<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wings of the BNP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166630</guid>
		<description>Brilliant Amrit.

What is it with Sikhs and jokes? Now all we need is Mangles at the mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant Amrit.</p>
<p>What is it with Sikhs and jokes? Now all we need is Mangles at the mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adnan</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166585</link>
		<dc:creator>Adnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166585</guid>
		<description>Jai @ 62,

I suspect that Churchill would possibly buy into other narratives such as British history / tradition being under threat.

Also, a worry is the BNP finding a leader untainted by racist thuggery, or a Nazi background (Holocaust Denial, dressing up in uniforms, links to US Far Right) - a logical progression in a process beginning with changing emphasis to a religious group, moderating their language. However, maybe they won&#039;t be sophisticated enough to do so, or they&#039;ll lose some of their real hard-core support (cited as a possible reason for the membership list leak).

I think the less overt racist approach has helped them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jai @ 62,</p>
<p>I suspect that Churchill would possibly buy into other narratives such as British history / tradition being under threat.</p>
<p>Also, a worry is the BNP finding a leader untainted by racist thuggery, or a Nazi background (Holocaust Denial, dressing up in uniforms, links to US Far Right) &#8211; a logical progression in a process beginning with changing emphasis to a religious group, moderating their language. However, maybe they won&#8217;t be sophisticated enough to do so, or they&#8217;ll lose some of their real hard-core support (cited as a possible reason for the membership list leak).</p>
<p>I think the less overt racist approach has helped them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166580</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We really need to see this happen though. I wish I could start a petition to get Paxman to grill not just the BNP,.....about their dodgy aspects. On primetime television. That would be amazing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would absolutely love to see a one-hour Newsnight special focusing solely on Paxman taking Griffin completely apart. Griffin got slaughtered by Adam Bolton and William Hague on Sky News on the night of the election, so you can only imagine what Paxman would be able to do to him.

***************************

&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™d like to see Nick Griffin stand his ground with Jello Biafra in the room&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d like to see Hitler-worshipping, Nazi-defending, WW2 RAF-hating Nick Griffin stand his ground with Winston Churchill in the room.

Churchill, for all his faults (especially his attitude towards Indians), was so aggressively hostile towards the Nazis that, during discussions on the matter in December 1944, US leaders actually had to restrain him when it came to his views on what should be done to captured leading Nazis. (Churchill&#039;s original stance involved summary executions via an &quot;Act of Attainder&quot; in order circumvent legal obstacles).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We really need to see this happen though. I wish I could start a petition to get Paxman to grill not just the BNP,&#8230;..about their dodgy aspects. On primetime television. That would be amazing.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would absolutely love to see a one-hour Newsnight special focusing solely on Paxman taking Griffin completely apart. Griffin got slaughtered by Adam Bolton and William Hague on Sky News on the night of the election, so you can only imagine what Paxman would be able to do to him.</p>
<p>***************************</p>
<blockquote><p>Iâ€™d like to see Nick Griffin stand his ground with Jello Biafra in the room</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see Hitler-worshipping, Nazi-defending, WW2 RAF-hating Nick Griffin stand his ground with Winston Churchill in the room.</p>
<p>Churchill, for all his faults (especially his attitude towards Indians), was so aggressively hostile towards the Nazis that, during discussions on the matter in December 1944, US leaders actually had to restrain him when it came to his views on what should be done to captured leading Nazis. (Churchill&#8217;s original stance involved summary executions via an &#8220;Act of Attainder&#8221; in order circumvent legal obstacles).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: persephone</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166573</link>
		<dc:creator>persephone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166573</guid>
		<description>@ 59 

Y&#039;know Amrit its not Nick Griffins fault that he did not get a higher class degree. 

