Could you at the very least provide a link to whatever it was Hatty’s Place (yeah, I know, it’s a spelling error, but it is quite funny) had to say about this?

Frankly, it is a tad hard to understand how Inyat Bunglawala, who I actually quite like, managed to make it into op-ed at fifteen or so.

Perhaps you could explain to your friendly and forgiving audience?

The dearth of actual supporting evidence from you, so far, is a tad damning to your case.

I’m sure you’ll rally to it though!

Pip! Pip!

munir

Any chance you could tell us how you know that Inayat Bunglawala pointed out that the BBC had two Jewish BBC heads at the age of 15?

There are can only be one of three answers:

1) You knew Inayat Bunglawala at that age and he told you so.
2) You are making it up.
3) You are Inayat Bunglawala and you have just inadvertently blown your identity.

Or
4) The written word is not good at conveying exagerration. Perhaps I should have added some !!! for the pea-brained and conspiratorial loonies amongst us

I know you think all Muslims are the same but
I can confirm that I am not Inayat Bunglawala.
Inayat posts on CIF and posts comments there under his real name. Why on earth would he come on another blog and start posting under another name ?

Its even more dim since I said “got upset with Inayat Bunglawala for pointing this out, when he was 15.” . Why would Inayat Bunglawala refer to himself in the third person? Is he a boxer?

You remind me of the idiots on HP who whenever someone posts a pro-Muslim comment think it must be Bob Pitt

Never mind. Whatever keeps you happy.

I have won the argument, you have retired wounded. Or rather, with your brain aching from trying to think too much!

Comparing me to holocaust deniers is some desperate stuff.

You have proved nothing. Just because you heard something somewhere does not make it evidence. When you make an allegation, reference it to a link or a document, or publish documents you have seen.

Take this as my last comment on this issue, until you can corroborate what you have said.

Allah knows best.

I understand the boys at HP got upset with Inayat Bunglawala for pointing this out, when he was 15.

That reads like a twofold claim:
1) HP got upset with Bunglawala for pointing out that the BBC has had 2 Jewish controllers previously.
2) Inayat Bunglawala already made this opinion known at the age of 15

His opinions were not published when he was 15. How did “munir” know this?

I understand the boys at HP got upset with Inayat Bunglawala for pointing this out, when he was 15.

HP was set up in 2002. That would make Inayat currently 22-ish? Or are you saying HP discovered something a schoolboy had said and attacked it? Link? That needs to be backed up. On the face of it the claim is bizarre. But I await the evidence.

Any chance you could tell us how you know that Inayat Bunglawala pointed out that the BBC had two Jewish BBC heads at the age of 15?

There are can only be one of three answers:

1) You knew Inayat Bunglawala at that age and he told you so.
2) You are making it up.
3) You are Inayat Bunglawala and you have just inadvertently blown your identity.

Which one?

They’re just such a bunch of PC ass kissers to minorities aint they marv.. I mean dont you know theyve had two Jewish BBC 1 heads !How incredibly predictable the beeb would manage to find, from a tiny 0.5% of the population, a Jew to head up the controllers post!

I understand the boys at HP got upset with Inayat Bunglawala for pointing this out, when he was 15.

munir, do you have a link to this specific story of HP getting upset with Inayat for pointing this out when he was 15.

That sounds very interesting.

You are running HDD here, that’s Holocaust Denial Defence and because you have a very short span of attention I will explain it.

What deniers like David Irving, Paul Rassinier and others do is to look at a mass of evidence and then select one or two bits of it which they will attack and then claim that the whole is a forgery.

Let us look at your latest contribution. I have made very specific allegations against named individuals all of which I have backed up with evidence and references. What you have done, or so it seems as some of what you write is simply incomprehensible, is to take the fact that Stonewall has praised Tower Hamlets for being user friendy to Gays and that the acting Chief Executive is gay and that therefore proves that the Labour Party isn’t under special measures, has had the right of chossing candidates taken away from them or any of the other things I have written about which you haven’t challenged.

The acting Chief Executive took over the post immediately the main one, Martin Smith was sacked by Lutfor Rahman. It was simple procedure. Also employment is a matter for the Personel Dpt and the cabinet have nothing to do with so if for instance the Libraries have a high proportion of Gay people working in them, and it certainly looks that way to me, that has got nothing to do with the leadership.

There is also a great deal of two facedness to the whole thing.Let us go back to the leadership’s favourite Immam Al-Sudais. Well we know what he thinks about the Jews, he has been convicted out of his own mouth.

In June 2004 he led 10,000 people for inter-faith peace and harmony assisted by the Chief Rabbi who might have taken a different course of action had he known that Al-Sudais thought he was a monkey and a pig.

