<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;d probably invade Burma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gus</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-119526</link>
		<dc:creator>gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-119526</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth noting that China is widely seen by westerners to have more sway on the Burmese generals than she really does. Burmese leaders do not have a record of listening to any foreigners, east or west, in their entire history short of war and invasion. The last four invasions by the Chinese in the 18th C when Burmese expansionism was seen to be a threat all ended in defeat, only the first and only other time before that way back in 1287 by Kublai Khan succeeded with the fall of Bagan, the first Burmese empire. 

Might is the only language the junta understands. The third Burmese empire only came to grief when it took on the industrial might of the British Empire in the 19th C. So far as trade and arms go, they know from experience it&#039;s never too difficult to deal with any of the other neighbours be it India or ASEAN countries. If you won&#039;t do it Jones will. They&#039;ve become quite good at manipulating the players in their own region having the good fortune of Burma&#039;s still substantial natural resources, and they are playing the China card very well. They are doing not so badly at fobbing off the UN either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that China is widely seen by westerners to have more sway on the Burmese generals than she really does. Burmese leaders do not have a record of listening to any foreigners, east or west, in their entire history short of war and invasion. The last four invasions by the Chinese in the 18th C when Burmese expansionism was seen to be a threat all ended in defeat, only the first and only other time before that way back in 1287 by Kublai Khan succeeded with the fall of Bagan, the first Burmese empire. </p>
<p>Might is the only language the junta understands. The third Burmese empire only came to grief when it took on the industrial might of the British Empire in the 19th C. So far as trade and arms go, they know from experience it&#8217;s never too difficult to deal with any of the other neighbours be it India or ASEAN countries. If you won&#8217;t do it Jones will. They&#8217;ve become quite good at manipulating the players in their own region having the good fortune of Burma&#8217;s still substantial natural resources, and they are playing the China card very well. They are doing not so badly at fobbing off the UN either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-119244</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-119244</guid>
		<description>Chamberlain is irrelevent and you are not Churchill and this ain&#039;t 1933. Please watch this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1971&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fool&lt;/a&gt;. There&#039;s a salutary lesson in there for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chamberlain is irrelevent and you are not Churchill and this ain&#8217;t 1933. Please watch this <a href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1971" rel="nofollow">fool</a>. There&#8217;s a salutary lesson in there for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-119064</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-119064</guid>
		<description>Douglas:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I’d like to think that we’d be able to argue our respective cases whilst respecting each other. You and I can take a joke without joining in the ridiculous idea that the other side is just stupid.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Imagine how boring our discussions would be if we treated each other as idiots. Mon dieu.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It is your misfortune that you are not Scottish.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh. It is at this point that I feel compelled to turn to the wise words of Dr. Johnson:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Much may be made of a Scotchman, if he be caught young.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

or

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;What enemy would invade Scotland, where there is nothing to be got?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I’d like to think that we’d be able to argue our respective cases whilst respecting each other. You and I can take a joke without joining in the ridiculous idea that the other side is just stupid.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Imagine how boring our discussions would be if we treated each other as idiots. Mon dieu.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It is your misfortune that you are not Scottish.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh. It is at this point that I feel compelled to turn to the wise words of Dr. Johnson:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Much may be made of a Scotchman, if he be caught young.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>or</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What enemy would invade Scotland, where there is nothing to be got?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118943</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118943</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I cannot speak for Sid, but I think that is so much shite, I am gobsmacked. That is not what I am about, and I’d take exception to the idea that I am:&lt;/em&gt;

Sure you can speak for me. What have I been writing here for the last few years?

It&#039;s easy for people like Morgoth to come here and lecture us on the mendacious argument that we&#039;re backing the fascists and *he* cares for brown people by advocating cluster bombing. 

