Yes other nations were invited to send troops… but they would have served under the present Coalition system (which has flaws in both action and intent) –
Agree but I think the UN also rejected such a course of action. Though maybe it will change its mind now.

You are either naive or have conceded shared overall ideological interests if you believe or are actually trying to say America are in this war primarily for the interests of the Iraqi people.
Did you actually read my article or not above?

http://iraqnow.blogspot.com/2005/11/how-i-stopped-worrying-and-learned-to.html

Provocative thoughts from a man who served in Iraq.

Yes other nations were invited to send troops… but they would have served under the present Coalition system (which has flaws in both action and intent) – I don’t think any of the nations you mentioned would like to be associated with this American project in Iraq. If you re-read what I said, I suggested a fresh system of security under the UN – doing exactly what the Americans claim (and supports of ‘keep the troops’ like yourself) they are doing… but without the lies, abuses, economic, political and ideological take-over being perpetrated by the US. You are either naive or have conceded shared overall ideological interests if you believe or are actually trying to say America are in this war primarily for the interests of the Iraqi people.

Add to that the immense human rights abuses, the brainwashed 18 year old soldiers who just want to kill Iraqis because they think all Iraqis believe in al-quaida as their religion and had something to do with 9-11

The human rights abuses (which I have pointed out) are still much smaller than the abuses of many alternatives (incl. Saddam Hussain, the Taliban, a Saudi style dictatorship).

oh and lets not forget the permanent establishment of the USA in Iraq for decades to come, with military bases, and the biggest US embassy deploying CIA agents in every sector of the nation to take and hold full control…
Some presence maybe, but I doubt they’ll have a huge presence for much longer, the losses and the money it costs is too much. America can’t afford that economic deficit forever.

The Iraqi government should request troops via the UN, from ‘friendly’ countries that the Iraqi population won’t have a problem with, Bangladeshi troops have done a good job in Sierra-Leone

Unfortunately thy tried that already, remember? Most Arab govts largely said no, even India said no. How many Pak troops are there in Iraq out of interest?

So we have those who still believe The Coalition invaded Iraq to help Iraq…despite lying initially.

So are the troops sitting there to help Iraq? Surely those watering at the mouth for power in Iraq need the help of the Americans..so they are not going be to calling for their exit.

Is the Coalition in Iraq solely to bring law and order and bring a fair and just rule? Or is it there to make money, and sew the seeds that will bring to their control the economy of a nation that has the potential to be a massive economic machine?

I think if even the most anti-war people ( myself included) could be convinced, that the coalition was there purely for law and order, establishment of infrastructure and a just government, Coalition presence in Iraq would not be so strongly disliked. Even if they were making a few lil moves and favoring their own in terms of rebuilding contracts….but PRIMARILY there for the good reasons people claim they should stay there and stick it out for.

The truth of the situation is, the coalition have from the beginning shown more interest in making money, taking over state assets, giving away contracts to powerful people and their friends, installing their preferred allied in power, installing their ‘democratic’ ideology [democracy as we are led to believe is meant to be a fair and representative just system of law, but in reality means pure submission to the principles of capitalism, pro-Americanism], making ‘peace’ with Israel [with which there is nothing wrong - as long as Israel delivers justice to the Palestinians...but this little detail is what they want to bypass ... remember the Iraqi interim gov't rep and Israel diplomat meeting.... and lets not forget the pseudo-israeli new Iraqi flag]…. the Coalition have shown more dedication to their own interests which are against Iraqi interests from day one! Further to that you have the neo-con conservative / right wing evangelicalism Christian ideology making its moves… so you have some right-wing religious ideology forwarding its plans…. ALL of which are coming before the reason they are giving for staying there…that is to bring stability and peace to the country.

Add to that the immense human rights abuses, the brainwashed 18 year old soldiers who just want to kill Iraqis because they think all Iraqis believe in al-quaida as their religion and had something to do with 9-11… oh and lets not forget the permanent establishment of the USA in Iraq for decades to come, with military bases, and the biggest US embassy deploying CIA agents in every sector of the nation to take and hold full control…

I say the troops should leave, now. The Iraqi government should request troops via the UN, from ‘friendly’ countries that the Iraqi population won’t have a problem with, Bangladeshi troops have done a good job in Sierra-Leone… perhaps they could work along side Pakistani troops with whom they already do military exercises and will probably work very well together.

sudan: thousands of christians and animists sudanese are being killed the arab [mulsim] sudan….etc, etc…..

and as an aside, i would like to ask the iraq war critics, would you have or did you also oppose the american intervention in the balkans

The producers then went and spent another billion on trying to get a different bunch of teletubbies from the thier planet.
Which happens to be called noooooiiii.

While this was happening we saw some drastic changes to the show Teletubbies, with these now fame hungry, drug snorting, cigarette smoking, vodka jelly eating motherfuckers running around on thier own show and pretty much shagging each other at every chance they got.
To the children watching they couldn’t tell what was going on as the process of mating within teletubbies looks like they just rubbing each other.

None the less once the new tele tubbies had arrived on earth the old ones were physically chucked out of the studio.
They then got a reality check, the biggest reality of thier time on earth.
It became evident that they couldn’t fend for themselves and they needed food and shelter.
So they walked around the streets of somewhere for a while and came across an HMV.
Luckily they got a job there, to just stand around and dance.
They felt happy again and understood that humans still thought they were the original teletubbies.

Time however passed as they kept on doing gigs all over the uk, dancing from here to there and paying off thier drug and drink habits as well as the rock candy which they love for both consumption and sexual purposes.

But at one of the gigs the real tele tubbies showed up, surrounded by paparazzi climbing out of thier limos.
At that moment people realised who the fakes were, and they were stoned to death.
But having such great armour the teletubbies just faked thier deaths instead.
The stones didn’t even hurt them physically but emotionally left them scarred.

The story from there on is that some renegade young man from the highlands aptly named Highlander took them on to be his students.
They were taught to blend in with society and learn how to harm other humans.

So its a strong possibility that infact the london bombers were linked or infact the teletubbies.

CIA ?

Christian Fundamentalists ?

Hindu Fascists ?

or James Bond ?

or is it a global hegemonistic conspiracy hatched by that fiendish duo Bush and Blair ?

http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/61251

Some good research here too – http://www.nineeleven.co.uk

Why not challenge the evidence instead of acting like a child?