<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bobby Jindal enters history books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Government and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-89515</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal Government and Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-89515</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Federal Government and Politics...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Federal Government and Politics&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koppakabana</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-86398</link>
		<dc:creator>koppakabana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-86398</guid>
		<description>Let me just tack on that it&#039;s nice to see another brown face in US politics, but it bothers me that he sold out (changing his name, converting religion) just to fit in.

I would almost be happier if he ran Republican but with his real name and original faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me just tack on that it&#8217;s nice to see another brown face in US politics, but it bothers me that he sold out (changing his name, converting religion) just to fit in.</p>
<p>I would almost be happier if he ran Republican but with his real name and original faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koppakabana</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-86397</link>
		<dc:creator>koppakabana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-86397</guid>
		<description>Hi Sunny - all -

First, Jindal is not the first Indian-American government official to be elected in the southeastern US. Check coverage on other politico types in South Carolina - Dino Teppara (senior staff for Joe Wilson, former co-chair of the Indian &amp; Indian-American caucus) and Nicki Haley. The south also has quite a few black politicians, Jim Clyburn being the first to come to mind.

Jindal is strange as he converted to Catholicism FOR POLITICAL REASONS, not for any personal commitment to the faith. 

I really like the south, by the way, I happen to think that the south is the part of the US that actually *got* what civil rights was all about (until disaster aka Katrina).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sunny &#8211; all -</p>
<p>First, Jindal is not the first Indian-American government official to be elected in the southeastern US. Check coverage on other politico types in South Carolina &#8211; Dino Teppara (senior staff for Joe Wilson, former co-chair of the Indian &amp; Indian-American caucus) and Nicki Haley. The south also has quite a few black politicians, Jim Clyburn being the first to come to mind.</p>
<p>Jindal is strange as he converted to Catholicism FOR POLITICAL REASONS, not for any personal commitment to the faith. </p>
<p>I really like the south, by the way, I happen to think that the south is the part of the US that actually *got* what civil rights was all about (until disaster aka Katrina).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-86110</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-86110</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Whatâ€™s more, Mr Jindalâ€™s independance of thought, his initiative, his conversion...
 
Another Ali Hirsi, in many ways.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have little sympathy for Ali Hirsi. She is a islamophobe of the worst kind, by saying that Islam by definition is a radical religion and cannot be reformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Whatâ€™s more, Mr Jindalâ€™s independance of thought, his initiative, his conversion&#8230;</p>
<p>Another Ali Hirsi, in many ways.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I have little sympathy for Ali Hirsi. She is a islamophobe of the worst kind, by saying that Islam by definition is a radical religion and cannot be reformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soso</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85946</link>
		<dc:creator>Soso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85946</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no such thing as a &#039;born again&#039; Roman Catholic.

The author that coined that term is an ignoramus.

And as for the indictment of Mr Jindal&#039;s Chrisitanity, as though it were somehow un-South Asian? Do people here realise that Christainity didn&#039;t arrive in India with european colonialism, but rather has been present on the subcontinent since the 400s?

It predates the arrival of Islam by more than two centuries and is nearly 9 centuries older than Sikhism.

And with more than 60 million adherents it is also India&#039;s fastest growing religious community, now outnumbering Sikhs by a ratio of almost two to one.

Revealing, then, that the mention Christian is absent from the side-bar list of &#039;organisations&#039; on this blog.

With such glaring ommissions emerging from a such morass of soft prejudice, is it any wonder Sunny is surprised, in fact broad-sided?

What&#039;s more, Mr Jindal&#039;s independance of thought, his initiative, his conversion and his ability to ignore the destructive tenors of a self-serving race industry mean that he connects with the larger world, that he can see Whites for who they are and is, thus, a very black sheep, indeed!

And a very WELCOME ONE.

