<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forced marriages and forced rape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galloise Blonde</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-25073</link>
		<dc:creator>Galloise Blonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-25073</guid>
		<description>The Forced Marriage Unit is putting out a handbook of guidance for social workers, teachers etc. etc., apparently to be released this Autumn, according to CIMEL. (And not a moment too soon! There&#039;s a demographic bulge of youth coming up to marriageable age right about now.) My group are currently investigating an idea from Germany: staffed advice chatrooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Forced Marriage Unit is putting out a handbook of guidance for social workers, teachers etc. etc., apparently to be released this Autumn, according to CIMEL. (And not a moment too soon! There&#8217;s a demographic bulge of youth coming up to marriageable age right about now.) My group are currently investigating an idea from Germany: staffed advice chatrooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-25065</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-25065</guid>
		<description>Anthea,

Point taken. I wasn&#039;t suggesting it would solve the problem, more that it might help in a few cases and send a signal generally. More helpful would be the idea put forward by other postrers here of a network which could help girls in that position. Ideally, someone in schools to whom they could go in confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthea,</p>
<p>Point taken. I wasn&#8217;t suggesting it would solve the problem, more that it might help in a few cases and send a signal generally. More helpful would be the idea put forward by other postrers here of a network which could help girls in that position. Ideally, someone in schools to whom they could go in confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibs</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-25064</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-25064</guid>
		<description>&quot;once again Labour has fallen victim to an army of Asian apologetics who prefer this muddle and like to pretend that the practice of forced marriages â€œis very rareâ€. What bullshit.&quot;

Well done Sunny. I wish MORE people would say the word &quot;BULLSHIT&quot; whenever they hear the oft repeated line &quot;forced marriages are very rare&quot;. It would be better if that were to happen not just on weblogs but also on prime time TV news (even if it were to be &quot;bleeped out&quot; it would still be obvious to everyone watching what was being said - i.e. the truth).

The reason this &quot;no-nonesense outspoken-ness&quot; probably DOESN&#039;T happen is probably because of a phenomenon described eloquently described by Chairwoman earlier: 

&quot;Welcome to the world of 2nd/3rd generation immigrants. This is the phase where you suddenly find yourself (in public)defending the undefendable*, and paying lip-service to customs you have no sympathy with, as not to do so appears disloyal.&quot;

Also perhaps too many 2nd/3rd generation people, like gullible cowards have bought the line &quot;you do not contradict elders no matter what they say (however ridiculous)&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;once again Labour has fallen victim to an army of Asian apologetics who prefer this muddle and like to pretend that the practice of forced marriages â€œis very rareâ€. What bullshit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well done Sunny. I wish MORE people would say the word &#8220;BULLSHIT&#8221; whenever they hear the oft repeated line &#8220;forced marriages are very rare&#8221;. It would be better if that were to happen not just on weblogs but also on prime time TV news (even if it were to be &#8220;bleeped out&#8221; it would still be obvious to everyone watching what was being said &#8211; i.e. the truth).</p>
<p>The reason this &#8220;no-nonesense outspoken-ness&#8221; probably DOESN&#8217;T happen is probably because of a phenomenon described eloquently described by Chairwoman earlier: </p>
<p>&#8220;Welcome to the world of 2nd/3rd generation immigrants. This is the phase where you suddenly find yourself (in public)defending the undefendable*, and paying lip-service to customs you have no sympathy with, as not to do so appears disloyal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also perhaps too many 2nd/3rd generation people, like gullible cowards have bought the line &#8220;you do not contradict elders no matter what they say (however ridiculous)&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthea</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24735</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;# 45 - Don: At the moment it is 18 or 16 with parental consent. Maybe that should be tweaked in the case of marriage to a non-UK citizen? &lt;/b&gt;

The problem with raising the marriage age, or even prohibiting a British asian from marrying a non-British asian is that there are ways to get around it.
I&#039;m pretty sure it applies to every, if not most asian countries, but when parents take their kids to Bangladesh or Pakistan and even India, they can still force them to get married. How? By having the civil/religious ceremonies and getting an official marriage certificate at the end of it. 

