<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Brown Premiership coming to an end?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stock Market Information</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91737</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Market Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91737</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stock Market Information...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stock Market Information&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91081</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91081</guid>
		<description>Leon:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Yep me too, and I echo Sunnyâ€™s view that Rumbold is one of the better Tories around (I really wish there were more like himâ€¦) but he still aint going to convince me to vote for the party!&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks. My plan to corrupt Pickled Politics seems to be working. My undercover mission for CCHQ is nearly over, and shortly I will reveal that I am Norman Tebbit and that you have all failed the cricket test.

Sonia:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;and then, also, my problem is, even though the Tories may claim they are â€˜minimalâ€™ govt (i.e. canâ€™t be bothered to fund infrastructure and public services anymore) theyâ€™re still - like all the other political parties out there - still going to legitimize and prop up the nation-state in the most problematic ways possible - so in the end, it really makes no difference to me. I might well vote Tory, i really canâ€™t see much difference - in ways that matter to me - practically now between New Labour and Tory.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why not vote for a proper libertarian party then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Yep me too, and I echo Sunnyâ€™s view that Rumbold is one of the better Tories around (I really wish there were more like himâ€¦) but he still aint going to convince me to vote for the party!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks. My plan to corrupt Pickled Politics seems to be working. My undercover mission for CCHQ is nearly over, and shortly I will reveal that I am Norman Tebbit and that you have all failed the cricket test.</p>
<p>Sonia:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;and then, also, my problem is, even though the Tories may claim they are â€˜minimalâ€™ govt (i.e. canâ€™t be bothered to fund infrastructure and public services anymore) theyâ€™re still &#8211; like all the other political parties out there &#8211; still going to legitimize and prop up the nation-state in the most problematic ways possible &#8211; so in the end, it really makes no difference to me. I might well vote Tory, i really canâ€™t see much difference &#8211; in ways that matter to me &#8211; practically now between New Labour and Tory.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Why not vote for a proper libertarian party then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91005</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91005</guid>
		<description>and there are im sure plenty of &#039;proposed&#039; policies which someone might put forward and say ah have you considered this or that? which is always useful, but the other main thing is i dont trust political parties saying &#039;this is what we will do&#039; and doing something completely different, and you know what, its too late then, you&#039;ve elected them in, and are completely powerless, until the next election. very silly that, puts people in a very awkward position. can&#039;t sack &#039;em or say oi you&#039;re not doing what you SAID! whether they&#039;re tory or labour or green or whatever. the system is the problem here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and there are im sure plenty of &#8216;proposed&#8217; policies which someone might put forward and say ah have you considered this or that? which is always useful, but the other main thing is i dont trust political parties saying &#8216;this is what we will do&#8217; and doing something completely different, and you know what, its too late then, you&#8217;ve elected them in, and are completely powerless, until the next election. very silly that, puts people in a very awkward position. can&#8217;t sack &#8216;em or say oi you&#8217;re not doing what you SAID! whether they&#8217;re tory or labour or green or whatever. the system is the problem here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91004</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-91004</guid>
		<description>rumbold heh :-) we&#039;ll have to see! personally as far as i can see, New Labour repeats the parrot fashion the fashionable market fundamentalism theory so i cant see much difference there, plus its so common now that regarldess of party stripe one always hears that simplistic stuff.  a lot would depend on where cameron sees the sustainable communities agenda going. but really, my main objection to the tories is really the silliness over Europe. still, again mind you, the whole goldplating thing shows Labour aren&#039;t particularly sensible when it comes to the whole nation-state vs. EU thing either. 

