<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is London too large?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117271</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117271</guid>
		<description>Leon. El Cid:

Yes, my borough does have an &#039;n&#039; in it, innit.

Douglas:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Toffs, your good self and Rumbold -v- Chavs like meâ€¦.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can&#039;t see you in a baseball cap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon. El Cid:</p>
<p>Yes, my borough does have an &#8216;n&#8217; in it, innit.</p>
<p>Douglas:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Toffs, your good self and Rumbold -v- Chavs like meâ€¦.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t see you in a baseball cap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117157</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117157</guid>
		<description>My apologies, Doug: I meant- as you inferred- that Scotland has a much lower population density than England. You acknowledge that some of your dislike of Johnson is based on his parents&#039; actions, not his own and therefore not rationally justified. 
What is a &quot;ruling class precept&quot;? I merely pointed out that Douglas-Home and Macmillan- Eton-educated &quot;toffs&quot;- were economically and socially much more progressive and egalitarian than our current Labour government. Do you disagree?
&quot;Paying to rule&quot; isn&#039;t a concept that&#039;s past its sell-by date, I think- it sounds like progressive and draconic income tax. If you mean &quot;paying for education&quot;, unfortunately, that isn&#039;t past its sell-by date either, though it should be. I don&#039;t know what class you or Rumbold come from or are in or believe you come from or are in. What I do know is that Johnson&#039;s supposed class membership is irrelevant to his fitness to be mayor of London. The policies he proposes are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies, Doug: I meant- as you inferred- that Scotland has a much lower population density than England. You acknowledge that some of your dislike of Johnson is based on his parents&#8217; actions, not his own and therefore not rationally justified.<br />
What is a &#8220;ruling class precept&#8221;? I merely pointed out that Douglas-Home and Macmillan- Eton-educated &#8220;toffs&#8221;- were economically and socially much more progressive and egalitarian than our current Labour government. Do you disagree?<br />
&#8220;Paying to rule&#8221; isn&#8217;t a concept that&#8217;s past its sell-by date, I think- it sounds like progressive and draconic income tax. If you mean &#8220;paying for education&#8221;, unfortunately, that isn&#8217;t past its sell-by date either, though it should be. I don&#8217;t know what class you or Rumbold come from or are in or believe you come from or are in. What I do know is that Johnson&#8217;s supposed class membership is irrelevant to his fitness to be mayor of London. The policies he proposes are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117130</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117130</guid>
		<description>Roger,

Whilst I&#039;d happily take a population per square kilometre arguement to prove the point you are trying to make, in actual geographical terms Scotland is circa 80k sq kilometres and England is circa 130k sq kilometres.

My issue with Johnson is that his parents bred him to be what he is today. Is that his fault? No. But it is a ruling class precept, as you rightly pointed out about Alec Douglas Hume and, err, The Earl of Roseberry? Who the hell was the Earl of Roseberry? Not a name I am familiar with.

Paying to rule is probably a concept that is past it&#039;s sell by date, but you and Rumbold both think I am being gauche by mentioning it. Hell, we had class arguements long before we had all this multicultural stuff. Perhaps I&#039;m just nostalgic, but it seems to me that that was a more honest debate. Toffs, your good self and Rumbold -v- Chavs like me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>Whilst I&#8217;d happily take a population per square kilometre arguement to prove the point you are trying to make, in actual geographical terms Scotland is circa 80k sq kilometres and England is circa 130k sq kilometres.</p>
<p>My issue with Johnson is that his parents bred him to be what he is today. Is that his fault? No. But it is a ruling class precept, as you rightly pointed out about Alec Douglas Hume and, err, The Earl of Roseberry? Who the hell was the Earl of Roseberry? Not a name I am familiar with.</p>
<p>Paying to rule is probably a concept that is past it&#8217;s sell by date, but you and Rumbold both think I am being gauche by mentioning it. Hell, we had class arguements long before we had all this multicultural stuff. Perhaps I&#8217;m just nostalgic, but it seems to me that that was a more honest debate. Toffs, your good self and Rumbold -v- Chavs like me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El  Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117129</link>
		<dc:creator>El  Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117129</guid>
		<description>what are the schools like in your manor Rumbold (state schools)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are the schools like in your manor Rumbold (state schools)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El  Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117128</link>
		<dc:creator>El  Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117128</guid>
		<description>you think? he&#039;s not very impressed then by mayoral efforts like the croydon tramlink or east london line extension to croydon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you think? he&#8217;s not very impressed then by mayoral efforts like the croydon tramlink or east london line extension to croydon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117127</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m betting he&#039;s a Croydon boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m betting he&#8217;s a Croydon boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El  Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117126</link>
		<dc:creator>El  Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117126</guid>
		<description>there is an &#039;n&#039; in it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is an &#8216;n&#8217; in it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117125</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117125</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;One of the outer ones.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>One of the outer ones.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaidMarian</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117122</link>
		<dc:creator>MaidMarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117122</guid>
		<description>Rumbold - 

