<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pakistan&#8217;s official defence budget revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121919</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121919</guid>
		<description>And does the ISI count as military? I assume that it eats up at least another 1/3. 1 more third goes on the funding the Laskhar-i-this-that-and-the-other to implement the â€˜death by a thousand cutsâ€™ programme.

Not much left for feeding or educating the largely illetrate populace. No wonder Islam is so big there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And does the ISI count as military? I assume that it eats up at least another 1/3. 1 more third goes on the funding the Laskhar-i-this-that-and-the-other to implement the â€˜death by a thousand cutsâ€™ programme.</p>
<p>Not much left for feeding or educating the largely illetrate populace. No wonder Islam is so big there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk1</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121917</link>
		<dc:creator>mk1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121917</guid>
		<description>Whilst as a percentage of their gdp the figure doesn&#039;t seem too large yet pakistan spends 1/3 of its annual budget on the military. Does anyone know how this compares to other nations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst as a percentage of their gdp the figure doesn&#8217;t seem too large yet pakistan spends 1/3 of its annual budget on the military. Does anyone know how this compares to other nations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121902</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121902</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;So platinum786, remind me, whoâ€™s the racist, me or you?&lt;/em&gt;

Me! Me! Me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So platinum786, remind me, whoâ€™s the racist, me or you?</em></p>
<p>Me! Me! Me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Coulby</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121901</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Coulby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121901</guid>
		<description>Easy people come on, as someone that is a Jew lets have peace on earth.  stop all this as a true child of god I say lets have peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy people come on, as someone that is a Jew lets have peace on earth.  stop all this as a true child of god I say lets have peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121897</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121897</guid>
		<description>So platinum786, remind me, who&#039;s the racist, me or you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So platinum786, remind me, who&#8217;s the racist, me or you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheikh Yassin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121896</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheikh Yassin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121896</guid>
		<description>Black people all they do is smoke crack, and take from the white people, most crimes in the uk are from black people, not brown or white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black people all they do is smoke crack, and take from the white people, most crimes in the uk are from black people, not brown or white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121895</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121895</guid>
		<description>`</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>`</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kulvinder</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121893</link>
		<dc:creator>Kulvinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121893</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You could be black, but that is limited because blogging is not a big thing amongst the black community.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


No they&#039;re too busy getting down with the music whilst swinging through trees eating bananas, amirite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You could be black, but that is limited because blogging is not a big thing amongst the black community.</p></blockquote>
<p>No they&#8217;re too busy getting down with the music whilst swinging through trees eating bananas, amirite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121889</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121889</guid>
		<description>No, death to the colonialist attitudes of the modern day leaders of the white man. 

Does this blog have moderating? Surely personal attacks are not politics, pickled or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, death to the colonialist attitudes of the modern day leaders of the white man. </p>
<p>Does this blog have moderating? Surely personal attacks are not politics, pickled or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheikh Yassin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121874</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheikh Yassin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121874</guid>
		<description>Death to the white man!

Internet access to the black man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death to the white man!</p>
<p>Internet access to the black man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786(dickhead)</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121869</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786(dickhead)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121869</guid>
		<description>platinum786 you dickhead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>platinum786 you dickhead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsifB</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121865</link>
		<dc:creator>AsifB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121865</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t say I agree with some of the logic and nationalism in above postings, but I think the point still comes across that military spending is bigger than it should be in Pakistan and the rest of South Asia

A legacy of centralised colonial structures not helped by partition and  Kashmir (actually Mountbatten should be more famous for suprressing Vietnamese independence in 1945 by releasing Japanese POWs to police the place till the post Vichy French could reclaim Saigon from Ho Chi Minh&#039;s US backed partisans - eight years before Dien Bien Phu, Quiet Americans, VC, Da Nang and all that )

Rumbold - the answer is mainly facade - I suggest if people want to make comparasions we should investigate the SIPRI database for some facts. ( I pick some below - usual caveats, the US military basically outspends the next ten powers all put together and is a big proportion of discretionary US Federal spending  - but China and Russia have much cheaper manpower still etc.. )

US dollars c.2006 (% of GNP accordig to Sipri)