and then, also, my problem is, even though the Tories may claim they are &#039;minimal&#039; govt (i.e. can&#039;t be bothered to fund infrastructure and public services anymore)  they&#039;re still - like all the other political parties out there - still going to legitimize and prop up the nation-state in the most problematic ways possible - so in the end, it really makes no difference to me. I might well vote Tory, i really can&#039;t see much difference - in ways that matter to me - practically now between New Labour and Tory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rumbold heh <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  we&#8217;ll have to see! personally as far as i can see, New Labour repeats the parrot fashion the fashionable market fundamentalism theory so i cant see much difference there, plus its so common now that regarldess of party stripe one always hears that simplistic stuff.  a lot would depend on where cameron sees the sustainable communities agenda going. but really, my main objection to the tories is really the silliness over Europe. still, again mind you, the whole goldplating thing shows Labour aren&#8217;t particularly sensible when it comes to the whole nation-state vs. EU thing either. </p>
<p>and then, also, my problem is, even though the Tories may claim they are &#8216;minimal&#8217; govt (i.e. can&#8217;t be bothered to fund infrastructure and public services anymore)  they&#8217;re still &#8211; like all the other political parties out there &#8211; still going to legitimize and prop up the nation-state in the most problematic ways possible &#8211; so in the end, it really makes no difference to me. I might well vote Tory, i really can&#8217;t see much difference &#8211; in ways that matter to me &#8211; practically now between New Labour and Tory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90975</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90975</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Deep down, under all the knee jerk stuff I come out with, I have in fact huge respect for both you and Rumbold.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep me too, and I echo Sunny&#039;s view that Rumbold is one of the better Tories around (I really wish there were more like him...) but he still aint going to convince me to vote for the party! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Deep down, under all the knee jerk stuff I come out with, I have in fact huge respect for both you and Rumbold.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep me too, and I echo Sunny&#8217;s view that Rumbold is one of the better Tories around (I really wish there were more like him&#8230;) but he still aint going to convince me to vote for the party! <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90891</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90891</guid>
		<description>Douglas:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;So, where do I sit in terms of a political party?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Conservatives. You know it makes sense.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I take it that that is a yes?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup- I agree with you on ID cards.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;However, I donâ€™t think I think that public schoolboys are brought up to see themselves as anything other than the ruling class.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What do you think happens in private schools Douglas? As Sonia said, it is impossible to generalise about these things. I went to a private secondary school (non-boarding), and I cannot remember this idea of us as the natural ruling class ever being broached. Maybe I went to the wrong school though.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Which is why I am grateful for finding this site. Honestly held views, and no lack of mutual respect.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed- it makes for a great discussion atmosphere.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;There is no evidence that the Tories believe anything much different from New Labour on the States right to intervene. Correct me if I am wrong.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While David Cameron seems content to dress himself in some of the clothes of socialism, the Conservatives in general still believe in the freedoms of the individaul over the state, which is why in that respect a Conservative government would be better.

A Conservative government is unlikely to create a land of milk and honey, but at least there will be no government official, paid for by the taxpayer, telling you the health risks involved in consuming milk and honey.

Sonia:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I think rumbold will soon convince us to vote Tory douglas. rumbold, you are quite a persuasive fella. mind you, my problem is with parties full stop. and perhaps humans too. but then, being the extreme libertarian anarchist misanthrope i am, ill just vote green.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are beginning to walk the right path Sonia. Now repeat after me: vote blue, go green. Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So, where do I sit in terms of a political party?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Conservatives. You know it makes sense.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I take it that that is a yes?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup- I agree with you on ID cards.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;However, I donâ€™t think I think that public schoolboys are brought up to see themselves as anything other than the ruling class.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What do you think happens in private schools Douglas? As Sonia said, it is impossible to generalise about these things. I went to a private secondary school (non-boarding), and I cannot remember this idea of us as the natural ruling class ever being broached. Maybe I went to the wrong school though.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Which is why I am grateful for finding this site. Honestly held views, and no lack of mutual respect.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed- it makes for a great discussion atmosphere.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is no evidence that the Tories believe anything much different from New Labour on the States right to intervene. Correct me if I am wrong.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>While David Cameron seems content to dress himself in some of the clothes of socialism, the Conservatives in general still believe in the freedoms of the individaul over the state, which is why in that respect a Conservative government would be better.</p>
<p>A Conservative government is unlikely to create a land of milk and honey, but at least there will be no government official, paid for by the taxpayer, telling you the health risks involved in consuming milk and honey.</p>
<p>Sonia:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think rumbold will soon convince us to vote Tory douglas. rumbold, you are quite a persuasive fella. mind you, my problem is with parties full stop. and perhaps humans too. but then, being the extreme libertarian anarchist misanthrope i am, ill just vote green.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You are beginning to walk the right path Sonia. Now repeat after me: vote blue, go green. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90820</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90820</guid>
		<description>Brown is no where near the level of person I would expect to be in charge of our country, but then again neither was Blair.  &#039;New Labour&#039; is becoming more like a conservative party, supporting those with money, and payign off the jobless layabouts who they cannot be arsed to take a stronger stance with.  The conservatives seem to be moving more into the labour catagory by supporting young workers and those who are willing to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brown is no where near the level of person I would expect to be in charge of our country, but then again neither was Blair.  &#8216;New Labour&#8217; is becoming more like a conservative party, supporting those with money, and payign off the jobless layabouts who they cannot be arsed to take a stronger stance with.  The conservatives seem to be moving more into the labour catagory by supporting young workers and those who are willing to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90789</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90789</guid>
		<description>Rumbold at 9,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Identity cards, though a waste of money and infringement of liberty, are merely the latest in the long line of government attempts to control everything. We are already watched everywhere we go by CCTV, while hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of state officials have access to our personal data. Agents of dozens of government agencies can enter our home if they want to, and we are paying for it all. ID cards are merely the icing on the top of the superstate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I take it that that is a yes?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Exactly. They should either have evidence or should let you go. The balance must be tilted in favour of the individual, rather than the state (which spuriously claims to be protecting society in this way).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely.

