<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pickled Politicsâ€™ comment policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90513</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90513</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Morgoth, I donâ€™t object to your opinions, but could you do something about the prolixity? Itâ€™s starting to grate. Thanks.&lt;/i&gt;

Why use big words when dimuitive ones will do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Morgoth, I donâ€™t object to your opinions, but could you do something about the prolixity? Itâ€™s starting to grate. Thanks.</i></p>
<p>Why use big words when dimuitive ones will do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90512</guid>
		<description>Proxility at its finest, by the great Mr Amitabh Bachchan (time: 20 seconds to 30 seconds):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKjC_5oIU7s&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proxility at its finest, by the great Mr Amitabh Bachchan (time: 20 seconds to 30 seconds):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKjC_5oIU7s&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKjC_5oIU7s&#038;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90506</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90506</guid>
		<description>Don:

It would be fair to say, taking all things into consideration, that, if one may be so bold as to submit an opinion at this particular point, Morgoth&#039;s supposed prediliction for proxility is not that grating if one takes into account the various strands surrounding his notable writing patterns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don:</p>
<p>It would be fair to say, taking all things into consideration, that, if one may be so bold as to submit an opinion at this particular point, Morgoth&#8217;s supposed prediliction for proxility is not that grating if one takes into account the various strands surrounding his notable writing patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90503</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90503</guid>
		<description>...what is known in the trade as ... 

...at this precise moment in time.

Morgoth, I don&#039;t object to your opinions, but could you do something about the prolixity? It&#039;s starting to grate. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;what is known in the trade as &#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230;at this precise moment in time.</p>
<p>Morgoth, I don&#8217;t object to your opinions, but could you do something about the prolixity? It&#8217;s starting to grate. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90493</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90493</guid>
		<description>Thank you Sonia:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Very gracefully done rumbold *claps and blows a kiss*.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And you Douglas:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;An admirable summing up.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I like an argument but compliments are welcome too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Sonia:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Very gracefully done rumbold *claps and blows a kiss*.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And you Douglas:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;An admirable summing up.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I like an argument but compliments are welcome too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90474</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90474</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It is a sad indictment of liberalism.&lt;/i&gt;

Indeed. The prime example is the &quot;We need our own space&quot; post over at LC by an occasional commenter here - an insecure and delicate little flower of a liberal so pathetic that she can&#039;t stand any disagreement at all. If she wants a liberal echo chamber much like the BBC. But heh, that&#039;s liberals for you.

&lt;i&gt;I do hope he hasnâ€™t actually been banned, as Iâ€™m sure it was just a phase he is going through.&lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t worry old bean, I am what is known in the trade as &quot;having a life&quot; at the moment, and besides there&#039;s little of interest to me on both HP and PP at this precise moment in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It is a sad indictment of liberalism.</i></p>
<p>Indeed. The prime example is the &#8220;We need our own space&#8221; post over at LC by an occasional commenter here &#8211; an insecure and delicate little flower of a liberal so pathetic that she can&#8217;t stand any disagreement at all. If she wants a liberal echo chamber much like the BBC. But heh, that&#8217;s liberals for you.</p>
<p><i>I do hope he hasnâ€™t actually been banned, as Iâ€™m sure it was just a phase he is going through.</i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry old bean, I am what is known in the trade as &#8220;having a life&#8221; at the moment, and besides there&#8217;s little of interest to me on both HP and PP at this precise moment in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90458</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90458</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that this applies to PP or LC, but there are few things less likely to make me read a post and its comments than a hundred one-line comments that make no argument.

I don&#039;t think anything should be taken down for being critical, strongly-worded, controversial etc., and nor do I think it would be. Things that clog up the debate by attracting counter-flames and so on are probably candidates for deletion.

The criteria for moderation should become more stringent as a post becomes longer.

