<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These people are meant to be intelligent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amrit</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68087</link>
		<dc:creator>Amrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68087</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;m sorry, but Jean-Luc Gascard, you are quite clearly taking the p, by pretending to be a French stereotype.

Forget sending people to Australia for failing the test, programmes like a &#039;A Place In The Sun&#039; are already doing it!

If I failed, I would want to go to New Zealand.

Sunny&#039;s language, restrained though it was, still made me laugh my head off. Sarah Standing is indeed an airhead... and what the hell is Fraser Nelson on about??!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;m sorry, but Jean-Luc Gascard, you are quite clearly taking the p, by pretending to be a French stereotype.</p>
<p>Forget sending people to Australia for failing the test, programmes like a &#8216;A Place In The Sun&#8217; are already doing it!</p>
<p>If I failed, I would want to go to New Zealand.</p>
<p>Sunny&#8217;s language, restrained though it was, still made me laugh my head off. Sarah Standing is indeed an airhead&#8230; and what the hell is Fraser Nelson on about??!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68048</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68048</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I think people who fail the citizenship test should be sent to Australia.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nobody deserves that fate, whatever their crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think people who fail the citizenship test should be sent to Australia.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Nobody deserves that fate, whatever their crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Luc Gascard</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68047</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Luc Gascard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68047</guid>
		<description>I think people who fail the citizenship test should be sent to Australia.

Sarah Standing is correct. No? It is the black man and woman who needs to, how do you say, acculturise his or herself to our way of life. No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people who fail the citizenship test should be sent to Australia.</p>
<p>Sarah Standing is correct. No? It is the black man and woman who needs to, how do you say, acculturise his or herself to our way of life. No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumbold</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68046</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumbold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68046</guid>
		<description>This sort of thing gives conservatives a bad name. The demonization of illegal immigrants benefits no-one aside from the BNP, and Sarah Standing would be better off campaigning for illegal immigrants to be allowed to work while their claims are being processed, in order so they have something to do and feel part of society.

I remember when Sarah Standing used to write for the Daily Telegraph; she wrote in the Weekend section on fashion. Says it all really. Every article would carry a big picture of her, presumably demanded by the author herself. The Spectator does have good articles now and then, but it is really going downhill. Some of its jokes are quite funny though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of thing gives conservatives a bad name. The demonization of illegal immigrants benefits no-one aside from the BNP, and Sarah Standing would be better off campaigning for illegal immigrants to be allowed to work while their claims are being processed, in order so they have something to do and feel part of society.</p>
<p>I remember when Sarah Standing used to write for the Daily Telegraph; she wrote in the Weekend section on fashion. Says it all really. Every article would carry a big picture of her, presumably demanded by the author herself. The Spectator does have good articles now and then, but it is really going downhill. Some of its jokes are quite funny though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68045</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68045</guid>
		<description>Yep, written by one David Cameron...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, written by one David Cameron&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68038</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68038</guid>
		<description>A little scratching and it&#039;s all under the surface. I mean, how can we forget the Tory&#039;s 2005 &lt;a&gt;Election Campaign&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little scratching and it&#8217;s all under the surface. I mean, how can we forget the Tory&#8217;s 2005 <a>Election Campaign</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68037</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68037</guid>
		<description>Tim, my point here is about employment rights, as is the point Sarah Sands is making. To say that they&#039;ll be celebrating holidays, when most of them work in appaling conditions BECAUSE they are illegal, is downright idiotic. It&#039;s becming the the typical Tory reaction to anything - blame illegal immigrants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, my point here is about employment rights, as is the point Sarah Sands is making. To say that they&#8217;ll be celebrating holidays, when most of them work in appaling conditions BECAUSE they are illegal, is downright idiotic. It&#8217;s becming the the typical Tory reaction to anything &#8211; blame illegal immigrants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68032</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68032</guid>
		<description>i wish the test had some fun questions on it though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish the test had some fun questions on it though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68030</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68030</guid>
		<description>the mock-up is way less pernickety than the real one -and uses &#039;common sense&#039;.  not many people (without mugging up the book) would get a pass to be honest - and i include myself, if you get about 7 questions wrong, you fail. and out of the 24 questions on the test, about 8 are about nitty gritty that you simply would have had to have memorised/or have an incredibly accurate memory. ah well. 

still - all very useful information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the mock-up is way less pernickety than the real one -and uses &#8216;common sense&#8217;.  not many people (without mugging up the book) would get a pass to be honest &#8211; and i include myself, if you get about 7 questions wrong, you fail. and out of the 24 questions on the test, about 8 are about nitty gritty that you simply would have had to have memorised/or have an incredibly accurate memory. ah well. </p>
<p>still &#8211; all very useful information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68027</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68027</guid>
		<description>Sonia,

If this mock up is accurate I would, in fact, have narrowly failed (10 out of 14).