Another Ali Hirsi, in many ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as a &#8216;born again&#8217; Roman Catholic.</p>
<p>The author that coined that term is an ignoramus.</p>
<p>And as for the indictment of Mr Jindal&#8217;s Chrisitanity, as though it were somehow un-South Asian? Do people here realise that Christainity didn&#8217;t arrive in India with european colonialism, but rather has been present on the subcontinent since the 400s?</p>
<p>It predates the arrival of Islam by more than two centuries and is nearly 9 centuries older than Sikhism.</p>
<p>And with more than 60 million adherents it is also India&#8217;s fastest growing religious community, now outnumbering Sikhs by a ratio of almost two to one.</p>
<p>Revealing, then, that the mention Christian is absent from the side-bar list of &#8216;organisations&#8217; on this blog.</p>
<p>With such glaring ommissions emerging from a such morass of soft prejudice, is it any wonder Sunny is surprised, in fact broad-sided?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, Mr Jindal&#8217;s independance of thought, his initiative, his conversion and his ability to ignore the destructive tenors of a self-serving race industry mean that he connects with the larger world, that he can see Whites for who they are and is, thus, a very black sheep, indeed!</p>
<p>And a very WELCOME ONE.</p>
<p>Another Ali Hirsi, in many ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85925</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85925</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;whseem to indicate the need for external approbation in the face of a deep-seated inferiority complex.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That explanation is somewhat simplistic, Sonia. I do know a lot of people which I respect for their achievements, despite not agreeing with their political views. I am not so narrow-minded to discredit people just because their views are different from mine. That does not imply that I have an deep-seated inferiority complex. 

Now, I am happy when Indians do well - no matter their religion or political views, and I believe Bobby Jindal&#039;s win is a good thing. If he didn&#039;t win, guess what? Another person with similar conservative views would have won.  At least with Jindal&#039;s victory in the deep South, will inspire others to follow suit... and that cannot be a bad thing. Do not underestimate the power of role-models in society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;whseem to indicate the need for external approbation in the face of a deep-seated inferiority complex.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That explanation is somewhat simplistic, Sonia. I do know a lot of people which I respect for their achievements, despite not agreeing with their political views. I am not so narrow-minded to discredit people just because their views are different from mine. That does not imply that I have an deep-seated inferiority complex. </p>
<p>Now, I am happy when Indians do well &#8211; no matter their religion or political views, and I believe Bobby Jindal&#8217;s win is a good thing. If he didn&#8217;t win, guess what? Another person with similar conservative views would have won.  At least with Jindal&#8217;s victory in the deep South, will inspire others to follow suit&#8230; and that cannot be a bad thing. Do not underestimate the power of role-models in society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85920</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85920</guid>
		<description>Glass ceiling broken = good.
Fundamentalist Christian Conservative = bad.
Ergo:
Fundamentalist Christian Conservative breaks Glass Ceiling = noteworthy.

Yes of course the politcs should trump the ethnicity.  But it is still interesting, and suitable fodder for Pickled Politics to discuss the issue.

Note how the glass ceiling breakers are so often those who adopt the politics of the establishment (or at least the prevailing hegemony).  Are they less &quot;threatening&quot; to the white majority?  Is radical policies AND radical skin colour just too much to bear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glass ceiling broken = good.<br />
Fundamentalist Christian Conservative = bad.<br />
Ergo:<br />
Fundamentalist Christian Conservative breaks Glass Ceiling = noteworthy.</p>
<p>Yes of course the politcs should trump the ethnicity.  But it is still interesting, and suitable fodder for Pickled Politics to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>Note how the glass ceiling breakers are so often those who adopt the politics of the establishment (or at least the prevailing hegemony).  Are they less &#8220;threatening&#8221; to the white majority?  Is radical policies AND radical skin colour just too much to bear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85567</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85567</guid>
		<description>good point Sajini - and useful to point out. 

and good points too Rohin.  &quot;Are Indians still so desperate for ratification and achievement that they latch on to any brownface no matter who they are?&quot;.. good question. seems to be the case.

and if that were the case...I would say ( ooh bring it on folks) that that would seem to indicate the need for external approbation in the face of a deep-seated inferiority complex. 

why hang on to such complexes? now &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is internalising racism and victimhood- in such a silly way - because then, it doesn&#039;t matter if there arent any White or Blue people left in the World to treat you badly, you&#039;ll just treat yourself badly cos you dont think you deserve any better. 

(like women often do in patriarchal societies, when there aren&#039;t any  men left to tell them to put their dopatta on straight, and not have any fun, because they just tell each other, or the younger women)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point Sajini &#8211; and useful to point out. </p>
<p>and good points too Rohin.  &#8220;Are Indians still so desperate for ratification and achievement that they latch on to any brownface no matter who they are?&#8221;.. good question. seems to be the case.</p>
<p>and if that were the case&#8230;I would say ( ooh bring it on folks) that that would seem to indicate the need for external approbation in the face of a deep-seated inferiority complex. </p>
<p>why hang on to such complexes? now <em>that</em> is internalising racism and victimhood- in such a silly way &#8211; because then, it doesn&#8217;t matter if there arent any White or Blue people left in the World to treat you badly, you&#8217;ll just treat yourself badly cos you dont think you deserve any better. </p>
<p>(like women often do in patriarchal societies, when there aren&#8217;t any  men left to tell them to put their dopatta on straight, and not have any fun, because they just tell each other, or the younger women)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SajiniW</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85516</link>
		<dc:creator>SajiniW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85516</guid>
		<description>I thought the cities in Louisiana were colour-neutral, so wasn&#039;t surprised by Jindal&#039;s win. New Orleans has a long history of black mayors, inclusive of current incumbent Ray Nagin.