The only problem with prohibiting the marriage from happening legally by British terms by a few years, is that it doesn&#039;t give the girl or boy time to consider the issue. It only makes the British parents more scheming: they&#039;ll get married in the asian country, the british youngster will come back, they&#039;ll wait a few years before they&#039;re legally allowed to marry by British law. The marriage will most liekly still happen and the other half will eventually reach British shores either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b># 45 &#8211; Don: At the moment it is 18 or 16 with parental consent. Maybe that should be tweaked in the case of marriage to a non-UK citizen? </b></p>
<p>The problem with raising the marriage age, or even prohibiting a British asian from marrying a non-British asian is that there are ways to get around it.<br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure it applies to every, if not most asian countries, but when parents take their kids to Bangladesh or Pakistan and even India, they can still force them to get married. How? By having the civil/religious ceremonies and getting an official marriage certificate at the end of it. </p>
<p>The only problem with prohibiting the marriage from happening legally by British terms by a few years, is that it doesn&#8217;t give the girl or boy time to consider the issue. It only makes the British parents more scheming: they&#8217;ll get married in the asian country, the british youngster will come back, they&#8217;ll wait a few years before they&#8217;re legally allowed to marry by British law. The marriage will most liekly still happen and the other half will eventually reach British shores either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24654</link>
		<dc:creator>mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24654</guid>
		<description>My personal view is that parents who force their kids into marriage should be in lock-up, after a massive name-and-shame exercise.


But the British asian community is apparently not yet ready for this.

Next best is : the asian community should own up to the problem and thus OWN the problem and work *bloody actively* towards solving the issue since they are so uptight about criminalising it.They should be putting in hell of a lot more  effort than they seem to be presently. 

They can take practical measures using resources  available within the community:

For example

1. having a specific person in every mosque, temple, gurdwara who can be approached discreetly by the victim for help. This person either counsells the parents concerned and tries  mediation or reports the problem to a specific authority if no resolution is possible so that the person at risk can be rescued before he/she is whisked off to the sub-continent.

It goes without saying that the primary concern of such a resource person MUST be  the welfare of the woman/man being coerced, not the &#039;reputation&#039; of the family/community. If they shy away from this task, then they really have no business bitching if the state steps in with (hopefully harsh)legal remedies. 300 cases a year (only those reported btw) is way too much. 

2. The community needs to be the most proactive in education on this issue.The message that needs to go out is that forced marriage is WRONG. No fudging allowed.

Asians should also get the clear message that they are being given a last opportunity to police themselves.They must have a clear idea of what the repercussions might be if the problem persists.  

 Kids can be reached through school and the mass media but the parents, esp if they are ultra-traditional or not so literate, may only be reached through the socio-religious networks.

3. The community network is better placed than the state to identify those at risk. If an older sister goes off on &#039;holiday&#039; to the sub-continent (friends,neighbours and relatives often know of such trips in advance) but fails to return, can&#039;t you reasonably assume that the younger sister is at risk? If the much vaunted asian &#039;community spirit or close-knittedness&#039; really exists, then they must have the best &#039;intelligence&#039;.It&#039;s about time such intelligence is shared.

