Questions for the BNP: part one


by guest
11th June, 2009 at 6:32 pm    

[Today marks the start of PP/eGov's 85 questions that the BNP need to answer- Rumbold's note]

Role models, affiliations, and policies of senior members of the BNP

1. Would Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons and all other members of the BNP be willing to submit to multiple independent DNA tests in order to confirm that none of them have any non-European ancestry within a particular timeframe (eg. the last 3000 years)?

2. If Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons, or any other members of the BNP are found to have any non-European ancestry at all within the timeframe mentioned above, would the individuals concerned be willing to resign their membership of the BNP immediately and, upon the election of a future BNP government, submit to all the policies which would be implemented, including repatriation to a country which is the closest match for their non-European ancestry?

3. On what basis can the BNP, specifically Nick Griffin, credibly insist that it is not actually a white supremacist organisation, when non-white British citizens are barred from joining it despite the fact that no such restrictions apply to white/Caucasian people originating from outside Britain?

4. Specifically which policies of the National Front in relation to non-white British citizens do Andrew Brons and the BNP as a whole renounce or support?

5. Specifically which policies and ideology of the historical German Nazi party does the BNP as a whole renounce or support, considering the confirmed admiration for Hitler and his organisation amongst several senior members of the BNP?

6. Specifically which aspects of Hitler’s book Mein Kampf does Nick Griffin agree with, considering that he is on record as stating that he has “learned a lot” from it?

7. How does the BNP reconcile historical and ongoing admiration of the Nazis and their policies with a) the fact that Britain went to war to destroy the Nazis, including subsequently supporting the prosecution and execution of various senior Nazis and other captured members of Nazi Germany for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and b) the fact that the BNP has been declaring the actions of Britain during WW2, including several major victories, as “examples of British greatness”?

8. How does the BNP reconcile the above with a) Nick Griffin praising the Waffen SS and simultaneously attacking the RAF for its bombing of Nazi Germany during his time as editor of The Rune between 1995 and 1997, b) the fact that, during a demonstration at Coventry Cathedral in 1998, Nick Griffin accused British airmen involved in the wartime effort of having engaged in “mass murder“, and c) the fact that Nick Griffin has been on record as claiming that the Holocaust is a “hoax” perpetrated by the victorious Allied powers, making the following statement in 1998: “I am well aware that the orthodox opinion is that 6 million Jews were gassed and cremated and turned into lampshades. Orthodox opinion also once held that the Earth was flat…..I have reached the conclusion that the “extermination” tale is a mixture of Allied wartime propaganda, extremely profitable lie, and latter witch-hysteria”?

9. Will the BNP’s proposed policies in relation to non-white British citizens also be applicable to Jewish British citizens ? If the answer is “Yes”, then all further queries in relation to non-white British citizens should be interpreted to also include Jewish British citizens.

10. Nick Griffin has claimed that the BNP’s policies and ideology are in line with the teachings of Christianity. Is the BNP therefore claiming that, as the Head of the Church of England, Queen Elizabeth II agrees with the BNP’s interpretation of Christianity? If not, is the BNP claiming that the Queen’s own interpretation of Christianity is wrong?

11. After the election of a BNP government, what would be the official policy in relation to Gurkhas who have served in the British armed forces and/or are serving at that particular time, ie. Will the recently-awarded right to British citizenship be revoked; will Gurkhas already possessing British citizenship due to military service be “encouraged” to engage in “voluntary repatriation”; will Gurkhas possessing British citizenship be afforded identical legal rights and protections as white/Caucasian British citizens?

12. Under a BNP government, would other non-white members of the British armed forces currently possessing British citizenship be afforded identical legal rights and protections as white/Caucasian British citizens?

13. During its various references to Britain’s historical participation in the two World Wars of the 20th century, why does the BNP never mention the fact that millions of non-white soldiers from the former British Empire fought alongside white/Caucasian soldiers on the side of the Allied powers in both World Wars, including 2.5 million soldiers from the Indian subcontinent during WW2 (comprising the largest volunteer army in recorded history), and including numerous non-white soldiers who were awarded medals for their military service and performance by the British authorities of the time?

14. To what extent does the BNP renounce or support the policies and ideologies of modern-day Neo-Nazi organisations across Europe, especially considering Nick Griffin’s ongoing efforts to build a pan-European alliance with organisations similar to the BNP based on the European mainland?

15. To what extent does the BNP renounce or support the policies and ideology of the Ku Klux Klan in the United States, considering Nick Griffin’s confirmed links with the organisation?

16. What percentage of BNP members, especially those at the senior levels of the organisation, are currently or have historically been active in participating on the white supremacist Stormfront internet forum and agree with the primary ethos of the website and its founder?

