Don’t you mean ‘reinvent the pseudointellectual ramblings of a BNP activist who used to be a vocal supporter of South African apartheid whose past works include articles written for a radical American white separatist organisation’?

In any case, it’s a funny read. I especially liked how all the achievements of ancient Egypt were the results of white Egyptians rather than the brown ones, so thanks for that.

People usually include a link to things they quote so that a) readers can go away and have a look for themselves, and b) to avoid the impression that they’re passing other people’s work off as their own.

It’s an honesty thing, which might be difficult for BNP types to understand.

That’s all very impressive. You’ve convinced me (that you’re able to ctrl+c/ctrl+v like a mofo) but you didn’t answer my question #118 Why is ethnicity such a big deal to you?

Yes. I’m one of those lazy idiots who prefers not to reinvent the wheel every five minutes.

I disagree with you Don. The term ‘collective’ is a valid to the question I raised. And here is why.

I share the view that a ‘race’ is defined as a group of individuals sharing common genetic attributes which determine that group’s physical appearance and, more controversially, their cognitive abilities. Ethnicity is defined as the creation of groupings by individuals (most often within racial groups but also possible across racial divides) of certain common traditions, languages, art forms, attitudes and other means of expression.

A culture is the name given to the physical manifestations created by ethnic groupings – the actual language, art forms, religion and social order and achievements of a particular ethnic group.

In practical terms then, it is possible to talk of a White race; of a Scottish ethnicity and a Scottish culture. The last two – ethnicity and culture – are directly dependent upon each other, and in fact flow from each other in a symbiotic relationship.

What exactly is meant by the White race? Essentially there are three main sub groupings to the White race, with two further divisions of note. The three major sub groupings are known to academics as Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean.

Although these names have come about mainly as a result of the geographic areas these sub groupings have been associated with in the Christian era (Nordics in northern Europe, Alpines in central Europe and Mediterraneans in southern Europe) it is incorrect to believe that these groupings always occupied these regions. These three main sub groupings have played a role in events in almost every geographical region where the White race as a group has appeared.

Of these three original groupings, only two are existent in any large numbers today: the Nordics and the Alpines. The original Mediterraneans of ancient history are not to be confused with those people loosely termed “Mediterranean” today – the present day inhabitants of the Mediterranean region are largely mixtures of several races, with the original White Mediterranean component for the greatest part having long since been submerged amongst invasions first of the Nordic and Alpine White sub-groupings, and then under non-White Arabic, Turkish and other Middle Eastern and North African racial groupings.

To illustrate the concept of these three main sub groupings: although there is a broadly termed “Black race” in existence, there are major sub-groupings amongst that racial grouping: the Congo basin Pygmy and the ultra tall Masai tribesmen of Kenya are two good examples of sub groupings within the Black racial group.

A sub grouping is therefore a branch of a particular race which exhibits slightly different physical characteristics but still shares enough of a common genetic inheritance with other sub-groupings to be included in a broad racial category.

It is worth stating again, as it is of great significance in more ways than one, that there are very few of the original Mediterranean racial types left in the world today. They were known as the “Old Europeans” and inhabited large parts of Europe, Egypt, the Middle and Near East and Egypt at the dawn of history.

These Mediterranean types bear almost no resemblance to the present day inhabitants of the Mediterranean basin: the original Old Europeans have been absorbed almost completely into either the Nordic/Alpine stock in Europe itself, or the African/Semitic/Asian stock of North Africa, the Near and Middle East.

The only place in Europe where occasional glimpses of this original Mediterranean racial sub grouping can still be seen, is in the Celtic fringes of Britain, most notably in Wales and Devonshire, and in the Basque territory of Spain. In these regions there exists a short dark strain – remnants of the original inhabitants of Europe.

Pure examples of this Mediterranean type are however still fairly rare, as even they have for the largest degree had some Nordic or Alpine admixture over the years.

Two other White racial sub groupings exist (called Dinarics and East Baltics) – these groupings are to the largest degree the result of mixtures of the three main sub groupings. The Dinarics and East Baltics are found in large numbers in present day Eastern Europe, and exhibit Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean physical characteristics.

A very small percentage of these two sub-groupings also display the physical characteristics resulting from physical mixing with the waves of Asiatic invaders who penetrated Europe from the east during the course of history.

How is race tracked in civilization? How is it determined whether the populations of certain societies or civilization belonged to specific races? The answer to this is simple: race in history is tracked in four ways: palaeoserology, art forms, language, and the science of genetics. This last test has only come into its own in the last ten years of the 20th Century, but has proven to be a major aid in tracking racial history.

——————-

I don’t want to bore you further Don. Suffice to say ‘Whites’ have occupied the landmass of Europe since the last ice age 15′000 years ago.

This is our land. Nobody will convice us otherwise so long as we retain the knowledge of our ancestry inside us.

Made for an amusing mistake though, hahaha.

Q1. Who, or what collective race of people occupied Britain around 3000 years BC?

North European tribes whose ancestors came from Africa. Why 3000BC? Why not 60000BC?

Chairwoman. Ich habe nicht schätzen Sie hatte ein Kommando der Deutschen

Not particularly well. Just a smattering.

How about nothing at all? A friend of mine is actually German, so I just IM your text, and she told me that it is gibberish, and sounded a lot like something that was translated automatically by Google. I understand you want to impress us by pretending you know a second language, but you keep on embarrassing yourself.

Who lived in Britain during the Neolithic period? I spent some time at Skara Brae a few years back (bit of an effort to get there, but worth it)and as I recall the builders were probably descended from northern European hunter-gatherers, but elsewhere in Britain there was significant movement from Iberia. And of course the neolothic is marked by the rapid take up of agriculture which was probably introduced by a wave of migration from the near-east.

I say ‘probably’ because this is an area where work is still very much in progress. That’s without wiki, but I did recently finish reading the excellent ‘Guns, Germs and Steel’ by Jared Diamond and that piqued my interest in early population movements.

So, a whole bunch of people to whom the term ‘collective race’ does not apply.

What part?

OK. I’ll make it easier.

Tell me who, or what collective race of people occupied ‘Southern Britain’ at, or around 3000 years BC?”

I can do better than tell you. I can show you with a picture.

“The human race?”

Avoidance!

Detail people. I’d like a semi-detailed answer to my basic question.

I’m beginning to think that “British Asians” lack the ability to recall their British heritage at a moments notice. Now why is that I wonder?

Q1. Who, or what collective race of people occupied Britain around 3000 years BC?

Personally, you’re all wrong. Only I should be allowed to live in the UK, the rest of you should get the f**k out of my country.

Oh Colin. Colin, Colin, Colin.

Did you know that the UK used to be attached to France, and that people migrated across the land mass and gradually the land split. If you’re going to get technical, the original Brits that you seem to be asking about were actually French.

I may have asked you this already, but if I haven’t, or if you didn’t answer before:

Why do you care so much about someone’s ethnic background? What difference does it make that some people wear different clothes, or pray in a different language, or eat better food?

Nobody’s stopping you eating Roast Beef and Tatties, or making you grow a beard, or learn another language (although you displayed so eloquently that you’re not against this). No-one’s telling you where to live, or what to wear, or how to slaughter your chickens.

Whatever culture you think immigration is eroding, it’s not. You can still get a Sunday Roast in your local pub, you can still buy miniskirts in Primark, you can still listen to The Beatles. WTF is your problem with 10% of the people in the UK not being the same colour skin as you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlf5ucFanpY

Not particularly well. Just a smattering.