Yes, I agree, I mentioned in my post that at least here in Watford way and well into the outer fringes of London I see little feeling of Londonness.  I don&#039;t know if it is different around the fringes, but the article does raise an interesting question.

We get two bus routes (142 and 258) and the Metropolitan line out here but not that much else.  Of course LU have been reluctant to extend the Metropolitan Line, I understand, in part because it is not in the GLA.  Were the original plans for a Watford Town Centre station to be revived there I am quite sure it would be a very lucrative line and would slash traffic on the Watford ring-road.  Oh well.

Just one other thought.  There is a TFL leaflet called &#039;around the fringe.&#039;  This details TFL services that are on the travelcard system but operate outside the GLA area.  I have only ever been able to get a copy of this in Zone 1!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold &#8211; </p>
<p>Yes, I agree, I mentioned in my post that at least here in Watford way and well into the outer fringes of London I see little feeling of Londonness.  I don&#8217;t know if it is different around the fringes, but the article does raise an interesting question.</p>
<p>We get two bus routes (142 and 258) and the Metropolitan line out here but not that much else.  Of course LU have been reluctant to extend the Metropolitan Line, I understand, in part because it is not in the GLA.  Were the original plans for a Watford Town Centre station to be revived there I am quite sure it would be a very lucrative line and would slash traffic on the Watford ring-road.  Oh well.</p>
<p>Just one other thought.  There is a TFL leaflet called &#8216;around the fringe.&#8217;  This details TFL services that are on the travelcard system but operate outside the GLA area.  I have only ever been able to get a copy of this in Zone 1!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El  Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117121</link>
		<dc:creator>El  Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117121</guid>
		<description>Thought you might. But I&#039;m not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought you might. But I&#8217;m not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117120</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117120</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you are taking bets, can I make one (I will lay out Â£1000)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you are taking bets, can I make one (I will lay out Â£1000)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117119</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117119</guid>
		<description>Yes and no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El  Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117118</link>
		<dc:creator>El  Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117118</guid>
		<description>If I was running a book -- which I&#039;m not -- I offer the following odds.

Waltham Forest, Havering, Redbridge or Bexley 3/1
Hillingdon, Harrow, Hounslow - 13/8
Croydon, Sutton - Evens
Barnet, Enfield - 8/13
Bromley, Richmond, Kingston -- 3/8

Am I warm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was running a book &#8212; which I&#8217;m not &#8212; I offer the following odds.</p>
<p>Waltham Forest, Havering, Redbridge or Bexley 3/1<br />
Hillingdon, Harrow, Hounslow &#8211; 13/8<br />
Croydon, Sutton &#8211; Evens<br />
Barnet, Enfield &#8211; 8/13<br />
Bromley, Richmond, Kingston &#8212; 3/8</p>
<p>Am I warm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117117</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117117</guid>
		<description>MaidMarian:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I will be honest that I am not too sure about some of the sentiment in the article - London boundaries are London boundaries, elections are fought on them and there can be no complaint after the fact.

I am not aware of any campaigns on the part of any of the boroughs to be removed from the GLA area?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I backed Boris, so this is not a case of sour grapes. I was just wondering whether people in outer London do feel like Londoners. Perhaps, as people have pointed out, the transport benefits from an integrated system outweigh the feeling of remoteness. I suppose that the mayor&#039;s powers and budget (Â£11 billion), is pretty samll anyway, so it is probably somewhat of a non-issue.