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4099770.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia,</p>
<p>If this mock up is accurate I would, in fact, have narrowly failed (10 out of 14).</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4099770.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4099770.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duc De Nemours</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68026</link>
		<dc:creator>Duc De Nemours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68026</guid>
		<description>Sonia

I know all this, so basically he&#039;s complaining about Sunny&#039;s loose language.

Fair enough then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonia</p>
<p>I know all this, so basically he&#8217;s complaining about Sunny&#8217;s loose language.</p>
<p>Fair enough then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68025</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68025</guid>
		<description>the use of the term migrant is in itself funny and harks back from an old age. How many people consider Brits going to work in a restaurant or a bar in Greece or Australia &#039;migrants&#039;? not many thats for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the use of the term migrant is in itself funny and harks back from an old age. How many people consider Brits going to work in a restaurant or a bar in Greece or Australia &#8216;migrants&#8217;? not many thats for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68022</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68022</guid>
		<description>Tim may have a point, but it is a rather narrow one.

I didn&#039;t have a problem reading the sentence as â€œIllegal immigrants donâ€™t have any legal (employment) rights if they work because they are illegal.â€

Of course they are entitled to protection of the law over murder, theft and rape, although in reality that protection might well be less effective because of their status and the fear and concealment it engenders.

Regarding the Greek workers, the error there was the Observer&#039;s, which failed to distinguish between legal and illegal workers; 
&#039;...illegal labourers is growing rapidly. Migrants now account for almost half the workforce in many key industries...&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim may have a point, but it is a rather narrow one.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have a problem reading the sentence as â€œIllegal immigrants donâ€™t have any legal (employment) rights if they work because they are illegal.â€</p>
<p>Of course they are entitled to protection of the law over murder, theft and rape, although in reality that protection might well be less effective because of their status and the fear and concealment it engenders.</p>
<p>Regarding the Greek workers, the error there was the Observer&#8217;s, which failed to distinguish between legal and illegal workers;<br />
&#8216;&#8230;illegal labourers is growing rapidly. Migrants now account for almost half the workforce in many key industries&#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68020</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68020</guid>
		<description>well it would make sense first of all to have some idea of what rights people who are not British have in the UK - lumping everyone under the term &#039;migrant workers&#039; is hardly useful as it totally depends on where you&#039;ve migrated from!

I bet most British people haven&#039;t a clue - having taken the Life in the UK Citizenship test I&#039;m convinced most Brits would fail it miserably!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it would make sense first of all to have some idea of what rights people who are not British have in the UK &#8211; lumping everyone under the term &#8216;migrant workers&#8217; is hardly useful as it totally depends on where you&#8217;ve migrated from!</p>
<p>I bet most British people haven&#8217;t a clue &#8211; having taken the Life in the UK Citizenship test I&#8217;m convinced most Brits would fail it miserably!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68019</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68019</guid>
		<description>tim has got a point. 

it might be more accurate to say that non-citizens who aren&#039;t part of the EU or the EEA ( though recent changes mean bulgarians and romanians are no longer eligible and will need work permits) and do not have a work permit - don&#039;t have any legally acknowledged or recognised employment rights in this country.

 i.e. when your employer fucks you over, you do not have recourse to State law. However, you could of course have recourse under the international human rights declaration. But that is hardly &#039;automatic&#039; and difficult to prove. you&#039;d probably get deported and then you could fight your battle internationally if you so wished, but who is going to do that? that is why if you&#039;re illegal you&#039;re pretty much fucked. you could of course seek asylum to try and stay in the country, but again, that is up for negotiation.

