<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tories propose criminalising forced marriages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104573</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104573</guid>
		<description>Showing that two parties in a marriage intend to live together and that marriage is subsisting is a subjective test. For example, I know many Dhakaiya Bengalis involved in sham marriages for money. It&#039;s a business transaction for these ppl. It is socially accepted amongst that ethnic group. Perhaps the qualifying period before receiving ILR should be 5 years and not two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Showing that two parties in a marriage intend to live together and that marriage is subsisting is a subjective test. For example, I know many Dhakaiya Bengalis involved in sham marriages for money. It&#8217;s a business transaction for these ppl. It is socially accepted amongst that ethnic group. Perhaps the qualifying period before receiving ILR should be 5 years and not two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104472</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;perhaps you are confused Ravi, let me clarify: i meant in seeing a polarity between two choices - one, something called â€˜arrangedâ€™ marriage , and the other, something seeing called â€˜love marriageâ€™. plenty of people in real life settle for all sorts of things in between.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, from the point of the view of this discussion and the terms used in the subcontinent, the term &quot;love marriage&quot; is used in contrast to &quot;arranged marriage&quot;. I see your point, though. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;and in no. 21, perhaps you see my one-liner to mean i would have the government put a stop to â€˜arranged marriagesâ€™. what a strange extrapolation &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, I didn&#039;t extrapolate that. But you clearly said in #21 that you believed that arranged marriages are a problem, and I thought that conflicted with #57. I also note a tone of disapproval of your sister in #49 by calling her the good girl who did everything to please her parents and community. That sort of struck a chord, as I have several siblings and I am the eldest. My two younger siblings have always complained that I am conformist, and indeed they are right. I guess it comes on two things: a) you feel like you need to do the right thing to serve as an example to the younger siblings, and b) your parents are far more strict with the eldest than with the youngest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>perhaps you are confused Ravi, let me clarify: i meant in seeing a polarity between two choices &#8211; one, something called â€˜arrangedâ€™ marriage , and the other, something seeing called â€˜love marriageâ€™. plenty of people in real life settle for all sorts of things in between.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, from the point of the view of this discussion and the terms used in the subcontinent, the term &#8220;love marriage&#8221; is used in contrast to &#8220;arranged marriage&#8221;. I see your point, though. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;and in no. 21, perhaps you see my one-liner to mean i would have the government put a stop to â€˜arranged marriagesâ€™. what a strange extrapolation &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>No, I didn&#8217;t extrapolate that. But you clearly said in #21 that you believed that arranged marriages are a problem, and I thought that conflicted with #57. I also note a tone of disapproval of your sister in #49 by calling her the good girl who did everything to please her parents and community. That sort of struck a chord, as I have several siblings and I am the eldest. My two younger siblings have always complained that I am conformist, and indeed they are right. I guess it comes on two things: a) you feel like you need to do the right thing to serve as an example to the younger siblings, and b) your parents are far more strict with the eldest than with the youngest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajn</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104450</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104450</guid>
		<description>If only they had outlawed arranged marriages before I got hitched...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only they had outlawed arranged marriages before I got hitched&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104437</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104437</guid>
		<description>Sonia:

I thought that your sister heartily disapproved, which was why I was sorry for you. My mistake.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Youâ€™re up with the lingo. and good points in the rest of your comment.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Safe, innit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia:</p>
<p>I thought that your sister heartily disapproved, which was why I was sorry for you. My mistake.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Youâ€™re up with the lingo. and good points in the rest of your comment.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Safe, innit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104433</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104433</guid>
		<description>corrections...&quot;i meant in my comment no.57 seeing a polarity&quot;  

and 

..&quot;something called â€˜love marriageâ€™&quot; &lt;em&gt;{ take out the &#039;seeing&#039; i don&#039;t know where that came from}&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>corrections&#8230;&#8221;i meant in my comment no.57 seeing a polarity&#8221;  </p>
<p>and </p>
<p>..&#8221;something called â€˜love marriageâ€™&#8221; <em>{ take out the &#8216;seeing&#8217; i don&#8217;t know where that came from}</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104432</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104432</guid>
		<description>perhaps you are confused Ravi, let me clarify: i meant in seeing a polarity between two choices - one,  something called &#039;arranged&#039; marriage , and the other, something seeing called &#039;love marriage&#039;. plenty of people in real life settle for all sorts of things in between.

