<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make your mind up Michael</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126116</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126116</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Just wait for my article: ‘Why brown people should vote Labour’.&lt;/i&gt;

Heh. Bastard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Just wait for my article: ‘Why brown people should vote Labour’.</i></p>
<p>Heh. Bastard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels C</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126115</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just visited Riijksmuseum in Amsterdam ( but it could as well have been National Gallery in London ),
A persons face and the interpretation of the face has been an integral and important part of our culture ar least since the middle ages. 
A person who wears a Niqab has decided not to be a part of our society and our traditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just visited Riijksmuseum in Amsterdam ( but it could as well have been National Gallery in London ),<br />
A persons face and the interpretation of the face has been an integral and important part of our culture ar least since the middle ages.<br />
A person who wears a Niqab has decided not to be a part of our society and our traditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126111</guid>
		<description>Let all women walk around naked and then the men can decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let all women walk around naked and then the men can decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126102</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126102</guid>
		<description>Gege:

Heh. This was, to a certain extent, meant as a tongue in cheek article. 

Marvin:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I think Rumbold is trying to gain some credibility with the left… Seeing as he’s a Tory through and through.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just wait for my article: &#039;Why brown people should vote Labour&#039;.

Sunny and David:

Perhaps Mr. Gove just isn&#039;t attracted to white women?

Ravi:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Does it mean, that if Rumbold is for magazines that cater niqab aficionados, that he must be against naked women in public?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh. I like to see a bit of ankle as much as the next man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gege:</p>
<p>Heh. This was, to a certain extent, meant as a tongue in cheek article. </p>
<p>Marvin:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think Rumbold is trying to gain some credibility with the left… Seeing as he’s a Tory through and through.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Just wait for my article: &#8216;Why brown people should vote Labour&#8217;.</p>
<p>Sunny and David:</p>
<p>Perhaps Mr. Gove just isn&#8217;t attracted to white women?</p>
<p>Ravi:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Does it mean, that if Rumbold is for magazines that cater niqab aficionados, that he must be against naked women in public?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh. I like to see a bit of ankle as much as the next man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126096</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126096</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Let women decide for themselves what to wear.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Shocking display of clear thinking, shocking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let women decide for themselves what to wear.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shocking display of clear thinking, shocking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126081</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126081</guid>
		<description>Oh give me a break. We are talking about two completely different things: covering your face in public, and magazines for guys. Does it mean, that if Rumbold is for magazines that cater niqab aficionados, that he must be against naked women in public? :) Make you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh give me a break. We are talking about two completely different things: covering your face in public, and magazines for guys. Does it mean, that if Rumbold is for magazines that cater niqab aficionados, that he must be against naked women in public? <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Make you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126072</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126072</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes the usual garbage. Let women decide for themselves what to wear. 

Of course, there can be family and cultural pressure to dress (or not dress) in a certain way. I am not sure the government should interfere with this though. People have to deal with their family and peer pressure problems themselves, which can be pretty damn tough in some cases.

What support groups are there for Muslim women who don&#039;t/do want to cover up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes the usual garbage. Let women decide for themselves what to wear. </p>
<p>Of course, there can be family and cultural pressure to dress (or not dress) in a certain way. I am not sure the government should interfere with this though. People have to deal with their family and peer pressure problems themselves, which can be pretty damn tough in some cases.</p>
<p>What support groups are there for Muslim women who don&#8217;t/do want to cover up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126067</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126067</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Gove subscribes to Asian Babes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Gove subscribes to Asian Babes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126066</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126066</guid>
		<description>when Rumbold started running McCain&#039;s campaign out his bedroom, his credibility with the left went out of the window :)

But more seriously - isn&#039;t it obvious? Muslim women should wear as little as possible while white women should cover up! Isn&#039;t that the standard Conservative position? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when Rumbold started running McCain&#8217;s campaign out his bedroom, his credibility with the left went out of the window <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But more seriously &#8211; isn&#8217;t it obvious? Muslim women should wear as little as possible while white women should cover up! Isn&#8217;t that the standard Conservative position? <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126062</link>
		<dc:creator>marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126062</guid>
		<description>I think Rumbold is trying to gain some credibility with the left... Seeing as he&#039;s a Tory through and through :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Rumbold is trying to gain some credibility with the left&#8230; Seeing as he&#8217;s a Tory through and through <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gege</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126061</link>
		<dc:creator>Gege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126061</guid>
		<description>Rumbold, what a useless article!(i just thought i&#039;d abuse you!)

The fact that one opposes islamic extremism does not mean that one supports hedonism! there is a midway called &#039;moderation&#039;.

However, I do agree that this should be a debate held by religious groups and not politicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold, what a useless article!(i just thought i&#8217;d abuse you!)</p>
<p>The fact that one opposes islamic extremism does not mean that one supports hedonism! there is a midway called &#8216;moderation&#8217;.</p>
<p>However, I do agree that this should be a debate held by religious groups and not politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2213/comment-page-1#comment-126060</link>
		<dc:creator>marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2213#comment-126060</guid>
		<description>Everything in moderation I&#039;d expect would be the answer.

Niqab is often (not always, of course) a badge of Islamist politics, either their own or their families/husbands. Or a badge of very strict wahhabist type culture. Especially the one&#039;s milling around behind their husband in various parts of London. The message is very much &quot;we are different to you&quot;, &quot;do not look at me&quot; etc etc

Criticising the normalisation of soft pornography is not mutually exclusive to this view point. I am no prude, but I do understand that this constant stream of soft pornography to the young male mind does give them the impression that women are basically sex objects. Which can only lead to frustration for both sexes. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828513365755&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;And sad role models for females growing up.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything in moderation I&#8217;d expect would be the answer.</p>
<p>Niqab is often (not always, of course) a badge of Islamist politics, either their own or their families/husbands. Or a badge of very strict wahhabist type culture. Especially the one&#8217;s milling around behind their husband in various parts of London. The message is very much &#8220;we are different to you&#8221;, &#8220;do not look at me&#8221; etc etc</p>
<p>Criticising the normalisation of soft pornography is not mutually exclusive to this view point. I am no prude, but I do understand that this constant stream of soft pornography to the young male mind does give them the impression that women are basically sex objects. Which can only lead to frustration for both sexes. <a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828513365755" rel="nofollow">And sad role models for females growing up.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