This is sick joke. Worse that they feel that this is how to build liberal democracies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I cannot speak for Sid, but I think that is so much shite, I am gobsmacked. That is not what I am about, and I’d take exception to the idea that I am:</em></p>
<p>Sure you can speak for me. What have I been writing here for the last few years?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy for people like Morgoth to come here and lecture us on the mendacious argument that we&#8217;re backing the fascists and *he* cares for brown people by advocating cluster bombing. </p>
<p>This is sick joke. Worse that they feel that this is how to build liberal democracies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118937</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118937</guid>
		<description>Rumbold,

It is your misfortune that you are not Scottish :-)

If you were, and here I&#039;m being disingenuous - to all that daft ideas that race or religion matters, when it comes down to going your own way, well, there&#039;s a number of Asian&#039;s that seem to do Nationalism. At least the Scottish version, is not racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold,</p>
<p>It is your misfortune that you are not Scottish <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you were, and here I&#8217;m being disingenuous &#8211; to all that daft ideas that race or religion matters, when it comes down to going your own way, well, there&#8217;s a number of Asian&#8217;s that seem to do Nationalism. At least the Scottish version, is not racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118933</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118933</guid>
		<description>Rumbold,

Shucks, that came as a surprise:

&lt;blockquote&gt;It is good to have you back, but you are dead wrong about Douglas. That is just the way he and I debate; we have a healthy respect for one another, and we wouldn’t have it any other way. I consider him a friends.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well not so much of a surprise as a fact. Whilst you and I are quite apart, politically, I have respect for a lot of what you say. Should I, therefore, treat you as an idiot? No, I should not.

I&#039;d like to think that we&#039;d be able to argue our respective cases whilst respecting each other. You and I can take a joke without joining in the ridiculous idea that the other side is just stupid.

I&#039;d like to think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold,</p>
<p>Shucks, that came as a surprise:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is good to have you back, but you are dead wrong about Douglas. That is just the way he and I debate; we have a healthy respect for one another, and we wouldn’t have it any other way. I consider him a friends.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well not so much of a surprise as a fact. Whilst you and I are quite apart, politically, I have respect for a lot of what you say. Should I, therefore, treat you as an idiot? No, I should not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think that we&#8217;d be able to argue our respective cases whilst respecting each other. You and I can take a joke without joining in the ridiculous idea that the other side is just stupid.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118928</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118928</guid>
		<description>Morgoth:

It is good to have you back, but you are dead wrong about Douglas. That is just the way he and I debate; we have a healthy respect for one another, and we wouldn&#039;t have it any other way. I consider him a friends. The three of us all hold strong views on various issues, which is great, but it is no reason to descend to calling Douglas &#039;scum&#039;. You are better than that. And it&#039;s not his fault he is Scottish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgoth:</p>
<p>It is good to have you back, but you are dead wrong about Douglas. That is just the way he and I debate; we have a healthy respect for one another, and we wouldn&#8217;t have it any other way. I consider him a friends. The three of us all hold strong views on various issues, which is great, but it is no reason to descend to calling Douglas &#8217;scum&#8217;. You are better than that. And it&#8217;s not his fault he is Scottish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118925</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118925</guid>
		<description>Morgoth,

I am quite amused. I&#039;d consider Rumbold a friend. A misguided friend, right enough. So let&#039;s leave that to one side. Why should the idea that I think he should be &#039;saved&#039; from the likes of the obviously raving insanity of DK?

Because I think Rumbold talks a lot of sense. And it is &#039;sense&#039; that the Libertarians seem to view as their exclusive right. Which it is not. However, it is sense wrapped up in political nonsense. You cannot be allowed to agree with an obvious statement, like:

&lt;blockquote&gt;You two would leave half the planet to fascists as long as you indulge yourselves in your juvenile anti-Americanism. You purveyors of Westphalian fetishism really are racist gobshites aren’t you? Brown people can go hang themselves as long as you can comfortably pronounce on the benefits of western liberal democracy from the safety of a western liberal democracy whilst denying people any means of getting a western liberal democracy, eh?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I cannot speak for Sid, but I think that is so much shite, I am gobsmacked. That is not what I am about, and I&#039;d take exception to the idea that I am:

