<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tories still don&#8217;t get racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sports Illustrated</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-91649</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports Illustrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-91649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sports Illustrated...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sports Illustrated&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth Satelite</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-90679</link>
		<dc:creator>Earth Satelite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-90679</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Earth Satelite...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Earth Satelite&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davecole.org &#187; blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rivers of Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-89172</link>
		<dc:creator>davecole.org &#187; blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rivers of Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-89172</guid>
		<description>[...] is a very good article on Powell&#8217;s speech at Pickled Politics, and it links to a good article by Danny Finkelstein of The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a very good article on Powell&#8217;s speech at Pickled Politics, and it links to a good article by Danny Finkelstein of The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Issue of the Week: Was Enoch Right? by the Thunderdragon &#124; The Wardman Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88435</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Issue of the Week: Was Enoch Right? by the Thunderdragon &#124; The Wardman Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88435</guid>
		<description>[...] you can&#8217;t complain if the hounds pursue you.” This issue also brought out the claim that “The Tories still don’t get racism” from Sunny of Pickled Politics. Unfortunately it seems that he hasn’t actually read – or at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you can&#8217;t complain if the hounds pursue you.” This issue also brought out the claim that “The Tories still don’t get racism” from Sunny of Pickled Politics. Unfortunately it seems that he hasn’t actually read – or at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88430</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88430</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The guys from another planet, truly!&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, a planet where people don&#039;t march to keep a genocidal fascist dictator in power and then are proud of that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The guys from another planet, truly!</i></p>
<p>Yeah, a planet where people don&#8217;t march to keep a genocidal fascist dictator in power and then are proud of that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88406</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88406</guid>
		<description>My first and only meeting with Enoch Powell was on a intercity train to London, 30 years ago. He walked through my carriage and I (along with a few others) followed him into 1st class. At the time I was a swotty nosed teenager but already I was well versed in all things Enoch Powell or so I thought. I thought he was nothing more than a straight up racist thug and Moseley blackshirt. Now you&#039;ve got to remember one thing. IMHO, Wolverhampton was and remains one of the most racially divisive towns in England. White people then, as now barely tolerated black. It was the number one reason I ended up becoming a Arsenal fan, because at Wolves all you got was spit. Powell on the otherhand, I was to learn was a totally different kettle of fish. First off, though most of his constituents were as thick as shit, I quickly realised that he WAS NOT! Then came his love of all things Indian and the British Raj. I came to realise that in many ways his perspective on the common or garden Englishman were in many ways very similar to my own. We were both outsiders looking in. Powell&#039;s greatest mistake was his attempt of intellecturising the views of the very common man because he couldn&#039;t. However hard he tried he always ended up in Shit Creek. What he had gain great intellect, he lacked in common sense. He was naive!

I&#039;m off to bed, more tomorrow. The Dude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first and only meeting with Enoch Powell was on a intercity train to London, 30 years ago. He walked through my carriage and I (along with a few others) followed him into 1st class. At the time I was a swotty nosed teenager but already I was well versed in all things Enoch Powell or so I thought. I thought he was nothing more than a straight up racist thug and Moseley blackshirt. Now you&#8217;ve got to remember one thing. IMHO, Wolverhampton was and remains one of the most racially divisive towns in England. White people then, as now barely tolerated black. It was the number one reason I ended up becoming a Arsenal fan, because at Wolves all you got was spit. Powell on the otherhand, I was to learn was a totally different kettle of fish. First off, though most of his constituents were as thick as shit, I quickly realised that he WAS NOT! Then came his love of all things Indian and the British Raj. I came to realise that in many ways his perspective on the common or garden Englishman were in many ways very similar to my own. We were both outsiders looking in. Powell&#8217;s greatest mistake was his attempt of intellecturising the views of the very common man because he couldn&#8217;t. However hard he tried he always ended up in Shit Creek. What he had gain great intellect, he lacked in common sense. He was naive!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m off to bed, more tomorrow. The Dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88401</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88401</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You’re beyond parody, y’know.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh if you think that you should have seen that neo con tosser, he was unbelievable. The guys from another planet, truly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You’re beyond parody, y’know.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh if you think that you should have seen that neo con tosser, he was unbelievable. The guys from another planet, truly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88396</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88396</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;neo con assholes ass &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re beyond parody, y&#039;know. Being kicked by Heseltine is like being savaged by a dead sheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>neo con assholes ass </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re beyond parody, y&#8217;know. Being kicked by Heseltine is like being savaged by a dead sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88393</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88393</guid>
		<description>Anyone watching Michael Hesltine kicking that neo con assholes ass on the Nigel Hastilow racism story. Check out the repeat it&#039;s well worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone watching Michael Hesltine kicking that neo con assholes ass on the Nigel Hastilow racism story. Check out the repeat it&#8217;s well worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisc</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88377</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88377</guid>
		<description>Rumbold -

