infused&#8217; in the sense that there seems to be more spirituality in it, it is more easy going (they are fine with traditional music, qawali etc whereas hardline orthodox want to stop music). Barelwi Islam is considered more &#8216;superstitious&#8217; by puritans because many Barelwis revere their saints and claim that the Prophet was  made of &#8216;light&#8217; etc. Barelwis tend to be more tolerant than salafis but many people from orthodox madhabs consider Barelwis not as &#8216;orthodox&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fe'reeha</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28099</link>
		<dc:creator>Fe'reeha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28099</guid>
		<description>I was wholly disappointed and also slightly appalled at the lack of the research that went into the show.  

I agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wholly disappointed and also slightly appalled at the lack of the research that went into the show.  </p>
<p>I agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28085</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28085</guid>
		<description>I was wholly disappointed and also slightly appalled at the lack of the research that went into the show. I agree with the feedback made so far. 

There were some dodgy interviewees. How he managed to get it so wrong on the penetration of Sufism among Muslims and then get a &quot;Sufi&quot; to back that claim up was a bit comical. 

Naqshi is right that they confused with Sufi with Barelvi because of its roots in the initiatic orders of the Sufis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wholly disappointed and also slightly appalled at the lack of the research that went into the show. I agree with the feedback made so far. </p>
<p>There were some dodgy interviewees. How he managed to get it so wrong on the penetration of Sufism among Muslims and then get a &#8220;Sufi&#8221; to back that claim up was a bit comical. </p>
<p>Naqshi is right that they confused with Sufi with Barelvi because of its roots in the initiatic orders of the Sufis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28084</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28084</guid>
		<description>&#039;want to ignore the suffering and oppression muslims face&#039; - why only non-muslims? if you&#039;re going to be a humane sort of person you&#039;d jolly well be interested in everyone&#039;s suffering and oppression. do you think you&#039;re only meant to worry about &#039;muslim&#039; suffering?! what a parochial and selfish triabl sort of idea. not at all universalistic sort of thinking. 

what on earth is a barelwi&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;want to ignore the suffering and oppression muslims face&#8217; &#8211; why only non-muslims? if you&#8217;re going to be a humane sort of person you&#8217;d jolly well be interested in everyone&#8217;s suffering and oppression. do you think you&#8217;re only meant to worry about &#8216;muslim&#8217; suffering?! what a parochial and selfish triabl sort of idea. not at all universalistic sort of thinking. </p>
<p>what on earth is a barelwi&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinionated Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28079</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinionated Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28079</guid>
		<description>I didnt watch the show, but the main problem is that we have peole at each end of the spectrum.  On one hand there are the well to do moderate muslims that want to ignore the opression and suffering muslims face, on the other hand there are the radical elements that shout &quot;infidels&quot; at every given chance.  More muslims in the middle is needed.  Let it be noted that this is where the majority currently lie, but the non-muslim bigots want to ignore this as it crushes their arguements, just as the government want to ignore this as it exposes their shallow policies and failure to address the realities of their current failings of the terror situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt watch the show, but the main problem is that we have peole at each end of the spectrum.  On one hand there are the well to do moderate muslims that want to ignore the opression and suffering muslims face, on the other hand there are the radical elements that shout &#8220;infidels&#8221; at every given chance.  More muslims in the middle is needed.  Let it be noted that this is where the majority currently lie, but the non-muslim bigots want to ignore this as it crushes their arguements, just as the government want to ignore this as it exposes their shallow policies and failure to address the realities of their current failings of the terror situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28076</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28076</guid>
		<description>Naqshi - Are the Mirpuris and Kashmiris mostly Barelwis? That can&#039;t be right. Indian Muslims are a minority aren&#039;t they? Man, I need a Venn diagram for all this. My head hurts :(

