Im personally not interested in acting against other Muslims merely to strength Israel and Pax America.

That is hands down the weirdest thing I’ve ever read on this site.

(I was going to be seriously tasteless, but I edited to maintain my dignity.)

Quite. Go away, Mushtaq.

Are you some sort of warrior for Islamists? I’d hope you’d agree that they have co-opted Islam for their own ends. Much as Catholics and Protestants co-opted Christianity for their ends in the Middle Ages.

It was just as much a load of mince then as it is now.

Chill, take a pill.

The comment above from Mushtaq is racist, no?

“Beholden to Judaism, Jew-behinds, Jew-ness, Jewish financiers, Jews have the money, reactionary Jewish backwardness”

- there’s a theme here isn’t there?

go away. I no longer want to hear about these sorts of flights of fancy. Deal with what they say or do.

If its a question of funding, present the evidence.

Otherwise give it a rest.

Why is this? Why do Southasian Muslims regard Jews as their superiors? Is it because we go weak-kneed whenever we hear the guttural tones of spoken Hebrew?
Surely we should know better by now? In spite of universal human rights abuses of the Israelis and the horror stories we hear year after year there is still a steadfast belief amongst Quilliamites that the sun shines out of Jew behinds.

Now that the Quilliam Foundation is free of their Jewish financiers, I hope that they can truly come into their own. I was hoping that one of their biggest achievements might be to develop a progressive, vernacular (read: British) school of Islam that is free (in every way) of reactionary Jewish backwardness.

And now its my double-standards! You need an assistant.

Now it leaves you with a freehand to accuse at will, with no one to actually able to refer back to those posts. Except you.

If I recall, you told me you deleted them because I had complained that the diversions from the topic of the posts were undermining the quality of Pickled Politics. There was no mention of the accusations you now make.

Which is why we either have to delete your comments or report your IP to the ISP. Which one would you rather have us do?

“Contrary to what you seem to think, this is quite a friendly site. I find your use of the personal as a weapon against other commentators bloody annoying.

You are certainly not going to change anyone’s mind with that approach”

I should try Sids approch. Well reasoned , sophisticated and subtle and nuanced.

Who can forget his comment to another poster: “youre an Islamist cnt”

He he.Says the man who deletes posts he doesnt like and reports people to their ISPs

lol

Yes, its called Freedom of Speech. How have you mananged to grow up to adulthood here in the West without hearing about it or indeed know what it even means?

And arent you guilty of exactly the same thing? You printed the Lord Ahmed 10,000 claim from the Brussel Journal without any chceking.

It has not yet been officially refuted, even if you want to wish it away.

You and many secularists have replaced the priests you accuse the religious of blindly relying on and following, with newspaper journalists you blindly accept!!

Unlike priests, I can insult any journalist I like without being questioned about my religious observance or my standing in the “community”.

At least the man Rushdie mentioned had the decency to admit his mistake something you didnt- instead you furiously tried to justify it!!

You’re losing me on this one. I tried to furiously justify what?

The majority of Muslims who protested Rushdie’s book had not read it with the notable exception of Sardar and others.

Yep, that’s what I just said.