<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;The West&#8217; as a victim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058</link>
	<description>Current affairs for a progressive generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Innit</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-61251</link>
		<dc:creator>Innit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-61251</guid>
		<description>So, it was just me who found the half naked men terribly attractive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it was just me who found the half naked men terribly attractive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-61141</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-61141</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNqiSkd1M6k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNqiSkd1M6k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNqiSkd1M6k</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59595</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59595</guid>
		<description>dammit, i know that hizb&#039;ollah have been breeding war rhinos for the last five years in the bekaa valley - seriously, people, when will we wake up??

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dammit, i know that hizb&#8217;ollah have been breeding war rhinos for the last five years in the bekaa valley &#8211; seriously, people, when will we wake up??</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas clark</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59591</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59591</guid>
		<description>Sadly, or perhaps not, the idea of War Rhinos seems to be a myth. But this is quite entertaining:

http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2007/03/war_rhinos.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, or perhaps not, the idea of War Rhinos seems to be a myth. But this is quite entertaining:</p>
<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2007/03/war_rhinos.php" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2007/03/war_rhinos.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59587</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59587</guid>
		<description>Its a film and not a very good one. Let it rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a film and not a very good one. Let it rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stiles</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59584</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59584</guid>
		<description>http://www.exile.ru/2007-March-23/war_nerd.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.exile.ru/2007-March-23/war_nerd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.exile.ru/2007-March-23/war_nerd.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59583</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59583</guid>
		<description>&#039;it ignores the far larger segment of society that doesn’t live that way&#039;

Well, the film is called the &#039;300&#039;, not the &#039;several armored divisions with full spectrum air support and nuclear weapons, financed by a first world economy any led by democratic politicians who were voted for by people who want nothing more than to go on living their lives as peaceful citizens&#039;...

The film is not about the reality of any situation, it&#039;s an expression of a myth that some people also make use of in real-world political arguments.

I think it is quite useful to remember that such arguments are only ever fully applicable in situations where the enemy are, as in &#039;300&#039;, ogres and combat rhinos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;it ignores the far larger segment of society that doesn’t live that way&#8217;</p>
<p>Well, the film is called the &#8216;300&#8242;, not the &#8217;several armored divisions with full spectrum air support and nuclear weapons, financed by a first world economy any led by democratic politicians who were voted for by people who want nothing more than to go on living their lives as peaceful citizens&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>The film is not about the reality of any situation, it&#8217;s an expression of a myth that some people also make use of in real-world political arguments.</p>
<p>I think it is quite useful to remember that such arguments are only ever fully applicable in situations where the enemy are, as in &#8216;300&#8242;, ogres and combat rhinos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59575</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59575</guid>
		<description>soru:

i take your point, but israel is a *leetle* bit more democratic than sparta was. if there was nobody else in israel other than the settlers, i&#039;d say it was accurate - in fact, as a *stereotype/caricature of how &quot;progressives&quot; see israelis*, rather than strictly speaking a satire, i would say it works rather well.

sadly enough, it&#039;s certainly how the loony wing of the settlers, the &quot;orange camp&quot;, see themselves - the &quot;persians&quot; in that case would include their own government, of course. but in terms of the larger israeli population, it ignores the far larger segment of society that doesn&#039;t live that way, much of which lives in cities, votes for left-wing parties and wants a two-state solution (and then there are the ultra-orthodox, who aren&#039;t interested in fighting anyone at all and just want to sit around having kids and studying Torah) well spotted though.

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>soru:</p>
<p>i take your point, but israel is a *leetle* bit more democratic than sparta was. if there was nobody else in israel other than the settlers, i&#8217;d say it was accurate &#8211; in fact, as a *stereotype/caricature of how &#8220;progressives&#8221; see israelis*, rather than strictly speaking a satire, i would say it works rather well.</p>
<p>sadly enough, it&#8217;s certainly how the loony wing of the settlers, the &#8220;orange camp&#8221;, see themselves &#8211; the &#8220;persians&#8221; in that case would include their own government, of course. but in terms of the larger israeli population, it ignores the far larger segment of society that doesn&#8217;t live that way, much of which lives in cities, votes for left-wing parties and wants a two-state solution (and then there are the ultra-orthodox, who aren&#8217;t interested in fighting anyone at all and just want to sit around having kids and studying Torah) well spotted though.</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59568</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59568</guid>
		<description>bb: I am afraid Spartans as Israelis works reasonably well as an analogy, in a way that&#039;s probably deliberate by Miller:

1. citizen-soldier-farmers
2. heavily outnumbered and out-gunned, but superior fighters
3. defending their homeland against foreign attack
4. ruling harshly over an under-class in fear they would rebel
5. but that doesn&#039;t matter because they are on the side of FREEDOM

That also parallels the South in the US civil war, which is, ultimately, what a certain strand of US right-wing support for Israel is all about.