&lt;blockquote&gt;So if you go to a private school you are incapable on running the country? The Conservatives, for all their faults, are the party most likely to reduce the power and size of the state. The left-wing parties (in general) wish to increase the stateâ€™s grasp, while the right (in general) will retract it. Take your pick.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is no evidence that the Tories believe anything much different from New Labour on the States right to intervene. Correct me if I am wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold at 9,</p>
<blockquote><p>Identity cards, though a waste of money and infringement of liberty, are merely the latest in the long line of government attempts to control everything. We are already watched everywhere we go by CCTV, while hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of state officials have access to our personal data. Agents of dozens of government agencies can enter our home if they want to, and we are paying for it all. ID cards are merely the icing on the top of the superstate.</p></blockquote>
<p>I take it that that is a yes?</p>
<blockquote><p>Exactly. They should either have evidence or should let you go. The balance must be tilted in favour of the individual, rather than the state (which spuriously claims to be protecting society in this way).</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely.</p>
<blockquote><p>So if you go to a private school you are incapable on running the country? The Conservatives, for all their faults, are the party most likely to reduce the power and size of the state. The left-wing parties (in general) wish to increase the stateâ€™s grasp, while the right (in general) will retract it. Take your pick.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is no evidence that the Tories believe anything much different from New Labour on the States right to intervene. Correct me if I am wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90788</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90788</guid>
		<description>Sonia at 11, 12 and 13,

Deep down, under all the knee jerk stuff I come out with, I have in fact huge respect for both you and Rumbold.

So there.

My ideas about educational elitism are not fully formed. However, I don&#039;t think I think that public schoolboys are brought up to see themselves as anything other than the ruling class. Which is fine for them, and not so fine for me. Or perhaps your good self, either.

And &lt;i&gt;hungrier&lt;/i&gt; for what exactly? Life just is, is it not? We tie ourselves up in knots of race, religion, class and political factionalism when we go beyond acceptance of our very fortunate existence.

Rumbold and you both cut across that divide. Which is why I am grateful for finding this site. Honestly held views, and no lack of mutual respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia at 11, 12 and 13,</p>
<p>Deep down, under all the knee jerk stuff I come out with, I have in fact huge respect for both you and Rumbold.</p>
<p>So there.</p>
<p>My ideas about educational elitism are not fully formed. However, I don&#8217;t think I think that public schoolboys are brought up to see themselves as anything other than the ruling class. Which is fine for them, and not so fine for me. Or perhaps your good self, either.</p>
<p>And <i>hungrier</i> for what exactly? Life just is, is it not? We tie ourselves up in knots of race, religion, class and political factionalism when we go beyond acceptance of our very fortunate existence.</p>
<p>Rumbold and you both cut across that divide. Which is why I am grateful for finding this site. Honestly held views, and no lack of mutual respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90766</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90766</guid>
		<description>why should a privileged etonian background automatically make someone a tosser? 

i can&#039;t see any reason for it. of course there are some privileged etonians that are tossers, but then so are many people who went to state schools, no?

there seems to be a view floating around that if you&#039;ve been brought up in filthy luxury you can&#039;t possibly understand life as everyone else lives it. and that you&#039;d be unconcerned and cushioned from life. for some people, sure, that might be true. for others, it might simply make you &lt;em&gt;hungrier&lt;/em&gt; for life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why should a privileged etonian background automatically make someone a tosser? </p>
<p>i can&#8217;t see any reason for it. of course there are some privileged etonians that are tossers, but then so are many people who went to state schools, no?</p>
<p>there seems to be a view floating around that if you&#8217;ve been brought up in filthy luxury you can&#8217;t possibly understand life as everyone else lives it. and that you&#8217;d be unconcerned and cushioned from life. for some people, sure, that might be true. for others, it might simply make you <em>hungrier</em> for life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90765</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90765</guid>
		<description>or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90764</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90764</guid>
		<description>i think rumbold will soon convince us to vote Tory douglas. rumbold, you are quite a persuasive fella. mind you, my problem is with parties full stop. and perhaps humans too. but then, being the extreme libertarian anarchist misanthrope i am, ill just vote green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think rumbold will soon convince us to vote Tory douglas. rumbold, you are quite a persuasive fella. mind you, my problem is with parties full stop. and perhaps humans too. but then, being the extreme libertarian anarchist misanthrope i am, ill just vote green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90759</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90759</guid>
		<description>Rumbold,

So, where do I sit in terms of a political party?