17. As public figures seeking high political office, would the BNP be willing to release the names of senior party members who are currently or have historically been active in participating on the Stormfront internet forum?

18. How will a BNP government ensure the safety of Britain’s female population, considering that a senior member of the BNP has been on record as stating that he believes “‘rape is simply sex. Women enjoy sex, so rape cannot be such a terrible physical ordeal?”

19. How will a BNP government ensure the safety, protection and welfare of Britain’s current and future disabled population, considering that a senior member of the BNP has been on record as stating that he supports forced euthanasia of the handicapped, saying that “we live in a country today which is unhealthily dominated by an excess of sentimentality towards the weak and unproductive. No good will come of it,” in response to the death of David Cameron’s son in spring 2009?


              Post to del.icio.us


Filed in: The BNP






89 Comments below   |  

Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Questions for the BNP: part one | Free Political Forum

    [...] Original post by Jai [...]


  2. Catherine Redfern

    Questions for the BNP http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4803


  3. Faerie

    Questions for the BNP http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4803


  4. Justin McKeating

    Questions for the BNP… http://bit.ly/eSIGl http://bit.ly/35GARz http://bit.ly/LUqDb http://bit.ly/15ecMY


  5. Leon Green

    RT @chickyog: Questions for the BNP… http://bit.ly/eSIGl http://bit.ly/35GARz http://bit.ly/LUqDb http://bit.ly/15ecMY


  6. Stuart Middleton

    RT @chickyog: Questions for the BNP… http://bit.ly/eSIGl http://bit.ly/35GARz http://bit.ly/LUqDb http://bit.ly/15ecMY


  7. The BNP have some questions to answer… - Chicken Yoghurt

    [...] Part 1: Role models, affiliations, and policies of senior members of the BNP – Part 2: The medical, economic and military impact of a BNP government – Part 3: The social and [...]


  8. Alex J. Thomas

    RT @pickledpolitics Questions for the BNP: part one | Pickled Politics http://cli.gs/tBHXNR (via @tweetmeme)


  9. Tim Ireland

    RT @pickledpolitics Questions for the BNP: part one | Pickled Politics http://cli.gs/tBHXNR (via @AlexJThomas)


  10. Nic Walker

    RT @bloggerheads: RT @pickledpolitics Questions for the BNP: part one | Pickled Politics http://cli.gs/tBHXNR (via @AlexJThomas)


  11. Questions for the BNP: part four | Pickled Politics

    [...] one, two and three here, here and here) tweetmeme_url = ‘http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4850′;tweetmeme_source = [...]


  12. links for 2009-06-18 « Embololalia

    [...] Questions for the BNP: part one | Pickled Politics Role models, affiliations, and policies of senior members of the BNP (tags: bnp uk politics) [...]


  13. ?s for the BNP | hilpers

    [...] sportspeople/athletes concerned do not agree with the BNP’s policies and ideology in this matter? http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4803 http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4818 http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4832 [...]


  14. Tom

    @carbonkid85 See: http://bit.ly/oZCNn ; http://bit.ly/5PQ8f ; http://bit.ly/pKUTy ; http://bit.ly/uDwjS ; http://bit.ly/pzduV #BBCQT


  15. Tom

    @carbonkid85 See: http://bit.ly/oZCNn ; http://bit.ly/5PQ8f ; http://bit.ly/pKUTy ; http://bit.ly/uDwjS ; http://bit.ly/pzduV ;




  1. John Wickham — on 11th June, 2009 at 6:59 pm  

    I can tell you’re with Labour. You’re all obsessed with DNA.

    Have you heard of “human rights?” Works with white men too…

  2. marvin — on 11th June, 2009 at 7:12 pm  

    The mainstream hacks never to seem to ask the right questions.

    Perhaps now these are white, nasty and extremist (sounds like a TV show!) they’ll do a bit more, perhaps actually decent interviewing, and not let them get away with some much crap.

    One could easily compile a list of questions for Islamists who get wheeled out by the media. It would be completely ignored, probably like this list.

    How many times have they allowed Islamist bigots like Anjem Choudry on programmes like Newsnight and almost given a free pass ?! Countless!

    If they can start to ask the right questions with the BNP, which I wont hold my breath over, then who knows, they might even start to it with other extremists who may shock, horror, have brown skin. One can hope.

    The fact is, the blogosphere, for a long time now have been asking these types of questions, and yet the ‘MSM’ haven’t even realised there were questions to ask in the first place!

  3. Shamit — on 11th June, 2009 at 7:27 pm  

    No we are not obsessed with DNA — we would like to have some proof of that indigenous race Griffin talks about.

