I haven’t heard the BNP call for the hijab to be banned. Please provide a link.

The BNP certainly aren’t keen on the Burka because it represents a symbol of female oppression imposed by men that are thought to be insecure or repressive to their own women.

Are you serious? Yeah the poor in the past could easily improve their social mobility. Though there are still barriers its never been easier for people from poor backgrounds to progress. How many of their grandparents generation had the chance to go to university or do other than manual jobs ?

Nice to know you are so conservative. So why does your party want to ban the Muslim hijab (headscarf)?

Colin, I know you can use Google, well at least make it work, comprehension might be quite a good thing too.

Try Googling

Demographic Transition Model

for some fairly straightforward explanations about why birth rates are higher in poorer parts of the world. The country that tops the list you linked to – Niger – is near the bottom of the same CIA factbook for life expectancy, a paltry 44.28 years. And there are thirteen basket cases below that too. Pity the prospects of the child born in Swaziland where life expectancy is 31.99 years.

Agreed.

Sadly, many British teenagers have lost their way. They are an embarrassment – a stain on our image as a people. However, the opportunity of social mobility, has been denied them by a succession of Labour/Tory misrule spanning the last five decades.

Advertising in all it’s forms has further influenced our teens to behave in this disgraceful way. TV adds such as Durex and alcopos have helped to send our children (not all) into a spiral off depravity

I get depressed when I see British teenage girls walking about in clothing that leaves very little to the imagination. They would look just as attractive if not more so in a long summer dress.

It is a well known fact, that inhabitants of colder countries have fewer children than those who inhabit warmer climates.

British Asians are inhabitants of the UK. The number of children that the inhabitants of warmer climates have is therefore completely irrelevant in this situation.

Keep it real.

Indeed, Colin. It’s generally not good scientific practice to assume that statistics & behaviour pertaining to the inhabitants of countries thousands of miles away have any bearing on, for example, the reproductive behaviour of people whose ancestry may lie in that part of the world but who actually live in other countries, particularly when the people concerned have actually grown up in the West during the last 40 years and are therefore fully a part of the Western Hemisphere’s population along with the other 1.7 billion people I mentioned earlier.

“You see, we are not a people driven by greed. You Asians worship money like it was your God.”

Hate to agree with a BNP scumbag but Colin is right; the greed and materialism in the Asian community is grotesque . It is an anathema to all the religious traditions Asians follow.

Again extrapolating without evidence.

Nowhere in the link do we see the birthrate among the British Asian population or any comparative data on birthrates or population in the UK.

So am i really wrong?

Listen to “the better angels of your nature” and quit supporting this racist bigoted and utterly worthless organisation called the BNP.

Come on you know you want to.

The UK is located in the Northern hemisphere. It is a well known fact, that inhabitants of colder countries have fewer children than those who inhabit warmer climates.

Keep it real.

If so, please refer us to the statistics for the non-indigenous.

Thank you.

Shamit you are wrong.

Check for yourself. Asians have twice as many offspring on average as Brits.

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=25

Brits have much smaller families than Asians.

Provide verifiable statistics for the average number of children that British Asians under the age of 40 have. Split the data according to British Indian, British Pakistani, British Bangladeshi and British Sri Lankan. Provide corresponding data for the average number of children that white/Caucasian British people under the age of 40 have. Finally, divide each set of data according to socio-economic group and/or income level.

We therefore have fewer family members available to baby sit our children if the need arises for us to work longer hours.

Makes a false assumption about the proportion of British Asians under the age of 40 who live in extended families, particularly those who fall into the 40% Income Tax bracket.

This has been our way for thousands of years.

Historically false. Families having the maximum number of children possible has been prevalent in many parts of the world including Britain, due to high infant mortality rates, lack of adequate healthcare, lack of a sufficiently high standard of living, and (until relatively recently) lack of access to effective contraception.

As standards of living rise, the number of children that survive increases and there is therefore less need to have more children to compensate, coupled with access to effective birth control. This has been the case here in Britain during the past century, and has also been duplicated by large numbers of the British Asian population, especially those who are Indians and particularly amongst the affluent.

In essence, you are taking advantage of our slower reproductive cycles

Provide verifiable medical sources confirming that white British people inherently have “slower reproductive cycles” compared to South Asians.

Owing to evolutionary and cultural differences

Provide verifiable medical sources confirming that white/Caucasian British people are inherently less fertile than South Asian British people, including the specific historical and biological reasons for this to be the case.

This brings me full circle back to my original analysis that your actions as a people are indeed parasitic in nature

Parasitic is defined as an organism that depends on others for survival. The people you are whining against actually work for long hours for their own survival and their families, they do not depend on the government, on “your” people or anyone else.

The opposite is true: your constant embarrassing whining, the fact that you feel you have some kind of entitlement even though you are a worthless individual, makes you a parasite, or a wannabe parasite. Think that’s unfair? Don asked you several times how you have contributed to society, and you were unable to provide anything.

As Jai demonstrated, when 4% of the population you loath generate 6% of the wealth, they are not leaching, they are actively contributing to this society.

Recent studies have shown that indigenous working class British children lag behind Chinese, (most) South Asian, Jewish, African children and Caribbean girls at all core development stages.

Do the evenings and weekends spent aiding the children with their development concentrate on their academic studies, or mastering the latest Wii game, or sitting in the ‘family room’ or ‘beer garden’ down at the local?

The late Chairman, who was as ‘indigenous’ as they come, was of the opinion that for the majority of the WWC, school was merely somewhere to send the children during the day to get them off their hands, and that their greatest fear was for them to become educated, and think that they were ‘better’ than their parents.

Colin – again the tendency to extrapolate without factual data.

Most of the Asians I grew up with in Britain are either the only child or one of two. That does not really represent large families.

On working long hours – irrespective of race, creed, religion – I hate to add what Jai already said as I am not as eloquent.

Working hard is about aspiration and achievement. Aspiring to be something and achieve something is not what people should look down upon.

One of the reasons we do not have Google’s, or Microsoft’s in this country is due to our lack of willing to do it.

In that mix, if the British Asian lot are working hard – that is good for Britain and you should be thankful not contemptuous. But then again you support the BNP so not surprised.

As far as I know, the BNP membership department doesn’t ask applicants if they are ‘openly Gay’ or Chinese.

Sorry, this is a joke.

The vast majority of English people (the working class)place family life way above the pursuit of wealth. Of course we have to work. But (9 till 5) is good enough for us. This way, we can spend evenings and weekends with our children to aid them in their development.

Brits have much smaller families than Asians. We therefore have fewer family members available to baby sit our children if the need arises for us to work longer hours.

This has been our way for thousands of years. Owing to evolutionary and cultural differences, Brits simply cannot compete with South Asians and Muslims.

In essence, you are taking advantage of our slower reproductive cycles – turning our disadvantage, into a profit. This doesn’t make you more intelligent. It simply makes you opportunists – a quality the British frown upon.

This brings me full circle back to my original analysis that your actions as a people are indeed parasitic in nature.