Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article


by Sunny
24th October, 2010 at 6:01 am    

This from a press release
At the High Court in London this week, Lady Justice Smith granted Indian national ‘His Holiness Sant Baba Jeet Singh ji Maharaj’ the right to appeal in his libel case against British journalist Hardeep Singh. The case will now go before three judges at the Court of Appeal to decide whether it should proceed to a full trial.

Hardeep Singh said: “I’ve been fighting this case for three years already; this adds a minimum of another six months of torment. If I lose, it will cost me over £1 million, let alone my costs so far and a tenth of my life. This feels like the biggest game of poker you can possibly play: all for exercising my right to free expression.”

He added: “I’m hoping the government take reform of our libel laws seriously and we get a robust bill in the New Year.”

Mike Harris from Index on Censorship said: “When individuals like Hardeep Singh risk £1million and bankruptcy all for a single newspaper article, it really hits home how important libel reform is. I hope the government backs the Libel Reform Campaign’s call for wholesale reform of our libel laws so free speech is protected.”

Síle Lane from Sense About Science said: ‘Change in the libel laws cannot come soon enough. Singh’s case highlights that the laws as they stand are unfair, unduly costly, out of date and against the public interest. Until we have a clear, strong public interest defence against libel actions writers, bloggers, NGOs and journalists will be forced to back down in the face of threats.’

The case centres on an article that Hardeep Singh wrote in August 2007 for the Sikh Times, a British newspaper, in which he claimed that Jeet Singh was an “accused Cult leader” whose teachings were not in line with mainstream Sikh doctrine. In May 2010 Mr Justice Eady threw the case out with no right to appeal.

Eady’s judgment held that secular courts should not make a judgment on a religious dispute. This week’s application for appeal was granted on the limited basis that there are arguable issues in Singh’s article that do not tread on the forbidden area of doctrinal dispute.


              Post to del.icio.us


Filed in: Civil liberties,Media






10 Comments below   |  

Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. sunny hundal

    Blogged: : Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article http://bit.ly/9sNkuu


  2. Christina Zaba

    RT @sunny_hundal: Blogged: : Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article http://bit.ly/9sNkuu


  3. Roger Thornhill

    RT @sunny_hundal: Blogged: : Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article http://bit.ly/9sNkuu // why use of the label "Asian"?


  4. 0-i biz

    Pickled Politics » Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article http://bit.ly/9XOZ3o


  5. Carmen D'Cruz

    RT @sunny_hundal: Blogged: : Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article http://bit.ly/9sNkuu


  6. 0ib

    Pickled Politics » Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article http://bit.ly/9XOZ3o


  7. ‘Hiccup Girl’ ChargedIn Florida Murder North Capitol Street

    [...] Pickled Politics » Asian journo faces £1m libel case over article [...]




  1. Jemmy Hope — on 24th October, 2010 at 11:26 am  

    Why do politicians refuse to reform these disgraceful libel laws? Do they get a cut form the damages awarded? There must be something in it for them.

  2. Musulman — on 24th October, 2010 at 2:56 pm  

    The reality is that freedom of speech is not without boundary or consequence. It is not right in many cases, but this is how it is. The guy should have just deleted the article and apologised because £1mill is a hefty price to pay!

  3. Don — on 24th October, 2010 at 5:16 pm  

    What a depressing attitude, Musulman. Our libel laws are a bloody disgrace. You think the best response to a bully is going belly up?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Pickled Politics © Copyright 2005 - 2010. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions.
With the help of PHP and Wordpress.