<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Islamic dance party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: serina</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-2#comment-14800</link>
		<dc:creator>serina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-14800</guid>
		<description>Salaam
I agree asian women should have fun in everyday life, enjoy life while were alive, we only live once!
This is what most people say, but i have not heard many one muslim say: &quot;Lets pray, we only live once. Pray now before its too late&#039;. (Not everyone)
Do you agree. 
In islam Music is forbidden ,and so there is nothing in the quran or hadith to say you are aloud to listen to &quot;RnB, pop etc&quot;. Basically you are not aloud to listen to any thing which involves themes which involve the human hearts to stir with desire and love. Because then the shaitaan comes in and misleads the son of Adam (as).
Why dont we muslims come together and teach the &#039;children&quot; and the &quot;parents&#039; in our society in this western country about Islam. I promise you not everyone understands religion, some people dont even know who the prophet is, or what the shahadah is. Some children dont even know who Allaah is.
So why dont we come together and educate the Muslim community with the blessed religion islam.
So why not do something for charity in the way of Allaah!
Jazakallah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salaam<br />
I agree asian women should have fun in everyday life, enjoy life while were alive, we only live once!<br />
This is what most people say, but i have not heard many one muslim say: &#8220;Lets pray, we only live once. Pray now before its too late&#8217;. (Not everyone)<br />
Do you agree.<br />
In islam Music is forbidden ,and so there is nothing in the quran or hadith to say you are aloud to listen to &#8220;RnB, pop etc&#8221;. Basically you are not aloud to listen to any thing which involves themes which involve the human hearts to stir with desire and love. Because then the shaitaan comes in and misleads the son of Adam (as).<br />
Why dont we muslims come together and teach the &#8216;children&#8221; and the &#8220;parents&#8217; in our society in this western country about Islam. I promise you not everyone understands religion, some people dont even know who the prophet is, or what the shahadah is. Some children dont even know who Allaah is.<br />
So why dont we come together and educate the Muslim community with the blessed religion islam.<br />
So why not do something for charity in the way of Allaah!<br />
Jazakallah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NM</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-2#comment-7929</link>
		<dc:creator>NM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-7929</guid>
		<description>Why was I not told about this party??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

btw..in normal everyday situations pardah is meant to be in the mind, their shouldn&#039;t be a need to segregate.

ps, just found this website from that asiana magazine.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was I not told about this party??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>btw..in normal everyday situations pardah is meant to be in the mind, their shouldn&#8217;t be a need to segregate.</p>
<p>ps, just found this website from that asiana magazine.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-2#comment-5187</link>
		<dc:creator>blue mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5187</guid>
		<description>However it is generally accepted that Turk/Mongol/Tartar emigrated to Central Asia after China constructed it&#039;s great wall of defence against plunder and anarchy. 

After conquest and intermingling with Central Asians,Turk/Mongol/Tartar became a menace to civilised world (India/Persia/Arabia/Caucasus/Europe).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However it is generally accepted that Turk/Mongol/Tartar emigrated to Central Asia after China constructed it&#8217;s great wall of defence against plunder and anarchy. </p>
<p>After conquest and intermingling with Central Asians,Turk/Mongol/Tartar became a menace to civilised world (India/Persia/Arabia/Caucasus/Europe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-2#comment-5180</link>
		<dc:creator>blue mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5180</guid>
		<description>oops ...sorry for the linguistic errors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops &#8230;sorry for the linguistic errors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5179</link>
		<dc:creator>blue mountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5179</guid>
		<description>Post no. 45...Sonia

&lt;i&gt; i wasn’t clear about exactly what you said higher up about the Moghuls. you weren’t suggesting they were turkic were you? because they weren’t -they were ‘persianized’ mongols.&lt;/i&gt;

There is a huge scholarly debate about the ethnicity of &quot;Turk&quot; and &quot;Tartar&quot;. Mughals themselves called them &quot;Turks&quot; and they spoke Turkic Language. Persian was the &lt;i&gt;lingua franca&lt;/i&gt; and the language of Royal Court. Mughals called their homemeland &quot;Turkistan&quot;.