    And also if anyone from the BNP who’s got a brain try to answer some of the questions Jai has asked. If you don’t understand big words do ask for help please

  4. billaricaydicky — on 11th June, 2009 at 7:43 pm  

    All this on DNA is fair as long as our home grown black nationalists, or should I say nazis like Simon Wooley and Lee Jasper, submit themselves to the same tests to find out how much white DNA they have as if it were not obvious by looking at them.

    I have always been fascinated how the whiter the black the blacker they are.

  5. Shatterface — on 11th June, 2009 at 8:18 pm  

    I don’t want anyone taking Nick Griffin’s DNA: some fucker might clone him in the future. I don’t want some kind of Jurassic Park featuring herds of neo-Nazis; I’ve seen the film, these dinosaurs can get out.

  6. Rumbold — on 11th June, 2009 at 8:55 pm  

    Heh Shatterface.

    Excellent piece Jai.

  7. Clairwil — on 11th June, 2009 at 9:19 pm  

    Ooooh! Can I predict the answers?

    1. We are only concerned with post 1948 immigration.
    2. No (see above)
    3. The Black Police Officers Association.
    4. That was the past. Peter Mandelson used to be a communist.
    5. See 4.
    6. See 4.
    7. See 4.
    8. See 4.
    9. We have a Jewish candidate.
    10.Don’t know that one.
    11. Are Native Americans racist because they resisted being race replaced?
    12. See 11.
    13. Dont know that one.
    14. See 4.
    15. We are the most lied about party in the UK and see 4.
    16. In 2005 a Labour/Tory/Lib Dem posted on XYZ forum. Why don’t you ask them about that? (also see 4 and 11).
    17. See 16
    18. See 15 and 16
    19. That wasn’t said on an official BNP website and see 15 and 16.

    P.S Can you sneak in a question about their links to loyalist terrorists in Northern Ireland and their plans for UK Catholics if you haven’t already done so?

  8. Ravi Naik — on 11th June, 2009 at 9:23 pm  

    Would Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons and all other members of the BNP be willing to submit to multiple independent DNA tests in order to confirm that none of them have any non-European ancestry within a particular timeframe (eg. the last 3000 years)?

    85 questions?! That’s pretty impressive! Though I would like to get partial credit for the first one – it is part of my ongoing campaign for racial transparency… to anyone who wants to exclude people on the grounds of race. :)

  9. Adnan — on 11th June, 2009 at 9:30 pm  

    “How many times have they allowed Islamist bigots like Anjem Choudry on programmes like Newsnight and almost given a free pass ?! Countless!”

    Oh do f*k off Marvin.

    Has Al-Muj got any chance of getting any form of political office in this country? They are on the fringes in a minority community. The BNP are on the fringes of the bulk of UK population and have achieved political office.

  10. Amrit — on 11th June, 2009 at 9:54 pm  

    Now, can we slip these Qs to Paxman and have him take on the British Nazi Poppets on prime-time TV?

  11. Clairwil — on 11th June, 2009 at 10:19 pm  

    I suspect questions fot the BNP will run to a work of several volumes and generate answers which would be lucky to cover a sheet of A4.

    Nevertheless I have more questions for the BNP, which I’d be delighted if they’d answer. They correctly state that current welfare spending is in excess of £13 billion but surprisingly wish to bring in workfare as the answer.

    Given that the bulk of welfare spending is on the elderly at £42.1 billion, will there be a retirement age in BNP Britain and what will it be?

    With regard to workfare for the elderly and the disabled, what do the BNP intend to do with those who are too disabled or infirm to work?

    At present council housing is only available to people with the right to remain in the UK and the right to access public funds. How many homes will become available when the BNP restricts availability to British citizens and what will be done with those made homeless under the policy?

    The BNP intend to take all privatised social housing stock back under local council ownership. Will the BNP compensate those who bought their homes for the loss of their investment in their homes, how much do they estimate this will cost and how will it be funded?

    The BNP state that they alone have the answer to the problems of the UK welfare system. What do they see as the shortcomings of the reforms proposed by the three main parties?

  12. sarah — on 12th June, 2009 at 12:53 am  

    Thanks for Q19 Jai.

  13. Golam Murtaza — on 12th June, 2009 at 5:29 am  

    Great to see Jai’s list already winding up the usual suspects. Though I fear it could cause a few tragic deaths. The head of the average BNP knuckledragger might implode if they try to think up serious answers to all these questions.