People like Miller and Hanson is not interested in refugees or playwrights, but in people who kick ass and take names in a righteous fashion, who win wars against the odds just because they are that badass.

It&#039;s not a coincidence that the US only really started supporting Israel once it started acting that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bb: I am afraid Spartans as Israelis works reasonably well as an analogy, in a way that&#8217;s probably deliberate by Miller:</p>
<p>1. citizen-soldier-farmers<br />
2. heavily outnumbered and out-gunned, but superior fighters<br />
3. defending their homeland against foreign attack<br />
4. ruling harshly over an under-class in fear they would rebel<br />
5. but that doesn&#8217;t matter because they are on the side of FREEDOM</p>
<p>That also parallels the South in the US civil war, which is, ultimately, what a certain strand of US right-wing support for Israel is all about.</p>
<p>People like Miller and Hanson is not interested in refugees or playwrights, but in people who kick ass and take names in a righteous fashion, who win wars against the odds just because they are that badass.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a coincidence that the US only really started supporting Israel once it started acting that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59567</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59567</guid>
		<description>Was Esther an orc, perhaps, Banabrain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Esther an orc, perhaps, Banabrain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananabrain</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59565</link>
		<dc:creator>bananabrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59565</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not sure if i should start worrying about anti-semitism. maybe the orcs are intended to be the jews who were based in persia at the time, at least the ones who hadn&#039;t gone back to israel to rebuild the Temple (thermopylae was 480 bce) - there were probably a good few of us with the persians at the time.

are any of the orcs shown doing the books for the persians? collecting receipts? doing the catering?anything like that?

b&#039;shalom

bananabrain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure if i should start worrying about anti-semitism. maybe the orcs are intended to be the jews who were based in persia at the time, at least the ones who hadn&#8217;t gone back to israel to rebuild the Temple (thermopylae was 480 bce) &#8211; there were probably a good few of us with the persians at the time.</p>
<p>are any of the orcs shown doing the books for the persians? collecting receipts? doing the catering?anything like that?</p>
<p>b&#8217;shalom</p>
<p>bananabrain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59561</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59561</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, it’s also quite wildly offensive towards Iranians.&quot;
It&#039;s also wildly offensive to Greeks and the only Greeks it isn&#039;t offensive to- Leonidas and friends- are inaccurately portrayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, it’s also quite wildly offensive towards Iranians.&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s also wildly offensive to Greeks and the only Greeks it isn&#8217;t offensive to- Leonidas and friends- are inaccurately portrayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZinZin</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59487</link>
		<dc:creator>ZinZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59487</guid>
		<description>Jai 
If you wanted historical accuracy you would have had to include gay sex in 300. Not exactly going to get the alpha males through the door.

Its still homoerotic despite the absence of gay sex. I mean they are killing thousands of persians wearing loincloths and red cloaks leaving their bronzed muscular torsos exposed. 

Maybe that was something for the ladies to look at while limbs and blood were veering in all directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jai<br />
If you wanted historical accuracy you would have had to include gay sex in 300. Not exactly going to get the alpha males through the door.</p>
<p>Its still homoerotic despite the absence of gay sex. I mean they are killing thousands of persians wearing loincloths and red cloaks leaving their bronzed muscular torsos exposed. </p>
<p>Maybe that was something for the ladies to look at while limbs and blood were veering in all directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikrant</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59482</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59482</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is also a huge amount of “artistic licence” taken with the portrayal of the Persians’ ethnicity, who are disproportionately shown as being black&lt;/i&gt;

Is that a news? It started with Indiana Jones and Lost Temple something, complete with its snake-eating child sacrificing Kali cult. Funnily the village situated at bottom of Himalayas was populated by Sinhalese (they spoke actual Sinhalese in the movie).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is also a huge amount of “artistic licence” taken with the portrayal of the Persians’ ethnicity, who are disproportionately shown as being black</i></p>
<p>Is that a news? It started with Indiana Jones and Lost Temple something, complete with its snake-eating child sacrificing Kali cult. Funnily the village situated at bottom of Himalayas was populated by Sinhalese (they spoke actual Sinhalese in the movie).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59480</guid>
		<description>=&gt;&quot;Alexander did not cover the whole of India, but he did conquer parts of it, and Chandra Gupta was able to build on the empire he left behind in India.&quot;