&lt;blockquote&gt;You really are utter scum, aren’t you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

maybe. maybe I am complete utter scum...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgoth,</p>
<p>I am quite amused. I&#8217;d consider Rumbold a friend. A misguided friend, right enough. So let&#8217;s leave that to one side. Why should the idea that I think he should be &#8217;saved&#8217; from the likes of the obviously raving insanity of DK?</p>
<p>Because I think Rumbold talks a lot of sense. And it is &#8217;sense&#8217; that the Libertarians seem to view as their exclusive right. Which it is not. However, it is sense wrapped up in political nonsense. You cannot be allowed to agree with an obvious statement, like:</p>
<blockquote><p>You two would leave half the planet to fascists as long as you indulge yourselves in your juvenile anti-Americanism. You purveyors of Westphalian fetishism really are racist gobshites aren’t you? Brown people can go hang themselves as long as you can comfortably pronounce on the benefits of western liberal democracy from the safety of a western liberal democracy whilst denying people any means of getting a western liberal democracy, eh?</p></blockquote>
<p>I cannot speak for Sid, but I think that is so much shite, I am gobsmacked. That is not what I am about, and I&#8217;d take exception to the idea that I am:</p>
<blockquote><p>You really are utter scum, aren’t you?</p></blockquote>
<p>maybe. maybe I am complete utter scum&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118924</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118924</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a poseur you are Morgoth. You&#039;re not fooling anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a poseur you are Morgoth. You&#8217;re not fooling anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118923</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118923</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Whilst most folk would prefer a liberal Middle East, it is pretty clear that invoking the US Marines is a rubbish arguement.&lt;/i&gt;

As to what, the Nelson Mandela International Peace Brigades? The UN? International Law?

Don&#039;t make me laugh.

Your way, Douglas, is the way of accommodation with tyrannies and dictators. You&#039;d have made a good Chamberlain, Douglas.

The way I support on the other hand, is Saddam&#039;s head in a noose.

Compare and Contrast.

And as for Bremner, YOU are a liar. Stop getting bullshit off conspiracy websites. His first act was DeBaathification. You know, like DeNazification.

But if we&#039;d listened to you, we&#039;d probably have surrendered to Hitler. Or let him kill as many Jews as he wanted. You really are an utterly morally bankrupt lowlife, aren&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Whilst most folk would prefer a liberal Middle East, it is pretty clear that invoking the US Marines is a rubbish arguement.</i></p>
<p>As to what, the Nelson Mandela International Peace Brigades? The UN? International Law?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t make me laugh.</p>
<p>Your way, Douglas, is the way of accommodation with tyrannies and dictators. You&#8217;d have made a good Chamberlain, Douglas.</p>
<p>The way I support on the other hand, is Saddam&#8217;s head in a noose.</p>
<p>Compare and Contrast.</p>
<p>And as for Bremner, YOU are a liar. Stop getting bullshit off conspiracy websites. His first act was DeBaathification. You know, like DeNazification.</p>
<p>But if we&#8217;d listened to you, we&#8217;d probably have surrendered to Hitler. Or let him kill as many Jews as he wanted. You really are an utterly morally bankrupt lowlife, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118921</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118921</guid>
		<description>Douglas, get a grip whenever you&#039;re in the midst of paranoia about &quot;neocons&quot; under the bed, eh? You&#039;re a paranoid loon whose every other post consists of nothing but Stopper fantasies - the way you ranted at poor Rumbold when he decided to join the Libertarian party, for example.

Sid, go fuck youself. I have supported the Bosnians, the Kosovars, the Iraqis fever since I was old enough to recognise what was going on...I don&#039;t care about their religion one jot. Fascists are fascists.

You two would leave half the planet to fascists as long as you indulge yourselves in your juvenile anti-Americanism. You purveyors of Westphalian fetishism really are racist gobshites aren&#039;t you? Brown people can go hang themselves as long as you can comfortably pronounce on the benefits of western liberal democracy from the safety of a western liberal democracy whilst denying people any means of getting a western liberal democracy, eh?

You two deserve to fuck of to North Korea and spend a few years living under Kim&#039;ll&#039;Sung. See how you like what you&#039;re condemning large chunks of the planet to...