  14. nobodys fool — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:11 am  

    griffin is a celtic name not anglo saxon germanic name.celtic tribe originated from central asia. Nick griffin was on the radio complaining about bbc having a black friar monk on a robin hood drama. I thought robin hood story was based around the time of the crusades , there were plenty of black people around like st george . Plus Roman soldiers, who were prodominately arabs or africans, would have left a legacy of black decendants

  15. Vikrant — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:40 am  

    Has anyone ever questioned BNP on how exactly do they propose going about the “generous monetary incentives for repatriation” scheme? It is simply unworkable practically and economically. Even if they pay 100K~500K quid per repatree that comes at about 4-5 trillion pounds.

    So BNP are basically bullshitting on this one, unless ofcourse the “generous incentives” include beatings and legalised discrimination!

  16. platinum786 — on 12th June, 2009 at 8:49 am  

    Excellent questions Jai. I for one hope the mainstream media makes the effort to put the BNP on the backfoot and truly expose them for what they are.

    They’ve won two Euro seats, one by a mere 5,000 votes, one by a mere, 15,000 votes. I’m sure if there is enough pressure by the media, those who did vote BNP will turn at the next election.

  17. chairwoman — on 12th June, 2009 at 9:30 am  

    I wonder what the BNP will do with me.

    “Repatriate” me. Israel or Poland? Makes no difference, I am fluent in neither language.

    or

    “Euthanase” me on account of my disability and advancing years.

    Should we make this a competition with a gold star for the best answer?

  18. The Common Humanist — on 12th June, 2009 at 9:34 am  

    Great work people!

    Keep it up!

    TCH

  19. A Councillor Writes — on 12th June, 2009 at 10:15 am  

    Vikrant – I suspect the generous monetary incentive will be that you get a plane ticket and maybe be able to take some of your personal money with you. The rest of your assets will be confiscated to pay for this, of course.

    I will, of course, be headed for a camp for anti-social elements. I suspect openly gay men who are known liberal politicians won’t be exactly tolerated in Griffin-wank world. Although, I will admit, I am a coward, if I thought there was any hope of Griffin’s house of horrors winning an election, I would ensure that after voting and campaigning all day, I would have a ticket for the 06:30 to Frankfurt the next morning.

  20. Jai — on 12th June, 2009 at 10:22 am  

    Rumbold, thanks for publishing this. My thanks also to everyone who has responded positively so far.

    There is much more to come. Further questions will be provided according to the following categories:

    - Medical impact of a BNP government.
    - Economic impact of a BNP government.
    - Military impact of a BNP government.
    - Social and legal impact of a BNP government.
    - Religious impact of a BNP government.
    - Sports and athletics.

    ********************************

    Vikrant, re: your post #16 — That issue will be covered in the “Social & legal impact” section (already provided to PP’s editors, along with the rest of the 85-question list). Stay tuned.

  21. Hantsboy — on 12th June, 2009 at 10:47 am  

    I know what riles a lot of you is that BNP won’t let you join their gang.

    But why should you ?

    You won’t get anything out of it and its purpose is to secure the economic dominance of the white indigenous population.
    Now if you were prepared to accept that – say in the way that High Castes run things on the sub-continent then perhaps BNP Central would have a look at you.
    Mind you I’m not promising anything…

  22. Shamit — on 12th June, 2009 at 11:03 am  

    “You won’t get anything out of it and its purpose is to secure the economic dominance of the white indigenous population”

    While the purpose seems to be clear I think Jai’s set of questions (including those not yet published) highlight the basic flaws in the argument on how BNP plan to achieve the dominance you so desparately desire?

    The policies that BNP chooses would ensure no dominance but complete destruction of the British economy. If we are wrong about the implications, then as you seem to have half a brain Hantsboy why don’t you enlighten us please? We await your sermon

  23. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 11:06 am  

    @#23

    But Hantsboy, we’re not riled we’re curious. I must say I’d have thought someone from the BNP would have come up with a few answers by now.

  24. platinum786 — on 12th June, 2009 at 11:07 am  

    You’ve missed out my favourite question;

    Black people don’t get sunburnt in Africa. Asian people don’t get sunburnt in Asia. Spanish people don’t get sunburnt in Spain. Why do BNP members get sunburnt in England?

    Judging by the first reply to this topic, they don’t know too much about genetics, DNA, Melanin etc.

  25. Ravi Naik — on 12th June, 2009 at 11:55 am  

    You won’t get anything out of it and its purpose is to secure the economic dominance of the white indigenous population.
    Now if you were prepared to accept that – say in the way that High Castes run things on the sub-continent then perhaps BNP Central would have a look at you.

    I am sure that’s a good question to Nick Griffin. Does he intend to create Apartheid in Britain. In fact, there are a number of questions that arise with that. How will they determine who is white and who is not.