I think Sunny overplayed his hand a little.
Implying that the Tories had &quot;reinstated&quot; Mercer.

In fact it was his beloved NuLab Gordon who had taken him on!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumbold -</p>
<p>I think Sunny overplayed his hand a little.<br />
Implying that the Tories had &#8220;reinstated&#8221; Mercer.</p>
<p>In fact it was his beloved NuLab Gordon who had taken him on!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88373</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88373</guid>
		<description>Laban Tall,

What is quite interesting is that Enoch Powell seemed to think quoting rabid constituents as evidence was A-OK. And what do we get, forty years later? Another playing exactly the same game.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;T&#039;ain&#039;t me sir, &#039;tis these poor disempowered folk&quot; Consequences? What consequences?&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

Robert has a very good analysis of Hastilows game, here:

http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/11/05/rivers-of-bloody-words/

I&#039;d agree that both knew what their constituency was, if that is the point you are trying to make, and &#039;dog whistle politics&#039; sums it up. What they were both trying to do was appeal to lowest common denominators amongst the white population. Frankly, neither gave a monkeys how it played out elsewhere.  Cheap nasty little demagogues, the both of them.

It is incredibly cowardly to hide behind a constituents words, for example &#039;the whip hand&#039; remark, and pretend that you are thus completely disassociated from it.

And you, sir, are disingenuous in the extreme. The phrase that Powell quoted was:

&quot;the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.&quot;

There is nothing to suggest it is anything other than an allusion to the slavedriving that Jagdeep so clearly posited. I take it that Powells&#039; audience were not &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; media studies graduates?

What is quite interesting also, is that the Powell speech is up on this site:

http://www.natfront.com/powell.html  

I despair, I really do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laban Tall,</p>
<p>What is quite interesting is that Enoch Powell seemed to think quoting rabid constituents as evidence was A-OK. And what do we get, forty years later? Another playing exactly the same game.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;T&#8217;ain&#8217;t me sir, &#8217;tis these poor disempowered folk&#8221; Consequences? What consequences?&#8221;</b></p>
<p>Robert has a very good analysis of Hastilows game, here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/11/05/rivers-of-bloody-words/" rel="nofollow">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/11/05/rivers-of-bloody-words/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree that both knew what their constituency was, if that is the point you are trying to make, and &#8216;dog whistle politics&#8217; sums it up. What they were both trying to do was appeal to lowest common denominators amongst the white population. Frankly, neither gave a monkeys how it played out elsewhere.  Cheap nasty little demagogues, the both of them.</p>
<p>It is incredibly cowardly to hide behind a constituents words, for example &#8216;the whip hand&#8217; remark, and pretend that you are thus completely disassociated from it.</p>
<p>And you, sir, are disingenuous in the extreme. The phrase that Powell quoted was:</p>
<p>&#8220;the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is nothing to suggest it is anything other than an allusion to the slavedriving that Jagdeep so clearly posited. I take it that Powells&#8217; audience were not <i>all</i> media studies graduates?</p>
<p>What is quite interesting also, is that the Powell speech is up on this site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.natfront.com/powell.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.natfront.com/powell.html</a>  </p>
<p>I despair, I really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88369</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88369</guid>
		<description>Councillor:

Yup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Councillor:</p>
<p>Yup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Councillor writes</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88368</link>
		<dc:creator>A Councillor writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88368</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Mercer for a time hold a position for Gordon Brown as an advisor on security? I seem to remember that there was considerable frothing at the mouth about it over on ConservativeHome.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2941845.ece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Mercer for a time hold a position for Gordon Brown as an advisor on security? I seem to remember that there was considerable frothing at the mouth about it over on ConservativeHome.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2941845.ece" rel="nofollow">http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2941845.ece</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88367</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88367</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just had a surreal moment flicking through the channels.
&quot;1-0 to the Arsenal&quot; on something called Raj TV Worldwide sponsored by the Britannic cash &amp; carry in Birmingham followed by the &quot;Great Immigration Debate&quot; hosted on TV and Radio Five Live with that guy from the Big Breakfast who used to make people run in the streets wrapped in bacon. Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just had a surreal moment flicking through the channels.<br />
&#8220;1-0 to the Arsenal&#8221; on something called Raj TV Worldwide sponsored by the Britannic cash &amp; carry in Birmingham followed by the &#8220;Great Immigration Debate&#8221; hosted on TV and Radio Five Live with that guy from the Big Breakfast who used to make people run in the streets wrapped in bacon. Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88363</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88363</guid>
		<description>Councillor:

Interesting- but I suppose they cannot force him to stay.

Sunny and ChrisC:

From what I can tell from his website, Mercer holds no shadow cabinet brief:

http://www.patrickmercer.org.uk/type3.asp?id=96&amp;type=3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Councillor:</p>
<p>Interesting- but I suppose they cannot force him to stay.</p>
<p>Sunny and ChrisC:</p>
<p>From what I can tell from his website, Mercer holds no shadow cabinet brief:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patrickmercer.org.uk/type3.asp?id=96&amp;type=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.patrickmercer.org.uk/type3.asp?id=96&amp;type=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laban</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88362</link>
		<dc:creator>Laban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88362</guid>
		<description>Sunny, opening bid : &quot;Nigel Hastilow, who was chucked out of the party for essentially endorsing Enoch ‘Rivers of Blood’ Powell’s views&quot;

Some time later : &quot;... how deliberately referring to such a bigot, but being careful to not endorse him personally ...&quot;

Thank you. You can always edit the post.

And what&#039;s the &quot;is hardly likely to make non-whites feel any better&quot; ? Are we all so easily wounded ? And I don&#039;t exactly get a sense of low self-esteem coming from your writing !

Jagdeep - 
a) Powell was quoting a constituent on the &#039;whip hand&#039;
b) it was a fairly common expression - I thought it came from racing, but maybe I&#039;m wrong  
c) Powell studied Greek, not cultural studies at SOAS. While I&#039;m not a Powell scholar, and life&#039;s too short, I&#039;m pretty certain Powell&#039;s speech was aimed at indigenous Brits, not chosen to frighten the maximum number of incomers. What would the point of that be ? He was trying to convince the natives.

At least people aren&#039;t raising &quot;piccaninnies&quot;, a common expression for children in the West Indies - still used today as &#039;pickney&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny, opening bid : &#8220;Nigel Hastilow, who was chucked out of the party for essentially endorsing Enoch ‘Rivers of Blood’ Powell’s views&#8221;</p>
<p>Some time later : &#8220;&#8230; how deliberately referring to such a bigot, but being careful to not endorse him personally &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you. You can always edit the post.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s the &#8220;is hardly likely to make non-whites feel any better&#8221; ? Are we all so easily wounded ? And I don&#8217;t exactly get a sense of low self-esteem coming from your writing !</p>
<p>Jagdeep &#8211;<br />
a) Powell was quoting a constituent on the &#8216;whip hand&#8217;<br />
b) it was a fairly common expression &#8211; I thought it came from racing, but maybe I&#8217;m wrong<br />
c) Powell studied Greek, not cultural studies at SOAS. While I&#8217;m not a Powell scholar, and life&#8217;s too short, I&#8217;m pretty certain Powell&#8217;s speech was aimed at indigenous Brits, not chosen to frighten the maximum number of incomers. What would the point of that be ? He was trying to convince the natives.</p>
<p>At least people aren&#8217;t raising &#8220;piccaninnies&#8221;, a common expression for children in the West Indies &#8211; still used today as &#8216;pickney&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Councillor writes</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-3#comment-88361</link>
		<dc:creator>A Councillor writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88361</guid>
		<description>Or is he. It seems his local party are considering not accepting his resignation.