It was all those immigrants in their multitudes that attend Cambridge that prevented him from achieving supremacy. All the Cambridge dons were spending all their time teaching remedial classes to the droves of non whites there. The same thing happened to him at the two private schools he attended before University too. Oh and at kindergarten he had to share the climbing frame with a non indigenous kid which ruined his motor skills for life too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 59 </p>
<p>Y&#8217;know Amrit its not Nick Griffins fault that he did not get a higher class degree. </p>
<p>It was all those immigrants in their multitudes that attend Cambridge that prevented him from achieving supremacy. All the Cambridge dons were spending all their time teaching remedial classes to the droves of non whites there. The same thing happened to him at the two private schools he attended before University too. Oh and at kindergarten he had to share the climbing frame with a non indigenous kid which ruined his motor skills for life too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kismet Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166562</link>
		<dc:creator>Kismet Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166562</guid>
		<description>The Dead Kennedys were far-left. I&#039;d like to see Nick Griffin stand his ground with Jello Biafra in the room</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dead Kennedys were far-left. I&#8217;d like to see Nick Griffin stand his ground with Jello Biafra in the room</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amrit</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166551</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166551</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you. :-D

What I would really love to see is this:

Pac-man: Let me get this straight. You think whites are &#039;the master race,&#039; and that Britain would be better off without non-whites.

British Nazi Poppet: Yes.

Pac-man: So, you have a leader who couldn&#039;t even get a second-class degree in History, but you think you&#039;re going to be able to train millions of &#039;indigenous whites&#039; to do significantly different and harder jobs, like surgery? Pharmacy?

British Nazi Poppet: *begins to make like a Ribena berry and go purple with rage*

Pac-man: I&#039;m waiting for an explanation...



We really need to see this happen though. I wish I could start a petition to get Paxman to grill not just the BNP, but ALL the major parties, about their dodgy aspects. On primetime television. That would be amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What I would really love to see is this:</p>
<p>Pac-man: Let me get this straight. You think whites are &#8216;the master race,&#8217; and that Britain would be better off without non-whites.</p>
<p>British Nazi Poppet: Yes.</p>
<p>Pac-man: So, you have a leader who couldn&#8217;t even get a second-class degree in History, but you think you&#8217;re going to be able to train millions of &#8216;indigenous whites&#8217; to do significantly different and harder jobs, like surgery? Pharmacy?</p>
<p>British Nazi Poppet: *begins to make like a Ribena berry and go purple with rage*</p>
<p>Pac-man: I&#8217;m waiting for an explanation&#8230;</p>
<p>We really need to see this happen though. I wish I could start a petition to get Paxman to grill not just the BNP, but ALL the major parties, about their dodgy aspects. On primetime television. That would be amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166533</guid>
		<description>Amrit,

Brilliant !

Especially this bit:

&lt;blockquote&gt;British Nazi Poppet: Well, obviously we will train indigenous whites to take over those rolesâ€¦

Pac-man: What if they donâ€™t want to do them? What if they want to become footballers and glamour models?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Love it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amrit,</p>
<p>Brilliant !</p>
<p>Especially this bit:</p>
<blockquote><p>British Nazi Poppet: Well, obviously we will train indigenous whites to take over those rolesâ€¦</p>
<p>Pac-man: What if they donâ€™t want to do them? What if they want to become footballers and glamour models?</p></blockquote>
<p>Love it <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: persephone</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166528</link>
		<dc:creator>persephone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166528</guid>
		<description>Amrit,

hilarious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amrit,</p>
<p>hilarious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamit</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166522</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166522</guid>
		<description>Amrit -

Nice one.

Jai has competition now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amrit -</p>
<p>Nice one.</p>
<p>Jai has competition now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amrit</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166514</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166514</guid>
		<description>&#039;Wings of the BNP&#039;

Are bat-like?

Ought to be clipped?


Seriously though, I really wish we could see Paxman facing down BNP members: &#039;So, you want to deport all non-whites, British or not.&#039;

*squirming BNP member* Er...

Pac-man: Is that not what it said in your manifesto?

British Nazi Poppet: Yes...

Pac-man: So what magic wand will you wave to replace all the, say, Indian doctors? The Filipino nurses?

British Nazi Poppet: Well, obviously we will train indigenous whites to take over those roles...

Pac-man: What if they don&#039;t want to do them? What if they want to become footballers and glamour models? 

British Nazi Poppet: ...

and so on and so on until GAME OVER! Pac-man will get his ghost (the British Nazi Poppet).

