<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tourism in Londonstan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 09:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19708</guid>
		<description>People have different preferences. Some like the &quot;masala&quot; sci-fi eg. Star Trek &amp; Star Wars, others prefer something more overtly intellectual eg. Solaris, 2001 etc. Different strokes for different folks.

Speaking of Star Trek movies, I think The Wrath of Khan was the best one all-round. It also seemed to make the 23rd Century a really exciting and upbeat time to be alive (just the way human life and society was portrayed). I didn&#039;t really get that feeling with most of the later films and definitely not with any of the spin-off series, from TNG onwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have different preferences. Some like the &#8220;masala&#8221; sci-fi eg. Star Trek &amp; Star Wars, others prefer something more overtly intellectual eg. Solaris, 2001 etc. Different strokes for different folks.</p>
<p>Speaking of Star Trek movies, I think The Wrath of Khan was the best one all-round. It also seemed to make the 23rd Century a really exciting and upbeat time to be alive (just the way human life and society was portrayed). I didn&#8217;t really get that feeling with most of the later films and definitely not with any of the spin-off series, from TNG onwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19690</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 19:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19690</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree about the Matrix. I think 9 or 10 is a fair place for it. I won&#039;t disagree at too much length as I can smell dinner, but despite it just being a Ghost in the Shell-Transformers mashup, it&#039;s still fucking good. I&#039;m not fussed about the martial arts and not especially about the SFX, I just think it was overtly cool without making any apologies for it. Who cares if philosophy is bunk? I buy the Force wholesale. I won&#039;t apologise for it, I really like the Matrix.

I wouldn&#039;t put Solaris (72) so high and frankly 2001 neither. I find it annoying that article interviewed two people I know and they didn&#039;t think to consult me once. So what that the other two are PhDs and people who&#039;ve gone into orbit, I bet they don&#039;t know their Clingon from their Klingon.

I think Bladerunner no. 1 is a choice I can agree with. No Planet of the Apes? No Star Trek?! (joking!) No Metropolis? Would Brazil be sci fi? Twelve Monkeys (not top ten I don&#039;t think)?

Akira etc - opening it to manga may change a lot. Hmm, having said that Akira is still probably the only one I&#039;d single out to be in an overall top 10 sci fi. Definite possibility, ten times more iconic than the Matrix.

You&#039;re clearly more of a classic fan than me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree about the Matrix. I think 9 or 10 is a fair place for it. I won&#8217;t disagree at too much length as I can smell dinner, but despite it just being a Ghost in the Shell-Transformers mashup, it&#8217;s still fucking good. I&#8217;m not fussed about the martial arts and not especially about the SFX, I just think it was overtly cool without making any apologies for it. Who cares if philosophy is bunk? I buy the Force wholesale. I won&#8217;t apologise for it, I really like the Matrix.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t put Solaris (72) so high and frankly 2001 neither. I find it annoying that article interviewed two people I know and they didn&#8217;t think to consult me once. So what that the other two are PhDs and people who&#8217;ve gone into orbit, I bet they don&#8217;t know their Clingon from their Klingon.</p>
<p>I think Bladerunner no. 1 is a choice I can agree with. No Planet of the Apes? No Star Trek?! (joking!) No Metropolis? Would Brazil be sci fi? Twelve Monkeys (not top ten I don&#8217;t think)?</p>
<p>Akira etc &#8211; opening it to manga may change a lot. Hmm, having said that Akira is still probably the only one I&#8217;d single out to be in an overall top 10 sci fi. Definite possibility, ten times more iconic than the Matrix.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re clearly more of a classic fan than me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19688</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19688</guid>
		<description>Hmmm

10/.  Close Encounter&#039;s of the Third Kind:

Mostly, this is actually a mind-numbingly boring saga of a mentally deranged guy searching for aliens. The last 15 minutes is incredible, yes (who can forget the &#039;musical&#039; scene) but the overall film is patchy.