Sonia:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;which borough do you live in then rumbold?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

One of the outer ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MaidMarian:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I will be honest that I am not too sure about some of the sentiment in the article &#8211; London boundaries are London boundaries, elections are fought on them and there can be no complaint after the fact.</p>
<p>I am not aware of any campaigns on the part of any of the boroughs to be removed from the GLA area?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I backed Boris, so this is not a case of sour grapes. I was just wondering whether people in outer London do feel like Londoners. Perhaps, as people have pointed out, the transport benefits from an integrated system outweigh the feeling of remoteness. I suppose that the mayor&#8217;s powers and budget (Â£11 billion), is pretty samll anyway, so it is probably somewhat of a non-issue.</p>
<p>Sonia:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;which borough do you live in then rumbold?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>One of the outer ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117095</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117095</guid>
		<description>which borough do you live in then rumbold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which borough do you live in then rumbold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The morning after &#171; Gary Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117047</link>
		<dc:creator>The morning after &#171; Gary Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117047</guid>
		<description>[...] energy into analysing why your candidate was beaten and work towards it not happening again? As Rumbold at Pickled Politics says, a lot of commentators culd learn from Ken Livinstone&#8217;s dignified exit speech (as could those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] energy into analysing why your candidate was beaten and work towards it not happening again? As Rumbold at Pickled Politics says, a lot of commentators culd learn from Ken Livinstone&#8217;s dignified exit speech (as could those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-117035</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-117035</guid>
		<description>&quot;The SNP - and Iâ€™m not even a member or a fellow traveller - are on record as wanting more immigrants into Scotland, which flies in the face of the Westminster consensus.&quot;
That&#039;s because Scotland has a much bigger area and many fewer people than England, which is where most immigrants go, and especially London.  Indeed the population of Scotlsnd is predicted to decline for the foreseeable future.
I have much the same opinion of Johnson that you do. i don&#039;t think that making gibes about his education is as persuasive an argument against him as his more recent career though. Indeed, comparing the last Scottish PMs before Blair and Brown, both may have been Conservative but both were much more socialist in social and tax policies than their successors and both were educated at Eton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The SNP &#8211; and Iâ€™m not even a member or a fellow traveller &#8211; are on record as wanting more immigrants into Scotland, which flies in the face of the Westminster consensus.&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s because Scotland has a much bigger area and many fewer people than England, which is where most immigrants go, and especially London.  Indeed the population of Scotlsnd is predicted to decline for the foreseeable future.<br />
I have much the same opinion of Johnson that you do. i don&#8217;t think that making gibes about his education is as persuasive an argument against him as his more recent career though. Indeed, comparing the last Scottish PMs before Blair and Brown, both may have been Conservative but both were much more socialist in social and tax policies than their successors and both were educated at Eton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-116988</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-116988</guid>
		<description>El Cid,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Douglas, with respect, this is a London thread â€” about a global city with a population the size of a small country. And you want us to focus on Scotland, which, incidently, the people of London subsidise. Ok, fair enough. Thatâ€™s what you bring to the table. Thatâ€™s your right.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is why I said in post 19, remember that far back? :

&quot;I donâ€™t want to make too much of this, really. However, you asked.&quot;

Boris Johnson appears, to me at least to have lived almost exclusively in the world of mainstream media and politics for his whole adult life. Perhaps not exclusively the Westminster bubble, but certainly the Metropolitan elite bubble. Perhaps these days that is the CV you need, but it seems a bit thin to me.