Asians must also  own up to the very close link between forced marriage and &#039;honour&#039; killing/abuse (a criminal matter, no?
The same misguided notions about female chastity/sexuality, the superiority of &#039;religious&#039; or &#039;asian&#039; values, &#039;status&#039; in the community etc  motivate both forms of violence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal view is that parents who force their kids into marriage should be in lock-up, after a massive name-and-shame exercise.</p>
<p>But the British asian community is apparently not yet ready for this.</p>
<p>Next best is : the asian community should own up to the problem and thus OWN the problem and work *bloody actively* towards solving the issue since they are so uptight about criminalising it.They should be putting in hell of a lot more  effort than they seem to be presently. </p>
<p>They can take practical measures using resources  available within the community:</p>
<p>For example</p>
<p>1. having a specific person in every mosque, temple, gurdwara who can be approached discreetly by the victim for help. This person either counsells the parents concerned and tries  mediation or reports the problem to a specific authority if no resolution is possible so that the person at risk can be rescued before he/she is whisked off to the sub-continent.</p>
<p>It goes without saying that the primary concern of such a resource person MUST be  the welfare of the woman/man being coerced, not the &#8216;reputation&#8217; of the family/community. If they shy away from this task, then they really have no business bitching if the state steps in with (hopefully harsh)legal remedies. 300 cases a year (only those reported btw) is way too much. </p>
<p>2. The community needs to be the most proactive in education on this issue.The message that needs to go out is that forced marriage is WRONG. No fudging allowed.</p>
<p>Asians should also get the clear message that they are being given a last opportunity to police themselves.They must have a clear idea of what the repercussions might be if the problem persists.  </p>
<p> Kids can be reached through school and the mass media but the parents, esp if they are ultra-traditional or not so literate, may only be reached through the socio-religious networks.</p>
<p>3. The community network is better placed than the state to identify those at risk. If an older sister goes off on &#8216;holiday&#8217; to the sub-continent (friends,neighbours and relatives often know of such trips in advance) but fails to return, can&#8217;t you reasonably assume that the younger sister is at risk? If the much vaunted asian &#8216;community spirit or close-knittedness&#8217; really exists, then they must have the best &#8216;intelligence&#8217;.It&#8217;s about time such intelligence is shared.</p>
<p>Asians must also  own up to the very close link between forced marriage and &#8216;honour&#8217; killing/abuse (a criminal matter, no?<br />
The same misguided notions about female chastity/sexuality, the superiority of &#8216;religious&#8217; or &#8216;asian&#8217; values, &#8216;status&#8217; in the community etc  motivate both forms of violence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queen Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24612</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24612</guid>
		<description>Rakhee

You have hit on an excellent idea; a forced marriage helpline, staffed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year (or at least for as many hours of the day as possible)

A telephone number that can be called freephone that will give help and advice to any girl or boy facing this situation, similar to Childline, but tailored especially for this problem, with links to police, shelters, social workers across the country, British Embassy advice etc etc

This is one practical thing that can be done. Work overtime to disseminate the telephone number across media through schools and colleges, so that it is as widely known as possible. This is the kind of thing that can be done to really help in a practical sense. These kinds of things can make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rakhee</p>
<p>You have hit on an excellent idea; a forced marriage helpline, staffed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year (or at least for as many hours of the day as possible)</p>
<p>A telephone number that can be called freephone that will give help and advice to any girl or boy facing this situation, similar to Childline, but tailored especially for this problem, with links to police, shelters, social workers across the country, British Embassy advice etc etc</p>
<p>This is one practical thing that can be done. Work overtime to disseminate the telephone number across media through schools and colleges, so that it is as widely known as possible. This is the kind of thing that can be done to really help in a practical sense. These kinds of things can make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakhee</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24610</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakhee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24610</guid>
		<description>Mirax - your comment - &quot;and as far as I know, there are no safe houses or an official network for helping them&quot; is key. There needs to be something in place for victims of forced marriages to go and there just isn&#039;t at the moment.

Sunny, your question as to what we could do. Have a couple of ideas:

1. The most powerful way of communicating this issue is to get people who have suffered a forced marriage to speak out. Is there any way we could source these women? I was reading this very story in The Asian Times today and there&#039;s a picture of a woman who has suffered a forced marriage and thankfully broken free. If we do a petition, perhaps it should be led by such women, with our support?

2. The other idea I have is to craft a letter or pledge, get it signed by organisations who are in support of legislating against forced marriages and submit it to a national paper. In a similar way to the FT letters page when companies sign a commitment for an issue (obviously the FT is not right in this case but perhaps some other title would work?)