Shame the neutrality doesn&#039;t extend to other faiths :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the cities in Louisiana were colour-neutral, so wasn&#8217;t surprised by Jindal&#8217;s win. New Orleans has a long history of black mayors, inclusive of current incumbent Ray Nagin.</p>
<p>Shame the neutrality doesn&#8217;t extend to other faiths <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Naik</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Naik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85495</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I find it quite nauseating that Indians, be they here, America or India, are automatically gratified to see this victory, despite Jindal being such a morally repugnant politician.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can understand that you find his beliefs  repugnant... but &lt;i&gt;morally&lt;/i&gt; repugnant? My... that sounds more like a judgement of his character rather than his beliefs.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Are Indians still so desperate for ratification and achievement that they latch on to any brownface no matter who they are?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Anyone who fights and achieves something - fair and square - despite all the odds, deserves credit in my book. Specially after having failed for being brown. And even though I disagree with his views, he does inspire me. He is the first Indian-American governor, and even if you don&#039;t want to admit it because he is not a liberal or progressive: he has indeed broken a glass ceiling. So he is not just a brownface. 

Of course, if he fucks up as a governor and becomes as incompetent as Bush, then I will take everything back.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;But to be honest, I think American rednecks with stupid right wing views are not actually stupid enough to ignore what someone speaks for.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It didn&#039;t happen four years ago. But hey stupid rednecks... how can one count their stupid ways? I am glad we can discuss about this without caricaturing people for their beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;I find it quite nauseating that Indians, be they here, America or India, are automatically gratified to see this victory, despite Jindal being such a morally repugnant politician.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I can understand that you find his beliefs  repugnant&#8230; but <i>morally</i> repugnant? My&#8230; that sounds more like a judgement of his character rather than his beliefs.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Are Indians still so desperate for ratification and achievement that they latch on to any brownface no matter who they are?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone who fights and achieves something &#8211; fair and square &#8211; despite all the odds, deserves credit in my book. Specially after having failed for being brown. And even though I disagree with his views, he does inspire me. He is the first Indian-American governor, and even if you don&#8217;t want to admit it because he is not a liberal or progressive: he has indeed broken a glass ceiling. So he is not just a brownface. </p>
<p>Of course, if he fucks up as a governor and becomes as incompetent as Bush, then I will take everything back.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;But to be honest, I think American rednecks with stupid right wing views are not actually stupid enough to ignore what someone speaks for.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It didn&#8217;t happen four years ago. But hey stupid rednecks&#8230; how can one count their stupid ways? I am glad we can discuss about this without caricaturing people for their beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85480</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85480</guid>
		<description>All I had to say on the matter, on an American site, was that I find it quite nauseating that Indians, be they here, America or India, are automatically gratified to see this victory, despite Jindal being such a morally repugnant politician.

If you agree with his policies, fair dos, you&#039;re both nuts so go ahead and be proud.

If you don&#039;t agree with his views, I don&#039;t understand. Are Indians still so desperate for ratification and achievement that they latch on to any brownface no matter who they are?