  26. Ravi Naik — on 12th June, 2009 at 11:58 am  

    You won’t get anything out of it and its purpose is to secure the economic dominance of the white indigenous population.
    Now if you were prepared to accept that – say in the way that High Castes run things on the sub-continent then perhaps BNP Central would have a look at you.

    I am sure that’s a good question to ask Nick Griffin. Does he intend to create Apartheid in Britain. In fact, there are a number of questions that arise with that. How will they determine who is white and who is not.

  27. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 12:45 pm  

    Ravi,
    They do intend to have ‘voluntary’ apartheid in BNP Britain for those that haven’t left ‘voluntarily’. According to their 2005 manifesto the racial foreigners will encouraged attend separate schools from the ‘anglo-saxons’ so that they can learn about their ancesteral heritage.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/BNP_uk_manifesto.pdf

  28. Leon — on 12th June, 2009 at 1:05 pm  

    I wonder what the BNP will do with me.

    “Repatriate” me. Israel or Poland? Makes no difference, I am fluent in neither language.

    I’ve thought the same about me, I can trace my English family back to Kent, parts of the North and Ireland. Where as my Dad’s side is Barbados (and further back Africa). Exactly where do people like myself go? I was born here, lived here all my life…

  29. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 1:20 pm  

    Ah Leon the great mixed race mystery. They seem curiously reluctant to expand upon their plans for mixed race folk.

    However they do intend to introduce legislation based on ‘Clause 28′ to ban the promotion of racial integration in schools and in the media. Whether the mere presence of a mised race teacher in a classroom or mixed race TV presenter in the media could be classed as promoting integration I couldn’t say. Perhaps someone from the BNP could shed some light on this for us once they’ve had a stab at Jai’s questions.

  30. A Councillor Writes — on 12th June, 2009 at 1:20 pm  

    Leon – There’s a lot of mutts around as far as the BNP are concerned. Look at me, white Midlander – but my Great Grandparents are from Ireland, Wales, Italy, Portugal and four from the USA (one of which was *supposedly* half-Cherokee). Can I go to Lisbon please :-)

  31. Ravi Naik — on 12th June, 2009 at 1:22 pm  

    Nick Griffin needs to appeal racists and moderates in order to grow, which is why he focuses on immigration rather than race, Islamisation rather than race, political corruption rather than race.

    Which is why, we should emphasise the differences between both demographics when asking questions. Asking whether he wants to establish Apartheid in Britain is an example (thanks Hantsboy for bring it up!) – it is really what he intends to do. It brings strong feelings to moderates – and places Nick Griffin into a corner. Also, asking about miscegenation laws, and how they would classify whites (1/4 of non-white blood = white?) in a BNP government reminds everyone about South Africa and Germany 1936.

    Rather than being judgemental about their ideology, you want to Nick Griffin to hide in a corner, to show that despite his “moderate” looks, lies an extremist and a simpleton. Keep giving him a rope, and he will choke around it.

  32. Ravi Naik — on 12th June, 2009 at 1:24 pm  

    Nick Griffin needs to appeal racists and moderates in order to grow, which is why he focuses on immigration rather than race, Islamisation rather than race, political corruption rather than race.

    Which is why, we should emphasise the differences between both demographics when asking questions. Asking whether he wants to establish Apartheid in Britain is an example (thanks Hantsboy for bring it up!) – it is really what he intends to do. It brings strong feelings to moderates – and places Nick Griffin into a corner. Also, asking about miscegenation laws, and how they would classify whites (1/4 of non-white blood = white?) in a BNP government reminds everyone about South Africa and Germany 1936.

    Rather than being judgemental about their ideology, you want to Nick Griffin to hide in a corner, to show that despite his “moderate” looks, lies an extremist and a simpleton. Keep giving him a rope, and he will choke around it.

  33. Dalbir — on 12th June, 2009 at 1:50 pm  

    #28

    “They do intend to have ‘voluntary’ apartheid in BNP Britain for those that haven’t left ‘voluntarily’. According to their 2005 manifesto the racial foreigners will encouraged attend separate schools from the ‘anglo-saxons’ so that they can learn about their ancesteral heritage”

    Seeing as statistically, Indian and Chinese students seem to piss all over Anglo-Saxon childen academically, could it be advantageous for them to keep away from intellectually inferior white Brits? (I’m being sarcastic btw).

    http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=461

  34. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 2:04 pm  

    #33
    Now now Dalbir -don’t you know the poor Anglo-Saxon kiddies are being held back by racial foreigners who can’t speak English? It is only ZOG and it’s immigrant footsoldiers that stands between the Anglo-Saxons and their true position as the master race!