3. In addition and linked to my comment above is to perhaps ask The Samaritans or another helpline to highlight the issue through their work. I don&#039;t know at the moment if there are specific helplines dedicated to people who suffer this type of thing? If the government aren&#039;t going to ban forced marriages, the very least they can do is support victims of it.

These are just quick ideas which may not work in this case, but it would be good to see some sort of action or solution come out of our debate....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mirax &#8211; your comment &#8211; &#8220;and as far as I know, there are no safe houses or an official network for helping them&#8221; is key. There needs to be something in place for victims of forced marriages to go and there just isn&#8217;t at the moment.</p>
<p>Sunny, your question as to what we could do. Have a couple of ideas:</p>
<p>1. The most powerful way of communicating this issue is to get people who have suffered a forced marriage to speak out. Is there any way we could source these women? I was reading this very story in The Asian Times today and there&#8217;s a picture of a woman who has suffered a forced marriage and thankfully broken free. If we do a petition, perhaps it should be led by such women, with our support?</p>
<p>2. The other idea I have is to craft a letter or pledge, get it signed by organisations who are in support of legislating against forced marriages and submit it to a national paper. In a similar way to the FT letters page when companies sign a commitment for an issue (obviously the FT is not right in this case but perhaps some other title would work?)</p>
<p>3. In addition and linked to my comment above is to perhaps ask The Samaritans or another helpline to highlight the issue through their work. I don&#8217;t know at the moment if there are specific helplines dedicated to people who suffer this type of thing? If the government aren&#8217;t going to ban forced marriages, the very least they can do is support victims of it.</p>
<p>These are just quick ideas which may not work in this case, but it would be good to see some sort of action or solution come out of our debate&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kulvinder</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24532</link>
		<dc:creator>Kulvinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24532</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find the original article on the consultation exercise that was carried out but i stand by everything i said there, reprehensible as this practise is laws already exist to cover all the issues concerned, a slight majority of asians were against the idea of these laws and education is a far better long term solution.  Those who call for new laws on any subject scare the crap out of me :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find the original article on the consultation exercise that was carried out but i stand by everything i said there, reprehensible as this practise is laws already exist to cover all the issues concerned, a slight majority of asians were against the idea of these laws and education is a far better long term solution.  Those who call for new laws on any subject scare the crap out of me <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24527</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What would be the difference between a marriage and a civil partnership?&lt;/i&gt;

Indian marriages are stupidly expensive - that&#039;s what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What would be the difference between a marriage and a civil partnership?</i></p>
<p>Indian marriages are stupidly expensive &#8211; that&#8217;s what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24523</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24523</guid>
		<description>Robert

What would be the difference between a marriage and a civil partnership?

