<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new point of Apu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72287</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72287</guid>
		<description>&quot;Their race indicates nothing of their understanding of Indian culture. It is an assumption to think all Asian people will understand Asian culture.&quot;

good one rohin.  and i would say its a racist assumption to boot. kind of like someone saying oh you&#039;re not white so you wouldn&#039;t understand. boy that would really piss so many people off! ( and did in the past of course when it was used widely, &#039;white&#039; civilisation - remember that one?!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Their race indicates nothing of their understanding of Indian culture. It is an assumption to think all Asian people will understand Asian culture.&#8221;</p>
<p>good one rohin.  and i would say its a racist assumption to boot. kind of like someone saying oh you&#8217;re not white so you wouldn&#8217;t understand. boy that would really piss so many people off! ( and did in the past of course when it was used widely, &#8216;white&#8217; civilisation &#8211; remember that one?!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72284</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72284</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Zeno&lt;/b&gt;, you have said a few different things in your debate with fr0y but I think what fr0y meant was that the difference between a white person putting on a silly Indian accent and a brown person doing it is artificial. At least, thatâ€™s what I feel. I simply tried to say that there is no inherent reason that just because a person is brown they are â€˜allowedâ€™ to do a silly accent.

Their race indicates nothing of their understanding of Indian culture. It is an assumption to think all Asian people will understand Asian culture.

&lt;b&gt;dearieme&lt;/b&gt;, not at all. I SPECIFICALLY mean American society and NOT â€˜some Americansâ€™. If you are saying that there are just â€˜some Americansâ€™ that make fun of Indians then so what, we have that in the UK too. The very linchpin of why I empathise with Indian Americans who dislike Apu is based on the fact American Society is, as a whole, racist. Thatâ€™s what I hear.

Itâ€™s not excused by Indians being less visible in America than here â€“ the message I take out of that is that America is racist. If it isnâ€™t (which Iâ€™m equally willing to believe) then I canâ€™t acknowledge many of the criticisms of Apu.

 &lt;b&gt;Kismet&lt;/b&gt;, I actually deleted a para from the piece about Rory Bremner doing Trevor McDonald (stop it) and no one finding that racist. Heâ€™s poking fun at the man, but because his accent is â€˜done wellâ€™ people are appeased. If Bremner was a bad impersonator, that would suddenly make him racist in the eyes of those who donâ€™t like a white man voicing Apu.

&lt;b&gt;Mala&lt;/b&gt;, thanks for your comments. One line resonated â€œMaybe Iâ€™m a bad Indian-American because I didnâ€™t ask if they felt oppressed?â€ This is something I have felt uncomfortable about with this whole issue. I got the impression that those that &lt;i&gt;werenâ€™t&lt;/i&gt; offended by Apu were somehow sell-outs. It smacked of a condescending attitude that weâ€™re not â€˜real Indiansâ€™ or something.