Excessive governance is ridiculously bureaucratic. On that we are agreed.

We also seem to agree that individual rights are more important than trumped up charges.

Whilst I might argue that a privilleged Etonian background does, in fact, make you a tosser, I&#039;m not going to argue that point, right now.

What I am seriously asking is whether or not there is a political party that I should subscribe to.

I suspect not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold,</p>
<p>So, where do I sit in terms of a political party?</p>
<p>Excessive governance is ridiculously bureaucratic. On that we are agreed.</p>
<p>We also seem to agree that individual rights are more important than trumped up charges.</p>
<p>Whilst I might argue that a privilleged Etonian background does, in fact, make you a tosser, I&#8217;m not going to argue that point, right now.</p>
<p>What I am seriously asking is whether or not there is a political party that I should subscribe to.</p>
<p>I suspect not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90752</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90752</guid>
		<description>Douglas:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Identity Cards? What the hell is that all about? It is, frankly along the lines that the state owns you, that the state is in some measure your parent. It is, in fact neither. It is accountabilty gone mad. A delight for bureucrats everywhere.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Identity cards, though a waste of money and infringement of liberty, are merely the latest in the long line of government attempts to control everything. We are already watched everywhere we go by CCTV, while hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of state officials have access to our personal data. Agents of dozens of government agencies can enter our home if they want to, and we are paying for it all. ID cards are merely the icing on the top of the superstate.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Or detention. What is that about either? If the state can level a charge at you, then let them. Otherwise, you ought to see yourself as freeborn. I do, despite the states intrusions.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Exactly. They should either have evidence or should let you go. The balance must be tilted in favour of the individual, rather than the state (which spuriously claims to be protecting society in this way).

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Though, Eton baby is no obvious alternative. An institutionised little wannabe.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So if you go to a private school you are incapable on running the country? The Conservatives, for all their faults, are the party most likely to reduce the power and size of the state. The left-wing parties (in general) wish to increase the state&#039;s grasp, while the right (in general) will retract it. Take your pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Identity Cards? What the hell is that all about? It is, frankly along the lines that the state owns you, that the state is in some measure your parent. It is, in fact neither. It is accountabilty gone mad. A delight for bureucrats everywhere.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Identity cards, though a waste of money and infringement of liberty, are merely the latest in the long line of government attempts to control everything. We are already watched everywhere we go by CCTV, while hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of state officials have access to our personal data. Agents of dozens of government agencies can enter our home if they want to, and we are paying for it all. ID cards are merely the icing on the top of the superstate.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Or detention. What is that about either? If the state can level a charge at you, then let them. Otherwise, you ought to see yourself as freeborn. I do, despite the states intrusions.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly. They should either have evidence or should let you go. The balance must be tilted in favour of the individual, rather than the state (which spuriously claims to be protecting society in this way).</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Though, Eton baby is no obvious alternative. An institutionised little wannabe.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So if you go to a private school you are incapable on running the country? The Conservatives, for all their faults, are the party most likely to reduce the power and size of the state. The left-wing parties (in general) wish to increase the state&#8217;s grasp, while the right (in general) will retract it. Take your pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edsa</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90741</link>
		<dc:creator>Edsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90741</guid>
		<description>It is a relief to know that Gordon Brown is poorly regarded by this forum. 
 On 2nd July 07, following the attack on Glasgow airport on 30Jun07, Brown claimed the terrorists were â€œparticularly against the values that we represent.â€ Earlier he had said on BBC Radio AM programme: â€œWe will not be intimidated and not allow anyone undermine our British way of life.â€

There was no reference to Britainâ€™s military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, motivating the jihadists or boosting their recruitment drive. 
This culture of denial lets British leaders feign innocence about the Westâ€™s murderous interventions in the Middle East for the last 100 years â€“ from Algeria to Afghanistan.
------------------------

In January 2005 Gordon Brown declared, at a press conference in Tanzania of all places: 
â€œthe days of Britain having to apologise for its colonial history are over. We should celebrate much of our past rather than apologise for it. We should talk about enduring British values â€“ they stand for the greatest ideas in history that grew in Britain and influenced the rest of the world: tolerance, liberty, civic duty; our strong traditions of fair play, openness, internationalism. These are great British values.â€ 

But in the colonies, laws institutionalising discrimination &amp; segregation were rigidly enforced, even in most churches. 
And do decades of race abuse and attacks on black &amp; Asian migrants (not to mention deaths in police custody) in the UK signify tolerance? 

