Dirty kaffir is a catchy tune. I’ve spoken to people from the Beeb who come away from terror trials whislting it and I heard Mohammed Hamid’s barrister whistling it in court also.

On the other hand, words like nigger and paki are just great! Not offensive at all!
What planet do some of you people live on?

Good luck with finding many more of those…I wouldn’t get into a “how many extremist protesters can you find” competition if I were you.

Did you check out the link cjcjc?

It is incredibly offensive to many non-muslims.

TCH

When extremist Muslims say nasty things like: “Britain will embrace Islam”, or “Christians will go to hell”, or “non-Muslims are unclean”, then people start getting outraged and say that tolerating these people will lead to more terrorists. But why wouldn’t the same logic apply to someone who uses the words “golliwog”, “nigger” or “Paki” with abandon? If those words become part of mainstream vernacular again, because some idiots think no one is outraged, then who is to say racist violence, which already exists, wouldn’t rise?

Sunny, this logic – that if X says something radical, X must be a terrorist- is wrong. So WHY do you apply such nonsense logic to people who use “gollywog” and “nigger”? If you want to make a point by implication, make sure you starting premise is true.

Good luck with finding many more of those…I wouldn’t get into a “how many extremist protesters can you find” competition if I were you.

And he’s not comparing “wog” with “dirty kaffir” – and nor were you.

You asked specifically
“What’s the difference between a Muslim who calls someone a ‘dirty kaffir’ and Carol Thatcher calling someone a ‘golliwog’?”

I think it’s pretty obvious that there is quite a big difference, and not just one of “etiquette”.