Comments on: Repeat it enough times…

By: BevanKieran

BevanKieran — Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:55:06 +0000

The following website has informations on funding of extremist Hindu groups in the U.K

http://www.awaazsaw.org/

http://www.blink.org.uk/pdescription.asp?key=2390&grp=18&cat=184

It was founded after the gujarat riots in 2002. Not sure if they are still active.

By: Siddharth

Siddharth — Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:04:57 +0000

Vikrant,
You introduced “HSS & IDF” into the discussion and then claim others (“Sid,Al Hack Co.”) called them “bad” – untrue. Now you say the HSS and IDF are possibly nothing to do with Hindutva.
Whats it all about, Viki?

By: Vikrant

Vikrant — Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:05 +0000

Sid… HSS & IDF may well be Hindutva charities. But theres a big MAY in it. People like Al Hack defend Interpal; when I use their argument to “defend” (it was a bait mind ya) HSS & IDF he calls me a Hindutva drone. Now thats doublespeak aint it?

By: Siddharth

Siddharth — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:36:39 +0000

Look closely, it is they (Sid,Al Hack Co.) who have decided that a Palestinian one is good and the Indian ones are bad.

Vikrant,
No one mentioned the Indian charities until you brought them up for the first time in [54]. Are they “bad”? I know nothing about them, so you tell us.

By: Vikrant

Vikrant — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:06:48 +0000

Wait you didnt get me…. I never claimed to defend HSS or IDF. Look closely, it is they (Sid,Al Hack Co.) who have decided that a Palestinian one is good and the Indian ones are bad.

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:12:13 +0000

I don’t believe I defended Interpal once Vikrant. So I haven’t displayed any double standards – I’m quite consistent in my desire to have no association with any religious charities (well actually InterPal isn’t religious but may have supported religious terrorists).

You’ve conveniently side-stepped what I said. How come you’re trying to defend charities who are clearly linked to a cause you repeatedly defend but claim to not be a supporter of? Your response was directed at Al-Hack, not me. And no one has “cried themselves hoarse”, please refrain from over-the-top drama which we expect from trolls.

You say that the HSS or IDRF have not been found guilty, but then neither has InterPal. So whose got the double standards now?

Either you accept that all these charities need further investigation or you defend them all. You have decided that a Palestinian one is bad and the Indian ones are good. I thought you were smarter than that.

By: Vikrant

Vikrant — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:24:41 +0000

Vikrant, I saw you posted on the dead whale thread. Dying to hear your legimisation on what thats got to do with Asians

Naah.. me saw ya whining “That fuckin’ bongophobic Hindutvadi neocon brahminist communalist lil’ whale”

By: Vikrant

Vikrant — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:57:37 +0000

fucksie! it should read “hook line ‘n sinker”.

By: Vikrant

Vikrant — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:55:13 +0000

Gee you guys fell for that hook, link ‘n sinker! Well HSS or IDF may well be hindutva money laundering fronts, but they havent been found guilty have they? On one hand you guys defend Interpal (as evidence points out may well have funded Palestinian intifada) whilst one mention of HSS from me, you cry yerself hoarse over Hindutva! Double standards aint it?

By: Sunny

Sunny — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:37:12 +0000

The poor whale is getting serious abuse for no reason. Leave his/her dead soul alone you infidels! Otherwise I’ll get the Charities Commission on you. Or failing that, Stephen Pollard.

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:19:27 +0000

Yup. Mosdef.

By: Jay Singh

Jay Singh — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:14:13 +0000

Do you think that David Icke has serious mental disorder?

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:08:58 +0000

Oh yeah – believing you’re being spied on by the CIA is SO yesterday. I mean John Nash totally wore that out. Lizards are the new grey, but this season it’s all about evolution. There are these crazed schizos who believe the world is 5 thousand years old and the world was created in 6 days! I mean, that’s as zany as Icke. Who ARE these mad people?

I found psychiatry boring, but I loved schizophrenia. Those patients were the most interesting I’ve ever met, including the murderers I visited in prison. The stuff they come up with is priceless, on a par with Icke.

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:05:46 +0000

And the Star Trek circle is complete. This is the third or fourth bizarre circle I’ve completed in PP’s comments. I must find the others, they’re my proudest moments.

By: Jay Singh

Jay Singh — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:05:27 +0000

I have a soft spot for David Icke. He believes we are ruled by reptilian aliens who inhabit the bodies of the leaders of the world in league with the illuminati. When I go nuts, I want to go nuts over something like that, not something small fry. I mean go really brain-crazy doo-lally looney-tune.

By: Jay Singh

Jay Singh — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:03:24 +0000

Moby Dick!

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:00:01 +0000

SHATNER and NIMOY went back in time to find a whale. PICARD went back in time as well. In First Contact, he quotes forth:

“And he piled upon the whales white hump the sum of all his rage and hatred from days old and present, had his chest been a cannon, he would have shot his heart upon it.”

Who can name the book? No googling.

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:57:22 +0000

David Icke was interviewed by James Whale. But Jay you don’t know how close you are, Icke once argued that vaccination is a secret genocide and he implicated whales in the plot, I kid you not! The only link I can find is a 404 and it’s not even google cached.

By: Jay Singh

Jay Singh — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:55:43 +0000

Make it Rohin that Star Trek movie with the whale was brilliant – not as good as Wrath of Khan but still good

By: Rohin

Rohin — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:54:51 +0000

I can make another Star Trek tie-in whale and time-travel reference here, but I fear no one would get it.