<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women versus men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 09:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22303</guid>
		<description>=&gt;&quot;But I can be very fierce when roused. Grr.&quot;

For a moment there I thought Don said.....&quot;fierce when Aroused.&quot;

Easy, tiger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=&gt;&#8221;But I can be very fierce when roused. Grr.&#8221;</p>
<p>For a moment there I thought Don said&#8230;..&#8221;fierce when Aroused.&#8221;</p>
<p>Easy, tiger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22225</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22225</guid>
		<description>Gosh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22221</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22221</guid>
		<description>Don

I think you&#039;re hot too. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re hot too. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22215</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 19:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22215</guid>
		<description>mirax, El Cid,

That&#039;s awfully sweet of you. But I can be very fierce when roused. Grr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mirax, El Cid,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s awfully sweet of you. But I can be very fierce when roused. Grr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22207</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22207</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Personally, I donâ€™t regard qualities as inherently â€œmasculine or feminineâ€, but â€œpositive or negativeâ€.&lt;/i&gt;
Oooh, I dunno Jai.
Dangerous territory. 
You don&#039;t have to be a man to be masculine or female to be feminine -- modern gender politics has rightfully taught as that. However, I still believe in the concept of masculinity and femininity, and I will take that to my grave. Hence, for example, lesbians have commonalities with heterosexual men in the way they react to pheromone-like compounds.
That doesn&#039;t mean that I&#039;m saying politics is a necessarily masculine polemical pastime while social services and care is feminine. On the contrary, as I&#039;ve said before, the main barriers are practical not bilogical. You childless commentators can choose to ignore the relationship between women and these things called children if you wish but you are pissing against the wind. You can&#039;t ignore the 800lb gorrilla in the room, ya get me?
That doesn&#039;t mean that I think women should necessarily play the main role bringing up kids. I&#039;m not saying that at all. I&#039;m just being practical. There&#039;s a reason why women make good social commentators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Personally, I donâ€™t regard qualities as inherently â€œmasculine or feminineâ€, but â€œpositive or negativeâ€.</i><br />
Oooh, I dunno Jai.<br />
Dangerous territory.<br />
You don&#8217;t have to be a man to be masculine or female to be feminine &#8212; modern gender politics has rightfully taught as that. However, I still believe in the concept of masculinity and femininity, and I will take that to my grave. Hence, for example, lesbians have commonalities with heterosexual men in the way they react to pheromone-like compounds.<br />
That doesn&#8217;t mean that I&#8217;m saying politics is a necessarily masculine polemical pastime while social services and care is feminine. On the contrary, as I&#8217;ve said before, the main barriers are practical not bilogical. You childless commentators can choose to ignore the relationship between women and these things called children if you wish but you are pissing against the wind. You can&#8217;t ignore the 800lb gorrilla in the room, ya get me?<br />
That doesn&#8217;t mean that I think women should necessarily play the main role bringing up kids. I&#8217;m not saying that at all. I&#8217;m just being practical. There&#8217;s a reason why women make good social commentators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22179</link>
		<dc:creator>mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22179</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;it seems to me that women are actively dis-encouraged by â€˜female mediaâ€™ from any kind of activism - ooh yes -instead weâ€™re meant to be interested in how we can buy something that makes us attractive/fashion/ how to bag a man/millionaire etc.

Sonia, first of all, I disagree with your implied premise that women are less activist than men. It is simply not true. Societies all over the world have been revolutionised over the last century due to the activism of women. Women&#039;s political movements in the 20th century made a dramatic impact on education, economics, the environment, law and politics, civil rights, gay rights, in short nearly everything that counts and that adds to the increased democratisation  of societies. The big picture reminds us just what we owe to the women who pushed the boundaries and forever changed the world that was. The feminist/humanist/democratisation project is by no means over and even the women painting their toenails are  aware of a lot more than we may give them credit for. 


&gt;&gt; is there any indication ever given by these opinion-leaders ( for thatâ€™s how powerful they are) that we might be interested in anything else? oh no. 