The entire Indo-Islamic period was marred in infighting among the Persian speaking Irani/Tajik ,Turani(origin Central Asia mother tongue Turkic language),Pathans and Hindustanis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post no. 45&#8230;Sonia</p>
<p><i> i wasn’t clear about exactly what you said higher up about the Moghuls. you weren’t suggesting they were turkic were you? because they weren’t -they were ‘persianized’ mongols.</i></p>
<p>There is a huge scholarly debate about the ethnicity of &#8220;Turk&#8221; and &#8220;Tartar&#8221;. Mughals themselves called them &#8220;Turks&#8221; and they spoke Turkic Language. Persian was the <i>lingua franca</i> and the language of Royal Court. Mughals called their homemeland &#8220;Turkistan&#8221;.</p>
<p>The entire Indo-Islamic period was marred in infighting among the Persian speaking Irani/Tajik ,Turani(origin Central Asia mother tongue Turkic language),Pathans and Hindustanis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Col. Mustafa</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5171</link>
		<dc:creator>Col. Mustafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5171</guid>
		<description>ffs how does so much dialogue come into play over this.

If it was a bunch of white house wives going to a strip club there would be no topic whatsoever.
If its a bunch of male muslim men indulging in sexual activity i.e prostitution, or bestiality, there would also be no topic.
Alright, maybe if it was bestiality.
So why is this an issue?
Thats the real question.
Women should be allowed to do whatever they want.
If they wanna have a dance party, good on them.
But i know there would be an immense amount of jealous, overbearing, insecure muslim males that would want to put a stop to this, especially if there wife is taking part.
How do you change that mentality?
errrm, it usually starts during childhood, so i guess then.
Men have to be taught early to understand that women are also human beings with the same urges, feelings and emotions.
Im quite happy to hear this as its about time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ffs how does so much dialogue come into play over this.</p>
<p>If it was a bunch of white house wives going to a strip club there would be no topic whatsoever.<br />
If its a bunch of male muslim men indulging in sexual activity i.e prostitution, or bestiality, there would also be no topic.<br />
Alright, maybe if it was bestiality.<br />
So why is this an issue?<br />
Thats the real question.<br />
Women should be allowed to do whatever they want.<br />
If they wanna have a dance party, good on them.<br />
But i know there would be an immense amount of jealous, overbearing, insecure muslim males that would want to put a stop to this, especially if there wife is taking part.<br />
How do you change that mentality?<br />
errrm, it usually starts during childhood, so i guess then.<br />
Men have to be taught early to understand that women are also human beings with the same urges, feelings and emotions.<br />
Im quite happy to hear this as its about time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5169</guid>
		<description>Sonia,

By &quot;Turkic&quot; I was referring specifically to the Delhi Sultans, although it is often also used as a broader generic term (re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples). 

When I used the term &quot;Turkic-Mughal&quot; I was therefore talking about the initial invasions resulting in the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate, along with Islamic rule in other parts of northern India; followed of course by the Mughal invasion and imperial rule, initiated by Babur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia,</p>
<p>By &#8220;Turkic&#8221; I was referring specifically to the Delhi Sultans, although it is often also used as a broader generic term (re: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples)</a>. </p>
<p>When I used the term &#8220;Turkic-Mughal&#8221; I was therefore talking about the initial invasions resulting in the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate, along with Islamic rule in other parts of northern India; followed of course by the Mughal invasion and imperial rule, initiated by Babur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikrant</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5167</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5167</guid>
		<description>As a member of now dying tribe of Marathi speaking Sisodiya Rajputs who sought refuge in Shivajis Kingdom i can atest that many Rajput clans did indeed collaborate with the Mughals and adopted many of Islamic customs. There are many instances of Mughals marrying Rajput princes (remember Jodha Bai?). Many Rajputs were also compelled to convert to Islam. In Pakistan many Muslims claim to be of Rajput descent. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajput</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of now dying tribe of Marathi speaking Sisodiya Rajputs who sought refuge in Shivajis Kingdom i can atest that many Rajput clans did indeed collaborate with the Mughals and adopted many of Islamic customs. There are many instances of Mughals marrying Rajput princes (remember Jodha Bai?). Many Rajputs were also compelled to convert to Islam. In Pakistan many Muslims claim to be of Rajput descent. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajput" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajput</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5165</guid>
		<description>Talking of niqabs,