&lt;b&gt;zucchini&lt;/b&gt;, you touch on an important point. People moan that Apu is an unethical Indian, but heâ€™s just an unethical shopkeeper. People create false links. Sure, itâ€™s his overall character that counts â€“ but by that token no one can argue Apu is a bad guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Zeno</b>, you have said a few different things in your debate with fr0y but I think what fr0y meant was that the difference between a white person putting on a silly Indian accent and a brown person doing it is artificial. At least, thatâ€™s what I feel. I simply tried to say that there is no inherent reason that just because a person is brown they are â€˜allowedâ€™ to do a silly accent.</p>
<p>Their race indicates nothing of their understanding of Indian culture. It is an assumption to think all Asian people will understand Asian culture.</p>
<p><b>dearieme</b>, not at all. I SPECIFICALLY mean American society and NOT â€˜some Americansâ€™. If you are saying that there are just â€˜some Americansâ€™ that make fun of Indians then so what, we have that in the UK too. The very linchpin of why I empathise with Indian Americans who dislike Apu is based on the fact American Society is, as a whole, racist. Thatâ€™s what I hear.</p>
<p>Itâ€™s not excused by Indians being less visible in America than here â€“ the message I take out of that is that America is racist. If it isnâ€™t (which Iâ€™m equally willing to believe) then I canâ€™t acknowledge many of the criticisms of Apu.</p>
<p> <b>Kismet</b>, I actually deleted a para from the piece about Rory Bremner doing Trevor McDonald (stop it) and no one finding that racist. Heâ€™s poking fun at the man, but because his accent is â€˜done wellâ€™ people are appeased. If Bremner was a bad impersonator, that would suddenly make him racist in the eyes of those who donâ€™t like a white man voicing Apu.</p>
<p><b>Mala</b>, thanks for your comments. One line resonated â€œMaybe Iâ€™m a bad Indian-American because I didnâ€™t ask if they felt oppressed?â€ This is something I have felt uncomfortable about with this whole issue. I got the impression that those that <i>werenâ€™t</i> offended by Apu were somehow sell-outs. It smacked of a condescending attitude that weâ€™re not â€˜real Indiansâ€™ or something.</p>
<p><b>zucchini</b>, you touch on an important point. People moan that Apu is an unethical Indian, but heâ€™s just an unethical shopkeeper. People create false links. Sure, itâ€™s his overall character that counts â€“ but by that token no one can argue Apu is a bad guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kulvinder</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72224</link>
		<dc:creator>Kulvinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72224</guid>
		<description>Katy&#039;s drunk with troll function power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katy&#8217;s drunk with troll function power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preet</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72184</link>
		<dc:creator>Preet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72184</guid>
		<description>Get your own avatar here: http://www.simpsonsmovie.com/main.html

You have to do your own funny voice though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get your own avatar here: <a href="http://www.simpsonsmovie.com/main.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.simpsonsmovie.com/main.html</a></p>
<p>You have to do your own funny voice though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zucchini</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72183</link>
		<dc:creator>zucchini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72183</guid>
		<description>Following my recent, possibly inflamatory posts (I flatter myself) about Bernard Manning - I tried to figure out why I did&#039;nt find Apu offensive as far as being a negative stereotype of Asians, as has been inferred here elsewhere..

First off, his surname seems like a piss-take of long South Indian names and as a South Indian you&#039;d expect me to be offended - not really, if you break the name down, yes...it SORT of sounds like an unpronounceable name, but it&#039;s gobbledegook...and funny with it.

In some ways there is little to separate Apu &amp; Manning (WHAT ! you say) - they both, as characters, don&#039;t give a f*ck - Apu drops a weiner on the floor and has no qualms about selling it - but why should this be appealing or funny ?

I like Apu simply because, unlike most Asians who live abroad, he does&#039;nt seek validation for his actions, right or wrong, from the host community - his sole aim is to make a living, not be an apu-logist (sorry) for being an Indian or cry for special treatment.

One problem we face as a community, and as artists, is this need for validation from non-asians, which I think is a post imperialist hang over.

I was in Cannes recently and attended a seminar held by various members of the Indian film community to discuss why there were hardly any films from India in competition, and by the end there was this feeling that although by &quot;Western&quot; film critic standards, most Hindi cinema is unwatchable tosh, you can&#039;t simply sweep it aside as invalid - whatever you may think about its merits or de-merits, it should be seen for what it is, not from the stand point of someone elses critical benchmarks.

