Full of Jews and foreign students.

http://www.cracked.com/article_15821_fun-size-countries-insane-histories-worlds-6-tiniest-nations.html

…only 10 days work each year.

What, every bleedin’ year?

This was the man who in 1968 said ” “In this country in 15 or 20 years time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.”

Yeh a fvcking crystal ball hants boy

“The British were never numerous enough to inflict the same fate on the sub-continent. And when their time was up folded their tents and went away.”

Actually some stayed and are Indians (ever heard of Anglo Indians?) . And Black and Asian British people are British not Indian or Jamaican.

Great!

According to the latest BNP manual of language and discipline, non-whites and their descendants can be British (as citizens not as part of the British identity) and have all the rights of indigenous people (rule #13). This is weird. They concede that you can have non-white British citizens, but don’t accept them as members?

Working on it with some great support from the other picklers.

I’m sure that’s what those NEETS are up to…budding Picassos all of them. Well they can dream on someone else’s money…

My point is that for their entire lives, they have been shoe-horned into someone else’s system – a system which they evidently feel is not right for them.

But instead of someone else’s system not being right for them and them being able to choose their own way of life, the damage has already been done, because other avenues – other ways of life – have been deliberately closed down by the industrial capitalists in order that their way of life is more-or-less the only way of life open to people.

We are “free” to do as they tell us.

Under those circumstances, it is no wonder that you end up with “NEETs” and all manner of other societal problems.

I am not asking you to pay for them to be idle. I am asking you (and all who think they know what’s best for others) to back off, get out of people’s lives, and empower them to live as they see fit.

Stop trying to force people to live in a way they do not want to live, and you won’t end up having to support those who don’t fit into your system.

But it is vital that other ways of living are not attacked, closed down, or made impossible – as they are currently. Self sufficiency should be an option for anybody who wants it – and indeed was, until the Enclosures stole our common land from us.

Great – let’s all go back to subsistance farming.

Look into forest gardening and permaculture – ways we can produce plenty of food, in a small-scale, self-sufficient manner. A well established forest garden (10+ years) can provide enough food for several families for something like only 10 days work each year.

Watch the BBC Natural World episode “A Farm For The Future” (torrent) where they talk to people doing just that.

We can have everything we need for around 10 days work a year (given the initial investment to get things up and running), and the rest of our time would be ours.

All we need is the land which was stolen from our communities. It’s time to give it back!!!

At any rate, why dont BNP put their money where their mouth is and start paying people like me who’ve already immigrate elsewhere haha .

I’m not altogether sure what evidence you are drawing on with that rather sweeping assertion – do you have anything to back that up? The point being made here and elsewhere is essentially that it is easy to be popular when you are throwing other people’s money (i.e. my money) around on what could charitably be called a pig-in-a-poke of a manifesto.

What the BNP’s policies appear to be are more or less what used to be called tax and spend. I would suggest that for 30-plus years election results have suggested strongly that a plurality wants is, essentially, Thatcher style cuts. I don’t really see the BNP’s grandiose spending chiming with election results (as opposed to talkboard hyperbole).

Sure, Immigration is a gripe – I don’t see anyone questioning that, and it ill behoves you to put words into other people’s mouths. The problem comes that the BNP take the view that immigrant=bad. You yourself may well take that view, I’m not here to tell you what to think.

As ever though, what is missed in the heat of a talkboard is the real-world sophistry that makes immigration a gripe issue rather than anything else. The BNP fall into the trap that pressure groups like MigrationWatch fall into. ‘Immigrant’ is not a single category, however much the BNP may want it to be.

The simple belief that an asylum piss-taker is on the same footing in the public mind as (say) a skilled immigrant worker is fanciful. The idea that a student visa overstayer is on the same footing as the immigrant nurse that looks after my elderly relatives is offensive.

The BNP could, of course try to come up with a deserving/undeserving dichotomy, but being identity obsessed it doesn’t look to anything other than the simple messages, designed to get media attention.

I would not perceive the BNP as a real threat because the public, when it comes to the crunch are more sophisticated and better than the BNP.

But that means hardly any oil revenue to pay for repatriation then!!

So where does the money come from if Scotland isn’t party to this?

Also that then brings the added pressure of the break up of the union to pay for as well as the break up of the armed forces.

So it then is no longer a question of kicking people out with their 50k.

Also would Scots then return home because they don’t support the BNP measures?

Whenever we refer to the BNP’s economic strategy we should use the term ‘Question 44′ as shorthand.

‘Also what if say Scotland and Wales didn’t want to be party to the plan? Do they have an opt-out as they have their own Parliaments?’

It will accelerate the break up of the union, Scotland will go independent within 5 years.

[Add to my list above:

5a. Who will we play with? ]