but actually, it is more complex because if you&#039;re an illegal immigrant, you&#039;re not considered by the nation-state as worthy of its protection. one of the things that protects you is the UN Human Rights Declaration, and in Europe, the EU Convention on Human Rights, which the assumption is that the nation-state would have to listen to. of course, too many people do abuse those who are illegal immigrants because it is easy to do so and get away with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim has got a point. </p>
<p>it might be more accurate to say that non-citizens who aren&#8217;t part of the EU or the EEA ( though recent changes mean bulgarians and romanians are no longer eligible and will need work permits) and do not have a work permit &#8211; don&#8217;t have any legally acknowledged or recognised employment rights in this country.</p>
<p> i.e. when your employer fucks you over, you do not have recourse to State law. However, you could of course have recourse under the international human rights declaration. But that is hardly &#8216;automatic&#8217; and difficult to prove. you&#8217;d probably get deported and then you could fight your battle internationally if you so wished, but who is going to do that? that is why if you&#8217;re illegal you&#8217;re pretty much fucked. you could of course seek asylum to try and stay in the country, but again, that is up for negotiation.</p>
<p>but actually, it is more complex because if you&#8217;re an illegal immigrant, you&#8217;re not considered by the nation-state as worthy of its protection. one of the things that protects you is the UN Human Rights Declaration, and in Europe, the EU Convention on Human Rights, which the assumption is that the nation-state would have to listen to. of course, too many people do abuse those who are illegal immigrants because it is easy to do so and get away with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duc De Nemours</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68016</link>
		<dc:creator>Duc De Nemours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68016</guid>
		<description>Tim clearly I have missed something but the point is that illegal immigrants, having exhausted their appeal rights, can not work.  They are therefore &#039;illegal&#039; in the sense Sunny states.

You are absolutely correct to state that in fact things are a little more complicated than this but I really can not see what this has to do with what Sunny was complaining about in relation to an article on a British day in the Spectator.

Perhaps you could explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim clearly I have missed something but the point is that illegal immigrants, having exhausted their appeal rights, can not work.  They are therefore &#8216;illegal&#8217; in the sense Sunny states.</p>
<p>You are absolutely correct to state that in fact things are a little more complicated than this but I really can not see what this has to do with what Sunny was complaining about in relation to an article on a British day in the Spectator.</p>
<p>Perhaps you could explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68014</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68014</guid>
		<description>A couple of errors there don&#039;t you think?

&quot;Illegal immigrants donâ€™t have any legal rights if they work because they are illegal.&quot;

?? 

You mean if I find an illegal worker I can murder them? Rape them? Steal their clothes? Because they don&#039;t have any legal rights because they&#039;re illegal workers?

&quot;Last week 54 Greek migrant workers employed to plant bulbs in Cornwall complained that they had been starved and threatened with sticks.&quot;

Greeks, being EU citizens as you and I are, have exactly the same rights to work in the UK as you and I do.

So, perhaps it&#039;s not quite to do with illegal immigrants working then, but perhaps something a touch more complex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of errors there don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>&#8220;Illegal immigrants donâ€™t have any legal rights if they work because they are illegal.&#8221;</p>
<p>?? </p>
<p>You mean if I find an illegal worker I can murder them? Rape them? Steal their clothes? Because they don&#8217;t have any legal rights because they&#8217;re illegal workers?</p>
<p>&#8220;Last week 54 Greek migrant workers employed to plant bulbs in Cornwall complained that they had been starved and threatened with sticks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Greeks, being EU citizens as you and I are, have exactly the same rights to work in the UK as you and I do.</p>
<p>So, perhaps it&#8217;s not quite to do with illegal immigrants working then, but perhaps something a touch more complex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68010</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68010</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it will mainly celebrated by illegal immigrants living in our great country thrilled to have yet another day off&lt;/i&gt;

No surprises there. Sounds like the sort of culturally retarded statement made by the average Conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it will mainly celebrated by illegal immigrants living in our great country thrilled to have yet another day off</i></p>
<p>No surprises there. Sounds like the sort of culturally retarded statement made by the average Conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68008</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1192#comment-68008</guid>
		<description>â€¦as &lt;a href=&quot;http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2007/06/invitation-to-visit-spectator-coffee.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recommended&lt;/a&gt; by Iain Dale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€¦as <a href="http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2007/06/invitation-to-visit-spectator-coffee.html" rel="nofollow">recommended</a> by Iain Dale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