You really are utter scum, aren&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas, get a grip whenever you&#8217;re in the midst of paranoia about &#8220;neocons&#8221; under the bed, eh? You&#8217;re a paranoid loon whose every other post consists of nothing but Stopper fantasies &#8211; the way you ranted at poor Rumbold when he decided to join the Libertarian party, for example.</p>
<p>Sid, go fuck youself. I have supported the Bosnians, the Kosovars, the Iraqis fever since I was old enough to recognise what was going on&#8230;I don&#8217;t care about their religion one jot. Fascists are fascists.</p>
<p>You two would leave half the planet to fascists as long as you indulge yourselves in your juvenile anti-Americanism. You purveyors of Westphalian fetishism really are racist gobshites aren&#8217;t you? Brown people can go hang themselves as long as you can comfortably pronounce on the benefits of western liberal democracy from the safety of a western liberal democracy whilst denying people any means of getting a western liberal democracy, eh?</p>
<p>You two deserve to fuck of to North Korea and spend a few years living under Kim&#8217;ll&#8217;Sung. See how you like what you&#8217;re condemning large chunks of the planet to&#8230;</p>
<p>You really are utter scum, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118920</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118920</guid>
		<description>Morgoth deals in interplanetary time scales. &#039;Cept, he doesn&#039;t. Morgoth is an idiot. Well, lets&#039; hear it from the idiot! I&#039;d  like an answer to 129. Expect that might be slow coming....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgoth deals in interplanetary time scales. &#8216;Cept, he doesn&#8217;t. Morgoth is an idiot. Well, lets&#8217; hear it from the idiot! I&#8217;d  like an answer to 129. Expect that might be slow coming&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118918</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118918</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;
Yes Sid, that’s why I wanted Saddam overthrown in 1991, that’s why I supported fervently both the Iraqi Shia, the Kurds, the Bosnians and Kosovars, and now the Albanians. That’s also why I support the Muslim Darfurese, why I want democracy through the he iMiddle-East. Why I want to see Assad’s head on a pike.
&lt;/em&gt;

Morgoth, you are a feckless, fecked-up pathological liar. Anyone can whip themselves up into a frenzy of outraged liberal guilt, even hidebound narcissists like you. I&#039;d like to remind you of a small contradiction in your high morals: have you forgotten your support of Daniel Pipes&#039; to intern Muslims in USA and Europe? I haven&#039;t.

Having said all that, you&#039;re absolutely right that US Marines have been outstanding as humanitarian aid workers in the Tsunami affected areas, and any number of times in the last 20 years in Bangladesh, most significantly after the 1991 cyclone when something like half a million lost their lives. The Marines are in a league of their own.

But US Marines are only effective in humanitarian work when the countries affected by natural disaster *allow* them in. What is the solution to the Burmese situation where the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7405777.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Burmese government is actively refusing the entry&lt;/a&gt; to US Naval task forces?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><br />
Yes Sid, that’s why I wanted Saddam overthrown in 1991, that’s why I supported fervently both the Iraqi Shia, the Kurds, the Bosnians and Kosovars, and now the Albanians. That’s also why I support the Muslim Darfurese, why I want democracy through the he iMiddle-East. Why I want to see Assad’s head on a pike.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Morgoth, you are a feckless, fecked-up pathological liar. Anyone can whip themselves up into a frenzy of outraged liberal guilt, even hidebound narcissists like you. I&#8217;d like to remind you of a small contradiction in your high morals: have you forgotten your support of Daniel Pipes&#8217; to intern Muslims in USA and Europe? I haven&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Having said all that, you&#8217;re absolutely right that US Marines have been outstanding as humanitarian aid workers in the Tsunami affected areas, and any number of times in the last 20 years in Bangladesh, most significantly after the 1991 cyclone when something like half a million lost their lives. The Marines are in a league of their own.</p>
<p>But US Marines are only effective in humanitarian work when the countries affected by natural disaster *allow* them in. What is the solution to the Burmese situation where the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7405777.stm" rel="nofollow">Burmese government is actively refusing the entry</a> to US Naval task forces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118916</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118916</guid>
		<description>Morgoth,

Your polemic, or perhaps masturbatory fantasy here:

&lt;blockquote&gt; Yes Sid, that’s why I wanted Saddam overthrown in 1991, that’s why I supported fervently both the Iraqi Shia, the Kurds, the Bosnians and Kosovars, and now the Albanians. That’s also why I support the Muslim Darfurese, why I want democracy through the Middle-East. Why I want to see Assad’s head on a pike. 