And as the saying goes... don&#039;t feed the trolls.

xD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that this applies to PP or LC, but there are few things less likely to make me read a post and its comments than a hundred one-line comments that make no argument.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anything should be taken down for being critical, strongly-worded, controversial etc., and nor do I think it would be. Things that clog up the debate by attracting counter-flames and so on are probably candidates for deletion.</p>
<p>The criteria for moderation should become more stringent as a post becomes longer.</p>
<p>And as the saying goes&#8230; don&#8217;t feed the trolls.</p>
<p>xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90435</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90435</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That is because you are of the true faith ;-) .

There are many folk that think they blog that donâ€™t allow comments at all. We call them vain. There are folk that blog and donâ€™t reply to comments, we call them journalists. And then there are those who get down and dirty. We call them righteous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh. Righteous. I like that. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That is because you are of the true faith <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>There are many folk that think they blog that donâ€™t allow comments at all. We call them vain. There are folk that blog and donâ€™t reply to comments, we call them journalists. And then there are those who get down and dirty. We call them righteous.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh. Righteous. I like that. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desi Italiana</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90418</link>
		<dc:creator>Desi Italiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90418</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m down for some degree of moderation. Not so much over ideas, but insults which at times are directed at female bloggers. I haven&#039;t seen this on PP, but I do know that female bloggers get some of the most brutish remarks which make me want to ban their asses for good. It&#039;s one thing to poke at someone&#039;s opinion, logic, argument, etc. It&#039;s another thing to be demeaning, insulting, and sexist just because the blogger lacks a protruding member.


But someone who is being a bit unruly...I wouldn&#039;t necessarily ban/moderate that. I&#039;ve behaved atrociously on some people&#039;s blogs (taking issue with people&#039;s views, saying a post is &#039;stupid&#039;, etc) but they have been very gracious to keep letting me post comments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down for some degree of moderation. Not so much over ideas, but insults which at times are directed at female bloggers. I haven&#8217;t seen this on PP, but I do know that female bloggers get some of the most brutish remarks which make me want to ban their asses for good. It&#8217;s one thing to poke at someone&#8217;s opinion, logic, argument, etc. It&#8217;s another thing to be demeaning, insulting, and sexist just because the blogger lacks a protruding member.</p>
<p>But someone who is being a bit unruly&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily ban/moderate that. I&#8217;ve behaved atrociously on some people&#8217;s blogs (taking issue with people&#8217;s views, saying a post is &#8216;stupid&#8217;, etc) but they have been very gracious to keep letting me post comments <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90391</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90391</guid>
		<description>Leon,

That is because you are of the true faith ;-) .

There are many folk that think they blog that don&#039;t allow comments at all. We call them vain. There are folk that blog and don&#039;t reply to comments, we call them journalists. And then there are those who get down and dirty. We call them righteous.

I&#039;d do a roll call, but it just gets me into trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon,</p>
<p>That is because you are of the true faith <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>There are many folk that think they blog that don&#8217;t allow comments at all. We call them vain. There are folk that blog and don&#8217;t reply to comments, we call them journalists. And then there are those who get down and dirty. We call them righteous.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d do a roll call, but it just gets me into trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90389</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90389</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see commenters having more value than the post starter, neither do I see the post starter having more value than commenters. 

The beauty and power of blogging is the relationship between the two, one without the other is meaningless imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see commenters having more value than the post starter, neither do I see the post starter having more value than commenters. </p>
<p>The beauty and power of blogging is the relationship between the two, one without the other is meaningless imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90376</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90376</guid>
		<description>Heh, erm thanks for the appreciation.

Firstly, it&#039;s precisely because I have a moderation policy that we&#039;ve developed a culture of having good discussion here. We have had plenty of derailings in the past with trolls. Anyone remember Amir? Every writer on PP was annoyed with him for constantly derailing every thread with massive rants. It destroys the atmosphere.

The second point about moderation, which is hardly ever brought up, is that moderation may actually bring out people to comment who don&#039;t want to be subjected to personal attacks for doing so. In other words, moderation actually brings out a range of opinion that would otherwise be silenced because non-moderation simply leads to a slagging match between the loudest (or most dedicated).