I&#039;ll just head back to my padded cell now. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Wings of the BNP&#8217;</p>
<p>Are bat-like?</p>
<p>Ought to be clipped?</p>
<p>Seriously though, I really wish we could see Paxman facing down BNP members: &#8216;So, you want to deport all non-whites, British or not.&#8217;</p>
<p>*squirming BNP member* Er&#8230;</p>
<p>Pac-man: Is that not what it said in your manifesto?</p>
<p>British Nazi Poppet: Yes&#8230;</p>
<p>Pac-man: So what magic wand will you wave to replace all the, say, Indian doctors? The Filipino nurses?</p>
<p>British Nazi Poppet: Well, obviously we will train indigenous whites to take over those roles&#8230;</p>
<p>Pac-man: What if they don&#8217;t want to do them? What if they want to become footballers and glamour models? </p>
<p>British Nazi Poppet: &#8230;</p>
<p>and so on and so on until GAME OVER! Pac-man will get his ghost (the British Nazi Poppet).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just head back to my padded cell now. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clairwil</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166512</link>
		<dc:creator>Clairwil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166512</guid>
		<description>Good post Rumbold and you&#039;re right it is comforting to see everyone trying to distance themselves from them. 

From reading the BNP manifesto as far as I can tell it appears to be unworkable mish mash of poulist rhetoric drawn from the right and the left in an effort to make themselves look like something more substantial than a single issue white taliban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Rumbold and you&#8217;re right it is comforting to see everyone trying to distance themselves from them. </p>
<p>From reading the BNP manifesto as far as I can tell it appears to be unworkable mish mash of poulist rhetoric drawn from the right and the left in an effort to make themselves look like something more substantial than a single issue white taliban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166481</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166481</guid>
		<description>Never heard of it myself Chairwoman. I shall ask down at the club.

Platinum786 was clearly joking. It is not as if Glen Jenvey is on this thread (or is he...?). If we can&#039;t even make jokes, then we might as well give up.

Jai:

I&#039;ll just make my points on this thread, rather than on the other one as well (so as to keep things simple). 

I am in general very uncomfortable with the idea of banning groups because of what they might do. For example, Gordon Brown and his cronies have destroyed this country&#039;s economy. A number had links with Britain&#039;s past enemies (Mandelson, Darling etc.). Should the Labour party therefore be banned? No. Should the BNP be banned because of what they might do? Again, no. People, and this includes Al-Muhajiroun, should be free to form their own groups, providing their group&#039;s activities/charter does not break the law. Individuals should be prosecuted for breaking the law.

Munir:

But some people don&#039;t vote on immigration in order to &#039;keep out the foreigners&#039;, but because they are worried by what they perceive as the negative aspects of it (such as extra pressure on public services). Deal with those problems, and you leave the BNp with their racism and not much else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of it myself Chairwoman. I shall ask down at the club.</p>
<p>Platinum786 was clearly joking. It is not as if Glen Jenvey is on this thread (or is he&#8230;?). If we can&#8217;t even make jokes, then we might as well give up.</p>
<p>Jai:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just make my points on this thread, rather than on the other one as well (so as to keep things simple). </p>
<p>I am in general very uncomfortable with the idea of banning groups because of what they might do. For example, Gordon Brown and his cronies have destroyed this country&#8217;s economy. A number had links with Britain&#8217;s past enemies (Mandelson, Darling etc.). Should the Labour party therefore be banned? No. Should the BNP be banned because of what they might do? Again, no. People, and this includes Al-Muhajiroun, should be free to form their own groups, providing their group&#8217;s activities/charter does not break the law. Individuals should be prosecuted for breaking the law.</p>
<p>Munir:</p>
<p>But some people don&#8217;t vote on immigration in order to &#8216;keep out the foreigners&#8217;, but because they are worried by what they perceive as the negative aspects of it (such as extra pressure on public services). Deal with those problems, and you leave the BNp with their racism and not much else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chairwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166480</link>
		<dc:creator>chairwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166480</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think I had :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think I had <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166477</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166477</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve had a sheltered life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve had a sheltered life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chairwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166474</link>
		<dc:creator>chairwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166474</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I curry my turkey on Boxing Day.