    (matching your sarcasm)

  35. Jai — on 12th June, 2009 at 2:29 pm  

    They seem curiously reluctant to expand upon their plans for mixed race folk.

    However they do intend to introduce legislation based on ‘Clause 28′ to ban the promotion of racial integration in schools and in the media. Whether the mere presence of a mised race teacher in a classroom or mixed race TV presenter in the media could be classed as promoting integration I couldn’t say.

    …..Also, asking about miscegenation laws, and how they would classify whites (1/4 of non-white blood = white?) in a BNP government

    Very good questions. All that’s covered in extensive detail in the forthcoming “Social and legal impact” section of my list too. I suspect you’ll find it very interesting reading.

    There’s much, much more to come, as per the areas mentioned in #22. Rumbold & co have already read the full version.

  36. platinum786 — on 12th June, 2009 at 2:56 pm  

    ^^^ all 85?

    How long did it take you to write these then!

  37. Jai — on 12th June, 2009 at 3:10 pm  

    It’s just something I’d been working on during the course of this week.

    Matters will become clearer when PP publishes each of the subsequent sections in turn. Don’t worry, they cover all the relevant bases concisely but in appropriate detail regarding the BNP’s various policies and aspirations.

  38. persephone — on 12th June, 2009 at 3:38 pm  

    How would apartheid Britain cope on the global stage – who would BNP leaders have a dialogue with if the other countries leader was non white?

  39. persephone — on 12th June, 2009 at 3:39 pm  

    If it is feasible to have a British National Party, and apartheid is the rule of thumb, then the formation of a United Colours of Britain (UCB) would be applicable. For full apartheid each party would operate as a separate fiscal & economic entity and all UCB member profits, products, skills, taxes etc would only be used for UCB members.

    The BNP members can keep all their ‘assets ‘ to them selves. Ask the BNP – deal or no deal?

  40. Dalbir — on 12th June, 2009 at 3:48 pm  

    #34

    Clairwil, it seems as if the BNP have not yet taken the time to speak to the poor urban indigenous youth, who live in predominantly white areas. How can immigrants be blamed for their atrocious grasp of the English language? Besides just what version of English do the BNP espouse? Queens?

    http://www.fmft.net/chav.jpg

  41. billaricaydicky — on 12th June, 2009 at 4:23 pm  

    So, how many of you lot have white in you and refuse to take a DNA test? I would bet a lot of you professional white haters have white ancestors like Lee Jasper. His mother is white and he denies her, how fucking sick can you get.

    Look in the mirror people, you are whiter thank you think, or at least are prepared to admit.

  42. Ravi Naik — on 12th June, 2009 at 4:45 pm  

    How would apartheid Britain cope on the global stage – who would BNP leaders have a dialogue with if the other countries leader was non white?

    Since they have a 1948 mindset, they probably think that the world is still ruled by Europeans.

  43. Don — on 12th June, 2009 at 4:48 pm  

    #41

    Is there some point you want to make, or are you just being a pain in the arse again?

  44. Ravi Naik — on 12th June, 2009 at 4:54 pm  

    Is there some point you want to make, or are you just being a pain in the arse again?

    He seems to live in a world of his own. I usually read what he writes and move on.

  45. Don — on 12th June, 2009 at 6:19 pm  

    Actually, I would quite like to have one of those DNA tests done. Maybe find a trace of Libyan Roman auxiliary, a hint of Ghengis Khan, a soupçon of smooth-talking Spanish Armada survivor. Who knows? I just think it might make me feel even more tied to our human past.

    Anyone tried it? What does it cost for a proper job of it?

  46. Amrit — on 12th June, 2009 at 6:44 pm  

    you professional white haters

    DING DING DING, and we have the Misguided Paranoiac of the Year award winner!

    Lee Jasper

    This is the important bit of the post. In future, instead of comments, just write ‘Simon Wooley’ ‘Lee Jasper’ ‘grrr, black racists,’ and everyone’s happy. :-D

  47. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:02 pm  

    #46
    My mum and dad have had those DNA tests done and we are currently awaiting the results. I’m going to riot if they don’t turn up a drop of Persian blood unless I get some Japanese ancestry as compensation.

  48. Shamit — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:06 pm  

    “professional white haters” – you serious Bill?

  49. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:06 pm  

    #41
    Ah well that’ll be the fault of left wing teachers with their ‘trendy’ teaching methods and ‘nonsense’ subjects and PC indoctrination. It’s a deliberate attempt to destroy the country. A conspiracy!

  50. Don — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:30 pm  

    Clairwil,

    Great. You will be posting the results, of course? Apparently Russian tends to show up a lot, but I can’t remember why.

    Was it pricey?

