<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC failing to challenge the BNP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McCarthy's Bar</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-109628</link>
		<dc:creator>McCarthy's Bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-109628</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s Griffin or Bunglawala, let them go on TV.  When people see who purports to speak for them and how they make the majority of us sound like card-carrying facists;  perhaps public opinion can start lobbying the BBC et al to put a stop to any of these mouthpieces from purporting to speak on my behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s Griffin or Bunglawala, let them go on TV.  When people see who purports to speak for them and how they make the majority of us sound like card-carrying facists;  perhaps public opinion can start lobbying the BBC et al to put a stop to any of these mouthpieces from purporting to speak on my behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All white on the night &#171; Rupa Huq&#8217;s home on the web</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-107810</link>
		<dc:creator>All white on the night &#171; Rupa Huq&#8217;s home on the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-107810</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;white&#8221; season which was launched with a Newsnight Nick Griffin interview (see Pickled Politics) and lo and behold it&#8217;s ending tonight. Where does the time go? The season has attracted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;white&#8221; season which was launched with a Newsnight Nick Griffin interview (see Pickled Politics) and lo and behold it&#8217;s ending tonight. Where does the time go? The season has attracted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refresh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-107183</link>
		<dc:creator>Refresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-107183</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve been watching the series, I am beginning to think there is much more depth to the &#039;White&#039; season. Its been compelling TV, and I have a strong hunch that Paxman et al will be out in force at the end of it.

And it will not just be Nick Griffin who will be in the hot seat. I can see Hazel Blears, Hutton, Hodge all being grilled. The one who should really be strung up is out hunting peace in the middle east.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve been watching the series, I am beginning to think there is much more depth to the &#8216;White&#8217; season. Its been compelling TV, and I have a strong hunch that Paxman et al will be out in force at the end of it.</p>
<p>And it will not just be Nick Griffin who will be in the hot seat. I can see Hazel Blears, Hutton, Hodge all being grilled. The one who should really be strung up is out hunting peace in the middle east.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sofia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-107179</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-107179</guid>
		<description>saw this and thought kirsty was crap...they should have had paxman on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw this and thought kirsty was crap&#8230;they should have had paxman on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a very public sociologist</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-107005</link>
		<dc:creator>a very public sociologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-107005</guid>
		<description>Lee B deserves a prize for the most ludicrous argument I&#039;ve seen in PP&#039;s comment boxes. What worries me is he probably genuinely believes it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee B deserves a prize for the most ludicrous argument I&#8217;ve seen in PP&#8217;s comment boxes. What worries me is he probably genuinely believes it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee B</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106748</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106748</guid>
		<description>Labour have despised the WWC since the Miners Strike of 1984 when the WWC failed to rise up with Scargill against Thatcher and usher in the Red Revolution.

At that point Old Labour died and New Labour was born.

Old Labour was far left, whilst New Labour was Fabianist. 

After the miners strike New Labour ideologues decided that immigrants were more reliable as their voter base and then sought to swamp the country with their new pet voters when in power, whilst keeping the Tory right happy with cheap workers to undercut UK workers.

Now of course the New Labour ethnic friendly elite who are hostile to the old far left are using the non-unionised immigrant workers to weaken the grip of the old far left unions as they seek to globalise the UK economy. 

So immigration is a win / win for both New Labour and Tories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour have despised the WWC since the Miners Strike of 1984 when the WWC failed to rise up with Scargill against Thatcher and usher in the Red Revolution.</p>
<p>At that point Old Labour died and New Labour was born.</p>
<p>Old Labour was far left, whilst New Labour was Fabianist. </p>
<p>After the miners strike New Labour ideologues decided that immigrants were more reliable as their voter base and then sought to swamp the country with their new pet voters when in power, whilst keeping the Tory right happy with cheap workers to undercut UK workers.</p>
<p>Now of course the New Labour ethnic friendly elite who are hostile to the old far left are using the non-unionised immigrant workers to weaken the grip of the old far left unions as they seek to globalise the UK economy. </p>
<p>So immigration is a win / win for both New Labour and Tories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyo</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106740</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106740</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see the BNP line from LJB. The business about socialism is untrue, of course, but demonstrates how fascists have been able to capture some of the WWC vote, for which the Labour Party bears much of the blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see the BNP line from LJB. The business about socialism is untrue, of course, but demonstrates how fascists have been able to capture some of the WWC vote, for which the Labour Party bears much of the blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyo</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106721</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106721</guid>
		<description>Zin Zin - &quot;This may seem bizarre but even the WWC are victims of political multiculturalism. The Muslims gets Bunglawala to speak on their behalf and the WWC get Griffin to speak on their behalf.&quot;

Excellent point. Ironically it typifies the condescending attitude of the middle class media - the WWC are racist and therefore represented by the BNP. 