In Feb 2006, Amnesty International condemned UK&#039;s violation of Human Rights such as detaining suspects without charge + curbing of civil liberties + invasion/torture in Iraqâ€¦.

This Gordon Brown must go. He is a more wooden version version of Tony Blair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a relief to know that Gordon Brown is poorly regarded by this forum.<br />
 On 2nd July 07, following the attack on Glasgow airport on 30Jun07, Brown claimed the terrorists were â€œparticularly against the values that we represent.â€ Earlier he had said on BBC Radio AM programme: â€œWe will not be intimidated and not allow anyone undermine our British way of life.â€</p>
<p>There was no reference to Britainâ€™s military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, motivating the jihadists or boosting their recruitment drive.<br />
This culture of denial lets British leaders feign innocence about the Westâ€™s murderous interventions in the Middle East for the last 100 years â€“ from Algeria to Afghanistan.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>In January 2005 Gordon Brown declared, at a press conference in Tanzania of all places:<br />
â€œthe days of Britain having to apologise for its colonial history are over. We should celebrate much of our past rather than apologise for it. We should talk about enduring British values â€“ they stand for the greatest ideas in history that grew in Britain and influenced the rest of the world: tolerance, liberty, civic duty; our strong traditions of fair play, openness, internationalism. These are great British values.â€ </p>
<p>But in the colonies, laws institutionalising discrimination &amp; segregation were rigidly enforced, even in most churches.<br />
And do decades of race abuse and attacks on black &amp; Asian migrants (not to mention deaths in police custody) in the UK signify tolerance? </p>
<p>In Feb 2006, Amnesty International condemned UK&#8217;s violation of Human Rights such as detaining suspects without charge + curbing of civil liberties + invasion/torture in Iraqâ€¦.</p>
<p>This Gordon Brown must go. He is a more wooden version version of Tony Blair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90717</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90717</guid>
		<description>Rumbold,

The Bolsheviks! This government has a Stalinist core, methinks.

Identity Cards? What the hell is that all about? It is, frankly along the lines that the state owns you, that the state is in some measure your parent. It is, in fact neither. It is accountabilty gone mad. A delight for bureucrats everywhere.

Or detention. What is that about either? If the state can level a charge at you, then let them. Otherwise, you ought to see yourself as freeborn. I do, despite the states intrusions. Though, Eton baby is no obvious alternative. An institutionised little wannabe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold,</p>
<p>The Bolsheviks! This government has a Stalinist core, methinks.</p>
<p>Identity Cards? What the hell is that all about? It is, frankly along the lines that the state owns you, that the state is in some measure your parent. It is, in fact neither. It is accountabilty gone mad. A delight for bureucrats everywhere.</p>
<p>Or detention. What is that about either? If the state can level a charge at you, then let them. Otherwise, you ought to see yourself as freeborn. I do, despite the states intrusions. Though, Eton baby is no obvious alternative. An institutionised little wannabe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahil</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90715</link>
		<dc:creator>Sahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90715</guid>
		<description>&quot;Since they have little in the way of actual ideological beliefs, they are willing to submit to the Brown regime if it keeps them in office, as they realise a divided party looks bad in public&quot;