Recognising a glass ceiling being broken...maybe. But to be honest, I think American rednecks with stupid right wing views are not actually stupid enough to ignore what someone speaks for. That Panorama episode referenced above had some shocking lines in it &quot;I don&#039;t like him...Obama, Osama...it&#039;s too close for me.&quot; But none of those types of lines would be said if Barack Obama said what those rednecks wanted. Because Jindal does, they like him. It&#039;s not as thought they&#039;ve embraced Indians, just a bible-totin&#039;, Republican loon with a tan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I had to say on the matter, on an American site, was that I find it quite nauseating that Indians, be they here, America or India, are automatically gratified to see this victory, despite Jindal being such a morally repugnant politician.</p>
<p>If you agree with his policies, fair dos, you&#8217;re both nuts so go ahead and be proud.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree with his views, I don&#8217;t understand. Are Indians still so desperate for ratification and achievement that they latch on to any brownface no matter who they are?</p>
<p>Recognising a glass ceiling being broken&#8230;maybe. But to be honest, I think American rednecks with stupid right wing views are not actually stupid enough to ignore what someone speaks for. That Panorama episode referenced above had some shocking lines in it &#8220;I don&#8217;t like him&#8230;Obama, Osama&#8230;it&#8217;s too close for me.&#8221; But none of those types of lines would be said if Barack Obama said what those rednecks wanted. Because Jindal does, they like him. It&#8217;s not as thought they&#8217;ve embraced Indians, just a bible-totin&#8217;, Republican loon with a tan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85469</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;India is hardly what youâ€™d call a â€˜tolerantâ€™ and â€˜progressiveâ€™ nation......And yet none of you seem to care about real racism in the developing world. Itâ€™s all â€˜Daily Express-this,â€™ â€˜Melanie Philips-that,&#039;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s because most of us here are British and are not (directly) from India or &#039;the developing world&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>India is hardly what youâ€™d call a â€˜tolerantâ€™ and â€˜progressiveâ€™ nation&#8230;&#8230;And yet none of you seem to care about real racism in the developing world. Itâ€™s all â€˜Daily Express-this,â€™ â€˜Melanie Philips-that,&#8217;</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s because most of us here are British and are not (directly) from India or &#8216;the developing world&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakey</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85463</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85463</guid>
		<description>Jindal becoming governor of Louisiana reminds me in some ways to the Dalit leader Mayawati becoming chief minister of UP state in India this year. Both were disadvantaged in terms of their ethnicity or caste but their politics appealed to the majority of voters in their respective states. Both cases are a victory for the democratic process rather than anything else. The difference is that Mayawati is a liberal progressive politician while Jindal is not. Could both be a sign of changing times? Maybe in the future Indian Americans could play a more active role in American politics than do today; likewise Dalit politicians could become more powerful in India. Wishful thinking maybe but a sign of gradual change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jindal becoming governor of Louisiana reminds me in some ways to the Dalit leader Mayawati becoming chief minister of UP state in India this year. Both were disadvantaged in terms of their ethnicity or caste but their politics appealed to the majority of voters in their respective states. Both cases are a victory for the democratic process rather than anything else. The difference is that Mayawati is a liberal progressive politician while Jindal is not. Could both be a sign of changing times? Maybe in the future Indian Americans could play a more active role in American politics than do today; likewise Dalit politicians could become more powerful in India. Wishful thinking maybe but a sign of gradual change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85461</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85461</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re welcome to be as tribal as you want, but women are not a minority. I&#039;m not sure you can apply the &quot;under-priveleged&quot; accusation in such a blanket way either. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re welcome to be as tribal as you want, but women are not a minority. I&#8217;m not sure you can apply the &#8220;under-priveleged&#8221; accusation in such a blanket way either. <img src='http://www.pickledpolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85460</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85460</guid>
		<description>and if some people are going to be tribal, i think &quot;we&quot; can as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if some people are going to be tribal, i think &#8220;we&#8221; can as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85459</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85459</guid>
		<description>i hate to point out the obvious indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate to point out the obvious indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85458</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85458</guid>
		<description>duh sunny, we&#039;re still an underprivileged group thanks very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duh sunny, we&#8217;re still an underprivileged group thanks very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85457</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85457</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;so - personally id rather consider a vote for an old white man &lt;/em&gt;

This is a pejorative term in British politics. Ask Ming Campbell.

I think &#039;young, right-wing, skinny-ass Indian nutter&#039; should be one as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>so &#8211; personally id rather consider a vote for an old white man </em></p>
<p>This is a pejorative term in British politics. Ask Ming Campbell.</p>
<p>I think &#8216;young, right-wing, skinny-ass Indian nutter&#8217; should be one as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85455</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85455</guid>
		<description>Sonia - erm, women are not a minority. I hate to point out the obvious.

Fred - we&#039;re based in the UK, not America. 

Tim W. - good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia &#8211; erm, women are not a minority. I hate to point out the obvious.</p>
<p>Fred &#8211; we&#8217;re based in the UK, not America. </p>
<p>Tim W. &#8211; good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85449</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1467#comment-85449</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s right, listen to Fred. if they want to elect twerps, why should we care just cos it happens to be a twerp whose parents came from India. after all he&#039;s American, why should he be singled out for where his ancestors came from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s right, listen to Fred. if they want to elect twerps, why should we care just cos it happens to be a twerp whose parents came from India. after all he&#8217;s American, why should he be singled out for where his ancestors came from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