Arif and I used to have huge debates about this in the past when I used to run another forum. Eventually he came around to my view that you need moderation to foster a good atmosphere otherwise it leads to chaos.

I know the anarchists hate it (here&#039;s looking at you Sonia ;) ) but it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, erm thanks for the appreciation.</p>
<p>Firstly, it&#8217;s precisely because I have a moderation policy that we&#8217;ve developed a culture of having good discussion here. We have had plenty of derailings in the past with trolls. Anyone remember Amir? Every writer on PP was annoyed with him for constantly derailing every thread with massive rants. It destroys the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The second point about moderation, which is hardly ever brought up, is that moderation may actually bring out people to comment who don&#8217;t want to be subjected to personal attacks for doing so. In other words, moderation actually brings out a range of opinion that would otherwise be silenced because non-moderation simply leads to a slagging match between the loudest (or most dedicated).</p>
<p>Arif and I used to have huge debates about this in the past when I used to run another forum. Eventually he came around to my view that you need moderation to foster a good atmosphere otherwise it leads to chaos.</p>
<p>I know the anarchists hate it (here&#8217;s looking at you Sonia <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) but it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90374</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90374</guid>
		<description>Rumbold,

An admirable summing up. Sunny does indeed put the effort in, which is not always appreciated. And I&#039;m glad to see someone else saying what I&#039;ve thought for a long time, this is a genuinely superb site. Maybe even Dons&#039; virtual community? 

Should we submit it for a prize?

Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold,</p>
<p>An admirable summing up. Sunny does indeed put the effort in, which is not always appreciated. And I&#8217;m glad to see someone else saying what I&#8217;ve thought for a long time, this is a genuinely superb site. Maybe even Dons&#8217; virtual community? </p>
<p>Should we submit it for a prize?</p>
<p>Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90370</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90370</guid>
		<description>yes that thread was very revealing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes that thread was very revealing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90369</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90369</guid>
		<description>heh just seen don&#039;s point there about getting &#039;battles&#039; to move to a discrete thread. what a good idea! this could be real fun. we&#039;d have anas back and amir and morgoth and muzumdar and it&#039;d be a right show! i bet that&#039;s where everyone would go hang out for ringside seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh just seen don&#8217;s point there about getting &#8216;battles&#8217; to move to a discrete thread. what a good idea! this could be real fun. we&#8217;d have anas back and amir and morgoth and muzumdar and it&#8217;d be a right show! i bet that&#8217;s where everyone would go hang out for ringside seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90368</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90368</guid>
		<description>very gracefully done rumbold *claps and blows a kiss* 
and a round of applause for sunny..

(hmm i must be getting soft in my old age!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very gracefully done rumbold *claps and blows a kiss*<br />
and a round of applause for sunny..</p>
<p>(hmm i must be getting soft in my old age!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90343</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90343</guid>
		<description>I agree with Sonia on the point of a blog. However, I realise that many of you (Douglas, Ravi, etc.) like a bit more moderation, so I doubt whether there will ever be a consensus on this.

Sunny deserves more credit then he sometimes gets, given the amount of work that he puts into running Pickled Politics. I think that everybody appreciates it, but we just don&#039;t say it enough, so let us give him a round of applause.

I believe that Pickled Politics is the best blog on the web because of the strength of the commentators. If nobody ever commented it would still be a good blog, but our real &#039;greatness&#039; lies in the fact that commentators are able to have an informed and open discussion about pretty much anything. You just do not get that to the same extent on other blogs, even on one&#039;s like Iain Dale&#039;s.

Leon:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Just out of curiosity, has this post been â€˜inspiredâ€™ by a spat on another thread on here?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not really. Sorry, I forgot to thank you for providing the link to the previous discussion.