and in no. 21, perhaps you see my one-liner to mean i would have the government put a stop to &#039;arranged marriages&#039;. what a strange extrapolation - i would never be in favour of something so strange. in my view that would be talking honestly and openly about the huge negativities ( that i perceive and have gone about at great length here) of having arranged marriages that are all about the family, that i see as the norm in the indian subcontinent. so yes, a critique of the &#039;standard&#039; arranged marriage, is what i am talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps you are confused Ravi, let me clarify: i meant in seeing a polarity between two choices &#8211; one,  something called &#8216;arranged&#8217; marriage , and the other, something seeing called &#8216;love marriage&#8217;. plenty of people in real life settle for all sorts of things in between.</p>
<p>and in no. 21, perhaps you see my one-liner to mean i would have the government put a stop to &#8216;arranged marriages&#8217;. what a strange extrapolation &#8211; i would never be in favour of something so strange. in my view that would be talking honestly and openly about the huge negativities ( that i perceive and have gone about at great length here) of having arranged marriages that are all about the family, that i see as the norm in the indian subcontinent. so yes, a critique of the &#8216;standard&#8217; arranged marriage, is what i am talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104398</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104398</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;itâ€™s not about opposing â€˜arrangedâ€™ or â€˜loveâ€™ marriage - that seems to be such an Indian way of looking at things.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

#21?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;itâ€™s not about opposing â€˜arrangedâ€™ or â€˜loveâ€™ marriage &#8211; that seems to be such an Indian way of looking at things.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>#21?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104392</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104392</guid>
		<description>yes hopefully douglas, but im not convinced that will happen by itself. there are lots more people escaping the &#039;control&#039; but the &#039;core&#039; seems to manage to still be pretty controlling, many many generations down..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes hopefully douglas, but im not convinced that will happen by itself. there are lots more people escaping the &#8216;control&#8217; but the &#8216;core&#8217; seems to manage to still be pretty controlling, many many generations down..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104391</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104391</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not about opposing &#039;arranged&#039; or &#039;love&#039; marriage - that seems to be such an Indian way of looking at things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not about opposing &#8216;arranged&#8217; or &#8216;love&#8217; marriage &#8211; that seems to be such an Indian way of looking at things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104390</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104390</guid>
		<description>after all, if someone wants to have a &#039;marriage of convenience&#039; - why would anyone stop them? its their life after all. the whole point is that &lt;em&gt;individuals&lt;/em&gt; should be able to make the choice to marry, or not, for whatever reasons they have. what ive been talking about are the wider social dynamics that contribute to the constraints/pressures brought to bear on individuals, and the kinds of &#039;social and emotional blackmail&#039; tricks used  as part of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after all, if someone wants to have a &#8216;marriage of convenience&#8217; &#8211; why would anyone stop them? its their life after all. the whole point is that <em>individuals</em> should be able to make the choice to marry, or not, for whatever reasons they have. what ive been talking about are the wider social dynamics that contribute to the constraints/pressures brought to bear on individuals, and the kinds of &#8216;social and emotional blackmail&#8217; tricks used  as part of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104389</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104389</guid>
		<description>of course if someone wants to marry &quot;for their family&quot; they are at liberty to do so, i don&#039;t think anyone was suggetiing their liberty to do so should be taken away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course if someone wants to marry &#8220;for their family&#8221; they are at liberty to do so, i don&#8217;t think anyone was suggetiing their liberty to do so should be taken away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104383</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;the question is though how does the media/government/voluntary organisations reduce the pressure to conform, without criminalising those marriages which are perfectly legal (i.e. those marriages which have taken place without force or dubious pressure)?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am not entirely convinced that marrying someone for the benefit of the family/community is bad by itself, and I would not want the government involved in that (am I becoming a libertarian now???) - several &quot;love&quot; marriages go sour as well. 

I am not sure what is the immigration law in regards to marrying someone from abroad. But one solution to minimise this problem is to make it harder for Asians in Britain to find &quot;suitable&quot; partners from the subcontinent. 2nd and 3rd gen are far more exposed to diversity, and more willing to reach out to other communities... and I would think less likely to perpetuate insularity and bigotry to the next generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;the question is though how does the media/government/voluntary organisations reduce the pressure to conform, without criminalising those marriages which are perfectly legal (i.e. those marriages which have taken place without force or dubious pressure)?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I am not entirely convinced that marrying someone for the benefit of the family/community is bad by itself, and I would not want the government involved in that (am I becoming a libertarian now???) &#8211; several &#8220;love&#8221; marriages go sour as well. </p>
<p>I am not sure what is the immigration law in regards to marrying someone from abroad. But one solution to minimise this problem is to make it harder for Asians in Britain to find &#8220;suitable&#8221; partners from the subcontinent. 2nd and 3rd gen are far more exposed to diversity, and more willing to reach out to other communities&#8230; and I would think less likely to perpetuate insularity and bigotry to the next generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104379</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104379</guid>
		<description>Sonia,

I think maybe that a lot of these controlling attitudes are probably on a sort of &#039;half-life&#039;. In the sense that they will be diluted, probably over a few generations. You are clearly not going to pass these ideas onto your kids, and I&#039;d assume that you are not alone in what you say, so the social pressure will, eventually, lessen.

Hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia,</p>
<p>I think maybe that a lot of these controlling attitudes are probably on a sort of &#8216;half-life&#8217;. In the sense that they will be diluted, probably over a few generations. You are clearly not going to pass these ideas onto your kids, and I&#8217;d assume that you are not alone in what you say, so the social pressure will, eventually, lessen.</p>
<p>Hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104378</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104378</guid>
		<description>yes :-) you&#039;re up with the lingo. and good points in the rest of your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  you&#8217;re up with the lingo. and good points in the rest of your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104377</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104377</guid>
		<description>No rumbold, don&#039;t be sorry - you didn&#039;t get what i was on about at all if that&#039;s what you think, that &#039;my family&#039; treated &lt;em&gt;me&lt;/em&gt; that way. i am very lucky, that my family didn&#039;t mind me getting married to a &quot;gora&quot; didnt even make a fuss when i made the announcement etc. My point is that I am lucky, that my family, despite being aware of the pressures &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; didn&#039;t pass the buck down to me. Perhaps because of that, i do feel responsible for the social implications &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; face. My sister i gave as an example because what the &#039;community&#039; thinks is very important to &lt;em&gt;her&lt;/em&gt; - and is a big factor in her life. Because of my choices, that directly ( it shouldn&#039;t do) impacts on her &#039;social&#039; standing in that community - that was my point. Now luckily again, for me, my sister supported me - but again, i am conscious of the ramifications on her life. 

So don&#039;t feel sorry for me Rumbold! i am one very lucky girl. and i dont give a damn about community pressures, but my family does, so hence my observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No rumbold, don&#8217;t be sorry &#8211; you didn&#8217;t get what i was on about at all if that&#8217;s what you think, that &#8216;my family&#8217; treated <em>me</em> that way. i am very lucky, that my family didn&#8217;t mind me getting married to a &#8220;gora&#8221; didnt even make a fuss when i made the announcement etc. My point is that I am lucky, that my family, despite being aware of the pressures <em>they</em> didn&#8217;t pass the buck down to me. Perhaps because of that, i do feel responsible for the social implications <em>they</em> face. My sister i gave as an example because what the &#8216;community&#8217; thinks is very important to <em>her</em> &#8211; and is a big factor in her life. Because of my choices, that directly ( it shouldn&#8217;t do) impacts on her &#8216;social&#8217; standing in that community &#8211; that was my point. Now luckily again, for me, my sister supported me &#8211; but again, i am conscious of the ramifications on her life. </p>
<p>So don&#8217;t feel sorry for me Rumbold! i am one very lucky girl. and i dont give a damn about community pressures, but my family does, so hence my observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104370</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104370</guid>
		<description>Sonia:

Very interesting example. I am sorry that some in your family have treated you that way. It is notable that even within families there can be major differences over attitudes to arranged marriages. You are right of course that it is within the &#039;community&#039; itself that change needs to happen; laws will only do so much (more important for government is to keep funding those groups that help victims, and ensure police protection). I suppose that less strong indivduals than yourself might well crack under the pressure and end up with an arranged marriage even if they do not really want one. A sort of semi-forced marriage if you will.

Rishta aunties are presume are matchmaking aunties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia:</p>
<p>Very interesting example. I am sorry that some in your family have treated you that way. It is notable that even within families there can be major differences over attitudes to arranged marriages. You are right of course that it is within the &#8216;community&#8217; itself that change needs to happen; laws will only do so much (more important for government is to keep funding those groups that help victims, and ensure police protection). I suppose that less strong indivduals than yourself might well crack under the pressure and end up with an arranged marriage even if they do not really want one. A sort of semi-forced marriage if you will.</p>
<p>Rishta aunties are presume are matchmaking aunties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104369</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104369</guid>
		<description>My own sister is a good example Rumbold, if you are actually serious about listening to some micro-social detail, (which may i add, is significant in trying to understand social dynamics --&gt; problems)  she - has always been the &#039;good child&#039; and conformed - out of all our sisters ( and i have 4 of them - a  good case study of asian +muslim parents seeking to influence their children, and the varied outcomes) - happily decided to go for the &#039;suitable&#039; marriage, wanted to keep mummy and daddy happy, met lots of &lt;strong&gt;rishta aunties&lt;/strong&gt; ( do you know what they are or do you want me to explain) while she was here at med school (oh so suitable! a doctor! and from &lt;em&gt;back home&lt;/em&gt; as well, not like these corrupt girls here) got married to a good suitable bengali british asian fellow. all is well. mummy daddy very happy ( and they weren&#039;t even on the scene, trust in rishta aunties so great). Other daughters - not so &#039;suitable&#039; marriages, one to non bengali hindu boy ( caused great chaos! hai hai! how could this be!) one to a bengali muslim boy ( less chaos, but still substantial, wrong class, etc.) and one to non-subcontinental, non-religion person ( least amount of chaos, perhaps because i am the youngest and they&#039;d run out of steam by then.) INteresting, that even in situations where there is minimal parental pressure, ugly &#039;community pressures&#039; can rear their head.  so back to point about my suitably married sister, now embroiled in the asian community in brummieland, had been busy telling me over the years, &#039;hai hai! so and so married a gora! oh my GOd!&#039; and echoing other &#039;community aunties&#039; whose training she seemed to be following. then her own sister gets married to a gora, so what can she do now? tries to keep as quiet as she can about it, that&#039;s what. tries to not have topic brought up by &quot;community aunties&quot; when they keep suggesting why lets find your sister a suitable man! very difficult for poor sister, indeed, quite a social dilemma. Perhaps she, out of all of us, feels the most pressure to keep the &#039;community&#039; happy, seeing as what &#039;her community&#039; thinks was always very important to her, and she really doesn&#039;t want that kind of social disapproval and &#039;loss of social standing&#039; from the senior community &#039;aunties&#039;. 