I see your point but the &#039;female media&#039; you deride is not so female (in terms of of ownership and overall motive which equals increasing consumerism) and not so central to women&#039;s lives. There are lots of alternative media and real opinion leaders, so women can hardly complain that the barbie lifestyle has been somehow foisted on them. 

Also it is natural for both women and men to find the mating instinct the most predominant instinct and the media simply responds to this, it doesn&#039;t create it.I have no problems with women who simply exist to bag a millionaire - their genes may win the evolutionary race ... ;-)


&gt;&gt;and if you are, chances are there will be many female friends/relatives out there who wonder why you â€˜make a fussâ€™

Maybe. But so what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;it seems to me that women are actively dis-encouraged by â€˜female mediaâ€™ from any kind of activism &#8211; ooh yes -instead weâ€™re meant to be interested in how we can buy something that makes us attractive/fashion/ how to bag a man/millionaire etc.</p>
<p>Sonia, first of all, I disagree with your implied premise that women are less activist than men. It is simply not true. Societies all over the world have been revolutionised over the last century due to the activism of women. Women&#8217;s political movements in the 20th century made a dramatic impact on education, economics, the environment, law and politics, civil rights, gay rights, in short nearly everything that counts and that adds to the increased democratisation  of societies. The big picture reminds us just what we owe to the women who pushed the boundaries and forever changed the world that was. The feminist/humanist/democratisation project is by no means over and even the women painting their toenails are  aware of a lot more than we may give them credit for. </p>
<p>&gt;&gt; is there any indication ever given by these opinion-leaders ( for thatâ€™s how powerful they are) that we might be interested in anything else? oh no. </p>
<p>I see your point but the &#8216;female media&#8217; you deride is not so female (in terms of of ownership and overall motive which equals increasing consumerism) and not so central to women&#8217;s lives. There are lots of alternative media and real opinion leaders, so women can hardly complain that the barbie lifestyle has been somehow foisted on them. </p>
<p>Also it is natural for both women and men to find the mating instinct the most predominant instinct and the media simply responds to this, it doesn&#8217;t create it.I have no problems with women who simply exist to bag a millionaire &#8211; their genes may win the evolutionary race &#8230; <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;and if you are, chances are there will be many female friends/relatives out there who wonder why you â€˜make a fussâ€™</p>
<p>Maybe. But so what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22172</link>
		<dc:creator>mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 14:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22172</guid>
		<description>Swati, I think it will be illuminating for some of us here if you&#039;d elaborate on what specifically prompted YOU to blog for the first time here and maybe, throw some light on what held you back previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swati, I think it will be illuminating for some of us here if you&#8217;d elaborate on what specifically prompted YOU to blog for the first time here and maybe, throw some light on what held you back previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22170</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 14:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22170</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; excuse the typo &lt;/i&gt;  what typo ?  All I can see is the extra &#039;full stop&#039; at the end of your post :-)

Sunny - can we have the preview back ?  and for Xmas can we have a spell checker?

Justforfun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> excuse the typo </i>  what typo ?  All I can see is the extra &#8216;full stop&#8217; at the end of your post <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sunny &#8211; can we have the preview back ?  and for Xmas can we have a spell checker?</p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22169</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 14:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22169</guid>
		<description>Sunny  &lt;i&gt; That surely has an impact on political life too. Most newspaper commentators on politics are men. The women are usually social commentators.&lt;/i&gt;  -  A good point and subtle distinction that I would not personally draw because I think politics at the moment is more about &#039;social&#039; issues while the politics of ideology  or at least Party Politics has been a bit dead for the last decade, or have I been asleep?  Its seems Conservate Lite has been the prevalent thought since 1992.  Are things changing?

Or perhaps I have misunderstood you and when you mean &#039;politics&#039; you mean the day to day practice of politics in Westminister.   I must say I don&#039;t read that many newspapers so I don&#039;t have a view, but if CIF is an example - is the female/male commentator split 50/50 and mostly over most areas?


