• Family

  • Comrades

  • In-laws


  • Clarkson stung after bank prank


    by Leon
    7th January, 2008 at 5:11 pm    

    This is just brilliant, damn shame the direct debit wasn’t for some green organisation, now that would’ve been really funny…

    Clarkson published details of his Barclays account in the Sun newspaper, including his account number and sort code. He even told people how to find out his address.

    “All you’ll be able to do with them is put money into my account. Not take it out. Honestly, I’ve never known such a palaver about nothing,” he told readers.

    But he was proved wrong, as the 47-year-old wrote in his Sunday Times column.

    “I opened my bank statement this morning to find out that someone has set up a direct debit which automatically takes £500 from my account,” he said.

    “The bank cannot find out who did this because of the Data Protection Act and they cannot stop it from happening again.

    “I was wrong and I have been punished for my mistake.” [Via BBC News]

    It couldn’t have happened to a nicer fellow!


                  Post to del.icio.us


    Filed in: Environmentalism,Humour






    26 Comments below   |  

    Reactions: Twitter, blogs


    1. Ravi Naik — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:22 pm  

      heh. :D

    2. El Cid — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:27 pm  

      I know it’s wrong, but I quite like him. Sorry.

    3. Leon — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:29 pm  

      *Jaw drops*

      Cid! Oh Cid! Nooooooo!!!

    4. Sid — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:31 pm  

      There aren’t enough 4-letter epithets in the world to describe him.

    5. El Cid — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:37 pm  

      And that’s after he said the Spanish were “a race which likes to poke holes in bulls and torture donkeys”

      C’mon, am I the only one here who watches Top Gear?

    6. Rumbold — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:54 pm  

      I disagree with aspects of Clarkson’s politics, and I have no interest in cars, but I do like Clarkson. The BBC would be poorer (both literally and figuratively) without him. He is a welcome counter-balance to some ways of thinking.

    7. Don — on 7th January, 2008 at 5:56 pm  

      Yeah, I suppose you could counter-balance thinking with non-thinking…

      I liked the stuff he did on Brunel, though.

    8. Sid — on 7th January, 2008 at 6:06 pm  

      I hanker for a world free of Clarkson.

    9. El Cid — on 7th January, 2008 at 6:23 pm  

      C’mon Sid, give in to your car lust!

      Here’s an article that will doubtless offend but which also dovetails neatly with parallel discussion on the Bishop of Rochester (I don’t vouch for the accuracy of some of the claims though)

      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/jeremy_clarkson/article3107633.ece

    10. leon — on 7th January, 2008 at 6:34 pm  

      He is a welcome counter-balance to some ways of thinking.

      Yeah I guess you’re right, we all need a Darth Vader to remind us sometimes we’re actually the Jedis…

    11. El Cid — on 7th January, 2008 at 6:43 pm  

      careful, you might then find he’s actually your dad

    12. leon — on 7th January, 2008 at 6:49 pm  

      Clarkson: “Leon…I Am You’re Faathar…”

      Leon: “Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!”

      *Leaps off the platform*

      :D

    13. Sofia — on 7th January, 2008 at 8:28 pm  

      plonka

    14. Rohin — on 7th January, 2008 at 9:13 pm  

      Oh dear, it seems i’ll be a lone voice in this regard then. I love top gear and I am a complete petrolhead that spends much of his time thinking and talking about cars. I’m not a crazed fan of clarkson himself, but I do like him. However he’s not the hero of top gear. Despite me being a short cheeky chappy, I don’t think hamster is either.

      James May is one of my heroes.

      And by the way, because I know you lot, don’t start shaking your fists at my green credentials, I cycle more than I drive!

    15. El Cid — on 7th January, 2008 at 9:20 pm  

      Oh dear, it seems i’ll be a lone voice in this regard then.

      Have I been deleted again?

    16. Rohin — on 7th January, 2008 at 10:24 pm  

      Sorry ciddo, work bans pp so I’m reading this on my phone and kinda miss the finer points of all comments.

    17. Random Guy — on 8th January, 2008 at 9:50 am  

      I have said it before and I will say it again: BWAHAHAHHAHAHAH! What a moron! Suck it Clarkson!

      [Deep Breath]

      That will be all for now.

    18. Morgoth — on 8th January, 2008 at 12:05 pm  

      I like Clarkson immensely. Funny and witty, and his politics (apart from his innate anri-Americanism) largely agree with mine.

      I note the hectoring little facist Sid is up to his usual tricks, I see.

    19. Jai — on 8th January, 2008 at 12:12 pm  

      I don’t necessarily agree with some of Clarkson’s politics, but I’m just about old enough to remember what Top Gear was like before he arrived on the scene and shook things up. I found the guy’s wry banter and blokey observations to be absolutely hilarious and a breath of fresh air for that show.

    20. Sid — on 8th January, 2008 at 12:27 pm  

      I note the hectoring little facist Sid is up to his usual tricks, I see.

      hahaha. Godwin’s Law proved on this thread by our very own PP-resident idiot, BoreGoth. How predictable.

      I couldn’t care less about Clarkson’s politics. Politically, he’s too stupid to be anything else. Its his ‘wry banter and blokey observations’ that has me flinging the remote control at the TV, shouting “F##K OFF”!

    21. Katy Newton — on 8th January, 2008 at 10:51 pm  

      This really was a special kind of stupid, wasn’t it? I’m all for discouraging people from panicking but you’d have to have lived in solitary confinement for ten years not to know about the havoc that a fraudster can wreak just with your address and your mother’s maiden name!

      I like Clarkson, though, partly because he’s not shy of holding up his hands when he’s wrong:

      larkson now says of the case: “Contrary to what I said at the time, we must go after the idiots who lost the discs and stick cocktail sticks in their eyes until they beg for mercy.”

    22. Dave S — on 11th January, 2008 at 11:45 am  

      Clarkson’s politics? That guy wouldn’t know a coherent political argument if it rear-ended him at 300mph!

      That’s probably why there are so many “Clarkson for PM” idiots around – fuckwits who want to be ruled by a fuckwit who hasn’t a fucking clue about anything.

      Anyone want to see a video of my mate’s ex-girlfriend in action with Jeremy Clarkson? Check this out:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nl9nqMKavI

      ;-)

    23. Sid — on 11th January, 2008 at 1:07 pm  

      hahaha. that’s made my Friday afternoon, that has.

    24. rambhai — on 11th January, 2008 at 4:51 pm  

      thats is hilarious. i kinda like his style of presenting the show~~its rich in litrature and yet very street like. topgear is the best automotive show~~~

    25. El Cid — on 11th January, 2008 at 5:19 pm  

      see, he’s a good sport and you cant argue with that.

      However, something’s been bugging me about this story. It’s not quite right.

      The bank cannot find out who did this because of the Data Protection Act and they cannot stop it from happening again.

      I just don’t believe it. A crime, in theory, was committed. Either Jeremy’s decision to print the data is a mitigating factor, he is again playing a good sport, or the bank has had a word with him.
      Something about it ain’t right.

    26. Don — on 11th January, 2008 at 6:48 pm  

      If the prankster just took a standard charity appeal, added Clarksons’s details and posted it then, short of getting all forensic on the case, how could a connection be made? I don’t see where the DPA comes into it.

      I must admit he came out well in the pie thing.

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

    Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
    With the help of PHP and Wordpress.