Here&#039;s the BBC on a privately run islamic school where the girls are walking  black shrouds and prayer seems the most important thing on the curriculum.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4467370.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking of niqabs,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the BBC on a privately run islamic school where the girls are walking  black shrouds and prayer seems the most important thing on the curriculum.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4467370.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4467370.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5162</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5162</guid>
		<description>jai singh i wasn&#039;t clear about exactly what you said higher up about the Moghuls. you weren&#039;t suggesting they were turkic were you? because they weren&#039;t -they were &#039;persianized&#039; mongols. interestingly enough they picked up people&#039;s cultures along the way hence in persia they&#039;d picked up poetry and islam. the other interesting thing is they also had an impact on persian art by infusing it with chinese art. ( they&#039;d come to persia via china..)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal_Empire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jai singh i wasn&#8217;t clear about exactly what you said higher up about the Moghuls. you weren&#8217;t suggesting they were turkic were you? because they weren&#8217;t -they were &#8216;persianized&#8217; mongols. interestingly enough they picked up people&#8217;s cultures along the way hence in persia they&#8217;d picked up poetry and islam. the other interesting thing is they also had an impact on persian art by infusing it with chinese art. ( they&#8217;d come to persia via china..)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal_Empire" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal_Empire</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5129</guid>
		<description>Sunny,

Sati and Jauhar are 2 different concepts, despite the fact that both involve female self-immolation.

&quot;Jauhar&quot; developed specifically in response to the tendency of invading Muslim armies to capture and attempt to rape the women of defeated Rajput armies -- a practice the Muslim soldiers involved justified under their interpretation of the Quranic injunction of allowing them to capture such women and keep them as &quot;wives and concubines&quot;. In fact, Guru Gobind Singh explicity prohibited his soldiers from acting in this same fashion towards the women of armies the Khalsa defeated, specifically because this attitude was prevalent in the context of Islamic warfare, and he told his warriors not to behave in a &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; manner in this matter.

Here&#039;s a good summary of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=2nir7fjyi45x?method=4&amp;dsid=2222&amp;dekey=Jauhar&amp;gwp=8&amp;curtab=2222_1&amp;sbid=lc02b&amp;linktext=jauhar&quot;&gt;Rajput custom of jauhar&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m certainly not ascribing all of Rajput society&#039;s misogynistic and partriarchal attitudes to the Mughals; but in the case of the &quot;veiling&quot; of women in front of men and so on, it is an established historical fact that they did indeed adopt this from their close links to -- and interaction with -- the Muslim aristocracy. Ditto for other high-caste Hindus, although as mentioned before this custom then trickled down into the rest of Hindu society in the affected regions too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny,</p>
<p>Sati and Jauhar are 2 different concepts, despite the fact that both involve female self-immolation.</p>
<p>&#8220;Jauhar&#8221; developed specifically in response to the tendency of invading Muslim armies to capture and attempt to rape the women of defeated Rajput armies &#8212; a practice the Muslim soldiers involved justified under their interpretation of the Quranic injunction of allowing them to capture such women and keep them as &#8220;wives and concubines&#8221;. In fact, Guru Gobind Singh explicity prohibited his soldiers from acting in this same fashion towards the women of armies the Khalsa defeated, specifically because this attitude was prevalent in the context of Islamic warfare, and he told his warriors not to behave in a &#8220;tit-for-tat&#8221; manner in this matter.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good summary of the <a href="http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=2nir7fjyi45x?method=4&amp;dsid=2222&amp;dekey=Jauhar&amp;gwp=8&amp;curtab=2222_1&amp;sbid=lc02b&amp;linktext=jauhar">Rajput custom of jauhar</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not ascribing all of Rajput society&#8217;s misogynistic and partriarchal attitudes to the Mughals; but in the case of the &#8220;veiling&#8221; of women in front of men and so on, it is an established historical fact that they did indeed adopt this from their close links to &#8212; and interaction with &#8212; the Muslim aristocracy. Ditto for other high-caste Hindus, although as mentioned before this custom then trickled down into the rest of Hindu society in the affected regions too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanvir</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5127</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanvir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5127</guid>
		<description>oh yeh...nice advert at the bottom of the page btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeh&#8230;nice advert at the bottom of the page btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanvir</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanvir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>Mirax,I dont need to file you under anything, you have done it yourself, you obviously dont agree with the ethic of a hijab, so dont wear one, but respecting someone else&#039;s choice is a different matter this is the area you have self-admittedly put yourself in a category.