So in short, we should just do our stuff and not worry too much about how it might seem to others - as far as Apu is concerned , the genius of the Simpsons is that he just seems a stereotype in a medium which is concerned with stereotypes in a kind of fantasy version of reality (TV Land), but actually he isn&#039;t one at all...he&#039;s just Apu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following my recent, possibly inflamatory posts (I flatter myself) about Bernard Manning &#8211; I tried to figure out why I did&#8217;nt find Apu offensive as far as being a negative stereotype of Asians, as has been inferred here elsewhere..</p>
<p>First off, his surname seems like a piss-take of long South Indian names and as a South Indian you&#8217;d expect me to be offended &#8211; not really, if you break the name down, yes&#8230;it SORT of sounds like an unpronounceable name, but it&#8217;s gobbledegook&#8230;and funny with it.</p>
<p>In some ways there is little to separate Apu &amp; Manning (WHAT ! you say) &#8211; they both, as characters, don&#8217;t give a f*ck &#8211; Apu drops a weiner on the floor and has no qualms about selling it &#8211; but why should this be appealing or funny ?</p>
<p>I like Apu simply because, unlike most Asians who live abroad, he does&#8217;nt seek validation for his actions, right or wrong, from the host community &#8211; his sole aim is to make a living, not be an apu-logist (sorry) for being an Indian or cry for special treatment.</p>
<p>One problem we face as a community, and as artists, is this need for validation from non-asians, which I think is a post imperialist hang over.</p>
<p>I was in Cannes recently and attended a seminar held by various members of the Indian film community to discuss why there were hardly any films from India in competition, and by the end there was this feeling that although by &#8220;Western&#8221; film critic standards, most Hindi cinema is unwatchable tosh, you can&#8217;t simply sweep it aside as invalid &#8211; whatever you may think about its merits or de-merits, it should be seen for what it is, not from the stand point of someone elses critical benchmarks.</p>
<p>So in short, we should just do our stuff and not worry too much about how it might seem to others &#8211; as far as Apu is concerned , the genius of the Simpsons is that he just seems a stereotype in a medium which is concerned with stereotypes in a kind of fantasy version of reality (TV Land), but actually he isn&#8217;t one at all&#8230;he&#8217;s just Apu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72181</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72181</guid>
		<description>I agree with all the even numbered posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all the even numbered posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72180</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72180</guid>
		<description>I agree cent for cent with Sid in post #21

Justforfun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree cent for cent with Sid in post #21</p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72179</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72179</guid>
		<description>What I want to know is, how did Rohin get a Simpsons caricature of himself made? HAs anyone see the alt-text on that image? The cheek!

I want one! *stamps foot*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is, how did Rohin get a Simpsons caricature of himself made? HAs anyone see the alt-text on that image? The cheek!</p>
<p>I want one! *stamps foot*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72175</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72175</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with what Kismet said in post #14.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with what Kismet said in post #14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72174</guid>
		<description>Not much to add at this point, apart from the fact that I agree 100% with what Jagdeep said in post #13.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much to add at this point, apart from the fact that I agree 100% with what Jagdeep said in post #13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72168</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72168</guid>
		<description>*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72166</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72166</guid>
		<description>yes - and what Sid said as well !

Justforfun

Now I feel much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes &#8211; and what Sid said as well !</p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
<p>Now I feel much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72165</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72165</guid>
		<description>Now look here.  

I have let you all play with your vowels because I trusted you to be mature and sensible and nice to each other.  But I &lt;b&gt;will not hesitate&lt;/b&gt; to take your vowels AWAY if you cannot play nicely with them.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now look here.  </p>
<p>I have let you all play with your vowels because I trusted you to be mature and sensible and nice to each other.  But I <b>will not hesitate</b> to take your vowels AWAY if you cannot play nicely with them.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72161</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72161</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Get a grip - and be thankful that youâ€™re not still in India and that the Red Indians were so decimated that they canâ€™t kick you into the sea.&lt;/em&gt;

?

yeah and you can be thankful you&#039;re still not eating boiled grass your peers shovelled out to you and you&#039;re not wiping your ass on your own furniture. That and bathrooms and bathing in general. harrrrumph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Get a grip &#8211; and be thankful that youâ€™re not still in India and that the Red Indians were so decimated that they canâ€™t kick you into the sea.</em></p>
<p>?</p>
<p>yeah and you can be thankful you&#8217;re still not eating boiled grass your peers shovelled out to you and you&#8217;re not wiping your ass on your own furniture. That and bathrooms and bathing in general. harrrrumph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justforfun</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72160</link>
		<dc:creator>justforfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72160</guid>
		<description>Ah - yes - &quot;It ain&#039;t half hot mum&quot; - the forgotten battle against those shifty slanty eyed little nips. Now they really are yellow people.

Now - How do I disenvowel myself? or commit hr kr

Seriously - is this an issue of the colour of ones skin or is it really just an issue of aggrieved entitlement to a  &#039;parity of respect&#039;

Why a Indian - Americans get upset that another bunch of hyphenated - Americans are making fun of them , when they are the first to bleat on about colonialism and the suffering under the Anglo-saxon colonialism - but seem quite happy to catch ride on the tailcoat of the Anglo-Saxon colonialism of the American continent.  Give or take a 100 years the timescale for the Anglo-Saxons in India,  is the same for the Anglo-Saxons in America.  The Anglo-saxons left India , but will they leave America?