Justforfun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny  <i> That surely has an impact on political life too. Most newspaper commentators on politics are men. The women are usually social commentators.</i>  &#8211;  A good point and subtle distinction that I would not personally draw because I think politics at the moment is more about &#8216;social&#8217; issues while the politics of ideology  or at least Party Politics has been a bit dead for the last decade, or have I been asleep?  Its seems Conservate Lite has been the prevalent thought since 1992.  Are things changing?</p>
<p>Or perhaps I have misunderstood you and when you mean &#8216;politics&#8217; you mean the day to day practice of politics in Westminister.   I must say I don&#8217;t read that many newspapers so I don&#8217;t have a view, but if CIF is an example &#8211; is the female/male commentator split 50/50 and mostly over most areas?</p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swati</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22168</link>
		<dc:creator>swati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22168</guid>
		<description>excuse the typo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excuse the typo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swati</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22167</link>
		<dc:creator>swati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22167</guid>
		<description>i think the discussion is getting expanded to a larger topic and is not limiting to the premise that &#039;do women blog/respond&#039; more...its now talking politics and media on a larger scape..

thank you all, the discussion sure promted me to blog for the first time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the discussion is getting expanded to a larger topic and is not limiting to the premise that &#8216;do women blog/respond&#8217; more&#8230;its now talking politics and media on a larger scape..</p>
<p>thank you all, the discussion sure promted me to blog for the first time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22164</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22164</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I believe that on a platform this virtual its the viewpoint that matters. &lt;/i&gt;  100% agreement - It cannot be any otherway. 

Swati - &lt;i&gt;But tell me would you correct you spouse, sibling or parent.&lt;/i&gt;  I don&#039;t know quite what you mean, but I understand your point about role models in the house and these are past on.  I did not raise the issue because I think it can be corrected in one generation or because I think there is blame to be aportioned but rather to just explore the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> I believe that on a platform this virtual its the viewpoint that matters. </i>  100% agreement &#8211; It cannot be any otherway. </p>
<p>Swati &#8211; <i>But tell me would you correct you spouse, sibling or parent.</i>  I don&#8217;t know quite what you mean, but I understand your point about role models in the house and these are past on.  I did not raise the issue because I think it can be corrected in one generation or because I think there is blame to be aportioned but rather to just explore the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22162</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22162</guid>
		<description>i think all this is relevant to and has an impact on political activism - definitely. if you&#039;re not allowed to feel confident to speak your mind - why then you won&#039;t - and what an effective way to curb dissent. 

it seems to me that women are actively dis-encouraged by &#039;female media&#039; from any kind of activism - ooh yes -instead we&#039;re meant to be interested in how we can buy something that makes us attractive/fashion/ how to bag a man/millionaire etc. is there any indication ever given by these opinion-leaders ( for that&#039;s how powerful they are) that we might be interested in anything else? oh no. and if you are, chances are there will be many female friends/relatives out there who wonder why you &#039;make a fuss&#039;