That&#039;s not true. Alexander hardly left an &quot;empire&quot; in the subcontinent -- he took over a few territories in the extreme northwest and what is now Afghanistan, but his impact on the vast majority of the Indian population and the country was negligible. In fact, the small fraction of Indian territory which came under his rule isn&#039;t even within the borders of what is modern-day India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=&gt;&#8221;Alexander did not cover the whole of India, but he did conquer parts of it, and Chandra Gupta was able to build on the empire he left behind in India.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not true. Alexander hardly left an &#8220;empire&#8221; in the subcontinent &#8212; he took over a few territories in the extreme northwest and what is now Afghanistan, but his impact on the vast majority of the Indian population and the country was negligible. In fact, the small fraction of Indian territory which came under his rule isn&#8217;t even within the borders of what is modern-day India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59479</guid>
		<description>Okay folks, I just saw &quot;300&quot; earlier today.

It&#039;s entertaining enough, rousing in some places, and Leonidas is certainly charismatic; I can understand the comparisons some reviewers in the media have made with Russell Crowe&#039;s Maximus from &quot;Gladiator&quot;.

However, it&#039;s also quite wildly offensive towards Iranians. The Persians are mostly shown as dehumanised -- literally, in some cases (eg. the Immortals and the &quot;orcs&quot;), and the depiction of their culture is also fairly inaccurate -- was Xerxes&#039; court really that debauched ? Xerxes himself of course looked nothing like his physical appearance in the movie. 

There is also a huge amount of &quot;artistic licence&quot; taken with the portrayal of the Persians&#039; ethnicity, who are disproportionately shown as being black (even more so than the misrepresentation of the Indians from the extreme northwest of the subcontinent in the film &quot;Alexander&quot;). I guess they wanted the Persians to look as non-white as possible. 

However, I guess the film&#039;s a good couple of hours&#039; entertainment if you bear in mind the considerable libterties which have been taken with the facts; people wishing to learn about the reality of those events would be wise not to base their conclusions on the movie and should do some background reading (the book &quot;Persian Fire&quot; mentioned above is a great start). The statements repeatedly made by the Spartans in the movie that they stood for &quot;freedom and rationality&quot; and &quot;against tyranny&quot; are of course rubbish.

On a lateral note, I did like the portrayal of Leonidas&#039;s wife. She was shown as being a pretty strong character, and her relationship with her husband did come across as passionate and very heartfelt; I thought the deep feelings between the two were quite nicely conveyed. I also liked the fact that Lena Heady (who played the queen) was very clearly in her thirties and not some early-twentysomething nymphette, but the queen was still shown as an extremely attractive and sensual woman. A nice touch; something which went against the grain of the way women past the age of 30 are often depicted by Hollywood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay folks, I just saw &#8220;300&#8243; earlier today.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s entertaining enough, rousing in some places, and Leonidas is certainly charismatic; I can understand the comparisons some reviewers in the media have made with Russell Crowe&#8217;s Maximus from &#8220;Gladiator&#8221;.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s also quite wildly offensive towards Iranians. The Persians are mostly shown as dehumanised &#8212; literally, in some cases (eg. the Immortals and the &#8220;orcs&#8221;), and the depiction of their culture is also fairly inaccurate &#8212; was Xerxes&#8217; court really that debauched ? Xerxes himself of course looked nothing like his physical appearance in the movie. </p>
<p>There is also a huge amount of &#8220;artistic licence&#8221; taken with the portrayal of the Persians&#8217; ethnicity, who are disproportionately shown as being black (even more so than the misrepresentation of the Indians from the extreme northwest of the subcontinent in the film &#8220;Alexander&#8221;). I guess they wanted the Persians to look as non-white as possible. </p>
<p>However, I guess the film&#8217;s a good couple of hours&#8217; entertainment if you bear in mind the considerable libterties which have been taken with the facts; people wishing to learn about the reality of those events would be wise not to base their conclusions on the movie and should do some background reading (the book &#8220;Persian Fire&#8221; mentioned above is a great start). The statements repeatedly made by the Spartans in the movie that they stood for &#8220;freedom and rationality&#8221; and &#8220;against tyranny&#8221; are of course rubbish.</p>
<p>On a lateral note, I did like the portrayal of Leonidas&#8217;s wife. She was shown as being a pretty strong character, and her relationship with her husband did come across as passionate and very heartfelt; I thought the deep feelings between the two were quite nicely conveyed. I also liked the fact that Lena Heady (who played the queen) was very clearly in her thirties and not some early-twentysomething nymphette, but the queen was still shown as an extremely attractive and sensual woman. A nice touch; something which went against the grain of the way women past the age of 30 are often depicted by Hollywood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59326</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59326</guid>
		<description>Bert P: agreed, most Europeans wouldn&#039;t cite the Greeks as originators of their culture, but the philosophers who define what European culture is- what the Spaniards and the English have in common-  would. It wasn&#039;t until the nineteenth century that democracy became admired rather than despised, so the philosophers had to find precursors to justify it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert P: agreed, most Europeans wouldn&#8217;t cite the Greeks as originators of their culture, but the philosophers who define what European culture is- what the Spaniards and the English have in common-  would. It wasn&#8217;t until the nineteenth century that democracy became admired rather than despised, so the philosophers had to find precursors to justify it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59299</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59299</guid>
		<description>Scene: UN Trade Towers, a neutral zone of commerce and diplomacy, a quarter of a million stories high