9/ The Matrix (1999)

LOL LMAO ROFLMAO This is the biggest pile of shit ever. Laughable &#039;philosophy&#039;, weak martial arts, gunplay a very poor fascimile of a John Woo movie, not saved by the &#039;bullet time&#039; conceit (see Ringo Lam&#039;s Full Contact for a much earlier and much better use of bullet cam).. Seriously overrated film

8/ War of the Worlds (1953) 

Now this is a good film, one of my favourites from childhood. Groundbreaking SFX for the time (OK we can see the wires today) Yes the script is hokey, but it has a real charm. The bit with the priest .going up to the Martian war machine followed up by all hell breaking loose with the military vs aliens was seriously awesome. Other memorable setpieces include Martian stalking the couple in the house and the H-bomb scene. Definitely a classic.

7/. The Day the Earth Stood Still

Classic. Nothing more to be said. Gort was a BAD motherfucker. &quot;Klaatu barada nikto!&quot; Should be higher.

6/. Terminator (1984)/T2(1991)

I&#039;m not a huge fan of these movies but they are good. Second is more of an action film than the first, rather like Aliens compared to Alien.. Predator is my favourite Arnold movie.

5/. Solaris (1972) 

This movie was obviously too intellectual for me to understand. Or maybe I&#039;ve never taken drugs. I&#039;m sure it means something.

4/  Alien (1979)

Great film, can drag a little on repeat watchings though. Chestburster scene - classic (I wish I had seen that in the cinema when it came out). Alien design - classic. Gieger earned his paycheck here.

3/ Star Wars (1977)/Empire Strikes Back (1980)

Not really a huge Star Wars geek, but I can see why these are a popular choice. Interesting fact, the death star attack in the first film is heavily inspired by the old WWII movie 633 squadron.

2/  2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

Iconic imagery, great sfx for the time, a memorable character in HAL, and that whole &#039;Thus Spake Zarathustra&#039;/&#039;Blue Danube&#039; business. I don&#039;t know what it all means though. I&#039;m sure lots of drugs were involved in the creation of this as well. Guess I&#039;m missing out.

1/ Blade Runner.

Again, some memorable imagery, the whole &#039;futuristic cityscape&#039; thing, and some weighty subject matter courtesy of Philip K Dick. Not sure if it&#039;s the best of all time though, but I tend to be biased towards older stuff.

Some good films on there, and some bizarre ones (The Matrix LOL). Other films that could have been considered, off the top of my head:

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)
Quatermass and the Pit (1967)
Invaders from Mars (1953)
The Thing from Another World (1951)
The Thing (1982)
Things to Come (1936)
The Beast from the 20,000 fathoms (1953)
Godzilla (1954)
Akira (1988)
Forbidden Planet (1956)