Bit of a ramble for you Rumbold, but perhaps you can see what i&#039;m getting at. (if you need explaining any of the &#039;lingo&#039; pls shout) All these people, feeling embarrassed their family members haven&#039;t been as good and conforming as they themselves have been - not even necessarily because they themselves think its such a terrible thing - but why what will aUNTIE naina say! what will the community say! now i cannot show my face so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own sister is a good example Rumbold, if you are actually serious about listening to some micro-social detail, (which may i add, is significant in trying to understand social dynamics &#8211;&gt; problems)  she &#8211; has always been the &#8216;good child&#8217; and conformed &#8211; out of all our sisters ( and i have 4 of them &#8211; a  good case study of asian +muslim parents seeking to influence their children, and the varied outcomes) &#8211; happily decided to go for the &#8216;suitable&#8217; marriage, wanted to keep mummy and daddy happy, met lots of <strong>rishta aunties</strong> ( do you know what they are or do you want me to explain) while she was here at med school (oh so suitable! a doctor! and from <em>back home</em> as well, not like these corrupt girls here) got married to a good suitable bengali british asian fellow. all is well. mummy daddy very happy ( and they weren&#8217;t even on the scene, trust in rishta aunties so great). Other daughters &#8211; not so &#8216;suitable&#8217; marriages, one to non bengali hindu boy ( caused great chaos! hai hai! how could this be!) one to a bengali muslim boy ( less chaos, but still substantial, wrong class, etc.) and one to non-subcontinental, non-religion person ( least amount of chaos, perhaps because i am the youngest and they&#8217;d run out of steam by then.) INteresting, that even in situations where there is minimal parental pressure, ugly &#8216;community pressures&#8217; can rear their head.  so back to point about my suitably married sister, now embroiled in the asian community in brummieland, had been busy telling me over the years, &#8216;hai hai! so and so married a gora! oh my GOd!&#8217; and echoing other &#8216;community aunties&#8217; whose training she seemed to be following. then her own sister gets married to a gora, so what can she do now? tries to keep as quiet as she can about it, that&#8217;s what. tries to not have topic brought up by &#8220;community aunties&#8221; when they keep suggesting why lets find your sister a suitable man! very difficult for poor sister, indeed, quite a social dilemma. Perhaps she, out of all of us, feels the most pressure to keep the &#8216;community&#8217; happy, seeing as what &#8216;her community&#8217; thinks was always very important to her, and she really doesn&#8217;t want that kind of social disapproval and &#8216;loss of social standing&#8217; from the senior community &#8216;aunties&#8217;. </p>
<p>Bit of a ramble for you Rumbold, but perhaps you can see what i&#8217;m getting at. (if you need explaining any of the &#8216;lingo&#8217; pls shout) All these people, feeling embarrassed their family members haven&#8217;t been as good and conforming as they themselves have been &#8211; not even necessarily because they themselves think its such a terrible thing &#8211; but why what will aUNTIE naina say! what will the community say! now i cannot show my face so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104367</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104367</guid>
		<description>&quot;My son is a lesbian.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My son is a lesbian.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sofia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104357</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104357</guid>
		<description>Sonia..i was not judging your comments...jesus woman you need to chill out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia..i was not judging your comments&#8230;jesus woman you need to chill out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sofia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104356</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1724#comment-104356</guid>
		<description>they already did that sketch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they already did that sketch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