Summary - 
So being on the receiving end of colonialism is BAD. Being on the giving end is GOOD.
Being on the giving end when others on the giving end are making fun of you is BAD.

Parity of respect is all that self professed victims  demand -  I love the that phrase.    

Boo Hooo -  One set of thieves upset that others in the gang are laughing at them - I weep for them.

Get a grip - and be thankful that you&#039;re not still in India and that the Red Indians were so decimated that they can&#039;t kick you into the sea.


Justforfun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah &#8211; yes &#8211; &#8220;It ain&#8217;t half hot mum&#8221; &#8211; the forgotten battle against those shifty slanty eyed little nips. Now they really are yellow people.</p>
<p>Now &#8211; How do I disenvowel myself? or commit hr kr</p>
<p>Seriously &#8211; is this an issue of the colour of ones skin or is it really just an issue of aggrieved entitlement to a  &#8216;parity of respect&#8217;</p>
<p>Why a Indian &#8211; Americans get upset that another bunch of hyphenated &#8211; Americans are making fun of them , when they are the first to bleat on about colonialism and the suffering under the Anglo-saxon colonialism &#8211; but seem quite happy to catch ride on the tailcoat of the Anglo-Saxon colonialism of the American continent.  Give or take a 100 years the timescale for the Anglo-Saxons in India,  is the same for the Anglo-Saxons in America.  The Anglo-saxons left India , but will they leave America?</p>
<p>Summary &#8211;<br />
So being on the receiving end of colonialism is BAD. Being on the giving end is GOOD.<br />
Being on the giving end when others on the giving end are making fun of you is BAD.</p>
<p>Parity of respect is all that self professed victims  demand &#8211;  I love the that phrase.    </p>
<p>Boo Hooo &#8211;  One set of thieves upset that others in the gang are laughing at them &#8211; I weep for them.</p>
<p>Get a grip &#8211; and be thankful that you&#8217;re not still in India and that the Red Indians were so decimated that they can&#8217;t kick you into the sea.</p>
<p>Justforfun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funkg</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72157</link>
		<dc:creator>funkg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72157</guid>
		<description>In my opinion Asians in Britain are much more entrenched into UK culture, mainly because of colonialism and early immigration.  Britain is a far smaller country so demographically, would have a greater impact.  I donâ€™t have to go into the whole chicken masala thing.  but in my opinion Indian Americans/Asians donâ€™t as yet have the same cultural impact as African/Irish Hispanic Americans.  Im sure they will very very soon. One thing I have seen change in the UK is perceptions of Asians.  When I grew up no one feared Asians, now especially where I work you canâ€™t mess with the Asian youth gangs on the streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion Asians in Britain are much more entrenched into UK culture, mainly because of colonialism and early immigration.  Britain is a far smaller country so demographically, would have a greater impact.  I donâ€™t have to go into the whole chicken masala thing.  but in my opinion Indian Americans/Asians donâ€™t as yet have the same cultural impact as African/Irish Hispanic Americans.  Im sure they will very very soon. One thing I have seen change in the UK is perceptions of Asians.  When I grew up no one feared Asians, now especially where I work you canâ€™t mess with the Asian youth gangs on the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fr0y</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72156</link>
		<dc:creator>fr0y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72156</guid>
		<description>Sorry for previous waffle!
I said:
&quot;either mockery of an accent is acceptable in ALL cases, or it is unacceptable in ALL cases.&quot;

