Don, that’s the story of Abraham and Isaac. It’s in the Quran and in the Old Testament. I hate that story.
What a vain, selfish, paranoid, cunt of a God.
Luckily, he/she/it seems to get a bit more easy going and loving in the New Testament.

Don’t let the ignrorance of KKKonservatives like Old Pickler and Palune bother you. When they hear or read about stories about Aisha they only let their western, Orientalism type thinking blind them to the true wisdom of what went on between Muhammad(pbuh) and Aisha. Inshallah they will open up their hearts one day.

First let me clear that muslims worship ONLY and ONLY Allah the Almighty.But ,after Allah,the Almighty we respect and love with our whole heart and soul Prophet Mohammad(PBUH).
On Him the Holy Quran was revealed,He spread the message of peace in the world of Jahiliyah-The pre-Islamic Arabian age of ignorance, marked by barbarism and unbelief. Islam came to end this evil age, according to its view.,He spread Islam not through force but through his moral conduct and superb character.
I know telling u all this is worthless coz only a muslim can truly feel the love and faith towards him.
As for his marrying Hazrat Aisha(PBUH) so that was a part of culture and it had its own wisdom and purpose ordained by Allah.Also,in ISlam marriage is done by the consent of girl so no point of force. ….And may i ask u how many books have u read on His life that u are using bad words for him????
And if u all truly wanna know about his marriage and character then kindly read this-

http://www.islamonline.net/English/In_Depth/mohamed/1424/index.shtml

On this web page go to misconceptions and there u will find lots of articles related to these silly questions.

THANK YOu

“you’ve been sussed”

I’m sorry I don’t speak scouse, could you please articulate yourself in English.

Don’t make me laugh dude – you’ve been sussed. And I never apologise – you have some strange obsession and trollery – weirdo.

I have been a Muslim revert for over ten years, what have I written that makes you think that I am some pathetic troll. Morover, how do you know the ethnicities of the names you mentioned I always thought that Yusuf Smith was Jamaican. I think, and a few brothers might concur, that an apology is in order.

You two must be paid up members of the BNP. Why don’t you crawl back underneath your rocks. I will not waste my time debating non-believers about the life of the Prophet(pbuh)

Tend to agree. Someone on another blog once said of the religious, ‘If God told you to kill your child, would you do it? If not, then you don’t really believe.’

if every religion is taken seriously instead of being viewed as a mild form of insanity by the majority of people in the West, then religion would be regulated like porn, alcohol or nicotine.

The first thing to go out of the window would be the freedom to claim that their deity is the only worthwhile one, and if taken to the logical bitter end, no religion will be legal anymore, or, censored into an even more meaningless pile of deluded ideas than they are already.

So, asking others to respect ones’ religous BS is not possible, ever, all we can do is allow people to be crazy as long as they doesn’t bother anyone else or try to make them conform to their weird ideas.

Likewise, asking anyone impartial and sensible to adjudicate in this matter is impossible, since the arguments only make sense if one believes in the premises, and unfortunatly, this is exclusive of one another.

So, if in doubt, the safest way is to remind people that the freedom of religion is conditinal of this being self-contained, and that a christian can eat a bacon bagel if they want, a muslim can eat halal meat in milk sauce, and athists like me get to eat whatever they bloody like, without having some demented busybody on my case… oh dang, I forgot the NHS/Labour religous decree about about me and my cat not getting obese … heh.

“Sunny at pickledpolitics.com:

I don’t see any Muslims protesting against al-Jazeera by showing all those bloody tapes”

We need more Muslims-inciting-violence-offended-by-vikings controversies Sunny, if we’re gonna become as famous as we crave deserve would like.

=>what’s the point in arresting them?
A convinction is far from certain and would give them even more PR.”

Well, they should be arrested because they’re breaking the law. I agree about the possibility of a lack of conviction (especially considering last week’s events regarding the BNP), but you never know for sure until you actually try.

=>”“Incitement to murder” Against whom in particular?”

As in, who are they inciting ? Other Muslims. Who do they wish to murder ? The rest of us.

Some commenters in the news have drawn a very good analogy: If large numbers of BNP supporters were holding protest marches and holding placards aloft stating that (for example) Muslims here should be massacred in revenge for 9/11 or 7/7, they certainly would not be allowed to get away with it and arrests would quickly follow. This would be a correct and appropriate response.

I therefore do not see why Islamists behaving in the same way should not be similarly prosecuted. Yes, there is a risk that a conviction will not follow, and yes you will create (metaphorical) martyrs out of them — but that’s a risk you have to take, and you cannot hesitate in taking these actions just because some similarly misguided people may decide the jihadists are heroes for their cause.

Actually, religion does involve obligations. The trouble lies when those obligations clash with the obligations of a secular society.

you said:

“We have the ‘right’ to exercise freedom of speech — NOT the ‘obligation’ to do so.”

True, but, this is equally true:

We have the right to exercise our freedom of religion — NOT the ‘obligation’ to do so.