Envoy C&#039;len: so, do you accept our offer?

bin Leonidas pushes C&#039;len off the tower

bin Leonidas: THIS! IS! ISLAM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scene: UN Trade Towers, a neutral zone of commerce and diplomacy, a quarter of a million stories high</p>
<p>Envoy C&#8217;len: so, do you accept our offer?</p>
<p>bin Leonidas pushes C&#8217;len off the tower</p>
<p>bin Leonidas: THIS! IS! ISLAM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soru</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59296</link>
		<dc:creator>soru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59296</guid>
		<description>Scene: Greenzone, legendary fortress of the Westguard
Busces (9 foot tall and camp)
Condi and Hilary (half-naked, serving wine)
General Petraus (in full military kit including backpack and helmet)

Enter: bin Leonidas (a Chippendale in a loincloth)

Petraus and bin Leonidas fight, while Busces watches from his throne

Busces: your defeat is inevitable, why do you struggle?

Join me and together we can rule the galaxy, as man and wife

bin Leonidas: I did join you. You have forgotten already how we fought together against the Sovieti? But you never wrote, never returned my calls...

bin Leonidas: besides, I fight for FREEDOM and my HOMELAND

General Petraus: your homeland is 2000 miles away, and what was that about FREEDOM?

bin Leonidas: You misheard, I am fighting for FREEDOM from my HOMELAND. That place sucks, this is the only way I could get to leave

Busces: Darken the sky with warplanes!

bin Leonidas: then we will fight them in these caves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scene: Greenzone, legendary fortress of the Westguard<br />
Busces (9 foot tall and camp)<br />
Condi and Hilary (half-naked, serving wine)<br />
General Petraus (in full military kit including backpack and helmet)</p>
<p>Enter: bin Leonidas (a Chippendale in a loincloth)</p>
<p>Petraus and bin Leonidas fight, while Busces watches from his throne</p>
<p>Busces: your defeat is inevitable, why do you struggle?</p>
<p>Join me and together we can rule the galaxy, as man and wife</p>
<p>bin Leonidas: I did join you. You have forgotten already how we fought together against the Sovieti? But you never wrote, never returned my calls&#8230;</p>
<p>bin Leonidas: besides, I fight for FREEDOM and my HOMELAND</p>
<p>General Petraus: your homeland is 2000 miles away, and what was that about FREEDOM?</p>
<p>bin Leonidas: You misheard, I am fighting for FREEDOM from my HOMELAND. That place sucks, this is the only way I could get to leave</p>
<p>Busces: Darken the sky with warplanes!</p>
<p>bin Leonidas: then we will fight them in these caves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058/comment-page-2#comment-59291</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1058#comment-59291</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for 300 Part II, an heroic tale of a band of 300 Taliban brothers defending a pass in Afghanistan against......you now the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for 300 Part II, an heroic tale of a band of 300 Taliban brothers defending a pass in Afghanistan against&#8230;&#8230;you now the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
