» Union leader Derek Simpson endorses @EdMilibandMP in this week's @NewStatesman. I'd like to see a proper debate first. 1 week ago

» RT @monkeyhotel: Met 3 people who vote tory today - they all listen to Phil Collins in a totally non-ironic way. Draw your own conclusions 1 week ago

» Hilarious! RT @Jessica_Asato: This must be the most awesome GOTV I have seen yet. http://bit.ly/bpJgc3 1 week ago

» Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos and Burma here I come! all by train and buses! Glorious. 1 week ago

» Time to get ready to catch my flight. All - I'm out until the end of March in S.E. Asia. Away from the madness! Don't miss me too much. 1 week ago

More updates...


  • Family

  • Comrades

  • In-laws




  • Technorati: graph / links

    Obama’s humanitarian stance on the Middle East


    by Ala on 17th November, 2008 at 10:06 PM    

    USAID, the independent federal government agency that provides humanitarian and development asistance under the foreign policy guidance of the Secretary of State spent $2.4 billion across the whole of the Middle East in 2007, including all reconstruction efforts in Iraq. The Bush administration did very little to acknowledge the humanitarian crisis it had brought about in Iraq let alone try to address it. In contrast, Obama pledged $2 billion in assistance for Iraq’s refugee crisis alone (the number of displaced civillians is around 5 million now) on top of a committment to an immediate and phased withdrawal.

    More on what Obama means for Iraq here.

    If Obama keeps his promise, this among other things will mark the beginnings of a new chapter in US-Middle East relations.


         
            Post to del.icio.us


    Filed in: Middle East, United States






    1 Comment below   |  

    Reactions: Twitter, blogs


    1. Sunny — on 17th November, 2008 at 11:27 PM  

      Sweet!

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

    Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2009. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
    With the help of PHP and Wordpress.