Ah, I better stop, So many more films I can think of. Picking a Top 10 would be impossible :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm</p>
<p>10/.  Close Encounter&#8217;s of the Third Kind:</p>
<p>Mostly, this is actually a mind-numbingly boring saga of a mentally deranged guy searching for aliens. The last 15 minutes is incredible, yes (who can forget the &#8216;musical&#8217; scene) but the overall film is patchy.</p>
<p>9/ The Matrix (1999)</p>
<p>LOL LMAO ROFLMAO This is the biggest pile of shit ever. Laughable &#8216;philosophy&#8217;, weak martial arts, gunplay a very poor fascimile of a John Woo movie, not saved by the &#8216;bullet time&#8217; conceit (see Ringo Lam&#8217;s Full Contact for a much earlier and much better use of bullet cam).. Seriously overrated film</p>
<p>8/ War of the Worlds (1953) </p>
<p>Now this is a good film, one of my favourites from childhood. Groundbreaking SFX for the time (OK we can see the wires today) Yes the script is hokey, but it has a real charm. The bit with the priest .going up to the Martian war machine followed up by all hell breaking loose with the military vs aliens was seriously awesome. Other memorable setpieces include Martian stalking the couple in the house and the H-bomb scene. Definitely a classic.</p>
<p>7/. The Day the Earth Stood Still</p>
<p>Classic. Nothing more to be said. Gort was a BAD motherfucker. &#8220;Klaatu barada nikto!&#8221; Should be higher.</p>
<p>6/. Terminator (1984)/T2(1991)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a huge fan of these movies but they are good. Second is more of an action film than the first, rather like Aliens compared to Alien.. Predator is my favourite Arnold movie.</p>
<p>5/. Solaris (1972) </p>
<p>This movie was obviously too intellectual for me to understand. Or maybe I&#8217;ve never taken drugs. I&#8217;m sure it means something.</p>
<p>4/  Alien (1979)</p>
<p>Great film, can drag a little on repeat watchings though. Chestburster scene &#8211; classic (I wish I had seen that in the cinema when it came out). Alien design &#8211; classic. Gieger earned his paycheck here.</p>
<p>3/ Star Wars (1977)/Empire Strikes Back (1980)</p>
<p>Not really a huge Star Wars geek, but I can see why these are a popular choice. Interesting fact, the death star attack in the first film is heavily inspired by the old WWII movie 633 squadron.</p>
<p>2/  2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)</p>
<p>Iconic imagery, great sfx for the time, a memorable character in HAL, and that whole &#8216;Thus Spake Zarathustra&#8217;/'Blue Danube&#8217; business. I don&#8217;t know what it all means though. I&#8217;m sure lots of drugs were involved in the creation of this as well. Guess I&#8217;m missing out.</p>
<p>1/ Blade Runner.</p>
<p>Again, some memorable imagery, the whole &#8216;futuristic cityscape&#8217; thing, and some weighty subject matter courtesy of Philip K Dick. Not sure if it&#8217;s the best of all time though, but I tend to be biased towards older stuff.</p>
<p>Some good films on there, and some bizarre ones (The Matrix LOL). Other films that could have been considered, off the top of my head:</p>
<p>Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)<br />
Quatermass and the Pit (1967)<br />
Invaders from Mars (1953)<br />
The Thing from Another World (1951)<br />
The Thing (1982)<br />
Things to Come (1936)<br />
The Beast from the 20,000 fathoms (1953)<br />
Godzilla (1954)<br />
Akira (1988)<br />
Forbidden Planet (1956)</p>
<p>Ah, I better stop, So many more films I can think of. Picking a Top 10 would be impossible <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19685</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19685</guid>
		<description>http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/news/page/0,12983,1290764,00.html

Not odd choices per se, just a few surprises considering it was a public vote. Look Raz, we can pitch our film and win the top 10 on DVD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/news/page/0,12983,1290764,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/news/page/0,12983,1290764,00.html</a></p>
<p>Not odd choices per se, just a few surprises considering it was a public vote. Look Raz, we can pitch our film and win the top 10 on DVD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19684</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19684</guid>
		<description>What was the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19682</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19682</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think it was the top ten- just the longest ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think it was the top ten- just the longest ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19681</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19681</guid>
		<description>Mate, with the new GP salaries I&#039;m suddenly giving it some serious thought. Whew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mate, with the new GP salaries I&#8217;m suddenly giving it some serious thought. Whew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19679</guid>
		<description>Becoming a GP anywhere other than Slough is a success - its being a GP in Slouth that will make him a failure :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becoming a GP anywhere other than Slough is a success &#8211; its being a GP in Slouth that will make him a failure <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19678</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19678</guid>
		<description>LOL at becoming a GP as a &#039;failure&#039; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL at becoming a GP as a &#8216;failure&#8217; <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19676</guid>
		<description>Rohin

I can see why the Warrior didn&#039;t receive everyone&#039;s acclaim - but it won awards and critical acclaim around the world. So the director says he wants to make movies about modern British Asian life - he&#039;s got the talent - does he get the funding? Does he hell - the same old tripe by the same old mediocrities gets the funding. Work as a GP in Slough to fund your first movie! Whatever it is good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rohin</p>
<p>I can see why the Warrior didn&#8217;t receive everyone&#8217;s acclaim &#8211; but it won awards and critical acclaim around the world. So the director says he wants to make movies about modern British Asian life &#8211; he&#8217;s got the talent &#8211; does he get the funding? Does he hell &#8211; the same old tripe by the same old mediocrities gets the funding. Work as a GP in Slough to fund your first movie! Whatever it is good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19675</guid>
		<description>Yeah Raz, don&#039;t forget the robots!