My wanting an end to the fascist dictators killing muslims in vast numbers is obviously becuase I hate them, Sid, isn’ tit? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

is frankly so far from any reasonable explanation of why G W Bush decided to give up on OBL and attack Saddam Hussein that I, at least, am left with cheap psychology - the failure of the father, corrected by the magic of the son.

To be honest, you have not made a case. In fact, you have never made the case. There is nothing, repeat nothing, to disagree with you on the sentiment. It is the reality, the fucked up reality, of replacing Baathist thugs with Blackwater thugs. Aided and abbetted by your chums, the US Marines. Or letting AK-47 armed idiots loose.

The boys you support are quite happy to let Muslims kill each other. No?

Which is contrary to what you are supposed to do, after you invade a country, after you disband it&#039;s army, after you take apart it&#039;s civil administration and replace it with a neo con nutter.

I stand by the fact that the idiot, Bremner&#039;s first act was to ensure that Iraq oil was denominated in dollars, not euros&#039;. That was the most important thing?

Get a grip.

Whilst most folk would prefer a liberal Middle East, it is pretty clear that invoking the US Marines is a rubbish arguement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgoth,</p>
<p>Your polemic, or perhaps masturbatory fantasy here:</p>
<blockquote><p> Yes Sid, that’s why I wanted Saddam overthrown in 1991, that’s why I supported fervently both the Iraqi Shia, the Kurds, the Bosnians and Kosovars, and now the Albanians. That’s also why I support the Muslim Darfurese, why I want democracy through the Middle-East. Why I want to see Assad’s head on a pike. </p>
<p>My wanting an end to the fascist dictators killing muslims in vast numbers is obviously becuase I hate them, Sid, isn’ tit? </p></blockquote>
<p>is frankly so far from any reasonable explanation of why G W Bush decided to give up on OBL and attack Saddam Hussein that I, at least, am left with cheap psychology &#8211; the failure of the father, corrected by the magic of the son.</p>
<p>To be honest, you have not made a case. In fact, you have never made the case. There is nothing, repeat nothing, to disagree with you on the sentiment. It is the reality, the fucked up reality, of replacing Baathist thugs with Blackwater thugs. Aided and abbetted by your chums, the US Marines. Or letting AK-47 armed idiots loose.</p>
<p>The boys you support are quite happy to let Muslims kill each other. No?</p>
<p>Which is contrary to what you are supposed to do, after you invade a country, after you disband it&#8217;s army, after you take apart it&#8217;s civil administration and replace it with a neo con nutter.</p>
<p>I stand by the fact that the idiot, Bremner&#8217;s first act was to ensure that Iraq oil was denominated in dollars, not euros&#8217;. That was the most important thing?</p>
<p>Get a grip.</p>
<p>Whilst most folk would prefer a liberal Middle East, it is pretty clear that invoking the US Marines is a rubbish arguement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118914</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118914</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, TCM, the US has plenty of resources. The problem is that no matter what they do, the usual brigade will be sniping at them. Look at the tsunami, for example, where the US was able to, within days, launch a massive aid operation that fed and watered and aided vast numbers of people. At the same time, the UN was busy...&lt;a href=&quot;http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2005/05/reminder-of-tsunami-and-transnational.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;doing nothing&lt;/a&gt;.

And yet, the likes of &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4136447.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clare Short&lt;/a&gt; would rather have people starving than admit that the US could do something positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, TCM, the US has plenty of resources. The problem is that no matter what they do, the usual brigade will be sniping at them. Look at the tsunami, for example, where the US was able to, within days, launch a massive aid operation that fed and watered and aided vast numbers of people. At the same time, the UN was busy&#8230;<a href="http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2005/05/reminder-of-tsunami-and-transnational.html" rel="nofollow">doing nothing</a>.</p>
<p>And yet, the likes of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4136447.stm" rel="nofollow">Clare Short</a> would rather have people starving than admit that the US could do something positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Common Humanist</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118911</link>
		<dc:creator>The Common Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118911</guid>
		<description>M,

&quot;And I dispute your “If it wasn’t for Iraq…” assertion. The STWC for example, was formed in the days after 9/11&quot;

???????