mary wolstonecraft shelley would turn in her grave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think all this is relevant to and has an impact on political activism &#8211; definitely. if you&#8217;re not allowed to feel confident to speak your mind &#8211; why then you won&#8217;t &#8211; and what an effective way to curb dissent. </p>
<p>it seems to me that women are actively dis-encouraged by &#8216;female media&#8217; from any kind of activism &#8211; ooh yes -instead we&#8217;re meant to be interested in how we can buy something that makes us attractive/fashion/ how to bag a man/millionaire etc. is there any indication ever given by these opinion-leaders ( for that&#8217;s how powerful they are) that we might be interested in anything else? oh no. and if you are, chances are there will be many female friends/relatives out there who wonder why you &#8216;make a fuss&#8217;</p>
<p>mary wolstonecraft shelley would turn in her grave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22161</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22161</guid>
		<description>.. i.e. the practicalities of having them, rearing them, etc.. that is the main factor holding back women in politics. 
to suggest otherwise is fresh-faced naivety!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. i.e. the practicalities of having them, rearing them, etc.. that is the main factor holding back women in politics.<br />
to suggest otherwise is fresh-faced naivety!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22160</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22160</guid>
		<description>Are you going to factor in children/babies at all into your reasoning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you going to factor in children/babies at all into your reasoning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22159</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22159</guid>
		<description>what i mean - just re-read that and i thought others may misunderstand me. not that &#039;women&#039; as a whole need to think of a &#039;position&#039; per se - but that we need to be reflexive about how our behaviour to each other can reinforce certain stereotypes. i find it very  irritating the no. of women who go around actively &#039;promoting&#039; an airhead image for &lt;em&gt;all other&lt;/em&gt; women -  under the &#039;oh its girly to be doing this..&quot; type of comment. if they want to be airheads fine. its not ok to imply that &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; women are like that just cos they are. it&#039;s back to the same point - the group allowing the individual members to be themselves, without being forced to partake of some elusive &#039;group identity&#039;. Women&#039;s &#039;mags&#039; definitely go all out to promote what they think of as a &#039;feminine identity&#039; and by golly it seems to work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i mean &#8211; just re-read that and i thought others may misunderstand me. not that &#8216;women&#8217; as a whole need to think of a &#8216;position&#8217; per se &#8211; but that we need to be reflexive about how our behaviour to each other can reinforce certain stereotypes. i find it very  irritating the no. of women who go around actively &#8216;promoting&#8217; an airhead image for <em>all other</em> women &#8211;  under the &#8216;oh its girly to be doing this..&#8221; type of comment. if they want to be airheads fine. its not ok to imply that <em>all</em> women are like that just cos they are. it&#8217;s back to the same point &#8211; the group allowing the individual members to be themselves, without being forced to partake of some elusive &#8216;group identity&#8217;. Women&#8217;s &#8216;mags&#8217; definitely go all out to promote what they think of as a &#8216;feminine identity&#8217; and by golly it seems to work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22158</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22158</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;i think anyone can see it ainâ€™t just the men - the women are doing a pretty good job keeping these attitudes and practices alive!&lt;/i&gt;

Though I was thinking more in terms of political activism, in keeping sexist traditions alive, you are right.


Mirax:
&lt;i&gt;that Iâ€™d have thought youâ€™d have quoted as a â€˜female voiceâ€™.&lt;/i&gt;
She&#039;s been a bit quiet though recently.

&lt;i&gt;It is just wise to be aware of deeply ingrained social and cultural (desi culture is spectacularly sexist) conditioning.&lt;/i&gt;
And I have no problems with you making me (or us) more aware of this. I&#039;m more than happy to constantly evaluate my own use of language or actions.


The other point Swati and justforfun make about blogs v real life. Although my examples did relate to internet discussions, I believe the same could probably be applied to real life (though I could be wrong). 

As Sonia brilliantly gave an example of above - women are encouraged in discussions to keep a tone of moderation while men ge away with being loud and beliggerent. 

That surely has an impact on political life too. Most newspaper commentators on politics are men. The women are usually social commentators. 

I also think that though it is partly the men holding back women in parliamentary politics, that it could also be that not enough women are applying or making an angry noise about not being represented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>i think anyone can see it ainâ€™t just the men &#8211; the women are doing a pretty good job keeping these attitudes and practices alive!</i></p>
<p>Though I was thinking more in terms of political activism, in keeping sexist traditions alive, you are right.</p>
<p>Mirax:<br />
<i>that Iâ€™d have thought youâ€™d have quoted as a â€˜female voiceâ€™.</i><br />
She&#8217;s been a bit quiet though recently.</p>
<p><i>It is just wise to be aware of deeply ingrained social and cultural (desi culture is spectacularly sexist) conditioning.</i><br />
And I have no problems with you making me (or us) more aware of this. I&#8217;m more than happy to constantly evaluate my own use of language or actions.</p>
<p>The other point Swati and justforfun make about blogs v real life. Although my examples did relate to internet discussions, I believe the same could probably be applied to real life (though I could be wrong). </p>
<p>As Sonia brilliantly gave an example of above &#8211; women are encouraged in discussions to keep a tone of moderation while men ge away with being loud and beliggerent. </p>
<p>That surely has an impact on political life too. Most newspaper commentators on politics are men. The women are usually social commentators. </p>
<p>I also think that though it is partly the men holding back women in parliamentary politics, that it could also be that not enough women are applying or making an angry noise about not being represented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22157</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22157</guid>
		<description>and this business about it doesn&#039;t matter who blogs - ahem! of course it does - blogs aren&#039;t just about &#039;fighting&#039; and &#039;winning arguments&#039; - they can be if the participants so choose - but the fact that more individuals can publish and have their voice heard. 