I also understand that there is something in either the Koran or the Hadiths which approves of lying to Kufirs if it advances the faith. Perhaps someone could enlighten us.

I have refered to Martin Smith being given the sack by Lutfor Rahman. While Smith has taken a six figure pay off and has a gagging clause in the deal some of the reasons for his getting the order of the boot are beginning to emerge from the very leaky ship Tower Hamlets.

It seems he was given a list of people to sack including some prominent gays as well as being ordered to hand the freehold of the land the mosque is built on to be handed to the mosque management. As both were illegal he refused and got the boot.

I have no idea of any other documentaries that John Ware has made, I only know of this one and I wouldlike his allegations to be dealt with. If you can’t disprove them you accept them.

It is also interesting that in spite of all of the Saudi millions at tye disposal of the mosquue and Al-Sudais that they haven’t used their retained lawyers Peter Carter Ruck to sue anyone. Carter Ruck is of course one of the most successful and expensive libel firms in the country. Interesting that.

They are also retained by Baroness Pola Uddin who is featured in today’s Sunday Times as being involved in more corruption. Interesting article from the Insight team. I fully expect Inspector Knacker of The Yard to be knocking on her door in Wapping soon.

Moo!

pounded away with his tiny pole
hard he tried to make it groan
with his tiny little stick

Really? Would you care to expand on that?

munir,
In my opinion, and it’s obviously subjective, you are far and away the most abusive abd offensive commenter (barring known trolls)here. Others contend, but you hold the crown.

It is becoming seriously detrimental to the site, every thread is derailed. You can argue without that, so I suggest you rein back and start doing it.

“Harry’s Place – I have just seen this unspeakable smear campaign – “part 1″ – against my colleague Mehdi Hasan at the New Statesman. You have just lowered yourself to the rankest form of fact-free, context-free, bent hatchet-job “blogging”. I am one of many outsiders who is repulsed. You pose as a quasi-intellectual blog-site, and yet you operate with no rules of journalism. Let me, therefore, offer you some facts.
I
have known Mehdi Hasan for seven years. In that time I have been honoured to know an actively moderate Muslim; easily the most moderate Muslim I have met and among the most religious people I know, and that catagory includes senior members of the Anglican communion to which I belong.

Mehdi Hasan does indeed have a double life: and it is the exact opposite to what your libelous bile presents. At the same time as being dismissed on neo-con sites like this as an “extremist” or fan of bin Laden, he in fact lectures his own community of London Shias of the need to integrate and be fully British. He does this on a weekly or monthly basis.

Only a few months ago Tony McNulty MP – not known for his pro-extremist stances – praised Mehdi Hasan at a public meeting in the House of Commons. He said he was previously unaware that this kind of speaking – in which Muslims were told by a Muslim to inegrate and be British – took place within the community.

This clip which you have seedily honed in on merely shows him sticking up for religion in the way that your heroes Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins denounce it and passionately defend atheism. As a Christian believer myself, I agree with Mehdi Hasan in his comments you seek to sensationalize – tell me then Harry’s Place, does that make me one of your targets, or are your dangerous smears purely based on race?

You have disgraced yourself, and it would be amusing were it not a calculated attempt to damage a man’s reputation. I have never known a more open-minded person who speaks publicly on religion. Many a time have I heard Mehdi Hasan angrily denounce anti-semitism, racism, prejudice of any kind.

If you seriously intend to run this series, by a doubtless fake “Channel 4 insider” – what have you got to hide, C4 Insider? Surely this is a great story if you are on safe ground? – then you had better be prepared for the consequences. Legalities aside, you threaten to shame your web site once and for all.

I feel like I am posting on the BNP site, and it is on that level that you will place yourselves with this pathetic smear, based purely on the fact that Mehdi got the better of your contributors last week. If you are going to go after him, go after me too – as I agree with almost everything he says about the world’s religions.

Mehdi Hasan is a friend, a colleague, and someone who deserves the utmost praise for his amazing role as an educator and moderator of those in his own faith.

It’s time for you to decide: are you going to be a serious blogsite, or are you going to place yourselves in the same catagory as bnp.org.uk?

Think about it.”

Previously you claimed that the Council is an extremist outpost run by terrorist Muslim Labour councillors. The same councillors who have recently appointed an interim chief executive (Kevan Collins) who is gay

The council also is trying to ban Hiz ut Tahris

http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2009/1/27/tower-hamlets-council-labour-group-votes-for-ban-on-hizb-ut.html

BilleracyDicky is a lier and a fantasist,

terrorist Muslim Labour councillors.

Though he may have a point as the Labour party has been involved in illegal terrorism, such as invading Iraq