And this is why I stopped listening to you aggesssss ago

The problem you have is that you are not consistent because you have an anti white, or at least a non white agenda, which blinds you to reality.

Still boyo, you don,t censor people like Jo Harker. Do you think he’s celebrating tonight, he reckons his mother was Irish. Mind you, everyone has one when we win something.

I,ll be back in the morning to have another go at yis.

Oh no, I shouldn’t do that, because then your cosy little bullshit narrative wouldn’t work until you’ve lumped all the ethnics together. Boring! Next time come up with something more intelligent, yeah?

I used an article on CiF about the front page Guardian article today about the brutality of the TSU to draw attention to the fact that when the old SPG became too notorious they simply changed the name and gave a link to southall79.googlemail.com for people wanting to get in touch.

It has been censored so so much for “Facts are sacred but comment is free”.

Er, I thought Clintons was the biggest distriber of cards in this country. Poor old Joseph, still reality was never strong point for Guardian jounalists. Turns out his mother was Irish and, presumably white, which makes his all whites are racists a bit weird.

Talking of weirdos Lee Jasper also denies his mum was white as well. What is it with these black revolutionaries. It seems the more white they are the blacker their politics. Anyone got any ideas?

You really don’t get it do you? Not everything that Melanie Phillips says is wrong and the opinion pages of the Guardian are sometimes full of the most amazing crap. It interests me to see an article on Comment is Free which is then absolutely savaged by what are presumably Guardian readers.

I remember an article on CiF earlier this year by the then editor of the late and unlamented New Nation Lester Holloway calling for all black short lists. He was ripped to shreds and the only person who supported him was Simon Wooley of Operation Black Vote. Well he would wouldn’t he? Otherwise he would be out of a job.

What you cannot,it seems do, is to think outside the box. There are for you and many posting here cetain articles of faith that are sacrosanct and which must never be challenged at any cost. It never fails to amaze me just how detached from reality many of you are. There was a posting here about my comments on think tanks. They are as reliable a guide to what is going on as reports on racism from the CRE now thank God no longer with us.

From its formation in 1976 every single investigation found racism, a strike rate the Spanish Inquisition didn’t achieve. Yet as soon as these mostly fictitious were published they were immediately holy writ.

The problem I think a lot of people out there have is one that the left have always had. If something, be it Stalinism, Trotskyism, Maoism or whatever is clearly wrong there are people who will defend it to their dying breath because without it they have to admit they have wasted the best years of their lives.

There is now a similar phenomena emerging on the left which is that anything written by Gilligan/Cohen/Phillips/Aronavitch/Hitches is by definition wrong and is quite clearly comrades orchestrated and paid for by the neo con Zionist conspiracy so clearly described in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

I am of course being humorous here, something the straight left can never be as they take themselves so seriously. Think outside the box and off the tram lines people and remember one of the many wise things George Orwell said. “Freedom, if it is anything, if the right to be told things you don’t want to hear”.

I’m not going to scroll up to see who mentioned black nazis but I would so describe anyone who supports the entry into this country of Louis Farrakhan. Stand up Simon Wooley, Lee Jasper, Joseph Harker of the Guardian who was allowed by that paper to write an article calling all white people racists. That’s all for now breakfast is on the table but I rather think it is going to be an interesting weekend.

My point exactly. You’re pretending not to know in order to excuse the indefensible.

Golam – this is very true.

Well I dont agree with the things you mentioned. Im not aware Mousawi holding these beliefs

The Lebanese shia have every right to defend themselves from Eretz Israeli fascists

By your logic you agree with Wilders since you defend him

Where do you get that from? Because he’s a darkie and he dares fight someone who invaders his land he wants to kill you.

Er… Hezbollah is bunch of Islamist nutters who call for the destruction of Israel. Stop with this spurious claim of justified resistance, or equivalence between him and Wilders.

Hezbollah accused Jews of deliberately spreading H.I.V. and other diseases to Arabs throughout the Middle East. Al-Manar, the Hezbollah-owned and operated television station, was criticized for airing “anti-Semitic propaganda” in the form of a television drama depicting a Jewish world domination conspiracy. Hezbollah also used antisemitic educational materials designed for 5-year-old scouts. Likewise, the group has been accused of engaging in Holocaust denial, and supporting Holocaust deniers.

You obviously know all that. So your defence of him is, what, because you agree with him?

“See, the difference is that Wilders doesn’t support violence to achieve his goals, unlike Mousawi. do you see the difference?”

Yes I do. Wilders country hasnt been invaded by the Israeli army killing thousands as Mousawis had.

“both have objectionable opinions. Mousawi will kill me.”

Where do you get that from? Because he’s a darkie and he dares fight someone who invaders his land he wants to kill you.

Mousawi has come to the UK twice before yet you appear to still be alive.

Well im a Muslim and Wilders would harm me if he eevr got into power

Given that you’re a big supporter of Melanie Phillips, which you haven’t justified, I’m glad you’re on Nick Cohen’s side on this.

That’s nearly right. I don’t think he wants to ‘expel Muslims. How is that incorrect, and what does it have to do with you glossing Mousawi as a newspaper editor?

See, the difference is that Wilders doesn’t support violence to achieve his goals, unlike Mousawi. do you see the difference?

both have objectionable opinions. Mousawi will kill me.

But I think they’re on shaky ground when they dismiss the role of people on the grounds that most have never heard of them, or don’t care about them. I suspect some of the most powerful and influential people are also extremely low profile and anonymous.

For the man in the street, what is being done, and by whom? Give us answers, not platitudes and conferences.