(And no, thatâ€™s not a euphemism for anal sex)&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Is this newspeak?  Not a euphemism with which I am familiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I curry my turkey on Boxing Day.</p>
<p>(And no, thatâ€™s not a euphemism for anal sex)&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Is this newspeak?  Not a euphemism with which I am familiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166472</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166472</guid>
		<description>I curry my turkey on Boxing Day.

(And no, that&#039;s not a euphemism for anal sex)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I curry my turkey on Boxing Day.</p>
<p>(And no, that&#8217;s not a euphemism for anal sex)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahya Birt</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166471</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahya Birt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166471</guid>
		<description>Random Guy @ 46

I&#039;m afraid you could be right, but in national elections with the current first-past-the-post system, for the BNP to win a seat in Westminister say in 2010 is obviously nigh-on impossible. With all the talk about PR or the forms of the Alternative Vote system for Westminister, surely this is something to take into proper consideration, as Chairwoman has pointed out. If I&#039;m not mistaken the Germans deal with this under their PR system by not granting federal seats to any party that gets less then 5% of the vote at the federal state elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random Guy @ 46</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid you could be right, but in national elections with the current first-past-the-post system, for the BNP to win a seat in Westminister say in 2010 is obviously nigh-on impossible. With all the talk about PR or the forms of the Alternative Vote system for Westminister, surely this is something to take into proper consideration, as Chairwoman has pointed out. If I&#8217;m not mistaken the Germans deal with this under their PR system by not granting federal seats to any party that gets less then 5% of the vote at the federal state elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Common Humanist</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166470</link>
		<dc:creator>The Common Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166470</guid>
		<description>Shamit, 

Agreed. A key problem with the Labour Party in rural S Yorks (as much of Barnsley and Doncaster Districts actually are), as opposed to Sheffield, is that it is weak in terms of activists due to decades of total dominance. 

One of the points missed about FPTP as a voting system by the upper echelons of both Labour and Tory Party leaderships  is that it helps attrophies partys as well as voter numbers. Something I see Brown and Cameron have still failed to grasped this arvo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shamit, </p>
<p>Agreed. A key problem with the Labour Party in rural S Yorks (as much of Barnsley and Doncaster Districts actually are), as opposed to Sheffield, is that it is weak in terms of activists due to decades of total dominance. </p>
<p>One of the points missed about FPTP as a voting system by the upper echelons of both Labour and Tory Party leaderships  is that it helps attrophies partys as well as voter numbers. Something I see Brown and Cameron have still failed to grasped this arvo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166467</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166467</guid>
		<description>Yahya @ 36, that sounds about right - and goes together with the &#039;disenfrachised&#039; theme. Regarding the &#039;credit crunch&#039; angle, my meaning is that perhaps we are approaching a tipping point now that we are in a full blown recession - where there is enough &#039;stock&#039; as it were, of people who have &#039;had enough of the way things are&#039;. And as we can see here, immigrants are typically first in the line of fire when it comes to this sort of thing.

Regarding having less votes, this could just be due to apathy surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahya @ 36, that sounds about right &#8211; and goes together with the &#8216;disenfrachised&#8217; theme. Regarding the &#8216;credit crunch&#8217; angle, my meaning is that perhaps we are approaching a tipping point now that we are in a full blown recession &#8211; where there is enough &#8216;stock&#8217; as it were, of people who have &#8216;had enough of the way things are&#8217;. And as we can see here, immigrants are typically first in the line of fire when it comes to this sort of thing.</p>
<p>Regarding having less votes, this could just be due to apathy surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chavscum</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/4783#comment-166466</link>
		<dc:creator>chavscum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=4783#comment-166466</guid>
		<description>Anyone thought that properly restricting immigration, removing positive discrimmination, and reducing public funding of separative initiatives like black history month, might stop people voting for fascists? Just an idea, like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone thought that properly restricting immigration, removing positive discrimmination, and reducing public funding of separative initiatives like black history month, might stop people voting for fascists? Just an idea, like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