However, racism aside, the BNP is the only party that has embraced rather than shunned the WWC and been prepared to raise issues like housing or the impact of immigration. 

The true scandal is that the mainstream political class never gave a toss, frankly - to the right it was all about economics, to the left post-imperial guilt, and personally I can&#039;t help thinking there was an underlying class hatred there too: in 1945, the WWC which lest we forget won WW2, voted for a proper (and possibly the last) socialist government which in five years created the NHS, Welfare State and damn-near nationalised half the country. 

They were just an inch away from creating a truly equitable country - by banning private education and taxing the rich till their pips squeaked - so we couldn&#039;t have that, could we. 

It seems to me that the wealthy mobilised their battalions and (albeit subconsciously) took control of the left, through the Labour Party and the media. So while Jeremy looked after the family finances in the City, Jemima did her best to shift the left from socialism to single-issueism on the Grauniad, marginalising the WWC to the extent that the only people prepared  to speak out for their interests are a bunch of racist twats. Unfeasible? Never underestimate the survival instinct of the British ruling class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zin Zin &#8211; &#8220;This may seem bizarre but even the WWC are victims of political multiculturalism. The Muslims gets Bunglawala to speak on their behalf and the WWC get Griffin to speak on their behalf.&#8221;</p>
<p>Excellent point. Ironically it typifies the condescending attitude of the middle class media &#8211; the WWC are racist and therefore represented by the BNP. </p>
<p>However, racism aside, the BNP is the only party that has embraced rather than shunned the WWC and been prepared to raise issues like housing or the impact of immigration. </p>
<p>The true scandal is that the mainstream political class never gave a toss, frankly &#8211; to the right it was all about economics, to the left post-imperial guilt, and personally I can&#8217;t help thinking there was an underlying class hatred there too: in 1945, the WWC which lest we forget won WW2, voted for a proper (and possibly the last) socialist government which in five years created the NHS, Welfare State and damn-near nationalised half the country. </p>
<p>They were just an inch away from creating a truly equitable country &#8211; by banning private education and taxing the rich till their pips squeaked &#8211; so we couldn&#8217;t have that, could we. </p>
<p>It seems to me that the wealthy mobilised their battalions and (albeit subconsciously) took control of the left, through the Labour Party and the media. So while Jeremy looked after the family finances in the City, Jemima did her best to shift the left from socialism to single-issueism on the Grauniad, marginalising the WWC to the extent that the only people prepared  to speak out for their interests are a bunch of racist twats. Unfeasible? Never underestimate the survival instinct of the British ruling class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106682</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106682</guid>
		<description>Labour&#039;s neglect of the WWC was in place long before Blair...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour&#8217;s neglect of the WWC was in place long before Blair&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refresh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106675</link>
		<dc:creator>Refresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106675</guid>
		<description>funkg, its worse than that.

Blair in the guise of New Labour not only deserted the working class (including WWC) but was embarassed by it. And in time turned on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funkg, its worse than that.</p>
<p>Blair in the guise of New Labour not only deserted the working class (including WWC) but was embarassed by it. And in time turned on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funkg</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106673</link>
		<dc:creator>funkg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106673</guid>
		<description>I have just got back from charlie wrights in hoxton (great pub) I am bloody pissed off how the so called labour government has allowed the likes of the BNP to become almost respectable. The so called &#039;zeitgeist&#039; amongst many WWC is more and more favouring the BNP and we would be naive to ignore that. Mageret Hodge got a trouncing last night on newsnight, and the left especially in London is getting a battering. I really am concerned with this rightward drift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just got back from charlie wrights in hoxton (great pub) I am bloody pissed off how the so called labour government has allowed the likes of the BNP to become almost respectable. The so called &#8216;zeitgeist&#8217; amongst many WWC is more and more favouring the BNP and we would be naive to ignore that. Mageret Hodge got a trouncing last night on newsnight, and the left especially in London is getting a battering. I really am concerned with this rightward drift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Rustle</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106616</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Rustle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106616</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, either Nick Griffin should have been in the studio discussion, where he would have been grilled by the others, or not in the program at all. A short interview, packing in a lot of questions without time for follow up questions did not reveal much of the BNP view on the subject.  

Of course the BBC knew this beforehand. I would hazard a guess that their intention was to give the impression of an inclusive discussion by including the BNP but with insufficient time for exposition or criticism, thus generating much heat but not much light. Or in other words a lot of publicity for their White Series without giving the  BNP  a  platform. The BBC was successful.