Did you see the top ten sci fi in the Grauniad yesterday? Hmm...strange selection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Raz, don&#8217;t forget the robots!</p>
<p>Did you see the top ten sci fi in the Grauniad yesterday? Hmm&#8230;strange selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19674</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19674</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed The Warrior, but I can see why some didn&#039;t. I&#039;m very into my slow, sweeping, beautiful films but many will get bored. Absolutely right Jay, I&#039;ve recently learned that both in publishing and film there is not really a dearth in talent or variety, but the powers that be want the same stereotyped content.

It&#039;s worse for film in a way, as the outlay is so much more than for a book. Actually even my old friend Gurinder Chadha said getting Film Council money was much easier when she wrote Bend It, which she admits is a stereotypical feel-good film, in comparison to more offbeat prior scripts. However now she&#039;s big (no pun intended) I feel she should try to redress the balance. Well she has other fish to fry, fine.

Thanks for the encouragement Jay, I will do my best! But making a film is so tough. As in a proper film. I can do a Blair Witch - in fact I have that same camera - but a film (not digital) production is a big undertaking. As of late I&#039;ve decided I will try writing first. I&#039;ll fail at that, spend my savings on a film, fail at that and become a GP in Slough. Whatever, watch this space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed The Warrior, but I can see why some didn&#8217;t. I&#8217;m very into my slow, sweeping, beautiful films but many will get bored. Absolutely right Jay, I&#8217;ve recently learned that both in publishing and film there is not really a dearth in talent or variety, but the powers that be want the same stereotyped content.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worse for film in a way, as the outlay is so much more than for a book. Actually even my old friend Gurinder Chadha said getting Film Council money was much easier when she wrote Bend It, which she admits is a stereotypical feel-good film, in comparison to more offbeat prior scripts. However now she&#8217;s big (no pun intended) I feel she should try to redress the balance. Well she has other fish to fry, fine.</p>
<p>Thanks for the encouragement Jay, I will do my best! But making a film is so tough. As in a proper film. I can do a Blair Witch &#8211; in fact I have that same camera &#8211; but a film (not digital) production is a big undertaking. As of late I&#8217;ve decided I will try writing first. I&#8217;ll fail at that, spend my savings on a film, fail at that and become a GP in Slough. Whatever, watch this space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raz</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19672</link>
		<dc:creator>raz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19672</guid>
		<description>Rohin, I&#039;ll help you! The world&#039;s first Asian sci-fi/zombie/stop motion/hentai film is coming from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rohin, I&#8217;ll help you! The world&#8217;s first Asian sci-fi/zombie/stop motion/hentai film is coming from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19671</guid>
		<description>You need to make your movies man! You&#039;re the man to do it! Somebody needs to shake up this movie scene!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to make your movies man! You&#8217;re the man to do it! Somebody needs to shake up this movie scene!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Singh FAO Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Singh FAO Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19670</guid>
		<description>Rohin - I think it is really disturbing that the guy who made The Warrior couldnt get anyone to finance his next movie when he wanted to make movies about British Asian life that didnt follow the cliches and stereotypes - proof that its not the talent that is lacking, its the money men who dont want to finance stories apart from the usual storylines and stereotypes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rohin &#8211; I think it is really disturbing that the guy who made The Warrior couldnt get anyone to finance his next movie when he wanted to make movies about British Asian life that didnt follow the cliches and stereotypes &#8211; proof that its not the talent that is lacking, its the money men who dont want to finance stories apart from the usual storylines and stereotypes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19668</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19668</guid>
		<description>Jay thanks! That was great, he read my mind. Praises Monsoon Wedding, attacks British Asian film portrayal, attacks Gurinder Chadha - is there anything this article DOESN&#039;T have? Excellent and well written.