  51. KB Player — on 12th June, 2009 at 7:52 pm  

    Anyone could ask better questions than those dim-witted BBC interviewers, who don’t seem to have done any research at all when confronted with the BNP. BBC interviewers seem to be so totally taken aback by the BNP having any serious following that they are left gibbering. Their questions are inane.

    I want to know:-

    How are they going to break it to Dawn French that they are shipping Lenny Henry back to the Caribbean?

    How can they give Leona Lewis any incentive to leave? She earns a packet.

    Will they take away Kelly Holmes’s Olympic medals off her as a woman of her colour couldn’t possibly represent Britain?

    Pity Jade Goody’s not still alive -there could have been huge spreads of her in Hullo being loaded into a cattle truck.

  52. Clairwil — on 12th June, 2009 at 9:16 pm  

    #Don,
    I’m not sure of the exact price, I think they got a deal because they worth both getting tested together. I’ll find out more and report back.

    I’m intrigued as to what the results will be. At a guess from looking at my dad’s side of the family and their colouring I’m guessing they’ll be some Scandinavian, though his mother’s side were all very dark so who knows what results will come up?

  53. Dalbir — on 13th June, 2009 at 4:00 am  

    #50

    Okay, that explains everything now……..

  54. Dalbir — on 13th June, 2009 at 4:06 am  

    #44

    Don, I thought the point was obvious? But I’ll clarify especially for you! Many white kids manage to do shite at school without the help of ethnics.

    Do yer geddit now? It was directed towards the BNP.

    PS – I admire the way you seek clarification when confused.

  55. Rumbold — on 13th June, 2009 at 8:38 am  

    Oops- sorry Dalbir. Don wasn’t referring to you, but to Billaricaydicky, but when I was deleting spam, the numbers changed.

  56. Chris Barnett — on 13th June, 2009 at 3:21 pm  

    It’s official. Pickled Politics is obsessed with race and Hitler.

  57. Dalbir — on 13th June, 2009 at 5:12 pm  

    Thanks for the explanation Rumbold.

    Chris @ 57

    If you changed ‘Pickled Politics’ with ‘The BNP’ in the above statement you would be onto something.

  58. Clairwil — on 14th June, 2009 at 1:28 pm  

    Rejoice! Thanks to Andrew Brons we’re a bit closer to finding out how the BNP regard mixed race folk. Sadly he doesn’t elaborate on what will happen to the ‘partially British’ in BNP Britain -though he has ruled out forced repatriation.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/5524684/Kelly-Holmes-is-not-fully-British-says-BNP-MEP-Andrew-Brons.html

    And in other news our chums at the News of the Screws
    get down to digging up the important stuff like the swinging antics of BNP chubby chaser Martin Reynolds

    http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/359197/BNP-We-uncover-the-secrets-of-boss-Nick-Griffins-henchmen-Respectable-image-conceals-a-Nazi-saluting-RACIST-a-depraved-SWINGER-and-a-FAILED-wannabe-councillor.html

  59. Rushdie — on 14th June, 2009 at 2:11 pm  

    ’1. Would Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons and all other members of the BNP be willing to submit to multiple independent DNA tests in order to confirm that none of them have any non-European ancestry within a particular timeframe (eg. the last 3000 years)?’

    If you apply the same test to Muslim extremists you may discover ones of Pakistani, Afghan, Turkmenistan, Uzbhekistan etc were originally Hindu’s and Buddhists. Those from the Balkans were originally Christians. The same questions should apply to all extremists.

  60. Robert Radcliffe — on 14th June, 2009 at 9:13 pm  

    Watching the media hysteria machine go into overdrive following the BNP’s electoral success has been absolutely priceless, as has been the the earnest debate by the chattering classes. Meanwhile we continue to grow unabated. What was that expression again? All that is needed for evil to triumph….

    *chortle*

  61. Dave S — on 15th June, 2009 at 1:42 am  

    Regarding question 19 and the BNP’s attitude towards disabled people:

    I wonder what the BNP make of Professor Stephen Hawking – perhaps one of the highest profile disabled (and British) people on Earth, and with one of the greatest scientific minds of all time?

    Tell “we live in a country today which is unhealthily dominated by an excess of sentimentality towards the weak and unproductive. No good will come of it” to him, you fascist idiots!

  62. Kat — on 15th June, 2009 at 12:21 pm  

    In every generation of siblings and first cousins there is on average at least one illegitimate birth, something I can attest to having spent decades researching family trees all over the country, this has been documented throughout the country for at least the last 350 years where records have been relatively consistently held, making a mockery of any claims of superior status based on ancestry.

