NEW LABOUR=NEW DANGER

BNP=BRITAIN FIRST

the average IQ of an average BNP member is so low you would have to dig for it!!!!!

Many of my posts state different points on the subject.

The BNP’s agenda is fairly broad, the Islamic issue is just one part of it.

The reason the BNP is more involved is poorer areas is because that is where the problems are more pronounced, it is not because the BNP feel that it is where they can more easily influence potential supporters.

It is perfectly valid for citizens of any country to be concerned with immigration, it’s effects and related governmental policies. The BNP are a legal, political organisation and have every right to discuss such matters with British citizens.

An increasing number of British citizens are aware of the truths that the BNP explain.
The BNP’s agenda is entirely transparent, they are
stating their intentions and policies clearly, they have no hidden agenda, you don’t need to decipher what they say. There is no reason to keep the truth from middle class British citizens, they are just as entitled
to know the truth as any other class of British citizen.

The BNP and the Muslim fundamentalists causes and agendas in the Uk and globally are not equivalent or equal. The equivalent of the BNP in a densely populated African country for instance would be a legal and democratic political party that decides that they need to limit the number of immigrants to that African country for various reasons including economic, cultural and environmental reasons and that they would like to ensure that their own citizens are not at a disadvantage simply because they are indigenous to that country while the legal and democratic political party would not wish to interfere and meddle in other countries affairs and would wish to protect the agricultural sector of the country to ensure a secure food supply. The hypothetical group of people would be nothing like typical Muslim fundamentalists extremists.
The charges against Mr Griffen are entirely false and have no other purpose than to damage a legal opposition political party.

The fact that Mr Griffen has caused the prosecution to fail is because the case against him is false and Mr Griffen and his excellent legal team simply stated the facts regarding his speeches and the context and circumstances in which his speeches were made, the only reason he wasn’t found not guilty on all charges is because the juries judgement has been heavily affected by lies and propaganda spread to mislead the British people on the issues being discussed.

So are you guys wrong or is the BNP wrong?

The BNP trolls are mine!!

You are not Jewish.

And here is what Nick Griffin’s right hand man is all about regarding Jews:

Modell has little in common with his subject and finds himself taking an exception to some of Collett’s interests and occupations – which range through rabid anti-Semitism (‘Jews aren’t white’) to explaining how he likes to “break” people, in particular his ex girlfriend

In the end Modell has to confront Collett to explain he has recorded his anti-Semitic pro-Nazi comments on tape. When he realises Modell is of Jewish descent, for once Collett is speechless.

http://www.channel4.com/news/2003/special_reports/young_nazi_proud.html

Ahh, the comment that says i can’t debate with you, but instead i shall make a cheap remark about your religion in the hope that this turns into a fistcuff.
Well done Oliver; youv’e shown us why you are more superior.

I hate to prick your bubble, but, it takes more to win an election than to win a court case.

The BNP has some valid points about Islamism, but I and many others think it is better if people with more gravitas and a higher ethical standing take the debate over and keep it where it belongs — within the realm of civility and actual practical problem solving.

Just because people can agree over some facts with the BNP, it does not mean that the BNP ideology is accepted.

By the way im being nice by saying 99%.