Roger, I frankly couldn&#039;t give a flying toss about what folk in the USA say. The SNP - and I&#039;m not even a member or a fellow traveller - are on record as wanting &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; immigrants into Scotland, which flies in the face of the Westminster consensus.

http://www.theherald.co.uk/search/display.var.2160531.0.salmond_rejects_plea_to_curb_immigration.php

I agree this is derailing the thread, so I&#039;ll shut up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Cid,</p>
<blockquote><p>Douglas, with respect, this is a London thread â€” about a global city with a population the size of a small country. And you want us to focus on Scotland, which, incidently, the people of London subsidise. Ok, fair enough. Thatâ€™s what you bring to the table. Thatâ€™s your right.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is why I said in post 19, remember that far back? :</p>
<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t want to make too much of this, really. However, you asked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Boris Johnson appears, to me at least to have lived almost exclusively in the world of mainstream media and politics for his whole adult life. Perhaps not exclusively the Westminster bubble, but certainly the Metropolitan elite bubble. Perhaps these days that is the CV you need, but it seems a bit thin to me.</p>
<p>Roger, I frankly couldn&#8217;t give a flying toss about what folk in the USA say. The SNP &#8211; and I&#8217;m not even a member or a fellow traveller &#8211; are on record as wanting <i>more</i> immigrants into Scotland, which flies in the face of the Westminster consensus.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theherald.co.uk/search/display.var.2160531.0.salmond_rejects_plea_to_curb_immigration.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.theherald.co.uk/search/display.var.2160531.0.salmond_rejects_plea_to_curb_immigration.php</a></p>
<p>I agree this is derailing the thread, so I&#8217;ll shut up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaidMarian</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-116958</link>
		<dc:creator>MaidMarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 10:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-116958</guid>
		<description>Rumbold - 

I will be honest that I am not too sure about some of the sentiment in the article - London boundaries are London boundaries, elections are fought on them and there can be no complaint after the fact.

 I am not aware of any campaigns on the part of any of the boroughs to be removed from the GLA area?

That said.  I live in Watford and in local government terms, this is the first authority outside of London.  It is true to say I think that here and in the &#039;fringes&#039; (here at least) there is very little feeling of &#039;Londonness.&#039;  To that extent, the article is making a rasonable point.  I am not aware that the Council here looked into entering the GLA, though it may have done at the time in 2000.

The slightly bigger issue in this, and somehting that does need looking at, is the &#039;regional&#039; tier.  Though places like Watford, St Albans, Rickmansworth, bits of Buckinghamshire etc are not &#039;London&#039; they are more in a &#039;London Region&#039; than any type of &#039;South East Region.&#039;

In that sense, I suspect that you idea of an &#039;Inner London Mayoralty&#039; with a more sensible regional co-ordinating body&#039; may be a good idea and would reflect the south east more effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold &#8211; </p>
<p>I will be honest that I am not too sure about some of the sentiment in the article &#8211; London boundaries are London boundaries, elections are fought on them and there can be no complaint after the fact.</p>
<p> I am not aware of any campaigns on the part of any of the boroughs to be removed from the GLA area?</p>
<p>That said.  I live in Watford and in local government terms, this is the first authority outside of London.  It is true to say I think that here and in the &#8216;fringes&#8217; (here at least) there is very little feeling of &#8216;Londonness.&#8217;  To that extent, the article is making a rasonable point.  I am not aware that the Council here looked into entering the GLA, though it may have done at the time in 2000.</p>
<p>The slightly bigger issue in this, and somehting that does need looking at, is the &#8216;regional&#8217; tier.  Though places like Watford, St Albans, Rickmansworth, bits of Buckinghamshire etc are not &#8216;London&#8217; they are more in a &#8216;London Region&#8217; than any type of &#8216;South East Region.&#8217;</p>
<p>In that sense, I suspect that you idea of an &#8216;Inner London Mayoralty&#8217; with a more sensible regional co-ordinating body&#8217; may be a good idea and would reflect the south east more effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1936#comment-116926</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/?p=1936#comment-116926</guid>
		<description>Rumbold:

&lt;blockquote&gt;But does an integrated transport system have to be a London thing? Why not have it on a national level instead?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I doubt it entirely feasible in both practical and economic terms but it would, no doubt be a boon for the entire country to be connected via a common transport system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold:</p>
<blockquote><p>But does an integrated transport system have to be a London thing? Why not have it on a national level instead?</p></blockquote>
<p>I doubt it entirely feasible in both practical and economic terms but it would, no doubt be a boon for the entire country to be connected via a common transport system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