As with putting people in boxes, I myself as a man follow the men&#039;s guidlines for dresscode, something often forgotten in the  sexist world of Asian culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mirax,I dont need to file you under anything, you have done it yourself, you obviously dont agree with the ethic of a hijab, so dont wear one, but respecting someone else&#8217;s choice is a different matter this is the area you have self-admittedly put yourself in a category.</p>
<p>As with putting people in boxes, I myself as a man follow the men&#8217;s guidlines for dresscode, something often forgotten in the  sexist world of Asian culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5120</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5120</guid>
		<description>Jai - as the Rajputs were quite enthusiastic on Sati, and I think the most recent case was also from there, I wouldn&#039;t blame all their sexist and patriarchal customs on the Mughals (who of course were no examples of sex equality themselves).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jai &#8211; as the Rajputs were quite enthusiastic on Sati, and I think the most recent case was also from there, I wouldn&#8217;t blame all their sexist and patriarchal customs on the Mughals (who of course were no examples of sex equality themselves).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5118</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5118</guid>
		<description>I noticed at the time Sid but let it pass. However,  I did not even guess that you were including Bengal under SE Asia. Sorry, us real SE asians are pretty clear that Bengal is nowhere part of the neighbourhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed at the time Sid but let it pass. However,  I did not even guess that you were including Bengal under SE Asia. Sorry, us real SE asians are pretty clear that Bengal is nowhere part of the neighbourhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5117</guid>
		<description>why is modesty only incumbent upon women anyway? what&#039;s so sexual about hair in particular?

Tanvir, you can file me under hijab-hater if  you like to put people away in neat boxes since I find ALL the reasoning behind the hijab pretty shoddy. That does not mean that I hate muslims  but I guess that distinction may escape some on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is modesty only incumbent upon women anyway? what&#8217;s so sexual about hair in particular?</p>
<p>Tanvir, you can file me under hijab-hater if  you like to put people away in neat boxes since I find ALL the reasoning behind the hijab pretty shoddy. That does not mean that I hate muslims  but I guess that distinction may escape some on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5116</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5116</guid>
		<description>MiraX: you&#039;re right, I am expecting you to believe me without supplying any sources. My problem is I don&#039;t have any and can&#039;t be arsed to look up google. Excuse me for arguing from the hip. Most social customsand norms involving gender norms in India, taht have survived the erosion of these values in the last century so or so, are Traditional and that means they certainly go back to vedic times.

Yes I did claim once that the entire SE Asia to be matriarchial, but I knew I was wrong about that even as I clicked the Send button. Unforgiveable, I know. I should have qualified it to mean Muslim Bengal, which is certainly not the entire SE Asia. And like the Malays is also suffering from the blight of Wahabbi muscularists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MiraX: you&#8217;re right, I am expecting you to believe me without supplying any sources. My problem is I don&#8217;t have any and can&#8217;t be arsed to look up google. Excuse me for arguing from the hip. Most social customsand norms involving gender norms in India, taht have survived the erosion of these values in the last century so or so, are Traditional and that means they certainly go back to vedic times.</p>
<p>Yes I did claim once that the entire SE Asia to be matriarchial, but I knew I was wrong about that even as I clicked the Send button. Unforgiveable, I know. I should have qualified it to mean Muslim Bengal, which is certainly not the entire SE Asia. And like the Malays is also suffering from the blight of Wahabbi muscularists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotzepolitic</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>fotzepolitic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;but rather something out of choice for the numerous very very good and respectable reasons for not showing their body&lt;/i&gt;

