<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The guilt-free liberal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popular Science</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-81321</link>
		<dc:creator>Popular Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-81321</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Popular Science...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Popular Science&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitamins Nutrition Supplements</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-80332</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitamins Nutrition Supplements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-80332</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Vitamins Nutrition Supplements...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vitamins Nutrition Supplements&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79426</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79426</guid>
		<description>True. I&#039;m utterly bored at work.

Its either come here, or work on a blog posting on why altriusm is dead, or why political parties are unacceptable manifestations of collectivism.

Sod it, these blog posts won&#039;t write themselves. Cheerio!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. I&#8217;m utterly bored at work.</p>
<p>Its either come here, or work on a blog posting on why altriusm is dead, or why political parties are unacceptable manifestations of collectivism.</p>
<p>Sod it, these blog posts won&#8217;t write themselves. Cheerio!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79425</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79425</guid>
		<description>&#039;I wonâ€™t be back here again except in exceptional circumstances&#039;

You have an odd idea of &#039;exceptional&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I wonâ€™t be back here again except in exceptional circumstances&#8217;</p>
<p>You have an odd idea of &#8216;exceptional&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79418</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79418</guid>
		<description>I love you too, Sid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you too, Sid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79416</guid>
		<description>Bananabrain,

&lt;blockquote&gt;hehe - â€œjoy in repetitionâ€ from â€œgraffiti bridgeâ€; in under 10 seconds, although youâ€™ve only got my word for it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Congratulations again, you are now officially a Purple Pimp, Player, and all-round New Jack Hustler. I&#039;m assuming you didn&#039;t cheat by googling the lyrics.....

Great song and one of my princely favourites, and brilliant guitar solo at the end. Very different from the &quot;pop&quot; stuff that he&#039;s more well-known for amongst the masses. I think that album&#039;s very underrated.

&lt;blockquote&gt;however, i doubt i could have done that on any album since about 1993 with the possible exception of â€œthe gold experienceâ€; certainly not anything since â€œchaos and disorderâ€.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed, I haven&#039;t actually bought any of his albums since The B-Sides back in the early/mid-90s. &quot;3121&quot; is apparently quite good, though.

&lt;blockquote&gt;i think iâ€™d have preferred the aftershow party; however, itâ€™s always worth seeing a truly fantastic band thatâ€™s that tight and that well rehearsed. plus maceo was leading the horn section.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I remember an &quot;Arena Special&quot; 90min/2hour (can&#039;t remember) documentary on Prince on the BBC in the early 90s which included a number of clips from his aftershow gigs -- lots of horns (Miles Davis, I think), songs originally by other artists such as the Rolling Stones, and so on. I have the programme buried away on one of my old VHS tapes somewhere, it was actually very good. Also included an excellent live bluesey clip of &quot;The Question of U&quot; from his 1990 tour. This was of course when Prince had a beard and was going through his &quot;I haven&#039;t had a haircut for about 2 years&quot; phase, which I thought was actually quite a cool look for him.