Seeker - thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naqshi &#8211; Are the Mirpuris and Kashmiris mostly Barelwis? That can&#8217;t be right. Indian Muslims are a minority aren&#8217;t they? Man, I need a Venn diagram for all this. My head hurts <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seeker &#8211; thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28072</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28072</guid>
		<description>majority of peole being SUfi? hah what a laugh. as if majority of people know anything about gnosis! there may have been Sufis in areas where immigrants come from - what the hell does that mean - nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>majority of peole being SUfi? hah what a laugh. as if majority of people know anything about gnosis! there may have been Sufis in areas where immigrants come from &#8211; what the hell does that mean &#8211; nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naqshi</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28069</link>
		<dc:creator>naqshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28069</guid>
		<description>Sunny:  &#039;sufi&#039; is their stupid shorthand for barelwi, and there is no question at all barelwis are the overwhelming majority of asian muslims in uk, and 80 pc would really not be surprising imo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny:  &#8216;sufi&#8217; is their stupid shorthand for barelwi, and there is no question at all barelwis are the overwhelming majority of asian muslims in uk, and 80 pc would really not be surprising imo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekeroftruth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28050</link>
		<dc:creator>seekeroftruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28050</guid>
		<description>Sunny: That comment by Grove was ironic because suicide bombing is not medieval but very modern. Unlike many peaceful conservative Muslims who do actually follow medieval traditions, the Jamaat/Ikhwan people are lax in their methodology and sinister in their motives. That is why Hamas (an offshoot of Ikhwan) came up with suicide bombing which intill then was considered a big sin and heretical by orthodox Muslims. In many ways Ikhwan and Jamaat are a product of modernity and less rooted in tradition because of their &#039;ends justify the means theology&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny: That comment by Grove was ironic because suicide bombing is not medieval but very modern. Unlike many peaceful conservative Muslims who do actually follow medieval traditions, the Jamaat/Ikhwan people are lax in their methodology and sinister in their motives. That is why Hamas (an offshoot of Ikhwan) came up with suicide bombing which intill then was considered a big sin and heretical by orthodox Muslims. In many ways Ikhwan and Jamaat are a product of modernity and less rooted in tradition because of their &#8216;ends justify the means theology&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28047</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/643#comment-28047</guid>
		<description>I know seeker, I agree with all your points. I think the problem is that Martin Bright was aiming this at a white audience and at the government in a language they can understand. Muslims will get the gist but feel uncomfortable at some of the &quot;facts&quot;.

I don&#039;t believe the 80% Sufi figure either. A stretch of the imagination.

I also found Michael Gove&#039;s usage of the word &quot;medieval&quot; a bit silly too. He could say inhumane etc or opressive or whatever. But the usage of that word suggests he still believes those people (meaning Muslim scholars are from the middle ages).... I wonder if he&#039;d used that for a Christian fanatic or an ultra-orthodox Jew. Don&#039;t think so.

Bunglawala got off too easily. There are so many ways to catch him on the spot but I think Bright didn&#039;t question him enough.

A good point was made though about the govt basically ignoring the recommendations since 7/7.
The other thing is it definitely made the MCB look like government lackeys, which they pretty much are. They support each other like drunkards. It will reduce their credibility for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know seeker, I agree with all your points. I think the problem is that Martin Bright was aiming this at a white audience and at the government in a language they can understand. Muslims will get the gist but feel uncomfortable at some of the &#8220;facts&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe the 80% Sufi figure either. A stretch of the imagination.</p>
<p>I also found Michael Gove&#8217;s usage of the word &#8220;medieval&#8221; a bit silly too. He could say inhumane etc or opressive or whatever. But the usage of that word suggests he still believes those people (meaning Muslim scholars are from the middle ages)&#8230;. I wonder if he&#8217;d used that for a Christian fanatic or an ultra-orthodox Jew. Don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Bunglawala got off too easily. There are so many ways to catch him on the spot but I think Bright didn&#8217;t question him enough.</p>
<p>A good point was made though about the govt basically ignoring the recommendations since 7/7.<br />
The other thing is it definitely made the MCB look like government lackeys, which they pretty much are. They support each other like drunkards. It will reduce their credibility for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