I totally agree, this is a party whose sole purpose is to remain in power by whatever means.  I am not voting for them even if it means the Tories get in power.  The parallels between 1990-1992 and at present is astonishing.  I&#039;m sick of being treated like a neglected lover (Sic) and I can&#039;t be bothered with these lot anymore.  I totally agree with you Leon, I smell something in the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Since they have little in the way of actual ideological beliefs, they are willing to submit to the Brown regime if it keeps them in office, as they realise a divided party looks bad in public&#8221;</p>
<p>I totally agree, this is a party whose sole purpose is to remain in power by whatever means.  I am not voting for them even if it means the Tories get in power.  The parallels between 1990-1992 and at present is astonishing.  I&#8217;m sick of being treated like a neglected lover (Sic) and I can&#8217;t be bothered with these lot anymore.  I totally agree with you Leon, I smell something in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90712</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90712</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s fair to say that Brown&#039;s stature has been seriously dented. So much for dour Scottish competence after 10 years of smiley smarmy Anglo-Scottish style over substance. Now we just have Scottish and dour.
And with the UK economy set to slow sharply next year (the consensus is for growth to slow to 2% from 3%, but I&#039;m tipping 1.5%) and the housing market set to correct (though not crash), it&#039;s gonna get worse for him.
He&#039;s got it all to do if 2009 and 2010 is going to serve him up another majority. I&#039;m beginning to have my doubts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that Brown&#8217;s stature has been seriously dented. So much for dour Scottish competence after 10 years of smiley smarmy Anglo-Scottish style over substance. Now we just have Scottish and dour.<br />
And with the UK economy set to slow sharply next year (the consensus is for growth to slow to 2% from 3%, but I&#8217;m tipping 1.5%) and the housing market set to correct (though not crash), it&#8217;s gonna get worse for him.<br />
He&#8217;s got it all to do if 2009 and 2010 is going to serve him up another majority. I&#8217;m beginning to have my doubts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90709</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90709</guid>
		<description>Would that you were right Leon, since it would be great to see the back of Gordon Brown. However, I fear this will not be the case until the next election (which may not take place until 2010). Unless there is a general election, Brown can only be toppled from within the party (as he will never resign), which in practice means the parliamentary Labour Party. 

Despite appearances to the contrary, Labour MPs are not stupid. They know that to start a civil war in order to get rid of Brown would damage the party. Many of these MPs are New Labourites or Brownites, whose sole purpose for being in power is to remain in power (see &#039;1984&#039;). Since they have little in the way of actual ideological beliefs, they are willing to submit to the Brown regime if it keeps them in office, as they realise a divided party looks bad in public.

Labour rebels are few and far between, and they are more pro-Brown than they were pro-Blair. Unions too are happy again after Gordon Brown bribed them to support him using taxpayers&#039; money.

The EU constitution will prove a hiccup, but no more than that, as enough Labour MPs will remember the lessons of the eighties. The Bolsheviks will be here to stay for another few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that you were right Leon, since it would be great to see the back of Gordon Brown. However, I fear this will not be the case until the next election (which may not take place until 2010). Unless there is a general election, Brown can only be toppled from within the party (as he will never resign), which in practice means the parliamentary Labour Party. </p>
<p>Despite appearances to the contrary, Labour MPs are not stupid. They know that to start a civil war in order to get rid of Brown would damage the party. Many of these MPs are New Labourites or Brownites, whose sole purpose for being in power is to remain in power (see &#8217;1984&#8242;). Since they have little in the way of actual ideological beliefs, they are willing to submit to the Brown regime if it keeps them in office, as they realise a divided party looks bad in public.</p>
<p>Labour rebels are few and far between, and they are more pro-Brown than they were pro-Blair. Unions too are happy again after Gordon Brown bribed them to support him using taxpayers&#8217; money.</p>
<p>The EU constitution will prove a hiccup, but no more than that, as enough Labour MPs will remember the lessons of the eighties. The Bolsheviks will be here to stay for another few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90707</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1543#comment-90707</guid>
		<description>The jury is still out on Gordon. What it does mean, North of the border, is that Mr Salmond seems statesmanlike. And thus someone to vote for. UK breakup, anyone?

It would only need some, preferably high profile, English sports commentator to suggest that Scotland should not have an international team. Then you&#039;d be right royally screwed.

Obviously, we&#039;d need to invade the Orkneys and Shetlands for their own good. Yanks would stand and clap at such an obvious &#039;bringing of democracy&#039; We would, clearly, be bringing &#039;peace on behalf of all mankind&#039;

Oil revenues? What oil revenues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jury is still out on Gordon. What it does mean, North of the border, is that Mr Salmond seems statesmanlike. And thus someone to vote for. UK breakup, anyone?</p>
<p>It would only need some, preferably high profile, English sports commentator to suggest that Scotland should not have an international team. Then you&#8217;d be right royally screwed.</p>
<p>Obviously, we&#8217;d need to invade the Orkneys and Shetlands for their own good. Yanks would stand and clap at such an obvious &#8216;bringing of democracy&#8217; We would, clearly, be bringing &#8216;peace on behalf of all mankind&#8217;</p>
<p>Oil revenues? What oil revenues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