Lucky you for managing to get tickets for his current tour. I hear that he&#039;s basically got a different song lineup on every night of the tour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bananabrain,</p>
<blockquote><p>hehe &#8211; â€œjoy in repetitionâ€ from â€œgraffiti bridgeâ€; in under 10 seconds, although youâ€™ve only got my word for it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Congratulations again, you are now officially a Purple Pimp, Player, and all-round New Jack Hustler. I&#8217;m assuming you didn&#8217;t cheat by googling the lyrics&#8230;..</p>
<p>Great song and one of my princely favourites, and brilliant guitar solo at the end. Very different from the &#8220;pop&#8221; stuff that he&#8217;s more well-known for amongst the masses. I think that album&#8217;s very underrated.</p>
<blockquote><p>however, i doubt i could have done that on any album since about 1993 with the possible exception of â€œthe gold experienceâ€; certainly not anything since â€œchaos and disorderâ€.</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed, I haven&#8217;t actually bought any of his albums since The B-Sides back in the early/mid-90s. &#8220;3121&#8243; is apparently quite good, though.</p>
<blockquote><p>i think iâ€™d have preferred the aftershow party; however, itâ€™s always worth seeing a truly fantastic band thatâ€™s that tight and that well rehearsed. plus maceo was leading the horn section.</p></blockquote>
<p>I remember an &#8220;Arena Special&#8221; 90min/2hour (can&#8217;t remember) documentary on Prince on the BBC in the early 90s which included a number of clips from his aftershow gigs &#8212; lots of horns (Miles Davis, I think), songs originally by other artists such as the Rolling Stones, and so on. I have the programme buried away on one of my old VHS tapes somewhere, it was actually very good. Also included an excellent live bluesey clip of &#8220;The Question of U&#8221; from his 1990 tour. This was of course when Prince had a beard and was going through his &#8220;I haven&#8217;t had a haircut for about 2 years&#8221; phase, which I thought was actually quite a cool look for him.</p>
<p>Lucky you for managing to get tickets for his current tour. I hear that he&#8217;s basically got a different song lineup on every night of the tour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79381</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79381</guid>
		<description>My vitriol is an affectation, but in any case, I&#039;d rather be ideologically vitriolic than racially abusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vitriol is an affectation, but in any case, I&#8217;d rather be ideologically vitriolic than racially abusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79380</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79380</guid>
		<description>oh, i see what you mean. yes, that is rather puerile. i don&#039;t think i could describe anyone here in such terms - i mean, for all that i&#039;m not a lefty, people are at least polite when others are polite back. civility is a much missed thing on the web. however, i think if you and others were a bit less vitriolic the standard of debate would be a bit less, well, ideologically abusive. personally, i stick to the issues, i hope.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, i see what you mean. yes, that is rather puerile. i don&#8217;t think i could describe anyone here in such terms &#8211; i mean, for all that i&#8217;m not a lefty, people are at least polite when others are polite back. civility is a much missed thing on the web. however, i think if you and others were a bit less vitriolic the standard of debate would be a bit less, well, ideologically abusive. personally, i stick to the issues, i hope.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79378</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79378</guid>
		<description>No, Bleh is a silly gobshite who&#039;s ouput of peurile, bigotted, claptrap can be smelled from a mile away. Hence, his note in #1 referring to Mulsim posters here as &quot;ignorant worthless Taqiyya merchants&quot; is wholly characteristic of him and representative of the filth in the HP commentsbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Bleh is a silly gobshite who&#8217;s ouput of peurile, bigotted, claptrap can be smelled from a mile away. Hence, his note in #1 referring to Mulsim posters here as &#8220;ignorant worthless Taqiyya merchants&#8221; is wholly characteristic of him and representative of the filth in the HP commentsbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79376</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79376</guid>