Pakistan    4.5bn US (3.2%)
India          24bn USD (2.7%)
Bangladesh 0.7bn USD (1%)
Sri Lanka   0.8bn USD (2.9%)
Germany    35bn USD (2.2%)
UK 55bn GBP ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say I agree with some of the logic and nationalism in above postings, but I think the point still comes across that military spending is bigger than it should be in Pakistan and the rest of South Asia</p>
<p>A legacy of centralised colonial structures not helped by partition and  Kashmir (actually Mountbatten should be more famous for suprressing Vietnamese independence in 1945 by releasing Japanese POWs to police the place till the post Vichy French could reclaim Saigon from Ho Chi Minh&#8217;s US backed partisans &#8211; eight years before Dien Bien Phu, Quiet Americans, VC, Da Nang and all that )</p>
<p>Rumbold &#8211; the answer is mainly facade &#8211; I suggest if people want to make comparasions we should investigate the SIPRI database for some facts. ( I pick some below &#8211; usual caveats, the US military basically outspends the next ten powers all put together and is a big proportion of discretionary US Federal spending  &#8211; but China and Russia have much cheaper manpower still etc.. )</p>
<p>US dollars c.2006 (% of GNP accordig to Sipri)</p>
<p>Pakistan    4.5bn US (3.2%)<br />
India          24bn USD (2.7%)<br />
Bangladesh 0.7bn USD (1%)<br />
Sri Lanka   0.8bn USD (2.9%)<br />
Germany    35bn USD (2.2%)<br />
UK 55bn GBP &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121856</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121856</guid>
		<description>The Fauji Foundation, Established in the early 50&#039;s to provide an income for retired serviceman and their families. 

http://www.fauji.org.pk/Webforms/Home.aspx?Id=142

These guys are big players in the economy, from cereals to cements, if generals are making money, it&#039;s via this. The Pakistani armed forces are the only institute in the country renowned for it&#039;s professionalism and lack of nepotism, hence corruption is unlikely or very low level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fauji Foundation, Established in the early 50&#8242;s to provide an income for retired serviceman and their families. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fauji.org.pk/Webforms/Home.aspx?Id=142" rel="nofollow">http://www.fauji.org.pk/Webforms/Home.aspx?Id=142</a></p>
<p>These guys are big players in the economy, from cereals to cements, if generals are making money, it&#8217;s via this. The Pakistani armed forces are the only institute in the country renowned for it&#8217;s professionalism and lack of nepotism, hence corruption is unlikely or very low level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121850</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121850</guid>
		<description>^^^ Look who started taking digs first?  You can&#039;t let it slide.

Secondly the notion that the Military is Punjabi dominated is false. Punjab happens to have the largest population too. That is reflected within the army but not to the level it is portrayed at. 

Let&#039;s not let one troll ruin a decent topic, if you want to talk about Kashmir talk about it in some other topic. The BBC recently did a decent article, Kashmir and Football, look it up.

As for money in the pockets of generals, it&#039;s not through the budget, as Pakistan has one of the worlds largest militaries and one of the smaller budgets, however where you can see room for money making is Fauji industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^ Look who started taking digs first?  You can&#8217;t let it slide.</p>
<p>Secondly the notion that the Military is Punjabi dominated is false. Punjab happens to have the largest population too. That is reflected within the army but not to the level it is portrayed at. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not let one troll ruin a decent topic, if you want to talk about Kashmir talk about it in some other topic. The BBC recently did a decent article, Kashmir and Football, look it up.</p>
<p>As for money in the pockets of generals, it&#8217;s not through the budget, as Pakistan has one of the worlds largest militaries and one of the smaller budgets, however where you can see room for money making is Fauji industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inders</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121849</link>
		<dc:creator>Inders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121849</guid>
		<description>Please ignore Platinum786.
 
Although he has in fact got a wealth of knowledge in the Pakistani defence topic and could contribute really well to a debate on military spending in Pakistan, he won&#039;t.

He&#039;s too busy berating white people (who fund a large chunk of the spending) and black people for not blogging enough (no evidence whatsoever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please ignore Platinum786.</p>
<p>Although he has in fact got a wealth of knowledge in the Pakistani defence topic and could contribute really well to a debate on military spending in Pakistan, he won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s too busy berating white people (who fund a large chunk of the spending) and black people for not blogging enough (no evidence whatsoever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121840</link>
		<dc:creator>ashik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121840</guid>
		<description>The real question surely is how much of the Pakistani defence budget goes into the back pocket of high ranking officers and certain oligarchic families? I suspect a large chunk. This is how the sons and daughters of these people can study at prestigious Western universities, costing upto Â£30,000 a year. 

The Pakistani military is a Punjabi dominated non-professional politicised institution with the blood of millions on itâ€™s hands eg. Bengalis in 1971 and Balochis during the 70â€™s. It is temperamentally more suited to crushing internal insurgencies than successfully fighting a conventional war. If not for 500,000 Punjabi bayonets, it is arguable whether Pakistan as currently constituted would exist. The same is true for India but to a lesser extent. 