I meant that they, the US, have precious little resources to spare for Burma as they are still in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M,</p>
<p>&#8220;And I dispute your “If it wasn’t for Iraq…” assertion. The STWC for example, was formed in the days after 9/11&#8243;</p>
<p>???????</p>
<p>I meant that they, the US, have precious little resources to spare for Burma as they are still in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118909</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118909</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;is that he wants Assads head on a spike….I want him to go back to dentistry…..&lt;/i&gt;

Head on a spike is so poetic. The Nicolae Ceauşescu treatment is better and more apt.

And I dispute your &quot;If it wasn&#039;t for Iraq...&quot; assertion. The STWC for example, was formed &lt;i&gt;in the days after 9/11&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>is that he wants Assads head on a spike….I want him to go back to dentistry…..</i></p>
<p>Head on a spike is so poetic. The Nicolae Ceauşescu treatment is better and more apt.</p>
<p>And I dispute your &#8220;If it wasn&#8217;t for Iraq&#8230;&#8221; assertion. The STWC for example, was formed <i>in the days after 9/11</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Common Humanist</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118904</link>
		<dc:creator>The Common Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118904</guid>
		<description>The key difference between a Liberal Foreign Policy Wonk/History Buff (i.e. Me) and a Conservative Foreign Policy Wonk/History Buff (i.e. Morgoth) is that he wants Assads head on a spike....I want him to go back to dentistry.....

Anyways, even if the US wasn&#039;t bogged down in iraq I think actual Marine landings might not help but the mere suggestion might. Shame. 

Now only if the Americans had thought that pesky nation building in Iraq through there might be money and marines to help the Burmese....

Yet another reason for GWB to go back to being a drunk coke headed serial failure..... (actually I might make an exception for GWB on the spike-head issue!)

TCH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key difference between a Liberal Foreign Policy Wonk/History Buff (i.e. Me) and a Conservative Foreign Policy Wonk/History Buff (i.e. Morgoth) is that he wants Assads head on a spike&#8230;.I want him to go back to dentistry&#8230;..</p>
<p>Anyways, even if the US wasn&#8217;t bogged down in iraq I think actual Marine landings might not help but the mere suggestion might. Shame. </p>
<p>Now only if the Americans had thought that pesky nation building in Iraq through there might be money and marines to help the Burmese&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yet another reason for GWB to go back to being a drunk coke headed serial failure&#8230;.. (actually I might make an exception for GWB on the spike-head issue!)</p>
<p>TCH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Common Humanist</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118902</link>
		<dc:creator>The Common Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118902</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for fascists being killed but its the nation building afterwards thats the tricky bit - the bit that has proved abit beyond the US and Iraqis so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for fascists being killed but its the nation building afterwards thats the tricky bit &#8211; the bit that has proved abit beyond the US and Iraqis so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1969/comment-page-3#comment-118899</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1969#comment-118899</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In addition to the Mon and the Karenni, well done Morgoth. Given that the Rohingya were expelled because they are muslims and the junta hate muslims as much as you do, you actually have more in common with them than you think.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes Sid, that&#039;s why I wanted Saddam overthrown in 1991, that&#039;s why I supported fervently both the Iraqi Shia, the Kurds, the Bosnians and Kosovars, and now the Albanians. That&#039;s also why I support the Muslim Darfurese, why I want democracy through the Middle-East. Why I want to see Assad&#039;s head on a pike. 

My wanting an end to the fascist dictators killing muslims in vast numbers is obviously becuase I hate them, Sid, isn&#039; tit?

&lt;b&gt;Pillock&lt;/b&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In addition to the Mon and the Karenni, well done Morgoth. Given that the Rohingya were expelled because they are muslims and the junta hate muslims as much as you do, you actually have more in common with them than you think.</i></p>
<p>Yes Sid, that&#8217;s why I wanted Saddam overthrown in 1991, that&#8217;s why I supported fervently both the Iraqi Shia, the Kurds, the Bosnians and Kosovars, and now the Albanians. That&#8217;s also why I support the Muslim Darfurese, why I want democracy through the Middle-East. Why I want to see Assad&#8217;s head on a pike. </p>
<p>My wanting an end to the fascist dictators killing muslims in vast numbers is obviously becuase I hate them, Sid, isn&#8217; tit?</p>
<p><b>Pillock</b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