After a long career with the BBC Jon Gaunt moved to Talksport and I would hazard a guess that the BBC will promote him as the authentic voice of the White Working Class as he supports Multiculturalism despite his  living in the country and educating his children privately, thus largely insulating himself and his children from the downside of Multiculturalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, either Nick Griffin should have been in the studio discussion, where he would have been grilled by the others, or not in the program at all. A short interview, packing in a lot of questions without time for follow up questions did not reveal much of the BNP view on the subject.  </p>
<p>Of course the BBC knew this beforehand. I would hazard a guess that their intention was to give the impression of an inclusive discussion by including the BNP but with insufficient time for exposition or criticism, thus generating much heat but not much light. Or in other words a lot of publicity for their White Series without giving the  BNP  a  platform. The BBC was successful.</p>
<p>After a long career with the BBC Jon Gaunt moved to Talksport and I would hazard a guess that the BBC will promote him as the authentic voice of the White Working Class as he supports Multiculturalism despite his  living in the country and educating his children privately, thus largely insulating himself and his children from the downside of Multiculturalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: septicisle</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106615</link>
		<dc:creator>septicisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106615</guid>
		<description>The main problem was that they had Kirsty Wark on interviewing him - I don&#039;t think Paxman would have let him get away with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem was that they had Kirsty Wark on interviewing him &#8211; I don&#8217;t think Paxman would have let him get away with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refresh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106610</link>
		<dc:creator>Refresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106610</guid>
		<description>Don

What a coincidence, just made that point to Sunny on another thread about sneering at villagers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don</p>
<p>What a coincidence, just made that point to Sunny on another thread about sneering at villagers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106606</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106606</guid>
		<description>Good points, AsifB. 

I was disturbed by that tatoo image too, as though the assumption had been made that the WWC could only be defined by opposition to the encroaching other.

I hope some time is spent on the rural working class, whose culture in many areas has been comprehensively trashed by overwhelmingly white, middle-class afluent incomers (including a high proportion of media types).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, AsifB. </p>
<p>I was disturbed by that tatoo image too, as though the assumption had been made that the WWC could only be defined by opposition to the encroaching other.</p>
<p>I hope some time is spent on the rural working class, whose culture in many areas has been comprehensively trashed by overwhelmingly white, middle-class afluent incomers (including a high proportion of media types).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refresh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106600</link>
		<dc:creator>Refresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106600</guid>
		<description>Excellent post AsifB. 

I would also add to your name checks people like Peter Hain, Lee Jasper, Ken Livingstone lest we forget how we, together, manage to pull the country from the brink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post AsifB. </p>
<p>I would also add to your name checks people like Peter Hain, Lee Jasper, Ken Livingstone lest we forget how we, together, manage to pull the country from the brink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parvinder Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106588</link>
		<dc:creator>Parvinder Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106588</guid>
		<description>#2 AsifB

good post. totally agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 AsifB</p>
<p>good post. totally agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106582</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106582</guid>
		<description>This may seem bizarre but even the WWC are victims of political multiculturalism. The Muslims gets Bunglawala to speak on their behalf and the WWC get Griffin to speak on their behalf. Neither have any considerable support, but as their names appear in the contact books of lazy journalists they get their mugs on Tv and are allowed to spout their nonsense.

Griffin and the BNP were brought on for nothing more than cheap controversy. Right-wing bias at the BBC? It may be wise to give &quot;White season&quot; a miss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may seem bizarre but even the WWC are victims of political multiculturalism. The Muslims gets Bunglawala to speak on their behalf and the WWC get Griffin to speak on their behalf. Neither have any considerable support, but as their names appear in the contact books of lazy journalists they get their mugs on Tv and are allowed to spout their nonsense.</p>
<p>Griffin and the BNP were brought on for nothing more than cheap controversy. Right-wing bias at the BBC? It may be wise to give &#8220;White season&#8221; a miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106581</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106581</guid>
		<description>I have *absolutely* no problem that Nick Griffin is interviewed by the BBC. He is after all the leader of a legitimate political party. What really pisses me off is the mainstream media interviewers who are ill-prepared to confront the half-truths and lies of nazis in suits. 