http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/news/tm_headline=enoch-powell-row-tory-nigel-hastilow-could-be-back%26method=full%26objectid=20080059%26siteid=50002-name_page.html

The local papers, both the Birmingham Mail and the Wolverhampton Suppress and Slur have been full of the sort of hideous readers letters that make dog-whistle politics so popular and full of urban myths about housing etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or is he. It seems his local party are considering not accepting his resignation.</p>
<p><a href="http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/news/tm_headline=enoch-powell-row-tory-nigel-hastilow-could-be-back%26method=full%26objectid=20080059%26siteid=50002-name_page.html" rel="nofollow">http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/news/tm_headline=enoch-powell-row-tory-nigel-hastilow-could-be-back%26method=full%26objectid=20080059%26siteid=50002-name_page.html</a></p>
<p>The local papers, both the Birmingham Mail and the Wolverhampton Suppress and Slur have been full of the sort of hideous readers letters that make dog-whistle politics so popular and full of urban myths about housing etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-2#comment-88359</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88359</guid>
		<description>ZinZin:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Yet not a word from our Rumbold over Mr Haitslow, despite asking him for a reaction to his comments. Priorities.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Er, this is what I said in #16:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Surely the Conservatives condemned racism by (rightly) sacking him?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It seemed a fairly open and shut case to me; Tory candidate makes racist comments, and is deselected by Tory party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZinZin:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Yet not a word from our Rumbold over Mr Haitslow, despite asking him for a reaction to his comments. Priorities.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Er, this is what I said in #16:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Surely the Conservatives condemned racism by (rightly) sacking him?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It seemed a fairly open and shut case to me; Tory candidate makes racist comments, and is deselected by Tory party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: septicisle</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-2#comment-88358</link>
		<dc:creator>septicisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88358</guid>
		<description>The problem I had with Hastilow&#039;s article wasn&#039;t that it was racist, it was that he was quite clearly hiding behind the views of those he &quot;spoke to&quot; when he was too cowardly to come out with them himself.  The granny of the family said the immigrants took all the housing; &quot;many&quot; say that Enoch was right; immigrants themselves tell him that the migrants of today come to freeload off the welfare state.  All he suggests is that we &quot;roll out the red carpet&quot; and that we should deport &quot;bogus&quot; asylum seekers and abandon the &quot;human rights merry-go-round.&quot;  He knew full well how offensive Powell&#039;s initial speech was, as he mentions in the article in a round-about way.  It was a calculating dog whistle article that he wrote to see if he could get away with it, and he didn&#039;t.  It&#039;s that simple.  Personally I think he shouldn&#039;t have resigned or been sacked and let his constituents themselves decided whether they wanted such a man to be their MP.

Longer, similar post: http://www.septicisle.info/2007/11/enoch-powell-was-right-and-completely.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I had with Hastilow&#8217;s article wasn&#8217;t that it was racist, it was that he was quite clearly hiding behind the views of those he &#8220;spoke to&#8221; when he was too cowardly to come out with them himself.  The granny of the family said the immigrants took all the housing; &#8220;many&#8221; say that Enoch was right; immigrants themselves tell him that the migrants of today come to freeload off the welfare state.  All he suggests is that we &#8220;roll out the red carpet&#8221; and that we should deport &#8220;bogus&#8221; asylum seekers and abandon the &#8220;human rights merry-go-round.&#8221;  He knew full well how offensive Powell&#8217;s initial speech was, as he mentions in the article in a round-about way.  It was a calculating dog whistle article that he wrote to see if he could get away with it, and he didn&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s that simple.  Personally I think he shouldn&#8217;t have resigned or been sacked and let his constituents themselves decided whether they wanted such a man to be their MP.</p>
<p>Longer, similar post: <a href="http://www.septicisle.info/2007/11/enoch-powell-was-right-and-completely.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.septicisle.info/2007/11/enoch-powell-was-right-and-completely.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagdeep</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504/comment-page-2#comment-88357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1504#comment-88357</guid>
		<description>Tell us more about your meeting with Enoch Powell, The Dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell us more about your meeting with Enoch Powell, The Dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