As for Kashmiris, my observation from the large UK community is that Mirpuri Kashmiris from the Pakistani occupied area are more religious and Pro acceding to Pakistan. The majority on the Indian occupied side want full independence from both countries and are more cultural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question surely is how much of the Pakistani defence budget goes into the back pocket of high ranking officers and certain oligarchic families? I suspect a large chunk. This is how the sons and daughters of these people can study at prestigious Western universities, costing upto Â£30,000 a year. </p>
<p>The Pakistani military is a Punjabi dominated non-professional politicised institution with the blood of millions on itâ€™s hands eg. Bengalis in 1971 and Balochis during the 70â€™s. It is temperamentally more suited to crushing internal insurgencies than successfully fighting a conventional war. If not for 500,000 Punjabi bayonets, it is arguable whether Pakistan as currently constituted would exist. The same is true for India but to a lesser extent. </p>
<p>As for Kashmiris, my observation from the large UK community is that Mirpuri Kashmiris from the Pakistani occupied area are more religious and Pro acceding to Pakistan. The majority on the Indian occupied side want full independence from both countries and are more cultural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121836</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121836</guid>
		<description>You have an English man and am writing on an English forum. The name you use is not typical of a tag for a website, but is rather a normal name hence it was pretty safe to assume you are male and white. You could be black, but that is limited because blogging is not a big thing amongst the black community. 

Secondly, nuclear weapons and successful arms industries are something to be produ of, particularly when your customers include NATO, Israel and the USA, some of the worlds leading arms suppliers, yet despite that Israel has purchased Dhruv helicopters from India, Holland has been a regular purchaser of ammunition from Pakistan and the USA ordered the Beagle UAV(Border Eagle)to monitor the Mexican border from Pakistan. How many other nations can boast weapons production of the quality that the greatest war mongers of the times purchase from them? 

You can say what you like about the Indian economy but the facts are that increased Indian spending and development has contributed to the economic downfall of the western economies and rising Inflation, today India   is exploiting resources and your kind are starving, 60 years ago it was the other way around. 

Hari Singh could have ceded mars to India, it wouldn&#039;t matter, Jinnah never agreed to it, nor did the people of Kashmir. History is history, the present is what matters and we are fighting for our freedom, who&#039;s going to stop us?    

When Pakistan was threatened Pakistan decided it was best to side with you. Now that you are stuck isn&#039;t it interesting how Pakistan has striking &quot;peace deals&quot; and attacks within Afghanistan are intensifying? 

Enjoy reaping what you sowed. I only have sympathy for the sons of the poor families who are being forced to fight the war of the business tycoons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have an English man and am writing on an English forum. The name you use is not typical of a tag for a website, but is rather a normal name hence it was pretty safe to assume you are male and white. You could be black, but that is limited because blogging is not a big thing amongst the black community. </p>
<p>Secondly, nuclear weapons and successful arms industries are something to be produ of, particularly when your customers include NATO, Israel and the USA, some of the worlds leading arms suppliers, yet despite that Israel has purchased Dhruv helicopters from India, Holland has been a regular purchaser of ammunition from Pakistan and the USA ordered the Beagle UAV(Border Eagle)to monitor the Mexican border from Pakistan. How many other nations can boast weapons production of the quality that the greatest war mongers of the times purchase from them? </p>
<p>You can say what you like about the Indian economy but the facts are that increased Indian spending and development has contributed to the economic downfall of the western economies and rising Inflation, today India   is exploiting resources and your kind are starving, 60 years ago it was the other way around. </p>
<p>Hari Singh could have ceded mars to India, it wouldn&#8217;t matter, Jinnah never agreed to it, nor did the people of Kashmir. History is history, the present is what matters and we are fighting for our freedom, who&#8217;s going to stop us?    </p>
<p>When Pakistan was threatened Pakistan decided it was best to side with you. Now that you are stuck isn&#8217;t it interesting how Pakistan has striking &#8220;peace deals&#8221; and attacks within Afghanistan are intensifying? </p>
<p>Enjoy reaping what you sowed. I only have sympathy for the sons of the poor families who are being forced to fight the war of the business tycoons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121830</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121830</guid>
		<description>Who said I was white? Assumption is the mother of all..etc

&lt;i&gt;regardless of that both Pakistan and India have managed to create nuclear weapons and have fledgling arms industries who are involved in exporting weapons to other countries.&lt;/i&gt;

And that&#039;s something to be proud of?

&lt;i&gt;Furthermore much to Indiaâ€™s credit they have become an economic powerhouse.&lt;/i&gt;

Not really, a fiscal elite have become an economic force, while the overwhelming majority of the population lives in utter poverty.