But in this day and age, they are hardly the cause of race tensions that still exist in this country. They merely exploit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have *absolutely* no problem that Nick Griffin is interviewed by the BBC. He is after all the leader of a legitimate political party. What really pisses me off is the mainstream media interviewers who are ill-prepared to confront the half-truths and lies of nazis in suits. </p>
<p>But in this day and age, they are hardly the cause of race tensions that still exist in this country. They merely exploit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsifB</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757/comment-page-1#comment-106580</link>
		<dc:creator>AsifB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1757#comment-106580</guid>
		<description>Failing to challenge would be fascists is one thing. But this looks more like the BBC gratuitously giving a platform to a fringe group just to publicise a new season of programmes. (which all sound interesting enough to watch anyway without sexing up)

Not only is the packaging of these films dumbed down - the provacative tatooing of a white face with &#039;foreign scribbles till it turns black&#039; undermining the  anti-racist patriotism of Billy Bragg&#039;s version of Jerusalem. But there also seems a concerted worldview among some in the media that &#039;white working classness is synonymous with racism.&#039;

This is untrue and Jon Gaunt is totally right - the BNP has been persistently rejected by the white working class in Britain. Only in its fantasies do the far right represent anything more than a guilty protest vote to a fraction of the white working class.
(and yes, its tragic they should appear tobe growing under a &#039;Labour&#039; government but that&#039;s another story)

If as some deluded white middle class people seem to believe - the white working class are all more  racist than middle class types, and can be represented by &quot;Ronnie and Reggie loving eastenders who moved to essex/spain to get away from ethnics&quot;  - then how come it was largely white working class solidarity with middle class lefties and ethnic minorities in the 1970s trade union movement that helped the  Anti-Nazi League and Rock against Racism fight fascists off the streets?

It would be impossible for anyone let alone middle class media types to enjoy the diversity of the great metropolis, if every working class person  - white or non-white- was a racist and went around London inciting fear in others - the days when most picklers were young or just a glint in the chutney jar when  there were plenty of places where National Front newpaper sellers were as common as Big Issue salesman and Chuggers, are long over. 

And we have the white working classes tendancy to muddle on and be tolerant - to thank for this - not self satisfied media types.The annoying thing about some of the season&#039;s packaging is that the Beeb seems to be going backwards - it was only five or so years ago that the Windrush documentary series highlighted how white Londoners helped resist racists in places like Lewisham in the 1970s. (and  Gary Bushell, the &#039;gaunty&#039; of his day, was happy to be interviwed  to express pride in fighting the NF)


This is what comes from the social isoloation of middle class media professionals - whose faults can be amplified with each succeeding generation as London prices ensure only those who can afford to intern can climb the ladder..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failing to challenge would be fascists is one thing. But this looks more like the BBC gratuitously giving a platform to a fringe group just to publicise a new season of programmes. (which all sound interesting enough to watch anyway without sexing up)</p>
<p>Not only is the packaging of these films dumbed down &#8211; the provacative tatooing of a white face with &#8216;foreign scribbles till it turns black&#8217; undermining the  anti-racist patriotism of Billy Bragg&#8217;s version of Jerusalem. But there also seems a concerted worldview among some in the media that &#8216;white working classness is synonymous with racism.&#8217;</p>
<p>This is untrue and Jon Gaunt is totally right &#8211; the BNP has been persistently rejected by the white working class in Britain. Only in its fantasies do the far right represent anything more than a guilty protest vote to a fraction of the white working class.<br />
(and yes, its tragic they should appear tobe growing under a &#8216;Labour&#8217; government but that&#8217;s another story)</p>
<p>If as some deluded white middle class people seem to believe &#8211; the white working class are all more  racist than middle class types, and can be represented by &#8220;Ronnie and Reggie loving eastenders who moved to essex/spain to get away from ethnics&#8221;  &#8211; then how come it was largely white working class solidarity with middle class lefties and ethnic minorities in the 1970s trade union movement that helped the  Anti-Nazi League and Rock against Racism fight fascists off the streets?</p>
<p>It would be impossible for anyone let alone middle class media types to enjoy the diversity of the great metropolis, if every working class person  &#8211; white or non-white- was a racist and went around London inciting fear in others &#8211; the days when most picklers were young or just a glint in the chutney jar when  there were plenty of places where National Front newpaper sellers were as common as Big Issue salesman and Chuggers, are long over. </p>
<p>And we have the white working classes tendancy to muddle on and be tolerant &#8211; to thank for this &#8211; not self satisfied media types.The annoying thing about some of the season&#8217;s packaging is that the Beeb seems to be going backwards &#8211; it was only five or so years ago that the Windrush documentary series highlighted how white Londoners helped resist racists in places like Lewisham in the 1970s. (and  Gary Bushell, the &#8216;gaunty&#8217; of his day, was happy to be interviwed  to express pride in fighting the NF)</p>
<p>This is what comes from the social isoloation of middle class media professionals &#8211; whose faults can be amplified with each succeeding generation as London prices ensure only those who can afford to intern can climb the ladder..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