El Cid and Wahishi:

Figuring out who is Muzumdar is a game played by a number of people on Pickled Politics. El Cid spotted him very early this time, so Wahishi/Muzumdar, you could at least admit when you have been caught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sonia on the point of a blog. However, I realise that many of you (Douglas, Ravi, etc.) like a bit more moderation, so I doubt whether there will ever be a consensus on this.</p>
<p>Sunny deserves more credit then he sometimes gets, given the amount of work that he puts into running Pickled Politics. I think that everybody appreciates it, but we just don&#8217;t say it enough, so let us give him a round of applause.</p>
<p>I believe that Pickled Politics is the best blog on the web because of the strength of the commentators. If nobody ever commented it would still be a good blog, but our real &#8216;greatness&#8217; lies in the fact that commentators are able to have an informed and open discussion about pretty much anything. You just do not get that to the same extent on other blogs, even on one&#8217;s like Iain Dale&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Leon:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Just out of curiosity, has this post been â€˜inspiredâ€™ by a spat on another thread on here?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Not really. Sorry, I forgot to thank you for providing the link to the previous discussion.</p>
<p>El Cid and Wahishi:</p>
<p>Figuring out who is Muzumdar is a game played by a number of people on Pickled Politics. El Cid spotted him very early this time, so Wahishi/Muzumdar, you could at least admit when you have been caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90333</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90333</guid>
		<description>I seldom read Muzumdar&#039;s posts because I didn&#039;t feel qualified to have an opinion on the topic, but Morgoth often made worthwhile points, when he wasn&#039;t being gratuitously rude or embarrassingly jejune. 

I do hope he hasn&#039;t actually been banned, as I&#039;m sure it was just a phase he is going through. I confess I went through a comparable phase myself, of believing that Casteneda and the quantum quackery of Zukav et al provided insights that the mundane majority could not grasp. I&#039;m sure I was a pain in the arse at the time, but it passed (oddly enough round about the time I found a girl-friend. Who insisted I choose between halucinogenic fungi and sex).

By all means delete the drive-by spittle-spraying hate junkies, but the eccentric, the misinformed, the disturbed/disturbing, and the plain wierd should be given a fair go in the hope that hanging with the PP community (are we a community yet?) will have a beneficial and civilising effect. Also, they are often fun. 

I think the balance is more or less right, but we need to keep transparency. If somone is being banned or sanctioned we need to know why and have the opportunity of arguing for or against. So I agree with those arguing for a yellow card/ sin-bin system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seldom read Muzumdar&#8217;s posts because I didn&#8217;t feel qualified to have an opinion on the topic, but Morgoth often made worthwhile points, when he wasn&#8217;t being gratuitously rude or embarrassingly jejune. </p>
<p>I do hope he hasn&#8217;t actually been banned, as I&#8217;m sure it was just a phase he is going through. I confess I went through a comparable phase myself, of believing that Casteneda and the quantum quackery of Zukav et al provided insights that the mundane majority could not grasp. I&#8217;m sure I was a pain in the arse at the time, but it passed (oddly enough round about the time I found a girl-friend. Who insisted I choose between halucinogenic fungi and sex).</p>
<p>By all means delete the drive-by spittle-spraying hate junkies, but the eccentric, the misinformed, the disturbed/disturbing, and the plain wierd should be given a fair go in the hope that hanging with the PP community (are we a community yet?) will have a beneficial and civilising effect. Also, they are often fun. </p>
<p>I think the balance is more or less right, but we need to keep transparency. If somone is being banned or sanctioned we need to know why and have the opportunity of arguing for or against. So I agree with those arguing for a yellow card/ sin-bin system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90323</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90323</guid>
		<description>good point Bananabrain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point Bananabrain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90322</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1535#comment-90322</guid>
		<description>jff - ;-) you are a funny one. 

i think on many occasions, morgoth and muzumdar were rapped on the knuckles for being morgoth and muzumdar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jff &#8211; <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  you are a funny one. </p>
<p>i think on many occasions, morgoth and muzumdar were rapped on the knuckles for being morgoth and muzumdar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