Surely people who were minded to force their children into an alliance with someone they deemed suitable would just push them into a civil partnership instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert</p>
<p>What would be the difference between a marriage and a civil partnership?</p>
<p>Surely people who were minded to force their children into an alliance with someone they deemed suitable would just push them into a civil partnership instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24522</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24522</guid>
		<description>The Chairwoman has spent 60-odd years dealing with second generation issues in this country, Queen Bee.  How rude you were to her, and it was so utterly unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chairwoman has spent 60-odd years dealing with second generation issues in this country, Queen Bee.  How rude you were to her, and it was so utterly unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chairwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24520</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24520</guid>
		<description>Queen Bee - Sorry I took so long getting back to you.  I wasn&#039;t talking about anyone commenting on this on this site, I was talking about all the people who said that a new law wasn&#039;t necessary, who want to police themselves.  I have been second generation for a very long time and what you heard was the voice of world-weary experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Queen Bee &#8211; Sorry I took so long getting back to you.  I wasn&#8217;t talking about anyone commenting on this on this site, I was talking about all the people who said that a new law wasn&#8217;t necessary, who want to police themselves.  I have been second generation for a very long time and what you heard was the voice of world-weary experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24517</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24517</guid>
		<description>Samuel Johnson&#039;s view of arranged marriages: &quot;I believe marriages would in general be as happy, and often more so, if they were all made by the Lord Chancellor, upon a due consideration of characters and circumstances, without the parties having any choice in the matter.&quot;
Possibly it would be worth abolishing marriage except as a religious custom. Spanish anarchists had a custom of &quot;freely chosen companionship&quot; where a couple lived together entirely by choice with no religious or legal coercion. These unions were usually happier and longer-lasting than marriages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Johnson&#8217;s view of arranged marriages: &#8220;I believe marriages would in general be as happy, and often more so, if they were all made by the Lord Chancellor, upon a due consideration of characters and circumstances, without the parties having any choice in the matter.&#8221;<br />
Possibly it would be worth abolishing marriage except as a religious custom. Spanish anarchists had a custom of &#8220;freely chosen companionship&#8221; where a couple lived together entirely by choice with no religious or legal coercion. These unions were usually happier and longer-lasting than marriages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24514</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24514</guid>
		<description>coercion..by any other name...obviously this is criminal..the solution would be to deal with the problem at it&#039;s source in Pakistan (where unfortunately most cases originate) and set up a joint media campaign in the area as well as ask the pak government to toughen up its own laws in that regard..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coercion..by any other name&#8230;obviously this is criminal..the solution would be to deal with the problem at it&#8217;s source in Pakistan (where unfortunately most cases originate) and set up a joint media campaign in the area as well as ask the pak government to toughen up its own laws in that regard..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24512</guid>
		<description>Speaking of &quot;minority law&quot;, I&#039;m beginning to get a little apprehensive about the term &quot;community leaders&quot;. It implies that the ethnic/religious groups concerned really are a united, formal unit and under the authority of the aforementioned &quot;leaders&quot; who they supposedly have allegiance to. It&#039;s basically implying a state-within-a-state.

The reality, of course, is that this is not actually the case, even if (I suspect) some of these &quot;leaders&quot; -- who are certainly not democratically elected by the hundreds of thousands/millions of people they supposedly represent -- may wish to believe they are indeed in some kind of position of authority.

&quot;Community representatives&quot; -- well, possibly. Community &lt;i&gt;leaders&lt;/i&gt; -- hell, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of &#8220;minority law&#8221;, I&#8217;m beginning to get a little apprehensive about the term &#8220;community leaders&#8221;. It implies that the ethnic/religious groups concerned really are a united, formal unit and under the authority of the aforementioned &#8220;leaders&#8221; who they supposedly have allegiance to. It&#8217;s basically implying a state-within-a-state.</p>
<p>The reality, of course, is that this is not actually the case, even if (I suspect) some of these &#8220;leaders&#8221; &#8212; who are certainly not democratically elected by the hundreds of thousands/millions of people they supposedly represent &#8212; may wish to believe they are indeed in some kind of position of authority.</p>
<p>&#8220;Community representatives&#8221; &#8212; well, possibly. Community <i>leaders</i> &#8212; hell, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24510</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24510</guid>
		<description>currently the way the rules are that if you get married in Britain to a non-british citizen you have to ask &#039;permission&#039; before you get married. the reasoning being that they then have the time to check if it&#039;s a marriage of convenience - the main way they do this is to check if the non-british person is close to the expiration date of their visa.  now if someone gets married to a non-british person outside of the country, that&#039;s another matter. of course when the spouse wants to come over, they&#039;re subject to immigration rules and all the checks if the marriage is a valid one and not one just for obtaining entry blah blah. the mechanisms for checks etc. is in place. 