Kapadia&#039;s point is one of the main ones:

&quot;For people like myself there is a much wider experience in Britain then just going on about arranged marriages. The danger is that it will breed tedium and films representing Asians will stop getting made.&quot;

Sunny do you know this Kaleem Aftab? 

BTW I find it laughable that yet another Romeo &amp; Juliet clone, this time called Love + Hate, has even stolen the &#039;+&#039; from Baz Luhrman&#039;s Romeo + Juliet! How do these filmmakers think what they&#039;re doing is original? Jeez, can&#039;t they use their eyes and see there&#039;s enough junk out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay thanks! That was great, he read my mind. Praises Monsoon Wedding, attacks British Asian film portrayal, attacks Gurinder Chadha &#8211; is there anything this article DOESN&#8217;T have? Excellent and well written.</p>
<p>Kapadia&#8217;s point is one of the main ones:</p>
<p>&#8220;For people like myself there is a much wider experience in Britain then just going on about arranged marriages. The danger is that it will breed tedium and films representing Asians will stop getting made.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sunny do you know this Kaleem Aftab? </p>
<p>BTW I find it laughable that yet another Romeo &#038; Juliet clone, this time called Love + Hate, has even stolen the &#8216;+&#8217; from Baz Luhrman&#8217;s Romeo + Juliet! How do these filmmakers think what they&#8217;re doing is original? Jeez, can&#8217;t they use their eyes and see there&#8217;s enough junk out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Singh FAO Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Singh FAO Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19664</guid>
		<description>Rohin

I just read this article in the Independent and thought you may like it - all about the crap and cliche of British Asian cinema:

http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/features/article361930.ece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rohin</p>
<p>I just read this article in the Independent and thought you may like it &#8211; all about the crap and cliche of British Asian cinema:</p>
<p><a href="http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/features/article361930.ece" rel="nofollow">http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/features/article361930.ece</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19597</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19597</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Suprisingly, or more accurately, gallingly, Dhaliwal’s rage against Malkani’s tome smacks of “I’m the only Asian in the village” superciliousness.&lt;/i&gt;

I think you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head Johnny Singh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Suprisingly, or more accurately, gallingly, Dhaliwal’s rage against Malkani’s tome smacks of “I’m the only Asian in the village” superciliousness.</i></p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head Johnny Singh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19587</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 12:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19587</guid>
		<description>Someone e-mail Johnny Singh&#039;s blistering and funny post to Nirpal Dhaliwal please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone e-mail Johnny Singh&#8217;s blistering and funny post to Nirpal Dhaliwal please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422/comment-page-2#comment-19585</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 12:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/422#comment-19585</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“In the Octagon, presenting Masher Malkani - specialising in grappling with Punjabi vernacular and wrestling with characterisation - versus Duffer Dhaliwal, whose style includes whinge chung, Fujitsu (he does gadget reviews on the side) and boxing (i.e. bundling up all those returns of “Tourism” from Waterstones).&lt;/i&gt;

This is fucking funny. The whole comment is. Stick around Johnny Singh, I like your style!

Did Dhaliwal get 4 As? He always struck me as thick. Still...not FIVE As is it? *polishes nails on T-shirt*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“In the Octagon, presenting Masher Malkani &#8211; specialising in grappling with Punjabi vernacular and wrestling with characterisation &#8211; versus Duffer Dhaliwal, whose style includes whinge chung, Fujitsu (he does gadget reviews on the side) and boxing (i.e. bundling up all those returns of “Tourism” from Waterstones).</i></p>
<p>This is fucking funny. The whole comment is. Stick around Johnny Singh, I like your style!</p>
<p>Did Dhaliwal get 4 As? He always struck me as thick. Still&#8230;not FIVE As is it? *polishes nails on T-shirt*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