now i&#039;d say a lot of women do blog and are &#039;opinion-formers&#039;..but what are they blogging about? &#039;group&#039; influences has a lot to do with this. women&#039;s magazines and other influential media clearly have a big impact on the self-image of women and what we&#039;re supposed to be interested in. there&#039;s plenty of participation on the internet in terms of &#039;shopping&#039; and &#039;lifestyle discussion forums&#039;  - so what does this say? now i wouldn&#039;t say ..ooh this is necessarily a problem - after all if someone wants to blog or not blog, sit and talk about shopping and gossip - that&#039;s &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; business as an individual. but it seems to appear that a lot of women may be doing different things if they felt it wouldn&#039;t be considered &#039;unfeminine&#039; and that&#039;s something women collectively need to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and this business about it doesn&#8217;t matter who blogs &#8211; ahem! of course it does &#8211; blogs aren&#8217;t just about &#8216;fighting&#8217; and &#8216;winning arguments&#8217; &#8211; they can be if the participants so choose &#8211; but the fact that more individuals can publish and have their voice heard. </p>
<p>now i&#8217;d say a lot of women do blog and are &#8216;opinion-formers&#8217;..but what are they blogging about? &#8216;group&#8217; influences has a lot to do with this. women&#8217;s magazines and other influential media clearly have a big impact on the self-image of women and what we&#8217;re supposed to be interested in. there&#8217;s plenty of participation on the internet in terms of &#8216;shopping&#8217; and &#8216;lifestyle discussion forums&#8217;  &#8211; so what does this say? now i wouldn&#8217;t say ..ooh this is necessarily a problem &#8211; after all if someone wants to blog or not blog, sit and talk about shopping and gossip &#8211; that&#8217;s <em>their</em> business as an individual. but it seems to appear that a lot of women may be doing different things if they felt it wouldn&#8217;t be considered &#8216;unfeminine&#8217; and that&#8217;s something women collectively need to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swati</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22156</link>
		<dc:creator>swati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22156</guid>
		<description>Justforfun - i think you made a valid point -reffering to how we are brought up. Mothers, women, wives - we watch them around us. But tell me would you correct you spouse, sibling or parent. The influence is also the role models we observe in the house. The treatment received  by grandfathers, fathers, uncles.

but coming back to the basic discussion, does it really make u feel better that there are less women responding, do u feel sorry that there are less women on blog, ..I mean why would a blogger want to know the gender of the respondent.

I believe that on a platform this virtual its the viewpoint that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justforfun &#8211; i think you made a valid point -reffering to how we are brought up. Mothers, women, wives &#8211; we watch them around us. But tell me would you correct you spouse, sibling or parent. The influence is also the role models we observe in the house. The treatment received  by grandfathers, fathers, uncles.</p>
<p>but coming back to the basic discussion, does it really make u feel better that there are less women responding, do u feel sorry that there are less women on blog, ..I mean why would a blogger want to know the gender of the respondent.</p>
<p>I believe that on a platform this virtual its the viewpoint that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/543#comment-22155</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t regard qualities as inherently &quot;masculine or feminine&quot;, but &quot;positive or negative&quot;.

It puts a different spin on things if one views behaviour and virtues/vices in this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t regard qualities as inherently &#8220;masculine or feminine&#8221;, but &#8220;positive or negative&#8221;.</p>
<p>It puts a different spin on things if one views behaviour and virtues/vices in this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