But again - the question still remains how best to deal  with the situation if someone&#039;s already signed the papers. really we need to be thinking about avoiding getting to that stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>currently the way the rules are that if you get married in Britain to a non-british citizen you have to ask &#8216;permission&#8217; before you get married. the reasoning being that they then have the time to check if it&#8217;s a marriage of convenience &#8211; the main way they do this is to check if the non-british person is close to the expiration date of their visa.  now if someone gets married to a non-british person outside of the country, that&#8217;s another matter. of course when the spouse wants to come over, they&#8217;re subject to immigration rules and all the checks if the marriage is a valid one and not one just for obtaining entry blah blah. the mechanisms for checks etc. is in place. </p>
<p>But again &#8211; the question still remains how best to deal  with the situation if someone&#8217;s already signed the papers. really we need to be thinking about avoiding getting to that stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galloise Blonde</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24509</link>
		<dc:creator>Galloise Blonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24509</guid>
		<description>The marriage age has been raised for everyone here in France, and in a few other European countries too. I don&#039;t see why this wouldn&#039;t help here. Sixteen is pretty young to be married; what if we made it 18, or even 21?, Although the effect would be marginal, there would still be some young women and men for whom the greater maturity  would empower them to resist parental pressure, and more independence to find the resources to do so. Also, increasing the age for everyone has, hopefully, no &#039;minority law&#039; implications, like tying it to immigration would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The marriage age has been raised for everyone here in France, and in a few other European countries too. I don&#8217;t see why this wouldn&#8217;t help here. Sixteen is pretty young to be married; what if we made it 18, or even 21?, Although the effect would be marginal, there would still be some young women and men for whom the greater maturity  would empower them to resist parental pressure, and more independence to find the resources to do so. Also, increasing the age for everyone has, hopefully, no &#8216;minority law&#8217; implications, like tying it to immigration would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24508</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24508</guid>
		<description>hardly going to address the matter of parents forcing their daughter to marry boy down the street is it now. and besides it wouldn&#039;t protect any of the 20 year olds..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hardly going to address the matter of parents forcing their daughter to marry boy down the street is it now. and besides it wouldn&#8217;t protect any of the 20 year olds..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24507</guid>
		<description>I guess there is one possible way forward, to supplement Sunny&#039;s original points. You could make the act of coercing one&#039;s child into marrying someone against their will to carry a &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; heavy criminal penalty indeed -- like rape (indeed, there may be an overlap between the two in some cases, as has been mentioned previously on this thread). Perhaps this could be extended to the &quot;manipulated marriages&quot; trend too, along with the more dangerous kidnap/threats variety.

The extensive prison sentence this would involve and the associated social condemnation should go some way towards acting as an effective deterrent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess there is one possible way forward, to supplement Sunny&#8217;s original points. You could make the act of coercing one&#8217;s child into marrying someone against their will to carry a <i>very</i> heavy criminal penalty indeed &#8212; like rape (indeed, there may be an overlap between the two in some cases, as has been mentioned previously on this thread). Perhaps this could be extended to the &#8220;manipulated marriages&#8221; trend too, along with the more dangerous kidnap/threats variety.</p>
<p>The extensive prison sentence this would involve and the associated social condemnation should go some way towards acting as an effective deterrent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/578#comment-24506</guid>
		<description>Don,

Presumably you mean &quot;tweaked&quot; in the sense of &quot;tweaked upwards&quot; (ie. older).

I don&#039;t think this will necessarily make much difference in many cases, as quite a few of the women concerned will still be living with their parents and, due to the cultural factors involved in their parents&#039; thinking, would not be able to move out until they got married. Of course increasing the age requirement will give such people a little more time to sort their lives out and get out of the house if possible.

The age amendment also won&#039;t necessarily affect the cases of sons being pushed into these situations with women they don&#039;t want to marry, regardless of whether the potential spouse is from the UK or abroad.

Although it&#039;s still a good idea and merits consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>Presumably you mean &#8220;tweaked&#8221; in the sense of &#8220;tweaked upwards&#8221; (ie. older).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this will necessarily make much difference in many cases, as quite a few of the women concerned will still be living with their parents and, due to the cultural factors involved in their parents&#8217; thinking, would not be able to move out until they got married. Of course increasing the age requirement will give such people a little more time to sort their lives out and get out of the house if possible.</p>
<p>The age amendment also won&#8217;t necessarily affect the cases of sons being pushed into these situations with women they don&#8217;t want to marry, regardless of whether the potential spouse is from the UK or abroad.</p>
<p>Although it&#8217;s still a good idea and merits consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

