LINK! Phwoooar

What about Nick Griffin & his fellow Englishmen in Wales, too?

This thread is a right laugh. I think some of these commentors need to be introduced to the “Babes of the BNP” to let loose of some of their inhibitions & problems- that is if they’re not in the closet!

Yes, been there, done that and debated with him in person, on why his theories on social capital and trust are not quite what they are made out to be. Quite a few people out there disagree with Putnam.

Give your whining a fucking rest will you. The police around here show no problem in harassing youths, especially of Somali origin, if they do anything out of the ordinary. The PC lefty brigade indeed. Some of you people have so much of a chip on your shoulder you should carry around a victim card just so we know not to engage you.

I suggest you report this to the police if they are causing a disturbance and it is unsafe for your children to play in the local park unsupervised.

Before you offer the assumption that the PC lefty brigade police force won’t do anything because they’re too busy upholding the rights of these foreign scum, perhaps you should give them a call. And if you’ve called them already, write a letter of complaint to them. And if they didn’t bother responding, write another one and send it by special delivery. And if they still don’t reply, write a letter to your local MP. And still, if nothing is done, perhaps supervise your children when they go to the park to play on the swings.

It doesn’t matter if it’s Somali men chewing khat, or English chavs shooting heroin in your park. If it is illegal, report it.

PS Love the link between the notion that Somalis may change the name of Leicester to the fact that they take drugs in childrens play areas.

I don’t know what name the Somali Men use for our local park, where they sit on the swings brawling, shouting and taking drugs all day. Only that our children cannot go there anymore.

Think you mean Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide requires that they be killed, not just paid to move home.

“Perhaps you could convince some of the British who’ve moved over to Spain to come back so that their presence alone (and possibly sheer numbers) could balance out the figures?”

Cos then THEY’D be immigrants too. Won’t somebody please think of the children?

People think this of you because you call for the genocide of Britain’s largest non-Christian religious minority. A position incidentally more extreme even than the aforementioned “knuckle-dragging tatooed fascist beast(s).”

Britain must NOT become an impoverished multi-ethnic slum or even – a more upmarket vision, this – a large International Airport transit lounge.

A Harvard scholar, Robert Putnam, has established that multi-ethnic societies are low-trust societies. Dig out his work and the work of scoffers and detractors and judge the issue for yourselves.

Israel might seem a visible exception, but there the very real external [and internal] threat of Islam and/or secular Arab Nationalism keeps the wagons in a circle.

Hold on a mo, following your logic, there is no increase in population in Leicester, as 10,000-10,000 is zero.

Unless the Somalis decide to rename Leicester, I think it’ll still be there. And if they do rename it, I hope it’s something fun like “Bester” coz it’s the best, which is why they all moved there.

That aside, it is predicted that 70% of the population increase will be made up of people emmigrating to the UK, which leaves 30% actually born here? What if that 30% are from mixed race couples, or British Asians, or British Africans, or British Caribbeans?

There will LITERALLY be NO WHITES left in the UK!

Perhaps you could convince some of the British who’ve moved over to Spain to come back so that their presence alone (and possibly sheer numbers) could balance out the figures?

No 70% of the INCREASE, not the whole. All of these figures refer to NETT Immigration which is in itself disingenuous. 10000 Somalis move to Leicester, 10000 whites leave,result – No Increase but it aint Lecester anymore.

So, what they’re saying is that 70% of the whole population of the UK in 2031 will be immigrants?

“The elephant in the room is the huge impact of migration on overall demand for housing. The Government has lost control of immigration, and does not have a housing policy to cope with the consequences. Immigration now accounts for nearly 40 per cent of new households. The waiting lists for social housing in England have risen by 60 per cent in six years and now include nearly 5 million people. Looking ahead, official statistics show that we will have to build a new home every five minutes for the next twenty years or so just for future migrants. With public spending under such pressure, the first step must be to reduce this major source of housing demand.”
Official figures released a fortnight ago showed that the projected number of households in England will rise from 21.52 million (2006) to 25.44 million in 2021. This is a rise of almost 4 million households in 15 years. According to Government forecasts, 70% of the population increase up to 2031 will be due to immigration. The largest single reason for household formation is immigration, which will account for almost 40% of all new household formation in England. More details can be found here

http://www.balancedmigration.com/pressreleases/Pressreleaseonregionaltrends240609.pdf

Following the European elections on 4 June, at which two BNP MEPs were elected to the European Parliament for the first time, Migrationwatch commissioned a YouGov poll on behalf of the Cross Party Group. The poll showed that 35 per cent of voters listed immigration as an issue that most influenced their decision, above the NHS, crime, education and the environment.

Fiddling the figures, as usual!!!!

Think youll find that we already have a system of voluntary repatriation. If people dont like it in the UK they leave (as many white Britons including BNPers do). There are no border police stopping people leaving the country. If they do like it, they stay.

This exposes the pernicous reality behind sugar coated pharses like “voluntary repatriation” which if the BNP ever got in (which they wouldnt) would be heavy on the second and light on the latter.

If they really can’t support themselves then of course I don’t think the taxpayer should support them. The only BNP policy I agree with (apart from leaving the EU) is voluntary repatriation. Sometimes it doesn’t work out and people find this isn’t the promised land after all, so having not made their fortune they should go back.

However, if it weren’t for such shit as the “policy” I described above, they’d have more of a chance.

Yes, a lot of blacks and Asians are part of the underclass and they too are receiving support for making lifestyle choices they can’t pay for, which is wrong. The problem is the overreach of the welfare state rather than any race, which is why I am anti-racist.

I have a special hatred of the BNP because of personal circumstances, but if we withdrew state housing and support for large, workless families and had a basic CBI for those who fall through the cracks we’d be better off.

I am currently a higher rate taxpayer but I have been unemployed before. I might lose my job. If so I’d claim basic unemployment benefit because that is what the welfare state was set up to do and I wouldn’t give a fuck about it if that was all it did.

If there was a basic CBI then people would know that any work they did would immediately and obviously make them better off so they would work. They would also refrain from having large families with no means of support.