&lt;i&gt;I as a Kashmiri can inform you the only part of Kashmir occupied is the Indian side&lt;/i&gt;

Hari Singh ceded to India under terms that both Jinnah and Nerhu agreed to. End of.

&lt;i&gt;the only obsession we have with Afghanistan is keeping the white man out of it &lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s odd, I could have sworn that Pakistan is the American headed coalition&#039;s staunchest ally in the region, helping prop up the puppet Karzai and quelling the Afghani freedom movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said I was white? Assumption is the mother of all..etc</p>
<p><i>regardless of that both Pakistan and India have managed to create nuclear weapons and have fledgling arms industries who are involved in exporting weapons to other countries.</i></p>
<p>And that&#8217;s something to be proud of?</p>
<p><i>Furthermore much to Indiaâ€™s credit they have become an economic powerhouse.</i></p>
<p>Not really, a fiscal elite have become an economic force, while the overwhelming majority of the population lives in utter poverty.</p>
<p><i>I as a Kashmiri can inform you the only part of Kashmir occupied is the Indian side</i></p>
<p>Hari Singh ceded to India under terms that both Jinnah and Nerhu agreed to. End of.</p>
<p><i>the only obsession we have with Afghanistan is keeping the white man out of it </i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s odd, I could have sworn that Pakistan is the American headed coalition&#8217;s staunchest ally in the region, helping prop up the puppet Karzai and quelling the Afghani freedom movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: platinum786</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121826</link>
		<dc:creator>platinum786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121826</guid>
		<description>^^^ Actually you pillock it&#039;s because we&#039;ve only been a country for 60 years. Prior to that we were slaves of you white people who occupied our country and enslaved our people. 

regardless of that both Pakistan and India have managed to create nuclear weapons and have fledgling arms industries who are involved in exporting weapons to other countries. Pakistan with collaberation with China has produced it&#039;s own fighter jet and India is well on it&#039;s way to producing one too. Furthermore much to India&#039;s credit they have become an economic powerhouse.

I as a Kashmiri can inform you the only part of Kashmir occupied is the Indian side and the only obsession we have with Afghanistan is keeping the white man out of it as you are the plague that has been the root of all the worlds ills.

My point was that we haven&#039;t invested heavily enough in private weapons companies who could create huge machines of war to keep your kind at bay, hence we have to invest in things like that as a state, therefore it is not in our interest to reveal a penny by penny account of our military spending. 

Furthermore in our quest to keep your kind away, we have historically worked with a black budget in terms of military spending, the Taliban didn&#039;t fund itself and giving weapons to Chechen and Bosnian fighters isn&#039;t cheap either. 

Neither are the current activities in Helmand province which irk you so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^ Actually you pillock it&#8217;s because we&#8217;ve only been a country for 60 years. Prior to that we were slaves of you white people who occupied our country and enslaved our people. </p>
<p>regardless of that both Pakistan and India have managed to create nuclear weapons and have fledgling arms industries who are involved in exporting weapons to other countries. Pakistan with collaberation with China has produced it&#8217;s own fighter jet and India is well on it&#8217;s way to producing one too. Furthermore much to India&#8217;s credit they have become an economic powerhouse.</p>
<p>I as a Kashmiri can inform you the only part of Kashmir occupied is the Indian side and the only obsession we have with Afghanistan is keeping the white man out of it as you are the plague that has been the root of all the worlds ills.</p>
<p>My point was that we haven&#8217;t invested heavily enough in private weapons companies who could create huge machines of war to keep your kind at bay, hence we have to invest in things like that as a state, therefore it is not in our interest to reveal a penny by penny account of our military spending. </p>
<p>Furthermore in our quest to keep your kind away, we have historically worked with a black budget in terms of military spending, the Taliban didn&#8217;t fund itself and giving weapons to Chechen and Bosnian fighters isn&#8217;t cheap either. </p>
<p>Neither are the current activities in Helmand province which irk you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/2077#comment-121822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=2077#comment-121822</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;we donâ€™t have a Rolls Royce or a Lockheed and Martin to create weapons for us.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s because you invest all your cash in weaponary and an unhealthy obsession with controlling Afghanistan and occupying Kashmir, rather than education.

If you did, you wouldn&#039;t be such a thick nation which is bound to act on the orders of the Great Shaitan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>we donâ€™t have a Rolls Royce or a Lockheed and Martin to create weapons for us.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s because you invest all your cash in weaponary and an unhealthy obsession with controlling Afghanistan and occupying Kashmir, rather than education.</p>
<p>If you did, you wouldn&#8217;t be such a thick nation which is bound to act on the orders of the Great Shaitan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