		<description>right, now i see what you&#039;re all on about. however, i doubt that bleh is referring to this, any more than he is referring to churchill&#039;s exploits at the battle of omdurman, back when people used to refer to the sudanese as &quot;fuzzy-wuzzies&quot;. i think this is probably a reference to european appeasement of hitler - and, frankly, i think in many ways the jihadi attitude to the rest of the world is actually harder to defeat, not to mention virtually impossible to contain.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right, now i see what you&#8217;re all on about. however, i doubt that bleh is referring to this, any more than he is referring to churchill&#8217;s exploits at the battle of omdurman, back when people used to refer to the sudanese as &#8220;fuzzy-wuzzies&#8221;. i think this is probably a reference to european appeasement of hitler &#8211; and, frankly, i think in many ways the jihadi attitude to the rest of the world is actually harder to defeat, not to mention virtually impossible to contain.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79368</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79368</guid>
		<description>On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,939608,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gassing Arabs&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;Churchill was particularly keen on chemical weapons, suggesting they be used &quot;against recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment&quot;. He dismissed objections as &quot;unreasonable&quot;. &quot;I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes _ [to] spread a lively terror _&quot; In today&#039;s terms, &quot;the Arab&quot; needed to be shocked and awed. A good gassing might well do the job.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,939608,00.html" rel="nofollow">gassing Arabs</a>:</p>
<p><em>Churchill was particularly keen on chemical weapons, suggesting they be used &#8220;against recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment&#8221;. He dismissed objections as &#8220;unreasonable&#8221;. &#8220;I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes _ [to] spread a lively terror _&#8221; In today&#8217;s terms, &#8220;the Arab&#8221; needed to be shocked and awed. A good gassing might well do the job.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79365</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79365</guid>
		<description>From Geoff Simon&#039;s &#039;Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam&#039;, St. Martin&#039;s Press, 1994, referred to in &#039;British Use of Chemical Weapons in Iraq&#039;, on &lt;a href=&quot;http://iraqwar.org/chemical.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this site&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Churchill himself was keen to argue that gas, fired from ground-based guns or dropped from aircraft, would cause &#039;only discomfort or illness, but not death to dissident tribespeople&#039;...Wing-Commander Sir Arthur Harris...was happy to emphasise that &quot;The Arab &amp; Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties &amp; damage. Within 45 mins. a full-size village can be practically wiped out &amp; a third of its inhabitants killed or injured&quot;...The ministry drew up a list of possible weapons, some of them the forerunners of napalm &amp; air-to-air ground missiles:
Phosphorus bombs, war rockets, metal crowsfeet (to maim livestock), man-killing shrapnel, liquid fire, delay-action bombs. Many of these weapons were first used in Kurdistan.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Geoff Simon&#8217;s &#8216;Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam&#8217;, St. Martin&#8217;s Press, 1994, referred to in &#8216;British Use of Chemical Weapons in Iraq&#8217;, on <a href="http://iraqwar.org/chemical.htm" rel="nofollow">this site</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Churchill himself was keen to argue that gas, fired from ground-based guns or dropped from aircraft, would cause &#8216;only discomfort or illness, but not death to dissident tribespeople&#8217;&#8230;Wing-Commander Sir Arthur Harris&#8230;was happy to emphasise that &#8220;The Arab &amp; Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties &amp; damage. Within 45 mins. a full-size village can be practically wiped out &amp; a third of its inhabitants killed or injured&#8221;&#8230;The ministry drew up a list of possible weapons, some of them the forerunners of napalm &amp; air-to-air ground missiles:<br />
Phosphorus bombs, war rockets, metal crowsfeet (to maim livestock), man-killing shrapnel, liquid fire, delay-action bombs. Many of these weapons were first used in Kurdistan.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79362</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79362</guid>
		<description>in which case, don, the word &quot;gasser&quot; is entirely misleading - tear gas, however unpleasant, is not at all to be compared to mustard gas or indeed to cyanide.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in which case, don, the word &#8220;gasser&#8221; is entirely misleading &#8211; tear gas, however unpleasant, is not at all to be compared to mustard gas or indeed to cyanide.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79338</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79338</guid>
		<description>Bleh, I know I&#039;ve been away, but if you&#039;re gonna get on your Himalayan horse and make a grand farewell speech and lambaste everyone, could you at least throw some shit my way. I&#039;ve never been so insulted in my life!