    That being the case, would any BNP member like to provide a fully documented and proven ancestry for me to examine? DNA will be unnecessary, any person’s claim can be easily thrown into doubt, all it takes is one illegitimate birth record.

    I would be willing to wager all I own that without exception, every single BNP member is walking around with a genetic inheritance from one, if not more, of the groups they stand against, this knowledge gives me a great deal of pleasure.

    Having said that, there is another statistic which may throw some light on BNP member mentality, based on my own research experience, on average within roughly every 5 generations, you will find at least one case of in-breeding, usually a first cousin but sometimes between direct relatives a generation removed, genetically this is not a good thing but it does have the potential to explain a great deal in some cases.

  63. chairwoman — on 15th June, 2009 at 1:01 pm  

    ” Meanwhile we continue to grow unabated. What was that expression again? All that is needed for evil to triumph…”

    So you acknowledge what you are.

  64. Ken — on 16th June, 2009 at 8:14 am  

    And you lot call the BNP racist !

  65. Antisocialist — on 16th June, 2009 at 7:44 pm  

    No we are not obsessed with DNA — we would like to have some proof of that indigenous race Griffin talks about.

    Please tell me you’re joking. Sadly I suspect you’re not.

  66. john murray — on 19th October, 2009 at 6:59 pm  

    its not about colour or race it about the way you behave – culture, values

    im not interested in all that crap just
    mass immigration and the rise of islam
    no police checks on asylum seekers
    asylum seekers despearte to get to the Uk and plug into the benefits sytem
    bogus marriages to stay here and forged documents – its an industry for foriegn migrants who travel through loads of countries to get here

    john

  67. Dawn — on 23rd April, 2010 at 5:27 pm  

    Im white english, and ask, i lived abroad for 19 years and my 3 children where born there. Only 1 of them lives with me here in london, all have british passports. Where does my childrens future in england stand with the BNP?

  68. douglas clark — on 23rd April, 2010 at 6:06 pm  

    I would assume your kids are British. The BNP are not important.

    Your kids can come into the country if they meet the criteria. And the BNP are just tits.

    And it is not BNP criteria.

    Sadly, ’cause we’d tell them to get to fuck!

  69. douglas clark — on 23rd April, 2010 at 7:19 pm  

    It cannot be a joke, can it, that I would vote for Sonia?

    Well, I would.

    And I’d vote for Sunny too.

    Well, obviously Sonia, first.

    That is who I am. That is who I think she is too.

  70. Rumbold — on 23rd April, 2010 at 7:22 pm  

    I would vote for Sunny too. And Douglas (SNP, Glasgow).

  71. douglas clark — on 23rd April, 2010 at 9:03 pm  

    And I’d vote for Sonia.

    And you, probably, wouldn’t you?

    I think we’d agree that we’d vote for chums, would we not?

    I do not agree with Rumbold on any political point that he makes, but I suspect he and I agree more than we are apart.

    Hmm..

    I know what I mean.

    I am very fond of Rumbold, and I will defend his right to talk rubbish as long as he stays a member of LPAK,

    It is sad, perhaps, but he is my chum.

  72. douglas clark — on 23rd April, 2010 at 9:11 pm  

    Obviously, I’d vote for him.

    Given that Sunny or Sonia weren’t also standing.

    Else, I would have doubts…

  73. Roy — on 30th April, 2010 at 1:30 pm  

    Here in April 2010, the appeal of the BNP is much greater.
    Sure, there may have been some bad things said by BNP members in the past, and given the chance I am sure they would take some of that nonsense back.
    Similarly, DNA tests for BNP members, you must be kidding me! It’s not about that, you missed the point by a mile.
    It’s about being entitled to get back some of what you put into a country. A country that you as a citizen actively contribute to.
    The BNP policies look spot on to me now, are very relevant, and may just help Great Britons to regain some self respect.

  74. Roy — on 30th April, 2010 at 1:50 pm  

    Who in the Uk wants to see another of our soldiers die? (apart from the enemies of our land Who LIVE here!)
    Anybody fancy being subjected to SHARIA LAW? I Flippin’ don’t and I am angry that my fellow Britons are subjected to it.
    I am not interested in spending one penny on foreign affairs against my will.
    If I want to donate money to a country that is having problems, it should be my choice and, most likely I will by the way.
    I want to know that British Citizens are put first in the queue when it comes to jobs, housing etc. etc. Also healthcare. WE PAY FOR IT!!
    I want us to remain the MAJORITY in this country, not the MINORITY.
    Not racist, not bigotted, just standing up for myself and my nation.
    Some things are best left not mixed. Cultures are a prime example.
    Water is useful, oil is useful, but what good is a mixture of oil and water.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
With the help of PHP and Wordpress.