Sorry this is not quite how I meant to word this and ignores the context of any given situation. I, for example remember gently taking the mick out of a Sri Lankan friend on the basis of his accent as he had previously taken the mick out of my &quot;skinny white-boy glow in the dark legs!&quot;. I also remember having to-and-fro banter with a friend from Leeds on the basis of her northern tongue and my posh plummy accent.
Is either of these examples more or less offensive than the other?
Sorry to harp on about this but I truly feel that mockery of a person&#039;s accent should not automatically be considered racist unless it is further backed up by racist sentiment. I would consider mocking the accent of someone I did not know offensive no matter the colour of their skin. If the mockery is followed up with further vehemence and violence then this is equally abhorrent regardless of the colour of the victim&#039;s skin.
The Simpsons makes jokes about a huge number groups of people based on race, occupation, social status, religious beliefs and many more but they are just jokes. It is my genuine opinion that none of these jokes are in themselves hugely offensive and the reason an Indian will take more offense than a Scotsman is simply because there is more of an underlying racist sentiment against Indians in America than against the Scottish in America. This however reflects only on American society and not on the acceptability of the jokes in the Simpsons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for previous waffle!<br />
I said:<br />
&#8220;either mockery of an accent is acceptable in ALL cases, or it is unacceptable in ALL cases.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry this is not quite how I meant to word this and ignores the context of any given situation. I, for example remember gently taking the mick out of a Sri Lankan friend on the basis of his accent as he had previously taken the mick out of my &#8220;skinny white-boy glow in the dark legs!&#8221;. I also remember having to-and-fro banter with a friend from Leeds on the basis of her northern tongue and my posh plummy accent.<br />
Is either of these examples more or less offensive than the other?<br />
Sorry to harp on about this but I truly feel that mockery of a person&#8217;s accent should not automatically be considered racist unless it is further backed up by racist sentiment. I would consider mocking the accent of someone I did not know offensive no matter the colour of their skin. If the mockery is followed up with further vehemence and violence then this is equally abhorrent regardless of the colour of the victim&#8217;s skin.<br />
The Simpsons makes jokes about a huge number groups of people based on race, occupation, social status, religious beliefs and many more but they are just jokes. It is my genuine opinion that none of these jokes are in themselves hugely offensive and the reason an Indian will take more offense than a Scotsman is simply because there is more of an underlying racist sentiment against Indians in America than against the Scottish in America. This however reflects only on American society and not on the acceptability of the jokes in the Simpsons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72148</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72148</guid>
		<description>Its only a cartoon, boys and girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its only a cartoon, boys and girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fr0y</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72147</link>
		<dc:creator>fr0y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72147</guid>
		<description>Zeno
Now hold on there Zeno, I fail to see how you are jumping to the conclusion that I am trying to justify racist abuse. I assure you I am not, I am merely questioning the difference between a Scouser making fun of a Brummie accent and a white-American making fun of an Indian accent. You are now shifting the goalposts somewhat by adding racist violence and murder to your initial example of mockery of an accent, is this not itself a false comparison of magnitude? I couldnâ€™t possibly and wouldnâ€™t conceive of trying to justify violence and murder, racist or otherwise! I still do not see the fundamental difference between mocking a Brummie accent and an Indian accent, surely making fun of a personâ€™s accent is (or should be) equally insulting no matter what the accent is? If a violent or murderous act is then perpetrated against either the Brummie or the Indian this then becomes a whole different issue in terms of magnitude! I truly feel your comparison is now in fact a dangerous false comparison of magnitude, please do not equate a slur on the basis of accent with racial violence.
I apologise if my example of Willie has distracted from the original debate here and I would like to make it clear once more that I am not equating that with racist violence perpetrated against Indians in America â€“ how could I? However I feel my original point is valid, either mockery of an accent (be it Indian, Scottish or Brummie) is acceptable in ALL cases, or it is unacceptable in ALL cases.
Regarding the Scottish character, firstly, how many Scottish people live in America compared to Indians? However, I will concede that this is largely irrelevant and that were the Scottish population equal in size to the Indian, the Indian population is likely still to receive greater levels of racist mockery, violence or murder than the Scottish. Unfortunately a minority (we hope) will always look to lash out on those different to themselves and by far the easiest basis on which to do this is skin colour. It was never my intention to equate mockery of an accent with violence and in fact I never did.