Groupthink indeed -- what tosh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bleh, I know I&#8217;ve been away, but if you&#8217;re gonna get on your Himalayan horse and make a grand farewell speech and lambaste everyone, could you at least throw some shit my way. I&#8217;ve never been so insulted in my life!</p>
<p>Groupthink indeed &#8212; what tosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79333</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79333</guid>
		<description>Stick around Morgy, I think you&#039;d make this place very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick around Morgy, I think you&#8217;d make this place very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79331</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79331</guid>
		<description>B&#039;brain,

I don&#039;t know where 1933 comes into it, but I suspect Sid is thinking of Churchill&#039;s 1919 statement;

In a War Office minute of 12 May 1919, Winston Churchill argued for the use of tear gas: &quot;I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas. I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.&quot;

He was, I think, talking of the Kurds at the time. I am not aware that any such action was taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B&#8217;brain,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where 1933 comes into it, but I suspect Sid is thinking of Churchill&#8217;s 1919 statement;</p>
<p>In a War Office minute of 12 May 1919, Winston Churchill argued for the use of tear gas: &#8220;I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas. I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.&#8221;</p>
<p>He was, I think, talking of the Kurds at the time. I am not aware that any such action was taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79329</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79329</guid>
		<description>Well, one has to laugh at Sunny claiming false victory (again), but thank you for the comments, one and all, even you, Sid. 

I won&#039;t be back here again except in exceptional circumstances, but I do reserve the right to comment on various postings here over at my own blog - I&#039;ve started blogging on an anti-collectivist theme over at &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://misanthropy101.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Diabolique&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, one has to laugh at Sunny claiming false victory (again), but thank you for the comments, one and all, even you, Sid. </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be back here again except in exceptional circumstances, but I do reserve the right to comment on various postings here over at my own blog &#8211; I&#8217;ve started blogging on an anti-collectivist theme over at <a HREF="http://misanthropy101.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Diabolique</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79317</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79317</guid>
		<description>hehe - &quot;joy in repetition&quot; from &quot;graffiti bridge&quot;; in under 10 seconds, although you&#039;ve only got my word for it.

however, i doubt i could have done that on any album since about 1993 with the possible exception of &quot;the gold experience&quot;; certainly not anything since &quot;chaos and disorder&quot;.

he was great, actually, although it was a &quot;greatest hits&quot; show and i think i&#039;d have preferred the aftershow party; however, it&#039;s always worth seeing a truly fantastic band that&#039;s that tight and that well rehearsed. plus maceo was leading the horn section.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe &#8211; &#8220;joy in repetition&#8221; from &#8220;graffiti bridge&#8221;; in under 10 seconds, although you&#8217;ve only got my word for it.</p>
<p>however, i doubt i could have done that on any album since about 1993 with the possible exception of &#8220;the gold experience&#8221;; certainly not anything since &#8220;chaos and disorder&#8221;.</p>
<p>he was great, actually, although it was a &#8220;greatest hits&#8221; show and i think i&#8217;d have preferred the aftershow party; however, it&#8217;s always worth seeing a truly fantastic band that&#8217;s that tight and that well rehearsed. plus maceo was leading the horn section.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79312</guid>
		<description>Bananabrain,

&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œcreamâ€, from â€œdiamonds and pearlsâ€ of course.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very good ! Well done. Just for that, you get a free roll in the hay with Sid.

And I hope that seeing the great man at the O2 lived up to everyone&#039;s expectations.

Here&#039;s another one to see exactly how much of a purple gangster you really are:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Pimps and thangs like to hang outside and cuss for kicks; Talking to no-one in particular, they say &quot;The baddest I am tonight&quot;.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;


Anyone able to name the song and the album is a true Prince player as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bananabrain,</p>
<blockquote><p>â€œcreamâ€, from â€œdiamonds and pearlsâ€ of course.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very good ! Well done. Just for that, you get a free roll in the hay with Sid.</p>
<p>And I hope that seeing the great man at the O2 lived up to everyone&#8217;s expectations.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another one to see exactly how much of a purple gangster you really are:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Pimps and thangs like to hang outside and cuss for kicks; Talking to no-one in particular, they say &#8220;The baddest I am tonight&#8221;.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Anyone able to name the song and the album is a true Prince player as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79298</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1353#comment-79298</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In other words, he fancies himself as an Arab gasser.&lt;/i&gt;

eh?

and, jagdeep, whether prince is kosher or not would depend on how he was killed.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In other words, he fancies himself as an Arab gasser.</i></p>
<p>eh?</p>
<p>and, jagdeep, whether prince is kosher or not would depend on how he was killed.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