What, as if everything available in British clothing stores is restricted to thongs and daisy dukes? For crying out loud, &quot;dressing modestly&quot; hardly requires a body-length flowing muumuu and a headscarf. Today I&#039;m wearing jeans and my boyfriend&#039;s sweatshirt because it&#039;s farking cold out, and I don&#039;t think men on the tube will be leering at me. Heck, when I was a teen us girls LIVED in baggy clothes because we had some sort of misplaced shame about our bodies developing, unlike all the girls and their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dyske.com/index.php?view_id=864&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;muffin-tops&lt;/a&gt; today. ;) All I&#039;m saying is, if modesty is your goal, it&#039;s not hard to find Western clothing that no one will blink twice at. I think it&#039;s more of a conscious segregation on the part of those women. An Ismaili Muslim once told me that when all the African-born desi Muslims came to the UK in the &#039;70s, an important imam told them to wear skirts and style their hair and blend in, because integrating and succeeding in the new culture was the most important thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but rather something out of choice for the numerous very very good and respectable reasons for not showing their body</i></p>
<p>What, as if everything available in British clothing stores is restricted to thongs and daisy dukes? For crying out loud, &#8220;dressing modestly&#8221; hardly requires a body-length flowing muumuu and a headscarf. Today I&#8217;m wearing jeans and my boyfriend&#8217;s sweatshirt because it&#8217;s farking cold out, and I don&#8217;t think men on the tube will be leering at me. Heck, when I was a teen us girls LIVED in baggy clothes because we had some sort of misplaced shame about our bodies developing, unlike all the girls and their <a href="http://www.dyske.com/index.php?view_id=864" rel="nofollow">muffin-tops</a> today. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/dablog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  All I&#8217;m saying is, if modesty is your goal, it&#8217;s not hard to find Western clothing that no one will blink twice at. I think it&#8217;s more of a conscious segregation on the part of those women. An Ismaili Muslim once told me that when all the African-born desi Muslims came to the UK in the &#8217;70s, an important imam told them to wear skirts and style their hair and blend in, because integrating and succeeding in the new culture was the most important thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>=&gt;True, but the practice of seclusion is Traditional. And that invariably means going back to earliest sources. 

Indian society wasn&#039;t exactly &quot;Vedic&quot; by the time the Turkic-Mughals came along. You need to take into consideration a gap of several thousand years, along with the substantial Buddhist period in-between, and the fact that by no means were all Indian regions Vedic in their interpretation and practice of Hinduism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=&gt;True, but the practice of seclusion is Traditional. And that invariably means going back to earliest sources. </p>
<p>Indian society wasn&#8217;t exactly &#8220;Vedic&#8221; by the time the Turkic-Mughals came along. You need to take into consideration a gap of several thousand years, along with the substantial Buddhist period in-between, and the fact that by no means were all Indian regions Vedic in their interpretation and practice of Hinduism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirax</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170/comment-page-1#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/170#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>Sid, so far the only source for your assertion for seclusion from vedic times  is a recent movie set in 19th century bengal- don&#039;t you think you should do better than simply parrot the practice is &#039;traditional&#039; and expect us to leave it at that?

Your point about the Tuareg : they are traditionally a matriachal society but their way of life (and the women&#039;s  freedom)is actually being threatened by the resurgence of  &#039;pure&#039; Islam. You once (wrongly ) pointed out that muslim societies in SE Asia are matriachal (to sort of prove how tolerant Islam is); you may be interested to know much of the traditional (and pre-islamic) matriachal customs or adat  of sumatra and malaysia have been slowly abandoned in the last 2-3 decades , due to the muscularity of &#039;pure&#039; Islam again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sid, so far the only source for your assertion for seclusion from vedic times  is a recent movie set in 19th century bengal- don&#8217;t you think you should do better than simply parrot the practice is &#8216;traditional&#8217; and expect us to leave it at that?</p>
<p>Your point about the Tuareg : they are traditionally a matriachal society but their way of life (and the women&#8217;s  freedom)is actually being threatened by the resurgence of  &#8216;pure&#8217; Islam. You once (wrongly ) pointed out that muslim societies in SE Asia are matriachal (to sort of prove how tolerant Islam is); you may be interested to know much of the traditional (and pre-islamic) matriachal customs or adat  of sumatra and malaysia have been slowly abandoned in the last 2-3 decades , due to the muscularity of &#8216;pure&#8217; Islam again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