We are completely in agreement that as you put it; â€œthe Apu caricature has become a basic staple in the repertoire of white racists to use against Indians in Americaâ€ and this is of course highly regrettable and any use of Apuâ€™s â€œcatchphrasesâ€ as a tool to cause offence should be regarded as unacceptable. However, do you not accept that the people who would use Apu in this way would and will use each and any other similar TV or film character in the same way whether or not Apu had ever existed. If we can accept that, should we not realise that the issue should not be the characters themselves (unless the nature of the character in itself causes racist offence ala Bernard Manning) but peopleâ€™s reactions to them. More specifically should we not have a problem with the racists who would use Apu for their ignorant ends rather than with Apu himself. Eradicating or dumbing down the characters will not stop racist abuse. Granted it may remove ammunition from their racist armory but unfortunately they will I am sure find alternatives. I take your point that Apu has become the foremost icon of racist abuse against Indians in America but I cannot agree that this abuse would not exist if Apu did not exist. I am starting to think that this debate on Apu is distracting from what the real issue should be; that racism (based on accent, origin or race) is unacceptable. Even if we eradicated every single possible character or media figure that could be used as fodder for racists, racism would still exist, like it or not.
Perhaps if I knew you better and indeed you knew me I would find your suggestion that I am trying to justify racism extremely offensive (maybe even odious) but I donâ€™t and you donâ€™t so I wonâ€™t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeno<br />
Now hold on there Zeno, I fail to see how you are jumping to the conclusion that I am trying to justify racist abuse. I assure you I am not, I am merely questioning the difference between a Scouser making fun of a Brummie accent and a white-American making fun of an Indian accent. You are now shifting the goalposts somewhat by adding racist violence and murder to your initial example of mockery of an accent, is this not itself a false comparison of magnitude? I couldnâ€™t possibly and wouldnâ€™t conceive of trying to justify violence and murder, racist or otherwise! I still do not see the fundamental difference between mocking a Brummie accent and an Indian accent, surely making fun of a personâ€™s accent is (or should be) equally insulting no matter what the accent is? If a violent or murderous act is then perpetrated against either the Brummie or the Indian this then becomes a whole different issue in terms of magnitude! I truly feel your comparison is now in fact a dangerous false comparison of magnitude, please do not equate a slur on the basis of accent with racial violence.<br />
I apologise if my example of Willie has distracted from the original debate here and I would like to make it clear once more that I am not equating that with racist violence perpetrated against Indians in America â€“ how could I? However I feel my original point is valid, either mockery of an accent (be it Indian, Scottish or Brummie) is acceptable in ALL cases, or it is unacceptable in ALL cases.<br />
Regarding the Scottish character, firstly, how many Scottish people live in America compared to Indians? However, I will concede that this is largely irrelevant and that were the Scottish population equal in size to the Indian, the Indian population is likely still to receive greater levels of racist mockery, violence or murder than the Scottish. Unfortunately a minority (we hope) will always look to lash out on those different to themselves and by far the easiest basis on which to do this is skin colour. It was never my intention to equate mockery of an accent with violence and in fact I never did.<br />
We are completely in agreement that as you put it; â€œthe Apu caricature has become a basic staple in the repertoire of white racists to use against Indians in Americaâ€ and this is of course highly regrettable and any use of Apuâ€™s â€œcatchphrasesâ€ as a tool to cause offence should be regarded as unacceptable. However, do you not accept that the people who would use Apu in this way would and will use each and any other similar TV or film character in the same way whether or not Apu had ever existed. If we can accept that, should we not realise that the issue should not be the characters themselves (unless the nature of the character in itself causes racist offence ala Bernard Manning) but peopleâ€™s reactions to them. More specifically should we not have a problem with the racists who would use Apu for their ignorant ends rather than with Apu himself. Eradicating or dumbing down the characters will not stop racist abuse. Granted it may remove ammunition from their racist armory but unfortunately they will I am sure find alternatives. I take your point that Apu has become the foremost icon of racist abuse against Indians in America but I cannot agree that this abuse would not exist if Apu did not exist. I am starting to think that this debate on Apu is distracting from what the real issue should be; that racism (based on accent, origin or race) is unacceptable. Even if we eradicated every single possible character or media figure that could be used as fodder for racists, racism would still exist, like it or not.<br />
Perhaps if I knew you better and indeed you knew me I would find your suggestion that I am trying to justify racism extremely offensive (maybe even odious) but I donâ€™t and you donâ€™t so I wonâ€™t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagdeep</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1253#comment-72140</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I canâ€™t believe anyone has not mentioned It Ainâ€™t Half Hot Mum&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I did mention 1970&#039;s sitcoms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I canâ€™t believe anyone has not mentioned It Ainâ€™t Half Hot Mum</p></blockquote>
<p>I did mention 1970&#8242;s sitcoms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

